Divorce Mediation Blog

They Got A Lot Right: Hassey v. Hassey, Part Three

Wednesday, September 03, 2014

In our last two blogs, we took the Appeals Court to task for inconsistency and over-reaching as we saw it, but we should not let it go without acknowledging what the Court got right:

  1. The trial judge terminated alimony for “retirement as defined in the [alimony] act.” The Appeals court hewed to the statutory language that absent a defined deviation, alimony stops at a specific retirement age, and not necessarily at actual retirement, before or after. Under the law, a person can work beyond retirement age and pay no alimony, unless a judge explicitly rules otherwise in conformity with criteria set forth in the statute.
  2. Where the trial court ordered the husband to disclose his income periodically to the wife in furtherance of his sliding alimony order, the Appeals Court ruled this an abuse of discretion, because it gave the wife free information about the husband’s changing circumstances while denying the same to the husband, about the wife. (This will likely not impact the parties since the Appeals Court vacated the percentage arrangement, which, in all likelihood, will cause Judge Abber to drop the disclosure provision, too).
  3. Findings of needs, as stressed in this decision, absolutely, are a critical component of alimony law, common and statutory; and the “new” alimony law underscores the practice, rather that reducing it.
  4. On property, the trial court excluded the wife’s family of origin-derived vacation home from property division calculation, while not excluding any part of the husband’s partially family of origin-derived dental practice. The appellate panel reversed on this point, being unconvinced by the trial judge’s conclusion that the vacation home was “never relied on as a financial resource” by the family; pointing out that the family’s habitual use of the property during the marriage was, in fact, a form of financial reliance that was worthy of consideration in weighing the equities of exclusion or inclusion in the section 34 distribution numbers.

The Appeals Court also noted, twice, that Judge Abber was dealing with an extraordinarily complex statutory scheme with little or no appellate guidance, a departure from the too frequent practice of appellate courts speaking uncharitably about the efforts of their trial court colleagues. They certainly got that right.

Go Back to “Self-Modifying” Divorce Judgments: The Appeals Court Feels Strongly Both Ways. Hassey v. Hassey, Part One

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


family law divorce lawyers med/arb Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly facilitated negotiations private dispute resolution family and probate law disputes family law arbitrators arbitration Self-adjusting alimony orders Baseball lawyer Levine Dispute Resolution Center divorce arbitrators COLA Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC divorced Child Support Guidelines Chouteau Levine divorce and family law mediators support orders divorce mediations divorce mediator special master Cohabitation separation SJC Massachusetts divorce lawyers med-arb high-risk methodology arbitrators family support annulment health coverage DOMA disputes divorce and family law traditional negotiations divorce process medical benefits divorce mediators family law mediation alimony Massachusetts lawyers mediators rehabilitative alimony MLB labor agreement The Seven Sins of Alimony Defense of Marriage Act alimony law health insurance fraud Alimony Reform Act conciliation family mediation alimony reform legislation lawyer-attended mediation child support General term alimony Baseball Arbitration Major League Baseball Arbitration how baseball arbitration works Boston divorce arbitrator Family Law Arbitration Massachusetts divorce mediators mediation divorce mediation divorce arbitration alimony orders Massachusetts lawyers IRC §2704 litigation Matrimonial Arbitration dispute resolution Divorce Agreements mediator LDRC pre-ARA alimony Same Sex Marriage divorce judgment Massachusetts alimony Uniform Arbitration Act alimony statute family law arbitrator Obamacare self-adjusting alimony Massachusetts alimony and child support resolve disputes Levine Dispute Resolutions Levine Dispute Resolution Divorce Baseball Players divorce litigation arbitrator divorce agreement mediations