Divorce Mediation Blog

The SJC Weighs in on Self-Adjusting Alimony Orders and Recipient “Need”: Young v. Young, Part 5

Wednesday, December 13, 2017

“What’s a judge to do?”

Levine Dispute Resolution - Alimony

In this entry, we consider a particular challenge that the trial judge will have on remand from the Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) in Young v. Young, in grappling with her assessment of the wife’s “need” for alimony. The trial judge tried to quantify the wife’s “need” by the tangible costs thereof, a common means of doing so. But, it appears that the evidence thwarted the judge in doing so, as she bumped up against a too frequent phenomenon: incredible and incredibly rising expense claims on sequential Rule 401 financial statements during litigation.

During an 11-month span of the Young case, the wife’s claims of weekly expense rose a remarkable 44%, from $453,856 per year to $653,906!

We have seen this movie before, as lawyers, judge, special master and divorce arbitrator. While it is certainly challenging for parties to give dispositive expense information when Rule 410 requires a full statement within 45 days, or when a party files motions, just 10 days. Moreover, uncertainty about just what “need” means, can make presenting financial statement expense claims dicey for the preparer.

Yet, litigation strategy plays an undeniable role. And, strategy evolves..

As a result, the judge critically found that the wife lacked “…personal knowledge regarding her own expenses,” and that her financial statements were not “…an accurate reflection of her need.” The wife’s credibility shot, the judge avoided the quantification of need and, instead opted for an ill-fated percentage-of-income order.

So, where the judge simply disbelieved the wife, and where she did not, apparently, find other, more convincing evidence of the wife’s “need” in the trial record (presumably there was no expert “lifestyle” testimony, or none at least that the court found credible), how will she do so now, on remand?

Don’t bet against a Young v. Young II appellate case, when one of these spouses appeals the judgment after remand.

In our next entry, we will consider the role that financial complexity played in undermining the fate of the trial court decision.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


pre-ARA alimony Alimony Reform Act conciliation resolve disputes annulment Levine Dispute Resolution Center The Seven Sins of Alimony separation divorce agreement family mediation divorce mediator Child Support Guidelines COLA self-adjusting alimony Boston mediators rehabilitative alimony health insurance med-arb Matrimonial Arbitration litigation Obamacare alimony reform legislation divorced Baseball Players Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC family law traditional negotiations Defense of Marriage Act Divorce Massachusetts alimony MLB labor agreement special master Baseball health coverage Same Sex Marriage divorce and family law DOMA dispute resolution SJC Massachusetts divorce mediators divorce lawyers IRC §2704 lawyer-attended mediation Massachusetts lawyers Baseball Arbitration divorce mediations family law mediation child support mediations disputes private dispute resolution Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth mediation divorce arbitrator Cohabitation Massachusetts alimony and child support Uniform Arbitration Act arbitration family law arbitrators alimony law family and probate law disputes facilitated negotiations divorce mediators arbitrator Self-adjusting alimony orders Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly divorce mediation support orders Chouteau Levine arbitrators lawyers Massachusetts divorce and family law mediators alimony high-risk methodology Family Law Arbitration Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act Levine Dispute Resolution divorce judgment Massachusetts divorce lawyers fraud divorce process divorce arbitration family support LDRC mediator lawyer med/arb medical benefits alimony orders Divorce Agreements how baseball arbitration works Levine Dispute Resolutions alimony statute General term alimony Major League Baseball Arbitration divorce litigation family law arbitrator divorce arbitrators