Divorce Mediation Blog

The SJC Weighs in on Self-Adjusting Alimony Orders and Recipient “Need”: Young v. Young, Part 1

Sunday, October 15, 2017

Levine Dispute Resolution - Alimony

With the long-awaited case Young v. Young, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) has revisited the important question of when may a trial court originate self-adjusting support orders, a subject that we have addressed here twice before. See, http://levinedisputeresolution.com/docs/Variable-Support-orders-3-28-16.pdf and http://levinedisputeresolution.com/divorce-mediation-blog/need-and-variable-support-orders-they-are-not-mutually-exclusive.

While the case does not address the situation where there is insufficient income to keep both parties living at the former marital standard of living, it does review and elaborate on existing precedent.

In a high income case of great executive compensation complexity, the trial court ordered the husband to pay to the wife a 1/3 share of all gross income that the husband receives going forward, rather than the fixed sum alimony that both parties sought, albeit in vastly different suggested amounts.

The core rulings of Young are neither complex nor novel on their face:

  1. Self-adjusting alimony orders are not per se prohibited, but they are to be limited to “special” though not necessarily “extraordinary” circumstances; and that
  2. Self-adjusting alimony orders that “intend” to elevate the recipient spouse’s standard of living above the marital station are prohibited

But, what does it all mean, really?

We will use Young as a jumping off point to address both its particular analysis and holdings, and to re-examine the curious case of variable support orders a/k/a self-adjusting support orders at large. We begin with just what is a variable support order and who uses them, then explore the analysis and implications of Young, and close (we think) with special problems in the area.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC IRC §2704 Baseball Arbitration Obamacare DOMA Child Support Guidelines divorce mediation Massachusetts alimony and child support mediations Divorce fraud health coverage family law arbitrators alimony reform legislation Major League Baseball Arbitration special master Alimony Reform Act divorce agreement how baseball arbitration works pre-ARA alimony divorce lawyers divorce arbitrators Levine Dispute Resolutions Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act medical benefits family law mediation divorce process support orders Baseball divorce mediators divorce litigation Defense of Marriage Act traditional negotiations arbitrators family law Massachusetts alimony arbitrator arbitration self-adjusting alimony mediator private dispute resolution health insurance Levine Dispute Resolution separation resolve disputes Massachusetts Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth alimony orders Divorce Agreements conciliation annulment Cohabitation divorce and family law mediators Same Sex Marriage rehabilitative alimony divorce and family law The Seven Sins of Alimony facilitated negotiations Self-adjusting alimony orders alimony divorce arbitrator mediation family law arbitrator COLA lawyer-attended mediation LDRC med-arb Chouteau Levine mediators alimony statute med/arb child support family mediation Massachusetts lawyers Boston family support disputes Family Law Arbitration family and probate law disputes divorce judgment Levine Dispute Resolution Center divorce mediations alimony law Massachusetts divorce mediators litigation lawyer Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly MLB labor agreement lawyers dispute resolution divorce arbitration Uniform Arbitration Act Massachusetts divorce lawyers General term alimony SJC Matrimonial Arbitration high-risk methodology divorce mediator divorced Baseball Players