Divorce Mediation Blog

The SJC Weighs in on Self-Adjusting Alimony Orders and Recipient “Need”: Young v. Young, Part 5

Wednesday, December 13, 2017

“What’s a judge to do?”

Levine Dispute Resolution - Alimony

In this entry, we consider a particular challenge that the trial judge will have on remand from the Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) in Young v. Young, in grappling with her assessment of the wife’s “need” for alimony. The trial judge tried to quantify the wife’s “need” by the tangible costs thereof, a common means of doing so. But, it appears that the evidence thwarted the judge in doing so, as she bumped up against a too frequent phenomenon: incredible and incredibly rising expense claims on sequential Rule 401 financial statements during litigation.

During an 11-month span of the Young case, the wife’s claims of weekly expense rose a remarkable 44%, from $453,856 per year to $653,906!

We have seen this movie before, as lawyers, judge, special master and divorce arbitrator. While it is certainly challenging for parties to give dispositive expense information when Rule 410 requires a full statement within 45 days, or when a party files motions, just 10 days. Moreover, uncertainty about just what “need” means, can make presenting financial statement expense claims dicey for the preparer.

Yet, litigation strategy plays an undeniable role. And, strategy evolves..

As a result, the judge critically found that the wife lacked “…personal knowledge regarding her own expenses,” and that her financial statements were not “…an accurate reflection of her need.” The wife’s credibility shot, the judge avoided the quantification of need and, instead opted for an ill-fated percentage-of-income order.

So, where the judge simply disbelieved the wife, and where she did not, apparently, find other, more convincing evidence of the wife’s “need” in the trial record (presumably there was no expert “lifestyle” testimony, or none at least that the court found credible), how will she do so now, on remand?

Don’t bet against a Young v. Young II appellate case, when one of these spouses appeals the judgment after remand.

In our next entry, we will consider the role that financial complexity played in undermining the fate of the trial court decision.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


IRC §2704 fraud family law arbitrator Self-adjusting alimony orders family law The Seven Sins of Alimony lawyer-attended mediation divorce arbitrator divorce judgment special master Alimony Reform Act conciliation Matrimonial Arbitration mediations General term alimony support orders SJC divorce mediation Massachusetts lawyers Child Support Guidelines Same Sex Marriage Levine Dispute Resolution Center COLA family support Baseball Arbitration alimony family law arbitrators Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act divorce mediations divorce lawyers mediation mediators alimony reform legislation dispute resolution Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth divorce agreement Baseball Players Cohabitation divorce mediator DOMA Divorce Agreements resolve disputes divorce mediators Uniform Arbitration Act alimony orders divorce and family law mediators divorce litigation self-adjusting alimony Levine Dispute Resolutions divorce process high-risk methodology Massachusetts Obamacare LDRC Family Law Arbitration med-arb lawyers child support medical benefits Defense of Marriage Act MLB labor agreement health insurance family law mediation family and probate law disputes how baseball arbitration works facilitated negotiations private dispute resolution med/arb Levine Dispute Resolution annulment Major League Baseball Arbitration Divorce Massachusetts divorce lawyers Massachusetts divorce mediators Baseball mediator separation litigation Chouteau Levine disputes Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC lawyer health coverage Boston divorce and family law arbitrator arbitrators Massachusetts alimony divorce arbitrators divorced divorce arbitration family mediation pre-ARA alimony Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly alimony statute rehabilitative alimony alimony law Massachusetts alimony and child support arbitration traditional negotiations