Divorce Mediation Blog

The Defense of Marriage Act: Defending the Indefensible

Thursday, July 05, 2012

Since 2004, gays and lesbians have been legally free to marry in Massachusetts. That is now the law in six (6) states and the District of Columbia. Yet, by congressional action, signed into law by President Clinton, legally married couples here are not legally married for any federal purpose, nor is their status respected in most other states.

The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) (declaring a marriage as only between one man and one woman for all federal law purposes and relieving other states of any obligation to recognize a same sex marriage permissibly created in another state) denies same sex spouses more than a thousand benefits, including the right to file joint tax returns, to have tax privileged spousal medical benefits and access to many social security and veterans survivors benefits. In divorce, gays and lesbians may not transfer property without taxation at the time of divorce, cannot claim alimony tax deductions and are prohibited from transferring pension assets without triggering tax consequences, which can be sometimes catastrophic; rights that all hetero-sexual married couples take for granted.

A group of plaintiffs sued in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts in the case of Gill v. O.P.M. and 2 companion cases, seeking to have DOMA declared unconstitutional. After defending DOMA and losing in the trial court, the Obama Administration declined to defend it again in the appeal of Judge Joseph Tauro’s judgment wherein he declared DOMA to be unconstitutional. The Department of Justice declared the statute indefensible. The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, agreed with Judge Tauro and upheld his judgment.

The next stop for this controversy is the United States Supreme Court, where others will stand in as surrogates for the federal government in seeking to reverse the First Circuit’s decision, doing what the current government refuses to do: defend the indefensible.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


divorce arbitrators divorce arbitrator how baseball arbitration works Levine Dispute Resolution Center DOMA family mediation alimony law Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act Defense of Marriage Act health insurance Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC alimony statute The Seven Sins of Alimony Matrimonial Arbitration arbitrators LDRC special master facilitated negotiations litigation divorce lawyers divorce mediation Major League Baseball Arbitration Cohabitation high-risk methodology Alimony Reform Act alimony Massachusetts alimony and child support MLB labor agreement rehabilitative alimony lawyer-attended mediation family law arbitrators arbitration alimony orders Levine Dispute Resolution Child Support Guidelines private dispute resolution Chouteau Levine arbitrator Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly COLA family law arbitrator divorce mediator conciliation family law divorce arbitration divorced lawyer SJC medical benefits resolve disputes pre-ARA alimony mediators health coverage Divorce divorce judgment lawyers divorce litigation divorce and family law Same Sex Marriage mediation General term alimony Baseball Players mediations Obamacare Boston family law mediation divorce process family support med-arb child support Massachusetts lawyers divorce mediators self-adjusting alimony IRC §2704 Baseball fraud med/arb divorce and family law mediators traditional negotiations support orders Uniform Arbitration Act Massachusetts divorce mediators alimony reform legislation Self-adjusting alimony orders family and probate law disputes mediator Massachusetts alimony Massachusetts Family Law Arbitration Divorce Agreements Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth divorce mediations dispute resolution annulment Massachusetts divorce lawyers Baseball Arbitration separation Levine Dispute Resolutions divorce agreement disputes