Divorce Mediation Blog

They Got A Lot Right: Hassey v. Hassey, Part Three

Wednesday, September 03, 2014

In our last two blogs, we took the Appeals Court to task for inconsistency and over-reaching as we saw it, but we should not let it go without acknowledging what the Court got right:

  1. The trial judge terminated alimony for “retirement as defined in the [alimony] act.” The Appeals court hewed to the statutory language that absent a defined deviation, alimony stops at a specific retirement age, and not necessarily at actual retirement, before or after. Under the law, a person can work beyond retirement age and pay no alimony, unless a judge explicitly rules otherwise in conformity with criteria set forth in the statute.
  2. Where the trial court ordered the husband to disclose his income periodically to the wife in furtherance of his sliding alimony order, the Appeals Court ruled this an abuse of discretion, because it gave the wife free information about the husband’s changing circumstances while denying the same to the husband, about the wife. (This will likely not impact the parties since the Appeals Court vacated the percentage arrangement, which, in all likelihood, will cause Judge Abber to drop the disclosure provision, too).
  3. Findings of needs, as stressed in this decision, absolutely, are a critical component of alimony law, common and statutory; and the “new” alimony law underscores the practice, rather that reducing it.
  4. On property, the trial court excluded the wife’s family of origin-derived vacation home from property division calculation, while not excluding any part of the husband’s partially family of origin-derived dental practice. The appellate panel reversed on this point, being unconvinced by the trial judge’s conclusion that the vacation home was “never relied on as a financial resource” by the family; pointing out that the family’s habitual use of the property during the marriage was, in fact, a form of financial reliance that was worthy of consideration in weighing the equities of exclusion or inclusion in the section 34 distribution numbers.

The Appeals Court also noted, twice, that Judge Abber was dealing with an extraordinarily complex statutory scheme with little or no appellate guidance, a departure from the too frequent practice of appellate courts speaking uncharitably about the efforts of their trial court colleagues. They certainly got that right.

Go Back to “Self-Modifying” Divorce Judgments: The Appeals Court Feels Strongly Both Ways. Hassey v. Hassey, Part One

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


child support alimony statute arbitrator mediation divorce arbitrators Chouteau Levine Levine Dispute Resolution Center divorced private dispute resolution rehabilitative alimony alimony law special master arbitrators dispute resolution Baseball Arbitration conciliation Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly divorce mediations self-adjusting alimony Levine Dispute Resolutions SJC The Seven Sins of Alimony IRC §2704 divorce and family law litigation Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC General term alimony Massachusetts lawyers Levine Dispute Resolution medical benefits traditional negotiations DOMA divorce lawyers Alimony Reform Act divorce judgment Major League Baseball Arbitration arbitration family support Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth Defense of Marriage Act fraud health insurance Boston divorce agreement resolve disputes divorce and family law mediators family mediation Divorce Agreements facilitated negotiations MLB labor agreement Massachusetts alimony and child support lawyer Massachusetts divorce mediators lawyers family law arbitrator high-risk methodology divorce mediation alimony Same Sex Marriage lawyer-attended mediation Baseball Massachusetts alimony alimony orders family and probate law disputes divorce mediator family law mediation Uniform Arbitration Act how baseball arbitration works med-arb mediations family law health coverage Matrimonial Arbitration Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act mediators divorce arbitration divorce mediators divorce litigation annulment disputes family law arbitrators Divorce COLA Child Support Guidelines divorce arbitrator Obamacare Massachusetts divorce lawyers divorce process mediator med/arb Massachusetts Family Law Arbitration separation Baseball Players alimony reform legislation Cohabitation pre-ARA alimony Self-adjusting alimony orders support orders LDRC