Divorce Mediation Blog

They Got A Lot Right: Hassey v. Hassey, Part Three

Wednesday, September 03, 2014

In our last two blogs, we took the Appeals Court to task for inconsistency and over-reaching as we saw it, but we should not let it go without acknowledging what the Court got right:

  1. The trial judge terminated alimony for “retirement as defined in the [alimony] act.” The Appeals court hewed to the statutory language that absent a defined deviation, alimony stops at a specific retirement age, and not necessarily at actual retirement, before or after. Under the law, a person can work beyond retirement age and pay no alimony, unless a judge explicitly rules otherwise in conformity with criteria set forth in the statute.
  2. Where the trial court ordered the husband to disclose his income periodically to the wife in furtherance of his sliding alimony order, the Appeals Court ruled this an abuse of discretion, because it gave the wife free information about the husband’s changing circumstances while denying the same to the husband, about the wife. (This will likely not impact the parties since the Appeals Court vacated the percentage arrangement, which, in all likelihood, will cause Judge Abber to drop the disclosure provision, too).
  3. Findings of needs, as stressed in this decision, absolutely, are a critical component of alimony law, common and statutory; and the “new” alimony law underscores the practice, rather that reducing it.
  4. On property, the trial court excluded the wife’s family of origin-derived vacation home from property division calculation, while not excluding any part of the husband’s partially family of origin-derived dental practice. The appellate panel reversed on this point, being unconvinced by the trial judge’s conclusion that the vacation home was “never relied on as a financial resource” by the family; pointing out that the family’s habitual use of the property during the marriage was, in fact, a form of financial reliance that was worthy of consideration in weighing the equities of exclusion or inclusion in the section 34 distribution numbers.

The Appeals Court also noted, twice, that Judge Abber was dealing with an extraordinarily complex statutory scheme with little or no appellate guidance, a departure from the too frequent practice of appellate courts speaking uncharitably about the efforts of their trial court colleagues. They certainly got that right.

Go Back to “Self-Modifying” Divorce Judgments: The Appeals Court Feels Strongly Both Ways. Hassey v. Hassey, Part One

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


divorce mediation Chouteau Levine General term alimony LDRC arbitration rehabilitative alimony Levine Dispute Resolutions Levine Dispute Resolution Center arbitrator resolve disputes Self-adjusting alimony orders alimony statute alimony law Divorce Agreements Baseball Players Baseball divorce mediations Massachusetts family law arbitrators divorce process mediators MLB labor agreement Defense of Marriage Act fraud annulment SJC IRC §2704 Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth Family Law Arbitration med-arb alimony orders Obamacare divorce mediator mediator Boston divorce arbitration family and probate law disputes high-risk methodology alimony reform legislation family support special master DOMA lawyer-attended mediation divorce mediators Massachusetts divorce lawyers divorce arbitrator lawyers mediations family law arbitrator divorced Major League Baseball Arbitration support orders Massachusetts alimony Massachusetts alimony and child support family mediation disputes medical benefits how baseball arbitration works divorce and family law divorce judgment Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly divorce agreement Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act Matrimonial Arbitration private dispute resolution lawyer Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC self-adjusting alimony traditional negotiations arbitrators litigation health insurance Divorce Child Support Guidelines family law mediation Massachusetts lawyers Uniform Arbitration Act family law COLA Baseball Arbitration facilitated negotiations divorce lawyers Alimony Reform Act dispute resolution alimony Same Sex Marriage med/arb health coverage separation Cohabitation conciliation Levine Dispute Resolution divorce arbitrators pre-ARA alimony divorce and family law mediators Massachusetts divorce mediators The Seven Sins of Alimony mediation divorce litigation child support