Divorce Mediation Blog

The SJC Weighs in on Self-Adjusting Alimony Orders and Recipient “Need”: Young v. Young, Part 5

Wednesday, December 13, 2017

“What’s a judge to do?”

Levine Dispute Resolution - Alimony

In this entry, we consider a particular challenge that the trial judge will have on remand from the Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) in Young v. Young, in grappling with her assessment of the wife’s “need” for alimony. The trial judge tried to quantify the wife’s “need” by the tangible costs thereof, a common means of doing so. But, it appears that the evidence thwarted the judge in doing so, as she bumped up against a too frequent phenomenon: incredible and incredibly rising expense claims on sequential Rule 401 financial statements during litigation.

During an 11-month span of the Young case, the wife’s claims of weekly expense rose a remarkable 44%, from $453,856 per year to $653,906!

We have seen this movie before, as lawyers, judge, special master and divorce arbitrator. While it is certainly challenging for parties to give dispositive expense information when Rule 410 requires a full statement within 45 days, or when a party files motions, just 10 days. Moreover, uncertainty about just what “need” means, can make presenting financial statement expense claims dicey for the preparer.

Yet, litigation strategy plays an undeniable role. And, strategy evolves..

As a result, the judge critically found that the wife lacked “…personal knowledge regarding her own expenses,” and that her financial statements were not “…an accurate reflection of her need.” The wife’s credibility shot, the judge avoided the quantification of need and, instead opted for an ill-fated percentage-of-income order.

So, where the judge simply disbelieved the wife, and where she did not, apparently, find other, more convincing evidence of the wife’s “need” in the trial record (presumably there was no expert “lifestyle” testimony, or none at least that the court found credible), how will she do so now, on remand?

Don’t bet against a Young v. Young II appellate case, when one of these spouses appeals the judgment after remand.

In our next entry, we will consider the role that financial complexity played in undermining the fate of the trial court decision.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


Massachusetts lawyers divorce arbitration pre-ARA alimony Uniform Arbitration Act Major League Baseball Arbitration Levine Dispute Resolution The Seven Sins of Alimony special master separation family and probate law disputes litigation divorce arbitrator Chouteau Levine IRC §2704 high-risk methodology Obamacare Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC annulment divorce agreement Levine Dispute Resolution Center Divorce Agreements alimony orders family mediation Alimony Reform Act fraud mediations Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth lawyer-attended mediation conciliation family law mediation divorce litigation Divorce alimony law alimony statute divorce and family law self-adjusting alimony Massachusetts alimony and child support child support family law divorce mediation family law arbitrators alimony reform legislation Matrimonial Arbitration rehabilitative alimony Levine Dispute Resolutions medical benefits family support disputes lawyer support orders Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly divorced Self-adjusting alimony orders divorce lawyers Baseball Arbitration Child Support Guidelines lawyers Massachusetts private dispute resolution Baseball arbitrators med-arb alimony resolve disputes divorce and family law mediators Cohabitation Family Law Arbitration Massachusetts divorce mediators divorce mediators family law arbitrator mediators divorce judgment Massachusetts alimony Massachusetts divorce lawyers divorce mediations how baseball arbitration works MLB labor agreement med/arb divorce mediator health coverage Boston SJC mediator facilitated negotiations DOMA arbitrator traditional negotiations arbitration divorce arbitrators mediation Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act Defense of Marriage Act General term alimony divorce process COLA health insurance LDRC dispute resolution Same Sex Marriage Baseball Players