Divorce Mediation Blog

What does Pisano v. Pisano mean? (And why was it “reported”?)

Wednesday, July 08, 2015

The recent case Pisano v. Pisano delivers less than its primary key word (premarital agreements) and name (the wife is the late John Belushi’s sister) might suggest. In fact, we wonder why the Massachusetts Appeals Court chose to make a "reported" decision, rather than a Rule 1:28 opinion (issued primarily for the parties, and not intended to be precedent). The case broke no new ground; it did not illumine any previously uncertain rule of law; and, in the end, we are not really sure of the court's reason for reversing. We may not always agree with the appellate courts’ reasoning, but we usually know what it is. Here? Not so sure.

The Appeals Court upheld the discretionary allocation of responsibility for a debt to the wife; and vacated an order for reimbursement of temporary alimony payments made by the wife to the husband, which the trial court had entered after concluding that alimony was precluded by a valid and enforceable pre-marital agreement. Without explanation, the appellate court rejected the "unjust enrichment" remedy that a special master and Probate and Family Court judge concurred should apply.

The alimony ruling was three-pronged. It cited the SJC's Holmes v. Holmes, presumably (because it was not stated) to establish that temporary alimony order authority stands apart, statutorily, from judgments made after trial. Second, the pre-nuptial agreement didn't explicitly mention temporary alimony. And, third, the court reported that the wife did not insist that the pre-nuptial agreement barred the temporary alimony order before its entry, but rather, she proposed a lesser sum than the husband sought. Thus, the court implied but did not expressly say that she gave up her right to complain later about the $32,000.00 of payments that she made, from sources that a master and two courts all agreed were derived from a validly prohibited source. v So, which factor killed the wife's alimony reimbursement claim: Holmes, the agreement or maybe-imputed waiver? If the case is intended as precedent, should we be left to wonder? Ironically, given our recent blog about Rule 1:28 decisions, maybe this case should be among them.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


special master alimony statute Divorce Agreements divorce arbitrator health insurance family law mediation family and probate law disputes med-arb divorce arbitrators Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act Alimony Reform Act Obamacare divorce litigation Massachusetts lawyers DOMA SJC Family Law Arbitration annulment Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC Defense of Marriage Act Massachusetts divorce lawyers LDRC disputes lawyer-attended mediation divorce agreement The Seven Sins of Alimony lawyer how baseball arbitration works divorce lawyers divorce mediators divorce arbitration Self-adjusting alimony orders Levine Dispute Resolution Same Sex Marriage Massachusetts divorce mediators Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly pre-ARA alimony Boston rehabilitative alimony divorce judgment divorce and family law mediators conciliation General term alimony traditional negotiations family mediation Chouteau Levine Matrimonial Arbitration alimony Massachusetts alimony Levine Dispute Resolution Center Baseball Players MLB labor agreement self-adjusting alimony medical benefits Massachusetts private dispute resolution arbitration mediation support orders Baseball Arbitration facilitated negotiations alimony reform legislation Massachusetts alimony and child support alimony law separation high-risk methodology alimony orders health coverage dispute resolution divorce mediator divorce mediation divorced Uniform Arbitration Act lawyers family law Divorce family law arbitrator Baseball child support divorce process resolve disputes Levine Dispute Resolutions arbitrator Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth mediators divorce and family law litigation COLA med/arb mediator Child Support Guidelines mediations Cohabitation family law arbitrators IRC §2704 arbitrators divorce mediations fraud Major League Baseball Arbitration family support