781.708.4445

wmlevine@levinedisputeresolution.com

Divorce Mediation Blog

The SJC Weighs in on Self-Adjusting Alimony Orders and Recipient “Need”: Young v. Young, Part 6

Wednesday, December 27, 2017

“Not everyone can afford a special master”

Levine Dispute Resolution - Alimony

Now, we will consider the role that financial complexity played in undermining the fate of the trial court decision in the Supreme Judicial Court’s (SJC) Young v. Young. The SJC reports that:

    …the [trial] judge found that, because of "the complex nature of [the husband's] compensation over and above his base salary and bonus," and because of "the constantly shifting nature of [the husband's] compensation," "it is reasonable and fair in the circumstances" to award alimony to the wife in the amount of thirty-three percent of the husband's gross income, rather than a fixed amount. (Italics ours)

The husband’s employment income arose from seven different compensation programs, including stock options, bonuses, investor entity units and discount stock purchase program opportunities. The various compensation modes featured differing consistencies, liquidity and transferability attributes, “…both considerable and variable”.

The SJC worried that the trial court’s self-adjusting alimony award (one-third of the husband’s gross pre-tax compensation) would lead to uncertainty of implementation, causing “continued strife” between the parties, citing the potential for inexact drafting and employer-employee collusion (to depress applicable income). The trial judge implicitly recognized the chance of future contention by appointing a special master, to keep the peace. Think: alimony coordinator.

The SJC deadpanned that: “Not everyone can afford a special master.”

If Mr. Young were simply a salaried employee, without the corporate power to manipulate his compensation, might the result have been different?



Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:



Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles


recent posts


tags

self-adjusting alimony divorce arbitrator health insurance Chouteau Levine med-arb family support Divorce Cohabitation Child Support Guidelines divorce process Massachusetts divorce lawyers family law alimony law Alimony Reform Act private dispute resolution Massachusetts alimony family law arbitrator divorce and family law mediators Baseball divorce arbitration Matrimonial Arbitration arbitration divorce judgment pre-ARA alimony Same Sex Marriage lawyers Boston Massachusetts divorce mediators Divorce Agreements child support medical benefits The Seven Sins of Alimony divorce mediations alimony statute support orders Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC General term alimony family mediation Levine Dispute Resolution arbitrator dispute resolution divorce mediator lawyer IRC §2704 how baseball arbitration works alimony orders Massachusetts Baseball Arbitration divorce lawyers Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly family law mediation med/arb divorce agreement annulment Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act Self-adjusting alimony orders divorce and family law mediations family and probate law disputes separation Levine Dispute Resolution Center family law arbitrators lawyer-attended mediation rehabilitative alimony Baseball Players divorce arbitrators facilitated negotiations Levine Dispute Resolutions Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth alimony reform legislation arbitrators COLA Massachusetts lawyers Massachusetts alimony and child support LDRC special master MLB labor agreement fraud divorce litigation Major League Baseball Arbitration health coverage Family Law Arbitration disputes traditional negotiations mediator SJC divorced litigation Obamacare alimony DOMA divorce mediation Uniform Arbitration Act resolve disputes high-risk methodology mediation divorce mediators conciliation Defense of Marriage Act mediators