Divorce Mediation Blog

The Defense of Marriage Act: Defending the Indefensible

Thursday, July 05, 2012

Since 2004, gays and lesbians have been legally free to marry in Massachusetts. That is now the law in six (6) states and the District of Columbia. Yet, by congressional action, signed into law by President Clinton, legally married couples here are not legally married for any federal purpose, nor is their status respected in most other states.

The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) (declaring a marriage as only between one man and one woman for all federal law purposes and relieving other states of any obligation to recognize a same sex marriage permissibly created in another state) denies same sex spouses more than a thousand benefits, including the right to file joint tax returns, to have tax privileged spousal medical benefits and access to many social security and veterans survivors benefits. In divorce, gays and lesbians may not transfer property without taxation at the time of divorce, cannot claim alimony tax deductions and are prohibited from transferring pension assets without triggering tax consequences, which can be sometimes catastrophic; rights that all hetero-sexual married couples take for granted.

A group of plaintiffs sued in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts in the case of Gill v. O.P.M. and 2 companion cases, seeking to have DOMA declared unconstitutional. After defending DOMA and losing in the trial court, the Obama Administration declined to defend it again in the appeal of Judge Joseph Tauro’s judgment wherein he declared DOMA to be unconstitutional. The Department of Justice declared the statute indefensible. The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, agreed with Judge Tauro and upheld his judgment.

The next stop for this controversy is the United States Supreme Court, where others will stand in as surrogates for the federal government in seeking to reverse the First Circuit’s decision, doing what the current government refuses to do: defend the indefensible.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


divorce and family law mediators pre-ARA alimony Uniform Arbitration Act Massachusetts alimony and child support Boston Self-adjusting alimony orders family law arbitrator how baseball arbitration works health coverage divorce mediators Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act health insurance alimony law litigation family and probate law disputes Same Sex Marriage support orders Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC mediations Matrimonial Arbitration DOMA Baseball Players dispute resolution child support separation traditional negotiations divorce mediation divorce arbitration divorce litigation divorce arbitrator Family Law Arbitration divorce process special master alimony Defense of Marriage Act Cohabitation COLA divorced divorce mediator lawyer-attended mediation Divorce med/arb SJC Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act divorce arbitrators Massachusetts divorce mediators alimony orders Levine Dispute Resolution The Seven Sins of Alimony Massachusetts lawyers divorce lawyers family mediation resolve disputes mediation private dispute resolution medical benefits Obamacare Major League Baseball Arbitration Levine Dispute Resolution Center arbitration mediators Levine Dispute Resolutions lawyers facilitated negotiations Child Support Guidelines fraud Massachusetts alimony divorce and family law arbitrators divorce judgment MLB labor agreement family law arbitrators lawyer self-adjusting alimony conciliation IRC §2704 Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly annulment high-risk methodology LDRC Baseball divorce mediations med-arb Divorce Agreements family support mediator Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth family law mediation disputes divorce agreement arbitrator alimony statute Massachusetts divorce lawyers alimony reform legislation Baseball Arbitration family law rehabilitative alimony General term alimony Chouteau Levine