Divorce Mediation Blog

The SJC Weighs in on Self-Adjusting Alimony Orders and Recipient “Need”: Young v. Young, Part 1

Sunday, October 15, 2017

Levine Dispute Resolution - Alimony

With the long-awaited case Young v. Young, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) has revisited the important question of when may a trial court originate self-adjusting support orders, a subject that we have addressed here twice before. See, http://levinedisputeresolution.com/docs/Variable-Support-orders-3-28-16.pdf and http://levinedisputeresolution.com/divorce-mediation-blog/need-and-variable-support-orders-they-are-not-mutually-exclusive.

While the case does not address the situation where there is insufficient income to keep both parties living at the former marital standard of living, it does review and elaborate on existing precedent.

In a high income case of great executive compensation complexity, the trial court ordered the husband to pay to the wife a 1/3 share of all gross income that the husband receives going forward, rather than the fixed sum alimony that both parties sought, albeit in vastly different suggested amounts.

The core rulings of Young are neither complex nor novel on their face:

  1. Self-adjusting alimony orders are not per se prohibited, but they are to be limited to “special” though not necessarily “extraordinary” circumstances; and that
  2. Self-adjusting alimony orders that “intend” to elevate the recipient spouse’s standard of living above the marital station are prohibited

But, what does it all mean, really?

We will use Young as a jumping off point to address both its particular analysis and holdings, and to re-examine the curious case of variable support orders a/k/a self-adjusting support orders at large. We begin with just what is a variable support order and who uses them, then explore the analysis and implications of Young, and close (we think) with special problems in the area.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


Baseball separation divorce process LDRC family support General term alimony divorce mediation health coverage family law arbitrators med-arb health insurance Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC med/arb Baseball Arbitration Cohabitation private dispute resolution Matrimonial Arbitration fraud family and probate law disputes divorce mediator divorce and family law divorce arbitrators facilitated negotiations divorce mediations family law lawyer-attended mediation Divorce how baseball arbitration works lawyers family mediation DOMA divorce litigation arbitration traditional negotiations Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly mediators Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act COLA Uniform Arbitration Act lawyer IRC §2704 dispute resolution Massachusetts divorce mediators resolve disputes disputes Massachusetts alimony and child support alimony MLB labor agreement arbitrators family law mediation Massachusetts alimony special master Same Sex Marriage Boston divorce mediators The Seven Sins of Alimony family law arbitrator arbitrator divorce judgment alimony orders Levine Dispute Resolution divorce agreement support orders Child Support Guidelines litigation divorce and family law mediators Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act mediator Levine Dispute Resolutions Major League Baseball Arbitration Massachusetts lawyers mediation Massachusetts divorce lawyers child support pre-ARA alimony Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth SJC alimony reform legislation rehabilitative alimony Chouteau Levine annulment Divorce Agreements mediations high-risk methodology medical benefits Self-adjusting alimony orders alimony law divorced alimony statute divorce arbitration divorce lawyers self-adjusting alimony Baseball Players Obamacare divorce arbitrator conciliation Levine Dispute Resolution Center Defense of Marriage Act Family Law Arbitration