781.708.4445

wmlevine@levinedisputeresolution.com

Divorce Mediation Blog

The SJC Weighs in on Self-Adjusting Alimony Orders and Recipient “Need”: Young v. Young, Part 6

Wednesday, December 27, 2017

“Not everyone can afford a special master”

Levine Dispute Resolution - Alimony

Now, we will consider the role that financial complexity played in undermining the fate of the trial court decision in the Supreme Judicial Court’s (SJC) Young v. Young. The SJC reports that:

    …the [trial] judge found that, because of "the complex nature of [the husband's] compensation over and above his base salary and bonus," and because of "the constantly shifting nature of [the husband's] compensation," "it is reasonable and fair in the circumstances" to award alimony to the wife in the amount of thirty-three percent of the husband's gross income, rather than a fixed amount. (Italics ours)

The husband’s employment income arose from seven different compensation programs, including stock options, bonuses, investor entity units and discount stock purchase program opportunities. The various compensation modes featured differing consistencies, liquidity and transferability attributes, “…both considerable and variable”.

The SJC worried that the trial court’s self-adjusting alimony award (one-third of the husband’s gross pre-tax compensation) would lead to uncertainty of implementation, causing “continued strife” between the parties, citing the potential for inexact drafting and employer-employee collusion (to depress applicable income). The trial judge implicitly recognized the chance of future contention by appointing a special master, to keep the peace. Think: alimony coordinator.

The SJC deadpanned that: “Not everyone can afford a special master.”

If Mr. Young were simply a salaried employee, without the corporate power to manipulate his compensation, might the result have been different?



Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:



Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles


recent posts


tags

Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC family law arbitrators alimony reform legislation dispute resolution divorce agreement divorce litigation family law resolve disputes family support Levine Dispute Resolutions The Seven Sins of Alimony divorce mediator alimony high-risk methodology divorce and family law mediators Massachusetts divorce lawyers alimony statute divorce arbitrator med/arb lawyers Levine Dispute Resolution divorce arbitration Obamacare Massachusetts alimony and child support self-adjusting alimony alimony law Divorce separation MLB labor agreement DOMA Baseball Players Child Support Guidelines Major League Baseball Arbitration special master Boston Baseball mediations lawyer family law mediation conciliation arbitrators family and probate law disputes divorce arbitrators med-arb divorce lawyers Alimony Reform Act arbitrator pre-ARA alimony Levine Dispute Resolution Center mediators Uniform Arbitration Act child support Self-adjusting alimony orders COLA Baseball Arbitration rehabilitative alimony Cohabitation SJC divorce mediations Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth divorce mediators Defense of Marriage Act Matrimonial Arbitration fraud Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act disputes Massachusetts divorce process support orders medical benefits health coverage LDRC Family Law Arbitration lawyer-attended mediation Massachusetts alimony Same Sex Marriage Massachusetts divorce mediators annulment divorce and family law health insurance Chouteau Levine General term alimony divorced alimony orders facilitated negotiations Divorce Agreements Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly arbitration Massachusetts lawyers mediation private dispute resolution mediator family mediation litigation divorce judgment family law arbitrator how baseball arbitration works IRC §2704 traditional negotiations divorce mediation