Divorce Mediation Blog

The Defense of Marriage Act: Defending the Indefensible

Thursday, July 05, 2012

Since 2004, gays and lesbians have been legally free to marry in Massachusetts. That is now the law in six (6) states and the District of Columbia. Yet, by congressional action, signed into law by President Clinton, legally married couples here are not legally married for any federal purpose, nor is their status respected in most other states.

The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) (declaring a marriage as only between one man and one woman for all federal law purposes and relieving other states of any obligation to recognize a same sex marriage permissibly created in another state) denies same sex spouses more than a thousand benefits, including the right to file joint tax returns, to have tax privileged spousal medical benefits and access to many social security and veterans survivors benefits. In divorce, gays and lesbians may not transfer property without taxation at the time of divorce, cannot claim alimony tax deductions and are prohibited from transferring pension assets without triggering tax consequences, which can be sometimes catastrophic; rights that all hetero-sexual married couples take for granted.

A group of plaintiffs sued in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts in the case of Gill v. O.P.M. and 2 companion cases, seeking to have DOMA declared unconstitutional. After defending DOMA and losing in the trial court, the Obama Administration declined to defend it again in the appeal of Judge Joseph Tauro’s judgment wherein he declared DOMA to be unconstitutional. The Department of Justice declared the statute indefensible. The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, agreed with Judge Tauro and upheld his judgment.

The next stop for this controversy is the United States Supreme Court, where others will stand in as surrogates for the federal government in seeking to reverse the First Circuit’s decision, doing what the current government refuses to do: defend the indefensible.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


alimony statute medical benefits divorce lawyers DOMA Levine Dispute Resolution arbitrators alimony law Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC traditional negotiations mediation divorce process Levine Dispute Resolutions litigation separation Massachusetts divorce mediators Chouteau Levine mediator divorce mediations mediators divorce agreement rehabilitative alimony family and probate law disputes Obamacare family law Massachusetts alimony and child support support orders SJC Baseball Players divorce mediators Same Sex Marriage arbitrator Uniform Arbitration Act family law arbitrators COLA how baseball arbitration works mediations alimony fraud alimony reform legislation lawyers conciliation divorce arbitrator Child Support Guidelines divorce judgment General term alimony disputes Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly med-arb lawyer child support divorce mediator pre-ARA alimony Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth divorce mediation divorce arbitrators Cohabitation Major League Baseball Arbitration The Seven Sins of Alimony arbitration family law arbitrator Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act health insurance Defense of Marriage Act Baseball Arbitration divorce arbitration Matrimonial Arbitration Baseball med/arb MLB labor agreement Levine Dispute Resolution Center Boston Divorce Agreements Family Law Arbitration Alimony Reform Act family mediation lawyer-attended mediation divorced resolve disputes Massachusetts annulment high-risk methodology IRC §2704 Divorce self-adjusting alimony alimony orders private dispute resolution special master divorce and family law Massachusetts alimony family law mediation Self-adjusting alimony orders facilitated negotiations divorce litigation LDRC Massachusetts lawyers family support dispute resolution Massachusetts divorce lawyers divorce and family law mediators health coverage