Divorce Mediation Blog

The SJC Weighs in on Self-Adjusting Alimony Orders and Recipient “Need”: Young v. Young, Part 8

Wednesday, January 24, 2018

Levine Dispute Resolution - Alimony

“Did stated intent of the
order trump the its effect?”

In Young v. Young, the Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) vacated the trial court judgment that awarded variable alimony based on a fixed percentage of the husband’s gross pre-tax compensation, based in part on its conclusion that it crossed the Alimony Reform Act (ARA) (eff. 3.1.12):

…[B]ecause [the order] was intended to award the wife an amount of alimony that exceeds her need to maintain the lifestyle she enjoyed during the marriage. (Italics ours)

By focusing on the intent of the order, we can only infer that the court was addressing the judge’s rationale for the order, instead of the order itself. That election matters, because it raises two questions:

  1. If the trial judge explained herself differently, might the SJC have upheld the judgment?
  2. If the SJC looked at the order in its full ramification, would it have impacted the outcome?

The actual support award in Young was bi-lateral, rising and dropping with the husband’s income, a fact eclipsed by the court’s sharp focus on intent. Thus, while the trial judge may have focused her analysis of the parties’ rising station, her order actually provided downside protection for the husband, too.

Had the judge expressed an intent to protect the husband in the event of income decline and stressed it concomitantly with the potential for “upside”, might the “intent” infirmity that the SJC seized upon been neutralized? Or, if the judge had found that a family with roller coaster income might experience corresponding lifestyle flux?

After all, as the SJC observed:

    There may also be special circumstances where an alimony award based on a percentage of the supporting spouse's income might not be an abuse of discretion, such as where the supporting spouse's income is highly variable from year to year, sometimes severely limiting his or her ability to pay, and where a percentage formula, averaged over time, is likely not to exceed the needs of the recipient spouse.

The SJC dealt with the former, but not the latter.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


Levine Dispute Resolutions Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC family law mediation how baseball arbitration works rehabilitative alimony alimony statute special master Uniform Arbitration Act support orders Family Law Arbitration Self-adjusting alimony orders divorce agreement conciliation Levine Dispute Resolution alimony orders MLB labor agreement lawyer divorce mediator med-arb facilitated negotiations Baseball Players alimony dispute resolution divorce mediations IRC §2704 Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act litigation pre-ARA alimony Matrimonial Arbitration divorce process Same Sex Marriage mediations alimony reform legislation health coverage Major League Baseball Arbitration Obamacare Massachusetts divorce lawyers arbitration divorce litigation divorce mediators SJC medical benefits Divorce Agreements Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly mediators divorce mediation high-risk methodology resolve disputes divorce arbitrators lawyer-attended mediation med/arb family and probate law disputes lawyers mediator Child Support Guidelines divorced COLA Baseball Arbitration traditional negotiations divorce judgment Massachusetts divorce mediators Massachusetts alimony and child support Divorce self-adjusting alimony divorce arbitration fraud arbitrator mediation Massachusetts alimony The Seven Sins of Alimony Alimony Reform Act Chouteau Levine health insurance divorce and family law mediators family mediation LDRC private dispute resolution DOMA annulment Cohabitation family law arbitrators Levine Dispute Resolution Center disputes Baseball family law child support Boston Defense of Marriage Act family support separation alimony law divorce and family law arbitrators Massachusetts lawyers family law arbitrator divorce arbitrator Massachusetts Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth General term alimony divorce lawyers