Divorce Mediation Blog

The SJC Weighs in on Self-Adjusting Alimony Orders and Recipient “Need”: Young v. Young, Part 5

Wednesday, December 13, 2017

“What’s a judge to do?”

Levine Dispute Resolution - Alimony

In this entry, we consider a particular challenge that the trial judge will have on remand from the Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) in Young v. Young, in grappling with her assessment of the wife’s “need” for alimony. The trial judge tried to quantify the wife’s “need” by the tangible costs thereof, a common means of doing so. But, it appears that the evidence thwarted the judge in doing so, as she bumped up against a too frequent phenomenon: incredible and incredibly rising expense claims on sequential Rule 401 financial statements during litigation.

During an 11-month span of the Young case, the wife’s claims of weekly expense rose a remarkable 44%, from $453,856 per year to $653,906!

We have seen this movie before, as lawyers, judge, special master and divorce arbitrator. While it is certainly challenging for parties to give dispositive expense information when Rule 410 requires a full statement within 45 days, or when a party files motions, just 10 days. Moreover, uncertainty about just what “need” means, can make presenting financial statement expense claims dicey for the preparer.

Yet, litigation strategy plays an undeniable role. And, strategy evolves..

As a result, the judge critically found that the wife lacked “…personal knowledge regarding her own expenses,” and that her financial statements were not “…an accurate reflection of her need.” The wife’s credibility shot, the judge avoided the quantification of need and, instead opted for an ill-fated percentage-of-income order.

So, where the judge simply disbelieved the wife, and where she did not, apparently, find other, more convincing evidence of the wife’s “need” in the trial record (presumably there was no expert “lifestyle” testimony, or none at least that the court found credible), how will she do so now, on remand?

Don’t bet against a Young v. Young II appellate case, when one of these spouses appeals the judgment after remand.

In our next entry, we will consider the role that financial complexity played in undermining the fate of the trial court decision.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


Chouteau Levine divorce arbitrator divorce agreement self-adjusting alimony Cohabitation Divorce alimony reform legislation child support litigation Divorce Agreements divorce mediations MLB labor agreement COLA arbitration annulment alimony law Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC divorce mediation alimony statute divorce litigation how baseball arbitration works Massachusetts alimony lawyers special master arbitrator medical benefits divorce and family law mediators divorce arbitration LDRC dispute resolution divorce mediators Major League Baseball Arbitration lawyer-attended mediation conciliation separation alimony Massachusetts lawyers mediators Boston Levine Dispute Resolutions resolve disputes DOMA SJC facilitated negotiations health coverage Levine Dispute Resolution Center Levine Dispute Resolution Massachusetts alimony and child support Matrimonial Arbitration family law arbitrators rehabilitative alimony alimony orders Child Support Guidelines Massachusetts divorce lawyers divorced Massachusetts divorce mediators Massachusetts traditional negotiations Obamacare Self-adjusting alimony orders arbitrators Defense of Marriage Act divorce lawyers Alimony Reform Act The Seven Sins of Alimony family law divorce mediator Same Sex Marriage Family Law Arbitration lawyer IRC §2704 Baseball mediator private dispute resolution Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth divorce and family law divorce arbitrators disputes family support high-risk methodology family and probate law disputes med-arb mediation med/arb Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly divorce judgment fraud family mediation Uniform Arbitration Act divorce process family law arbitrator Baseball Arbitration mediations Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act General term alimony health insurance Baseball Players family law mediation support orders pre-ARA alimony