781.708.4445

wmlevine@levinedisputeresolution.com

Divorce Mediation Blog

What does Pisano v. Pisano mean? (And why was it “reported”?)

Wednesday, July 08, 2015

The recent case Pisano v. Pisano delivers less than its primary key word (premarital agreements) and name (the wife is the late John Belushi’s sister) might suggest. In fact, we wonder why the Massachusetts Appeals Court chose to make a "reported" decision, rather than a Rule 1:28 opinion (issued primarily for the parties, and not intended to be precedent). The case broke no new ground; it did not illumine any previously uncertain rule of law; and, in the end, we are not really sure of the court's reason for reversing. We may not always agree with the appellate courts’ reasoning, but we usually know what it is. Here? Not so sure.

The Appeals Court upheld the discretionary allocation of responsibility for a debt to the wife; and vacated an order for reimbursement of temporary alimony payments made by the wife to the husband, which the trial court had entered after concluding that alimony was precluded by a valid and enforceable pre-marital agreement. Without explanation, the appellate court rejected the "unjust enrichment" remedy that a special master and Probate and Family Court judge concurred should apply.

The alimony ruling was three-pronged. It cited the SJC's Holmes v. Holmes, presumably (because it was not stated) to establish that temporary alimony order authority stands apart, statutorily, from judgments made after trial. Second, the pre-nuptial agreement didn't explicitly mention temporary alimony. And, third, the court reported that the wife did not insist that the pre-nuptial agreement barred the temporary alimony order before its entry, but rather, she proposed a lesser sum than the husband sought. Thus, the court implied but did not expressly say that she gave up her right to complain later about the $32,000.00 of payments that she made, from sources that a master and two courts all agreed were derived from a validly prohibited source. v So, which factor killed the wife's alimony reimbursement claim: Holmes, the agreement or maybe-imputed waiver? If the case is intended as precedent, should we be left to wonder? Ironically, given our recent blog about Rule 1:28 decisions, maybe this case should be among them.



Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:



Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles


recent posts


tags

Baseball Players Defense of Marriage Act Massachusetts lawyers divorce mediator divorce judgment special master divorce mediation alimony how baseball arbitration works divorce arbitration Alimony Reform Act lawyer dispute resolution health insurance General term alimony COLA Family Law Arbitration Same Sex Marriage lawyer-attended mediation Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC arbitrator high-risk methodology Baseball Arbitration divorce mediators Massachusetts alimony and child support med-arb Major League Baseball Arbitration Boston facilitated negotiations fraud alimony law divorce arbitrator divorce arbitrators Massachusetts divorce lawyers Massachusetts alimony Levine Dispute Resolution self-adjusting alimony Uniform Arbitration Act Matrimonial Arbitration arbitrators health coverage family law arbitrators The Seven Sins of Alimony divorce and family law mediators traditional negotiations IRC §2704 family law arbitrator arbitration Levine Dispute Resolutions alimony orders family support divorce lawyers Self-adjusting alimony orders resolve disputes Child Support Guidelines mediators Cohabitation separation DOMA mediator alimony statute alimony reform legislation rehabilitative alimony Levine Dispute Resolution Center divorce and family law med/arb MLB labor agreement lawyers Baseball mediation child support family and probate law disputes private dispute resolution Obamacare Massachusetts divorce mediators SJC divorce agreement LDRC family law mediations conciliation Chouteau Levine pre-ARA alimony family law mediation Massachusetts divorce litigation support orders family mediation divorce mediations annulment Divorce Agreements litigation medical benefits divorce process Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth disputes Divorce Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act divorced