Divorce Mediation Blog

Spousal Medical Insurance After Divorce: A Priority

Wednesday, August 08, 2012

Many, many years after Massachusetts’ (pre-Romney) groundbreaking effort to provide medical insurance for non-employee former spouses beyond the rights provided by the federal COBRA laws, we remain the most advanced state in this regard; but not without our own continuing uncertainties. In the most general terms, COBRA allows a divorced heterosexual person (don’t forget the Defense of Marriage Act: it is, regrettably, still national law) to buy continuing health coverage through the other spouse’s employer plan for a period of up to three years post-divorce only, at a cost of 102% of the cost of an individual plan member. Massachusetts, by contrast, offers an indefinite period of coverage at no cost beyond that required for the employee spouse to cover himself and children under a family plan without a fixed limitation of years; and when child coverage is no longer necessary, the non-employee may still have coverage on the family plan if the employee has not remarried, without a time limit. If the employee spouse marries another person, the former spouse may still be covered at the cost of an individual employee, by use of a rider. The non-employee spouse loses these rights whenever she remarries.

Yet, when the law was enacted, it had a loophole that has not, to this day, been closed:  self-insurance.  The law is an insurance statute and not a generic healthcare provision, so employers who choose not to buy an insurance product for their employees, but instead pay defined medical costs themselves, are exempt for the law, even if the hire an insurance company to provide administrative services to help run their internal plan.  It is likely that self-insurance employers become “insured” for the law’s purposes if they buy “stop loss” insurance (that is, if costs go above a certain amount, an insurance company steps in to cover the excess – think catastrophic coverage for the employer), but this information difficult to ascertain, uncertain and costly for the consumer to enforce.

There also remains a lack of clarity about what is a Massachusetts employer for purposes of the law. Many companies who do business here, but are based elsewhere, continue to contend that their obligations are covered by the (lack of) law to trump or augment COBRA in their home state. There is also uncertainty about what happens to the non-employee former spouse’s coverage if the employee changes jobs or moves out of state. To make matters more difficult, many company human resource departments appear, genuinely or not, to be hearing about our laws for the first time when counsel or client inquires.

For all of these reasons, it is a priority in any divorce action for the parties to gain and share the greatest level information possible about the employee spouse’s coverage, at the earliest time available in the divorce process. This information is all spelled out somewhere in paper or digital format; and if it is left to be treated as a last minute detail of divorce negotiation, or as one that is informed by casual representations only, disastrous and unanticipated consequences can occur. Sometimes, significant time must be invested in communicating with the employer about its state law obligations before they will be acknowledged and honored. In some cases, litigation, or the suggestion of same, may even be necessary.

As always, knowing is essential; and time is an ally.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


special master family mediation Chouteau Levine disputes Massachusetts divorce lawyers family law Massachusetts divorce mediators LDRC dispute resolution separation Child Support Guidelines med/arb arbitrator divorce mediators pre-ARA alimony med-arb litigation Massachusetts alimony family law arbitrators alimony statute divorce process resolve disputes Uniform Arbitration Act Alimony Reform Act health insurance Baseball Arbitration Cohabitation high-risk methodology Levine Dispute Resolution arbitration General term alimony family law mediation Family Law Arbitration Divorce Agreements divorce agreement COLA divorce and family law mediators Self-adjusting alimony orders arbitrators mediation divorce judgment divorce arbitration facilitated negotiations alimony law divorce litigation divorce mediator MLB labor agreement Boston divorced fraud Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act annulment Obamacare divorce arbitrator divorce lawyers self-adjusting alimony mediations alimony orders lawyer-attended mediation Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly mediators Baseball Players DOMA Levine Dispute Resolution Center alimony reform legislation divorce and family law family and probate law disputes Divorce divorce arbitrators alimony Same Sex Marriage lawyer Defense of Marriage Act family law arbitrator traditional negotiations divorce mediation how baseball arbitration works medical benefits child support private dispute resolution Matrimonial Arbitration Massachusetts lawyers Massachusetts health coverage SJC Levine Dispute Resolutions support orders lawyers The Seven Sins of Alimony family support conciliation IRC §2704 Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC Major League Baseball Arbitration divorce mediations rehabilitative alimony Baseball mediator Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth Massachusetts alimony and child support