Divorce Mediation Blog

The SJC Weighs in on Self-Adjusting Alimony Orders and Recipient “Need”: Young v. Young, Part 6

Wednesday, December 27, 2017

“Not everyone can afford a special master”

Levine Dispute Resolution - Alimony

Now, we will consider the role that financial complexity played in undermining the fate of the trial court decision in the Supreme Judicial Court’s (SJC) Young v. Young. The SJC reports that:

    …the [trial] judge found that, because of "the complex nature of [the husband's] compensation over and above his base salary and bonus," and because of "the constantly shifting nature of [the husband's] compensation," "it is reasonable and fair in the circumstances" to award alimony to the wife in the amount of thirty-three percent of the husband's gross income, rather than a fixed amount. (Italics ours)

The husband’s employment income arose from seven different compensation programs, including stock options, bonuses, investor entity units and discount stock purchase program opportunities. The various compensation modes featured differing consistencies, liquidity and transferability attributes, “…both considerable and variable”.

The SJC worried that the trial court’s self-adjusting alimony award (one-third of the husband’s gross pre-tax compensation) would lead to uncertainty of implementation, causing “continued strife” between the parties, citing the potential for inexact drafting and employer-employee collusion (to depress applicable income). The trial judge implicitly recognized the chance of future contention by appointing a special master, to keep the peace. Think: alimony coordinator.

The SJC deadpanned that: “Not everyone can afford a special master.”

If Mr. Young were simply a salaried employee, without the corporate power to manipulate his compensation, might the result have been different?

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


Massachusetts divorce lawyers family mediation Major League Baseball Arbitration Boston support orders Levine Dispute Resolution Matrimonial Arbitration divorce mediator COLA health insurance Divorce Chouteau Levine SJC private dispute resolution family law mediation divorce agreement MLB labor agreement arbitration Levine Dispute Resolution Center litigation IRC §2704 divorce arbitration traditional negotiations med-arb family support alimony statute LDRC The Seven Sins of Alimony alimony reform legislation divorce mediations pre-ARA alimony divorce lawyers how baseball arbitration works alimony law medical benefits Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly divorce litigation Defense of Marriage Act conciliation Massachusetts alimony and child support alimony orders Massachusetts DOMA mediator divorce arbitrator high-risk methodology divorce and family law Massachusetts lawyers Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act divorce and family law mediators family and probate law disputes family law Levine Dispute Resolutions mediators Same Sex Marriage facilitated negotiations child support annulment arbitrator resolve disputes lawyer divorce process Massachusetts divorce mediators Alimony Reform Act Massachusetts alimony med/arb separation Obamacare General term alimony rehabilitative alimony divorce arbitrators divorced arbitrators mediations Baseball Players divorce mediators Divorce Agreements dispute resolution Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth Uniform Arbitration Act Family Law Arbitration alimony family law arbitrator health coverage self-adjusting alimony Self-adjusting alimony orders special master Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC fraud Baseball Arbitration lawyer-attended mediation divorce mediation divorce judgment Child Support Guidelines Baseball disputes lawyers family law arbitrators mediation Cohabitation