Divorce Mediation Blog

The Defense of Marriage Act: Defending the Indefensible

Thursday, July 05, 2012

Since 2004, gays and lesbians have been legally free to marry in Massachusetts. That is now the law in six (6) states and the District of Columbia. Yet, by congressional action, signed into law by President Clinton, legally married couples here are not legally married for any federal purpose, nor is their status respected in most other states.

The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) (declaring a marriage as only between one man and one woman for all federal law purposes and relieving other states of any obligation to recognize a same sex marriage permissibly created in another state) denies same sex spouses more than a thousand benefits, including the right to file joint tax returns, to have tax privileged spousal medical benefits and access to many social security and veterans survivors benefits. In divorce, gays and lesbians may not transfer property without taxation at the time of divorce, cannot claim alimony tax deductions and are prohibited from transferring pension assets without triggering tax consequences, which can be sometimes catastrophic; rights that all hetero-sexual married couples take for granted.

A group of plaintiffs sued in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts in the case of Gill v. O.P.M. and 2 companion cases, seeking to have DOMA declared unconstitutional. After defending DOMA and losing in the trial court, the Obama Administration declined to defend it again in the appeal of Judge Joseph Tauro’s judgment wherein he declared DOMA to be unconstitutional. The Department of Justice declared the statute indefensible. The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, agreed with Judge Tauro and upheld his judgment.

The next stop for this controversy is the United States Supreme Court, where others will stand in as surrogates for the federal government in seeking to reverse the First Circuit’s decision, doing what the current government refuses to do: defend the indefensible.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


Family Law Arbitration Obamacare conciliation mediation separation alimony reform legislation Defense of Marriage Act Same Sex Marriage pre-ARA alimony traditional negotiations med/arb divorce arbitrator divorce arbitrators Child Support Guidelines Levine Dispute Resolution mediator special master lawyer-attended mediation divorce lawyers alimony family law mediation how baseball arbitration works high-risk methodology support orders Baseball Arbitration Boston resolve disputes divorce litigation SJC Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly family and probate law disputes med-arb lawyers disputes DOMA family mediation Major League Baseball Arbitration Massachusetts alimony alimony law divorce process divorce arbitration divorce mediation Baseball Players self-adjusting alimony divorce agreement Massachusetts divorce mediators LDRC mediators Divorce Levine Dispute Resolution Center family support divorce and family law mediators Uniform Arbitration Act divorce mediators divorce and family law arbitrator family law arbitrator health coverage mediations COLA lawyer divorce mediations Massachusetts divorce lawyers health insurance Massachusetts alimony and child support Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC divorced family law dispute resolution Chouteau Levine facilitated negotiations divorce judgment child support private dispute resolution Divorce Agreements General term alimony medical benefits divorce mediator Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth Baseball arbitration Cohabitation family law arbitrators alimony orders Massachusetts lawyers Alimony Reform Act The Seven Sins of Alimony fraud Levine Dispute Resolutions rehabilitative alimony Self-adjusting alimony orders annulment IRC §2704 MLB labor agreement Matrimonial Arbitration alimony statute Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act litigation Massachusetts arbitrators