781.708.4445

wmlevine@levinedisputeresolution.com

Divorce Mediation Blog

What does Pisano v. Pisano mean? (And why was it “reported”?)

Wednesday, July 08, 2015

The recent case Pisano v. Pisano delivers less than its primary key word (premarital agreements) and name (the wife is the late John Belushi’s sister) might suggest. In fact, we wonder why the Massachusetts Appeals Court chose to make a "reported" decision, rather than a Rule 1:28 opinion (issued primarily for the parties, and not intended to be precedent). The case broke no new ground; it did not illumine any previously uncertain rule of law; and, in the end, we are not really sure of the court's reason for reversing. We may not always agree with the appellate courts’ reasoning, but we usually know what it is. Here? Not so sure.

The Appeals Court upheld the discretionary allocation of responsibility for a debt to the wife; and vacated an order for reimbursement of temporary alimony payments made by the wife to the husband, which the trial court had entered after concluding that alimony was precluded by a valid and enforceable pre-marital agreement. Without explanation, the appellate court rejected the "unjust enrichment" remedy that a special master and Probate and Family Court judge concurred should apply.

The alimony ruling was three-pronged. It cited the SJC's Holmes v. Holmes, presumably (because it was not stated) to establish that temporary alimony order authority stands apart, statutorily, from judgments made after trial. Second, the pre-nuptial agreement didn't explicitly mention temporary alimony. And, third, the court reported that the wife did not insist that the pre-nuptial agreement barred the temporary alimony order before its entry, but rather, she proposed a lesser sum than the husband sought. Thus, the court implied but did not expressly say that she gave up her right to complain later about the $32,000.00 of payments that she made, from sources that a master and two courts all agreed were derived from a validly prohibited source. v So, which factor killed the wife's alimony reimbursement claim: Holmes, the agreement or maybe-imputed waiver? If the case is intended as precedent, should we be left to wonder? Ironically, given our recent blog about Rule 1:28 decisions, maybe this case should be among them.



Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:



Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles


recent posts


tags

Major League Baseball Arbitration Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth facilitated negotiations Baseball Arbitration Massachusetts alimony and child support General term alimony Baseball Players how baseball arbitration works Divorce IRC §2704 health insurance MLB labor agreement divorce agreement SJC DOMA Massachusetts divorce lawyers divorce arbitrator divorce mediations divorce mediation Levine Dispute Resolutions mediator medical benefits alimony statute Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Levine Dispute Resolution Center health coverage divorce arbitration pre-ARA alimony family law arbitrators divorce and family law mediators annulment alimony reform legislation Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC divorce lawyers Child Support Guidelines special master Self-adjusting alimony orders alimony lawyer private dispute resolution divorce litigation Cohabitation divorce judgment family law resolve disputes family support Baseball arbitrators family law arbitrator Massachusetts Massachusetts lawyers separation mediation rehabilitative alimony Alimony Reform Act family mediation Chouteau Levine Massachusetts divorce mediators Levine Dispute Resolution child support COLA family law mediation arbitrator med-arb divorce and family law lawyer-attended mediation mediations LDRC arbitration divorce mediators Uniform Arbitration Act Obamacare divorce process Defense of Marriage Act Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act divorce mediator Family Law Arbitration dispute resolution traditional negotiations alimony law disputes alimony orders lawyers med/arb family and probate law disputes divorced conciliation support orders divorce arbitrators Matrimonial Arbitration mediators fraud Massachusetts alimony litigation Boston The Seven Sins of Alimony Same Sex Marriage high-risk methodology Divorce Agreements self-adjusting alimony