Divorce Mediation Blog

The Defense of Marriage Act: Defending the Indefensible

Thursday, July 05, 2012

Since 2004, gays and lesbians have been legally free to marry in Massachusetts. That is now the law in six (6) states and the District of Columbia. Yet, by congressional action, signed into law by President Clinton, legally married couples here are not legally married for any federal purpose, nor is their status respected in most other states.

The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) (declaring a marriage as only between one man and one woman for all federal law purposes and relieving other states of any obligation to recognize a same sex marriage permissibly created in another state) denies same sex spouses more than a thousand benefits, including the right to file joint tax returns, to have tax privileged spousal medical benefits and access to many social security and veterans survivors benefits. In divorce, gays and lesbians may not transfer property without taxation at the time of divorce, cannot claim alimony tax deductions and are prohibited from transferring pension assets without triggering tax consequences, which can be sometimes catastrophic; rights that all hetero-sexual married couples take for granted.

A group of plaintiffs sued in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts in the case of Gill v. O.P.M. and 2 companion cases, seeking to have DOMA declared unconstitutional. After defending DOMA and losing in the trial court, the Obama Administration declined to defend it again in the appeal of Judge Joseph Tauro’s judgment wherein he declared DOMA to be unconstitutional. The Department of Justice declared the statute indefensible. The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, agreed with Judge Tauro and upheld his judgment.

The next stop for this controversy is the United States Supreme Court, where others will stand in as surrogates for the federal government in seeking to reverse the First Circuit’s decision, doing what the current government refuses to do: defend the indefensible.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


lawyer dispute resolution mediator Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC Divorce Agreements COLA alimony law Massachusetts alimony and child support litigation Uniform Arbitration Act Child Support Guidelines divorce process divorce and family law mediators conciliation divorce mediations medical benefits IRC §2704 DOMA mediations Alimony Reform Act Massachusetts alimony Self-adjusting alimony orders divorce mediator family and probate law disputes med/arb alimony alimony reform legislation Major League Baseball Arbitration family law arbitrator high-risk methodology fraud family mediation special master Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth Matrimonial Arbitration rehabilitative alimony med-arb lawyers Massachusetts divorce mediators divorce mediation private dispute resolution arbitrators family law arbitrators LDRC divorce judgment pre-ARA alimony Cohabitation Defense of Marriage Act divorce litigation support orders divorce arbitrator divorce and family law traditional negotiations family law mediation Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Levine Dispute Resolution divorce lawyers disputes arbitration lawyer-attended mediation how baseball arbitration works divorced divorce mediators mediation Baseball Arbitration General term alimony Massachusetts divorce lawyers health coverage Baseball Players divorce arbitration alimony statute Obamacare Massachusetts lawyers resolve disputes Levine Dispute Resolution Center self-adjusting alimony Chouteau Levine Family Law Arbitration The Seven Sins of Alimony divorce agreement Baseball Divorce mediators Massachusetts family support arbitrator family law divorce arbitrators Boston Levine Dispute Resolutions SJC alimony orders health insurance annulment separation Same Sex Marriage facilitated negotiations child support MLB labor agreement Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act