Divorce Mediation Blog

The SJC Weighs in on Self-Adjusting Alimony Orders and Recipient “Need”: Young v. Young, Part 1

Sunday, October 15, 2017

Levine Dispute Resolution - Alimony

With the long-awaited case Young v. Young, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) has revisited the important question of when may a trial court originate self-adjusting support orders, a subject that we have addressed here twice before. See, http://levinedisputeresolution.com/docs/Variable-Support-orders-3-28-16.pdf and http://levinedisputeresolution.com/divorce-mediation-blog/need-and-variable-support-orders-they-are-not-mutually-exclusive.

While the case does not address the situation where there is insufficient income to keep both parties living at the former marital standard of living, it does review and elaborate on existing precedent.

In a high income case of great executive compensation complexity, the trial court ordered the husband to pay to the wife a 1/3 share of all gross income that the husband receives going forward, rather than the fixed sum alimony that both parties sought, albeit in vastly different suggested amounts.

The core rulings of Young are neither complex nor novel on their face:

  1. Self-adjusting alimony orders are not per se prohibited, but they are to be limited to “special” though not necessarily “extraordinary” circumstances; and that
  2. Self-adjusting alimony orders that “intend” to elevate the recipient spouse’s standard of living above the marital station are prohibited

But, what does it all mean, really?

We will use Young as a jumping off point to address both its particular analysis and holdings, and to re-examine the curious case of variable support orders a/k/a self-adjusting support orders at large. We begin with just what is a variable support order and who uses them, then explore the analysis and implications of Young, and close (we think) with special problems in the area.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


arbitrator Self-adjusting alimony orders divorced private dispute resolution Defense of Marriage Act divorce and family law how baseball arbitration works lawyers resolve disputes IRC §2704 Child Support Guidelines Massachusetts divorce process rehabilitative alimony family law arbitrators mediator Massachusetts alimony Same Sex Marriage Massachusetts lawyers support orders Massachusetts alimony and child support litigation pre-ARA alimony Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth lawyer-attended mediation Baseball Players Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act divorce arbitration Chouteau Levine divorce and family law mediators COLA Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Massachusetts divorce lawyers Uniform Arbitration Act The Seven Sins of Alimony high-risk methodology disputes Baseball alimony conciliation Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC DOMA divorce agreement Major League Baseball Arbitration Levine Dispute Resolutions health insurance Matrimonial Arbitration Baseball Arbitration family law mediation divorce litigation SJC divorce arbitrators medical benefits divorce judgment arbitrators General term alimony self-adjusting alimony alimony orders divorce mediators arbitration Family Law Arbitration family law arbitrator child support MLB labor agreement separation Obamacare divorce arbitrator divorce mediations Cohabitation Divorce divorce mediation med/arb family law mediation mediators med-arb alimony reform legislation Boston alimony statute health coverage divorce lawyers traditional negotiations mediations annulment fraud Divorce Agreements facilitated negotiations LDRC family and probate law disputes divorce mediator Alimony Reform Act dispute resolution alimony law special master lawyer Massachusetts divorce mediators Levine Dispute Resolution family mediation Levine Dispute Resolution Center family support