781.708.4445

wmlevine@levinedisputeresolution.com

Divorce Mediation Blog

The SJC Weighs in on Self-Adjusting Alimony Orders and Recipient “Need”: Young v. Young, Part 6

Wednesday, December 27, 2017

“Not everyone can afford a special master”

Levine Dispute Resolution - Alimony

Now, we will consider the role that financial complexity played in undermining the fate of the trial court decision in the Supreme Judicial Court’s (SJC) Young v. Young. The SJC reports that:

    …the [trial] judge found that, because of "the complex nature of [the husband's] compensation over and above his base salary and bonus," and because of "the constantly shifting nature of [the husband's] compensation," "it is reasonable and fair in the circumstances" to award alimony to the wife in the amount of thirty-three percent of the husband's gross income, rather than a fixed amount. (Italics ours)

The husband’s employment income arose from seven different compensation programs, including stock options, bonuses, investor entity units and discount stock purchase program opportunities. The various compensation modes featured differing consistencies, liquidity and transferability attributes, “…both considerable and variable”.

The SJC worried that the trial court’s self-adjusting alimony award (one-third of the husband’s gross pre-tax compensation) would lead to uncertainty of implementation, causing “continued strife” between the parties, citing the potential for inexact drafting and employer-employee collusion (to depress applicable income). The trial judge implicitly recognized the chance of future contention by appointing a special master, to keep the peace. Think: alimony coordinator.

The SJC deadpanned that: “Not everyone can afford a special master.”

If Mr. Young were simply a salaried employee, without the corporate power to manipulate his compensation, might the result have been different?



Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:



Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles


recent posts


tags

lawyer-attended mediation Defense of Marriage Act pre-ARA alimony alimony law Boston high-risk methodology Baseball Players divorce mediation private dispute resolution facilitated negotiations alimony statute family law arbitrators Levine Dispute Resolution divorce judgment Massachusetts alimony med/arb self-adjusting alimony mediators divorce and family law mediators Levine Dispute Resolution Center arbitration Self-adjusting alimony orders separation mediation med-arb mediations how baseball arbitration works Chouteau Levine divorce arbitration Levine Dispute Resolutions Same Sex Marriage Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth support orders divorce arbitrators Family Law Arbitration litigation health coverage Cohabitation divorce arbitrator Baseball mediator General term alimony Massachusetts divorce lawyers Alimony Reform Act divorce agreement arbitrator COLA child support alimony reform legislation MLB labor agreement alimony lawyers Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly medical benefits Baseball Arbitration divorce and family law fraud Massachusetts divorce mediators health insurance family mediation Major League Baseball Arbitration Massachusetts alimony and child support IRC §2704 divorced SJC conciliation resolve disputes traditional negotiations Child Support Guidelines DOMA Matrimonial Arbitration annulment Divorce Agreements divorce mediations divorce mediator Massachusetts lawyers Divorce divorce litigation divorce process family law Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC special master rehabilitative alimony family law mediation family support Uniform Arbitration Act divorce lawyers divorce mediators Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act dispute resolution arbitrators disputes family and probate law disputes The Seven Sins of Alimony lawyer Obamacare Massachusetts family law arbitrator LDRC alimony orders