Divorce Mediation Blog

The SJC Weighs in on Self-Adjusting Alimony Orders and Recipient “Need”: Young v. Young, Part 8

Wednesday, January 24, 2018

Levine Dispute Resolution - Alimony

“Did stated intent of the
order trump the its effect?”

In Young v. Young, the Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) vacated the trial court judgment that awarded variable alimony based on a fixed percentage of the husband’s gross pre-tax compensation, based in part on its conclusion that it crossed the Alimony Reform Act (ARA) (eff. 3.1.12):

…[B]ecause [the order] was intended to award the wife an amount of alimony that exceeds her need to maintain the lifestyle she enjoyed during the marriage. (Italics ours)

By focusing on the intent of the order, we can only infer that the court was addressing the judge’s rationale for the order, instead of the order itself. That election matters, because it raises two questions:

  1. If the trial judge explained herself differently, might the SJC have upheld the judgment?
  2. If the SJC looked at the order in its full ramification, would it have impacted the outcome?

The actual support award in Young was bi-lateral, rising and dropping with the husband’s income, a fact eclipsed by the court’s sharp focus on intent. Thus, while the trial judge may have focused her analysis of the parties’ rising station, her order actually provided downside protection for the husband, too.

Had the judge expressed an intent to protect the husband in the event of income decline and stressed it concomitantly with the potential for “upside”, might the “intent” infirmity that the SJC seized upon been neutralized? Or, if the judge had found that a family with roller coaster income might experience corresponding lifestyle flux?

After all, as the SJC observed:

    There may also be special circumstances where an alimony award based on a percentage of the supporting spouse's income might not be an abuse of discretion, such as where the supporting spouse's income is highly variable from year to year, sometimes severely limiting his or her ability to pay, and where a percentage formula, averaged over time, is likely not to exceed the needs of the recipient spouse.

The SJC dealt with the former, but not the latter.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


divorce arbitrators divorced disputes facilitated negotiations health coverage Levine Dispute Resolutions divorce and family law alimony reform legislation Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth lawyer-attended mediation Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC divorce mediators med-arb divorce arbitrator Levine Dispute Resolution Matrimonial Arbitration health insurance divorce agreement child support divorce arbitration mediation Uniform Arbitration Act alimony alimony orders traditional negotiations Boston Massachusetts alimony and child support divorce and family law mediators Alimony Reform Act Obamacare family law Divorce General term alimony Massachusetts divorce mediators fraud lawyer Massachusetts divorce lawyers Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly family and probate law disputes divorce mediations SJC high-risk methodology family mediation Divorce Agreements arbitrators divorce process medical benefits Baseball Players Same Sex Marriage Major League Baseball Arbitration support orders dispute resolution litigation Levine Dispute Resolution Center mediations Cohabitation family law arbitrator mediator Defense of Marriage Act arbitration Baseball pre-ARA alimony conciliation DOMA Massachusetts self-adjusting alimony Baseball Arbitration separation lawyers divorce lawyers arbitrator Chouteau Levine alimony statute med/arb LDRC MLB labor agreement divorce mediator Massachusetts alimony alimony law special master family law mediation Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act Massachusetts lawyers divorce mediation mediators resolve disputes COLA IRC §2704 divorce litigation Family Law Arbitration how baseball arbitration works annulment family law arbitrators Child Support Guidelines The Seven Sins of Alimony divorce judgment family support Self-adjusting alimony orders private dispute resolution rehabilitative alimony