Divorce Mediation Blog

The SJC Weighs in on Self-Adjusting Alimony Orders and Recipient “Need”: Young v. Young, Part 5

Wednesday, December 13, 2017

“What’s a judge to do?”

Levine Dispute Resolution - Alimony

In this entry, we consider a particular challenge that the trial judge will have on remand from the Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) in Young v. Young, in grappling with her assessment of the wife’s “need” for alimony. The trial judge tried to quantify the wife’s “need” by the tangible costs thereof, a common means of doing so. But, it appears that the evidence thwarted the judge in doing so, as she bumped up against a too frequent phenomenon: incredible and incredibly rising expense claims on sequential Rule 401 financial statements during litigation.

During an 11-month span of the Young case, the wife’s claims of weekly expense rose a remarkable 44%, from $453,856 per year to $653,906!

We have seen this movie before, as lawyers, judge, special master and divorce arbitrator. While it is certainly challenging for parties to give dispositive expense information when Rule 410 requires a full statement within 45 days, or when a party files motions, just 10 days. Moreover, uncertainty about just what “need” means, can make presenting financial statement expense claims dicey for the preparer.

Yet, litigation strategy plays an undeniable role. And, strategy evolves..

As a result, the judge critically found that the wife lacked “…personal knowledge regarding her own expenses,” and that her financial statements were not “…an accurate reflection of her need.” The wife’s credibility shot, the judge avoided the quantification of need and, instead opted for an ill-fated percentage-of-income order.

So, where the judge simply disbelieved the wife, and where she did not, apparently, find other, more convincing evidence of the wife’s “need” in the trial record (presumably there was no expert “lifestyle” testimony, or none at least that the court found credible), how will she do so now, on remand?

Don’t bet against a Young v. Young II appellate case, when one of these spouses appeals the judgment after remand.

In our next entry, we will consider the role that financial complexity played in undermining the fate of the trial court decision.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


family and probate law disputes divorce arbitrators high-risk methodology mediations fraud resolve disputes divorce judgment Defense of Marriage Act Massachusetts divorce lawyers rehabilitative alimony how baseball arbitration works private dispute resolution Massachusetts alimony and child support Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth Boston Child Support Guidelines alimony reform legislation Uniform Arbitration Act pre-ARA alimony divorce mediation Baseball Players facilitated negotiations Levine Dispute Resolution family mediation divorce process family support divorce lawyers divorced Chouteau Levine mediator self-adjusting alimony Massachusetts lawyers divorce arbitration lawyer-attended mediation Matrimonial Arbitration dispute resolution child support The Seven Sins of Alimony disputes Massachusetts alimony MLB labor agreement Alimony Reform Act divorce mediations Family Law Arbitration arbitration arbitrators General term alimony arbitrator traditional negotiations divorce arbitrator alimony statute alimony law Massachusetts mediation lawyer family law mediation Obamacare Divorce Agreements divorce litigation separation SJC health coverage Cohabitation family law arbitrators Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Divorce Same Sex Marriage alimony Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC DOMA Major League Baseball Arbitration Baseball Arbitration divorce and family law family law lawyers Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act divorce mediator COLA Levine Dispute Resolutions med/arb Massachusetts divorce mediators special master annulment mediators divorce agreement family law arbitrator LDRC Baseball divorce mediators medical benefits divorce and family law mediators litigation Levine Dispute Resolution Center health insurance conciliation med-arb support orders alimony orders Self-adjusting alimony orders IRC §2704