Divorce Mediation Blog

The SJC Weighs in on Self-Adjusting Alimony Orders and Recipient “Need”: Young v. Young, Part 1

Sunday, October 15, 2017

Levine Dispute Resolution - Alimony

With the long-awaited case Young v. Young, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) has revisited the important question of when may a trial court originate self-adjusting support orders, a subject that we have addressed here twice before. See, http://levinedisputeresolution.com/docs/Variable-Support-orders-3-28-16.pdf and http://levinedisputeresolution.com/divorce-mediation-blog/need-and-variable-support-orders-they-are-not-mutually-exclusive.

While the case does not address the situation where there is insufficient income to keep both parties living at the former marital standard of living, it does review and elaborate on existing precedent.

In a high income case of great executive compensation complexity, the trial court ordered the husband to pay to the wife a 1/3 share of all gross income that the husband receives going forward, rather than the fixed sum alimony that both parties sought, albeit in vastly different suggested amounts.

The core rulings of Young are neither complex nor novel on their face:

  1. Self-adjusting alimony orders are not per se prohibited, but they are to be limited to “special” though not necessarily “extraordinary” circumstances; and that
  2. Self-adjusting alimony orders that “intend” to elevate the recipient spouse’s standard of living above the marital station are prohibited

But, what does it all mean, really?

We will use Young as a jumping off point to address both its particular analysis and holdings, and to re-examine the curious case of variable support orders a/k/a self-adjusting support orders at large. We begin with just what is a variable support order and who uses them, then explore the analysis and implications of Young, and close (we think) with special problems in the area.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


divorce and family law Cohabitation dispute resolution Same Sex Marriage divorce judgment how baseball arbitration works arbitration litigation IRC §2704 support orders Self-adjusting alimony orders Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Major League Baseball Arbitration alimony law LDRC family mediation traditional negotiations Massachusetts divorce mediators arbitrator Baseball Players Massachusetts pre-ARA alimony Defense of Marriage Act high-risk methodology med-arb family law arbitrator medical benefits Divorce Agreements child support divorce process conciliation Massachusetts lawyers med/arb Levine Dispute Resolution mediator Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth Levine Dispute Resolutions Boston Massachusetts divorce lawyers Chouteau Levine divorce agreement divorced Alimony Reform Act rehabilitative alimony lawyer divorce and family law mediators disputes special master divorce litigation Massachusetts alimony Family Law Arbitration The Seven Sins of Alimony COLA health coverage family law arbitrators Baseball Arbitration lawyers divorce mediation family and probate law disputes alimony statute alimony orders alimony reform legislation Baseball annulment divorce arbitrators divorce mediator fraud Divorce arbitrators divorce lawyers Massachusetts alimony and child support mediations MLB labor agreement divorce mediators divorce arbitration General term alimony divorce mediations Matrimonial Arbitration family support mediators private dispute resolution Levine Dispute Resolution Center family law family law mediation Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act SJC facilitated negotiations alimony Child Support Guidelines Obamacare self-adjusting alimony health insurance DOMA mediation lawyer-attended mediation resolve disputes Uniform Arbitration Act Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC separation divorce arbitrator