Divorce Mediation Blog

The Goose, the Gander and the TCJA

Wednesday, February 20, 2019

Levine Dispute Resolution - Alimony

We know that under the federal Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (TCJA) alimony instruments executed before December 31, 2018 will carry over deductibility when modified thereafter so long as the parties (or the court?) don’t opt out of that treatment. While we all hope that we can successfully maintain this important tax leverage for the sake of restructured families by incorporating existing temporary (interlocutory) orders into 2019-and-later agreements, a question (among many) that continues to nag is, just how malleable is this rule?

It seems clear that if one modifies former Spouse A’s alimony by reducing the sum or increasing it, deductibility remains intact.

I also assume that if we change former Spouse A’s alimony from an expressed sum to a formula, in whole or in part (i.e., $5000 per month to .325 of gross pay, or $5,000 per month to $4,000 per month plus .325 of future bonuses) deductibility is not jeopardized.

And, if former Spouse A’s alimony durational term is reduced or extended, there seems to be no reason why the opt out rule should not apply.

But, here is the payoff question:

    What if former Spouse A loses her job, former Spouse B’s career has taken off, and the modification shifts the payment obligation from A to B, is deductibility still available for this new obligation?

If this sounds a bit familiar, we wondered in an earlier blog entry if the durational limits of the Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act (eff. 3.1.12) apply to one spouse, or to both when they trade alimony places. As in, if the presumed duration is 7 years, and halfway through, the alimony obligation shifts, does the clock re-set, or does the second payor get credit for the former payor’s time served?

In an era of 2 partner family income predominance, this is not a far-fetched scenario — and now we have to worry about deductibility, too.

What do you think?

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


alimony child support facilitated negotiations divorce mediation med/arb Levine Dispute Resolutions Cohabitation lawyer-attended mediation Chouteau Levine mediator fraud lawyer LDRC divorce mediator Levine Dispute Resolution Divorce resolve disputes divorce agreement divorce judgment mediations alimony statute self-adjusting alimony high-risk methodology Matrimonial Arbitration family law arbitrators Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC The Seven Sins of Alimony COLA Uniform Arbitration Act traditional negotiations divorce and family law mediators family law mediation support orders pre-ARA alimony how baseball arbitration works Boston dispute resolution Obamacare Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act Baseball mediation divorce mediations Major League Baseball Arbitration special master arbitrators disputes divorce mediators Massachusetts divorce litigation Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly MLB labor agreement Baseball Arbitration conciliation divorce lawyers divorce arbitrator Same Sex Marriage Family Law Arbitration lawyers Self-adjusting alimony orders Levine Dispute Resolution Center mediators family mediation Massachusetts alimony and child support Massachusetts divorce lawyers Alimony Reform Act alimony reform legislation med-arb IRC §2704 divorce arbitration Massachusetts divorce mediators family law DOMA General term alimony Massachusetts alimony rehabilitative alimony divorce process Defense of Marriage Act Baseball Players alimony law SJC Child Support Guidelines litigation arbitrator family law arbitrator health insurance separation alimony orders divorced annulment Massachusetts lawyers family and probate law disputes medical benefits divorce arbitrators divorce and family law arbitration health coverage Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth Divorce Agreements private dispute resolution family support