Divorce Mediation Blog

The SJC Weighs in on Self-Adjusting Alimony Orders and Recipient “Need”: Young v. Young, Part 1

Sunday, October 15, 2017

Levine Dispute Resolution - Alimony

With the long-awaited case Young v. Young, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) has revisited the important question of when may a trial court originate self-adjusting support orders, a subject that we have addressed here twice before. See, http://levinedisputeresolution.com/docs/Variable-Support-orders-3-28-16.pdf and http://levinedisputeresolution.com/divorce-mediation-blog/need-and-variable-support-orders-they-are-not-mutually-exclusive.

While the case does not address the situation where there is insufficient income to keep both parties living at the former marital standard of living, it does review and elaborate on existing precedent.

In a high income case of great executive compensation complexity, the trial court ordered the husband to pay to the wife a 1/3 share of all gross income that the husband receives going forward, rather than the fixed sum alimony that both parties sought, albeit in vastly different suggested amounts.

The core rulings of Young are neither complex nor novel on their face:

  1. Self-adjusting alimony orders are not per se prohibited, but they are to be limited to “special” though not necessarily “extraordinary” circumstances; and that
  2. Self-adjusting alimony orders that “intend” to elevate the recipient spouse’s standard of living above the marital station are prohibited

But, what does it all mean, really?

We will use Young as a jumping off point to address both its particular analysis and holdings, and to re-examine the curious case of variable support orders a/k/a self-adjusting support orders at large. We begin with just what is a variable support order and who uses them, then explore the analysis and implications of Young, and close (we think) with special problems in the area.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


special master lawyer-attended mediation Massachusetts alimony and child support Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly LDRC child support rehabilitative alimony resolve disputes Defense of Marriage Act Matrimonial Arbitration divorce arbitrators med-arb Baseball family law mediation COLA health insurance Baseball Players Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act divorce process alimony law divorce mediators medical benefits pre-ARA alimony Divorce Agreements SJC annulment Self-adjusting alimony orders med/arb Boston divorce and family law mediators dispute resolution divorce arbitrator support orders Same Sex Marriage DOMA alimony statute divorce litigation IRC §2704 arbitrator Cohabitation MLB labor agreement alimony arbitrators private dispute resolution mediations family law arbitrators divorce judgment arbitration fraud divorce mediation litigation divorce agreement lawyers Massachusetts Massachusetts divorce mediators conciliation family and probate law disputes divorce mediator family law arbitrator self-adjusting alimony General term alimony lawyer Obamacare Major League Baseball Arbitration family law Chouteau Levine Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC separation divorce lawyers divorced Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth Family Law Arbitration mediator The Seven Sins of Alimony mediation Levine Dispute Resolution Center family support Uniform Arbitration Act facilitated negotiations Massachusetts alimony Baseball Arbitration Massachusetts divorce lawyers divorce arbitration how baseball arbitration works divorce and family law health coverage Massachusetts lawyers alimony orders high-risk methodology alimony reform legislation Levine Dispute Resolutions mediators family mediation Levine Dispute Resolution divorce mediations Divorce Child Support Guidelines disputes Alimony Reform Act traditional negotiations