Divorce Mediation Blog

The SJC Weighs in on Self-Adjusting Alimony Orders and Recipient “Need”: Young v. Young, Part 6

Wednesday, December 27, 2017

“Not everyone can afford a special master”

Levine Dispute Resolution - Alimony

Now, we will consider the role that financial complexity played in undermining the fate of the trial court decision in the Supreme Judicial Court’s (SJC) Young v. Young. The SJC reports that:

    …the [trial] judge found that, because of "the complex nature of [the husband's] compensation over and above his base salary and bonus," and because of "the constantly shifting nature of [the husband's] compensation," "it is reasonable and fair in the circumstances" to award alimony to the wife in the amount of thirty-three percent of the husband's gross income, rather than a fixed amount. (Italics ours)

The husband’s employment income arose from seven different compensation programs, including stock options, bonuses, investor entity units and discount stock purchase program opportunities. The various compensation modes featured differing consistencies, liquidity and transferability attributes, “…both considerable and variable”.

The SJC worried that the trial court’s self-adjusting alimony award (one-third of the husband’s gross pre-tax compensation) would lead to uncertainty of implementation, causing “continued strife” between the parties, citing the potential for inexact drafting and employer-employee collusion (to depress applicable income). The trial judge implicitly recognized the chance of future contention by appointing a special master, to keep the peace. Think: alimony coordinator.

The SJC deadpanned that: “Not everyone can afford a special master.”

If Mr. Young were simply a salaried employee, without the corporate power to manipulate his compensation, might the result have been different?

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


family mediation traditional negotiations pre-ARA alimony Massachusetts divorce mediators Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC arbitrator self-adjusting alimony family law arbitrators health insurance MLB labor agreement Baseball General term alimony mediator separation Massachusetts alimony and child support The Seven Sins of Alimony divorce arbitrator rehabilitative alimony COLA family support family law Divorce Agreements alimony alimony orders arbitrators divorce and family law divorce process mediations mediation Same Sex Marriage Defense of Marriage Act divorce mediators divorce agreement resolve disputes LDRC Levine Dispute Resolutions mediators divorce arbitration lawyers Obamacare divorce and family law mediators divorced medical benefits special master divorce litigation med-arb health coverage Baseball Players lawyer Levine Dispute Resolution Center SJC Divorce Boston Chouteau Levine arbitration family law arbitrator Uniform Arbitration Act Major League Baseball Arbitration divorce mediations alimony law annulment divorce arbitrators conciliation high-risk methodology divorce judgment Levine Dispute Resolution disputes Massachusetts alimony Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act Child Support Guidelines Matrimonial Arbitration private dispute resolution Cohabitation family law mediation lawyer-attended mediation med/arb Massachusetts Baseball Arbitration alimony reform legislation IRC §2704 Massachusetts lawyers Massachusetts divorce lawyers Family Law Arbitration dispute resolution DOMA Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth alimony statute divorce mediation Self-adjusting alimony orders child support divorce mediator support orders facilitated negotiations family and probate law disputes Alimony Reform Act litigation Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly how baseball arbitration works fraud divorce lawyers