Divorce Mediation Blog

The SJC Weighs in on Self-Adjusting Alimony Orders and Recipient “Need”: Young v. Young, Part 8

Wednesday, January 24, 2018

Levine Dispute Resolution - Alimony

“Did stated intent of the
order trump the its effect?”

In Young v. Young, the Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) vacated the trial court judgment that awarded variable alimony based on a fixed percentage of the husband’s gross pre-tax compensation, based in part on its conclusion that it crossed the Alimony Reform Act (ARA) (eff. 3.1.12):

…[B]ecause [the order] was intended to award the wife an amount of alimony that exceeds her need to maintain the lifestyle she enjoyed during the marriage. (Italics ours)

By focusing on the intent of the order, we can only infer that the court was addressing the judge’s rationale for the order, instead of the order itself. That election matters, because it raises two questions:

  1. If the trial judge explained herself differently, might the SJC have upheld the judgment?
  2. If the SJC looked at the order in its full ramification, would it have impacted the outcome?

The actual support award in Young was bi-lateral, rising and dropping with the husband’s income, a fact eclipsed by the court’s sharp focus on intent. Thus, while the trial judge may have focused her analysis of the parties’ rising station, her order actually provided downside protection for the husband, too.

Had the judge expressed an intent to protect the husband in the event of income decline and stressed it concomitantly with the potential for “upside”, might the “intent” infirmity that the SJC seized upon been neutralized? Or, if the judge had found that a family with roller coaster income might experience corresponding lifestyle flux?

After all, as the SJC observed:

    There may also be special circumstances where an alimony award based on a percentage of the supporting spouse's income might not be an abuse of discretion, such as where the supporting spouse's income is highly variable from year to year, sometimes severely limiting his or her ability to pay, and where a percentage formula, averaged over time, is likely not to exceed the needs of the recipient spouse.

The SJC dealt with the former, but not the latter.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


private dispute resolution lawyer-attended mediation The Seven Sins of Alimony Massachusetts lawyers dispute resolution SJC Divorce lawyers Same Sex Marriage Alimony Reform Act self-adjusting alimony Levine Dispute Resolution Baseball Arbitration Massachusetts alimony and child support divorce mediation Family Law Arbitration divorce arbitrator divorce agreement family law lawyer med-arb Baseball Players divorce arbitrators arbitrator Self-adjusting alimony orders med/arb mediation MLB labor agreement divorce mediations Chouteau Levine family law arbitrator alimony statute Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC family and probate law disputes family law mediation Levine Dispute Resolutions Cohabitation high-risk methodology litigation Uniform Arbitration Act Baseball divorced LDRC annulment divorce and family law fraud divorce arbitration conciliation facilitated negotiations COLA IRC §2704 health coverage alimony law Matrimonial Arbitration Massachusetts pre-ARA alimony DOMA rehabilitative alimony Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth Massachusetts divorce lawyers divorce and family law mediators arbitration alimony Massachusetts alimony Levine Dispute Resolution Center Defense of Marriage Act Child Support Guidelines divorce mediators support orders divorce mediator arbitrators family law arbitrators disputes family mediation child support health insurance mediator separation traditional negotiations Boston Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly divorce judgment divorce process divorce lawyers special master General term alimony family support medical benefits Major League Baseball Arbitration mediators Obamacare resolve disputes Divorce Agreements mediations how baseball arbitration works alimony reform legislation Massachusetts divorce mediators Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act divorce litigation alimony orders