Divorce Mediation Blog

The SJC Weighs in on Self-Adjusting Alimony Orders and Recipient “Need”: Young v. Young, Part 1

Sunday, October 15, 2017

Levine Dispute Resolution - Alimony

With the long-awaited case Young v. Young, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) has revisited the important question of when may a trial court originate self-adjusting support orders, a subject that we have addressed here twice before. See, http://levinedisputeresolution.com/docs/Variable-Support-orders-3-28-16.pdf and http://levinedisputeresolution.com/divorce-mediation-blog/need-and-variable-support-orders-they-are-not-mutually-exclusive.

While the case does not address the situation where there is insufficient income to keep both parties living at the former marital standard of living, it does review and elaborate on existing precedent.

In a high income case of great executive compensation complexity, the trial court ordered the husband to pay to the wife a 1/3 share of all gross income that the husband receives going forward, rather than the fixed sum alimony that both parties sought, albeit in vastly different suggested amounts.

The core rulings of Young are neither complex nor novel on their face:

  1. Self-adjusting alimony orders are not per se prohibited, but they are to be limited to “special” though not necessarily “extraordinary” circumstances; and that
  2. Self-adjusting alimony orders that “intend” to elevate the recipient spouse’s standard of living above the marital station are prohibited

But, what does it all mean, really?

We will use Young as a jumping off point to address both its particular analysis and holdings, and to re-examine the curious case of variable support orders a/k/a self-adjusting support orders at large. We begin with just what is a variable support order and who uses them, then explore the analysis and implications of Young, and close (we think) with special problems in the area.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


Self-adjusting alimony orders divorce arbitration divorce and family law Baseball divorce mediation Cohabitation family law arbitrators lawyer divorce mediators family law arbitrator resolve disputes alimony orders alimony reform legislation Massachusetts alimony and child support health coverage alimony statute divorce lawyers mediators traditional negotiations med-arb Massachusetts alimony divorce and family law mediators Obamacare divorce agreement fraud divorced how baseball arbitration works The Seven Sins of Alimony child support Massachusetts lawyers divorce process family law mediation family law arbitrator Defense of Marriage Act Massachusetts divorce arbitrators Levine Dispute Resolution Center Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC General term alimony Baseball Players Child Support Guidelines alimony special master Uniform Arbitration Act divorce mediations DOMA MLB labor agreement IRC §2704 Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly arbitrators rehabilitative alimony divorce litigation family and probate law disputes disputes dispute resolution Matrimonial Arbitration Family Law Arbitration support orders annulment Major League Baseball Arbitration lawyer-attended mediation facilitated negotiations private dispute resolution health insurance lawyers divorce arbitrator family support Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth pre-ARA alimony Alimony Reform Act medical benefits mediator mediation med/arb Levine Dispute Resolution divorce mediator litigation Baseball Arbitration Massachusetts divorce lawyers Boston LDRC mediations divorce judgment Same Sex Marriage alimony law COLA conciliation Levine Dispute Resolutions SJC family mediation self-adjusting alimony high-risk methodology arbitration separation Divorce Agreements Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act Massachusetts divorce mediators Chouteau Levine Divorce