781.708.4445

info@levinedisputeresolution.com

Divorce Mediation Blog

The SJC Weighs in on Self-Adjusting Alimony Orders and Recipient “Need”: Young v. Young, Part 8

Wednesday, January 24, 2018

Levine Dispute Resolution - Alimony

“Did stated intent of the
order trump the its effect?”

In Young v. Young, the Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) vacated the trial court judgment that awarded variable alimony based on a fixed percentage of the husband’s gross pre-tax compensation, based in part on its conclusion that it crossed the Alimony Reform Act (ARA) (eff. 3.1.12):

…[B]ecause [the order] was intended to award the wife an amount of alimony that exceeds her need to maintain the lifestyle she enjoyed during the marriage. (Italics ours)

By focusing on the intent of the order, we can only infer that the court was addressing the judge’s rationale for the order, instead of the order itself. That election matters, because it raises two questions:

  1. If the trial judge explained herself differently, might the SJC have upheld the judgment?
  2. If the SJC looked at the order in its full ramification, would it have impacted the outcome?

The actual support award in Young was bi-lateral, rising and dropping with the husband’s income, a fact eclipsed by the court’s sharp focus on intent. Thus, while the trial judge may have focused her analysis of the parties’ rising station, her order actually provided downside protection for the husband, too.

Had the judge expressed an intent to protect the husband in the event of income decline and stressed it concomitantly with the potential for “upside”, might the “intent” infirmity that the SJC seized upon been neutralized? Or, if the judge had found that a family with roller coaster income might experience corresponding lifestyle flux?

After all, as the SJC observed:

    There may also be special circumstances where an alimony award based on a percentage of the supporting spouse's income might not be an abuse of discretion, such as where the supporting spouse's income is highly variable from year to year, sometimes severely limiting his or her ability to pay, and where a percentage formula, averaged over time, is likely not to exceed the needs of the recipient spouse.

The SJC dealt with the former, but not the latter.



Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:



Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles


recent posts


tags

Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC divorce judgment family mediation Levine Dispute Resolutions divorce mediator high-risk methodology arbitration health coverage family law mediation Same Sex Marriage MLB labor agreement Uniform Arbitration Act family law support orders mediators IRC §2704 divorce agreement divorce mediations divorce mediation alimony conciliation health insurance Family Law Arbitration facilitated negotiations fraud Self-adjusting alimony orders SJC private dispute resolution Massachusetts alimony family law arbitrators lawyers Massachusetts divorce lawyers mediations The Seven Sins of Alimony Divorce mediator annulment mediation lawyer-attended mediation rehabilitative alimony disputes family and probate law disputes Massachusetts med-arb LDRC divorce arbitrators divorce and family law mediators traditional negotiations divorce litigation Baseball divorce and family law how baseball arbitration works separation Levine Dispute Resolution Center Major League Baseball Arbitration Massachusetts alimony and child support divorce mediators Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth divorce process Cohabitation Baseball Players Alimony Reform Act Massachusetts lawyers Boston General term alimony Massachusetts divorce mediators Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly family support child support Levine Dispute Resolution alimony reform legislation litigation Matrimonial Arbitration COLA Child Support Guidelines alimony orders alimony law arbitrators resolve disputes DOMA Divorce Agreements Chouteau Levine divorce arbitration alimony statute lawyer self-adjusting alimony special master divorce arbitrator med/arb pre-ARA alimony Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act divorce lawyers arbitrator family law arbitrator Defense of Marriage Act dispute resolution divorced Baseball Arbitration Obamacare medical benefits