Divorce Mediation Blog

The SJC Weighs in on Self-Adjusting Alimony Orders and Recipient “Need”: Young v. Young, Part 1

Sunday, October 15, 2017

Levine Dispute Resolution - Alimony

With the long-awaited case Young v. Young, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) has revisited the important question of when may a trial court originate self-adjusting support orders, a subject that we have addressed here twice before. See, http://levinedisputeresolution.com/docs/Variable-Support-orders-3-28-16.pdf and http://levinedisputeresolution.com/divorce-mediation-blog/need-and-variable-support-orders-they-are-not-mutually-exclusive.

While the case does not address the situation where there is insufficient income to keep both parties living at the former marital standard of living, it does review and elaborate on existing precedent.

In a high income case of great executive compensation complexity, the trial court ordered the husband to pay to the wife a 1/3 share of all gross income that the husband receives going forward, rather than the fixed sum alimony that both parties sought, albeit in vastly different suggested amounts.

The core rulings of Young are neither complex nor novel on their face:

  1. Self-adjusting alimony orders are not per se prohibited, but they are to be limited to “special” though not necessarily “extraordinary” circumstances; and that
  2. Self-adjusting alimony orders that “intend” to elevate the recipient spouse’s standard of living above the marital station are prohibited

But, what does it all mean, really?

We will use Young as a jumping off point to address both its particular analysis and holdings, and to re-examine the curious case of variable support orders a/k/a self-adjusting support orders at large. We begin with just what is a variable support order and who uses them, then explore the analysis and implications of Young, and close (we think) with special problems in the area.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


divorce mediation SJC child support Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC support orders lawyer facilitated negotiations family support Divorce Agreements divorce arbitrator Boston Massachusetts lawyers arbitrator Baseball Arbitration LDRC divorce litigation Massachusetts divorce mediators health coverage family and probate law disputes disputes General term alimony Massachusetts alimony lawyers divorce judgment Family Law Arbitration traditional negotiations divorce agreement The Seven Sins of Alimony Alimony Reform Act high-risk methodology MLB labor agreement rehabilitative alimony Levine Dispute Resolution mediator Cohabitation divorce mediations divorced alimony reform legislation med-arb alimony orders lawyer-attended mediation Baseball Players alimony separation COLA mediation Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act Massachusetts alimony and child support IRC §2704 Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly med/arb Massachusetts fraud Major League Baseball Arbitration divorce arbitrators mediators litigation Massachusetts divorce lawyers Baseball special master self-adjusting alimony divorce arbitration Defense of Marriage Act dispute resolution divorce process Uniform Arbitration Act Levine Dispute Resolution Center private dispute resolution Divorce arbitrators family mediation Self-adjusting alimony orders family law mediation divorce lawyers Child Support Guidelines Same Sex Marriage resolve disputes medical benefits Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth alimony statute Matrimonial Arbitration conciliation Levine Dispute Resolutions family law arbitrator family law arbitrators how baseball arbitration works divorce and family law alimony law family law pre-ARA alimony annulment divorce mediator divorce mediators divorce and family law mediators DOMA Chouteau Levine Obamacare health insurance arbitration mediations