Divorce Mediation Blog

The SJC Weighs in on Self-Adjusting Alimony Orders and Recipient “Need”: Young v. Young, Part 6

Wednesday, December 27, 2017

“Not everyone can afford a special master”

Levine Dispute Resolution - Alimony

Now, we will consider the role that financial complexity played in undermining the fate of the trial court decision in the Supreme Judicial Court’s (SJC) Young v. Young. The SJC reports that:

    …the [trial] judge found that, because of "the complex nature of [the husband's] compensation over and above his base salary and bonus," and because of "the constantly shifting nature of [the husband's] compensation," "it is reasonable and fair in the circumstances" to award alimony to the wife in the amount of thirty-three percent of the husband's gross income, rather than a fixed amount. (Italics ours)

The husband’s employment income arose from seven different compensation programs, including stock options, bonuses, investor entity units and discount stock purchase program opportunities. The various compensation modes featured differing consistencies, liquidity and transferability attributes, “…both considerable and variable”.

The SJC worried that the trial court’s self-adjusting alimony award (one-third of the husband’s gross pre-tax compensation) would lead to uncertainty of implementation, causing “continued strife” between the parties, citing the potential for inexact drafting and employer-employee collusion (to depress applicable income). The trial judge implicitly recognized the chance of future contention by appointing a special master, to keep the peace. Think: alimony coordinator.

The SJC deadpanned that: “Not everyone can afford a special master.”

If Mr. Young were simply a salaried employee, without the corporate power to manipulate his compensation, might the result have been different?

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


health insurance divorce arbitration Defense of Marriage Act divorce arbitrators Major League Baseball Arbitration Massachusetts alimony and child support divorce mediator litigation Levine Dispute Resolution MLB labor agreement dispute resolution fraud mediations Massachusetts divorce mediators Same Sex Marriage Baseball Players Self-adjusting alimony orders lawyer COLA Chouteau Levine divorce and family law mediators divorced mediator arbitrators DOMA alimony reform legislation family law arbitrator IRC §2704 self-adjusting alimony mediation family support Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Divorce Agreements divorce mediation facilitated negotiations divorce process alimony arbitrator Massachusetts divorce lawyers mediators traditional negotiations special master annulment child support Baseball Levine Dispute Resolutions Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act Cohabitation arbitration family law mediation Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth separation divorce litigation Obamacare Baseball Arbitration Divorce divorce lawyers General term alimony alimony statute Massachusetts alimony Massachusetts lawyers divorce judgment resolve disputes disputes Levine Dispute Resolution Center SJC divorce mediators support orders Boston family and probate law disputes Alimony Reform Act divorce arbitrator family law rehabilitative alimony conciliation private dispute resolution divorce and family law alimony orders alimony law Uniform Arbitration Act divorce mediations how baseball arbitration works health coverage family law arbitrators lawyer-attended mediation medical benefits pre-ARA alimony lawyers med-arb Massachusetts med/arb family mediation The Seven Sins of Alimony divorce agreement high-risk methodology LDRC Matrimonial Arbitration Child Support Guidelines Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC Family Law Arbitration