781.708.4445

wmlevine@levinedisputeresolution.com

Divorce Mediation Blog

Spousal Medical Insurance After Divorce: A Priority

Wednesday, August 08, 2012

Many, many years after Massachusetts’ (pre-Romney) groundbreaking effort to provide medical insurance for non-employee former spouses beyond the rights provided by the federal COBRA laws, we remain the most advanced state in this regard; but not without our own continuing uncertainties. In the most general terms, COBRA allows a divorced heterosexual person (don’t forget the Defense of Marriage Act: it is, regrettably, still national law) to buy continuing health coverage through the other spouse’s employer plan for a period of up to three years post-divorce only, at a cost of 102% of the cost of an individual plan member. Massachusetts, by contrast, offers an indefinite period of coverage at no cost beyond that required for the employee spouse to cover himself and children under a family plan without a fixed limitation of years; and when child coverage is no longer necessary, the non-employee may still have coverage on the family plan if the employee has not remarried, without a time limit. If the employee spouse marries another person, the former spouse may still be covered at the cost of an individual employee, by use of a rider. The non-employee spouse loses these rights whenever she remarries.

Yet, when the law was enacted, it had a loophole that has not, to this day, been closed:  self-insurance.  The law is an insurance statute and not a generic healthcare provision, so employers who choose not to buy an insurance product for their employees, but instead pay defined medical costs themselves, are exempt for the law, even if the hire an insurance company to provide administrative services to help run their internal plan.  It is likely that self-insurance employers become “insured” for the law’s purposes if they buy “stop loss” insurance (that is, if costs go above a certain amount, an insurance company steps in to cover the excess – think catastrophic coverage for the employer), but this information difficult to ascertain, uncertain and costly for the consumer to enforce.

There also remains a lack of clarity about what is a Massachusetts employer for purposes of the law. Many companies who do business here, but are based elsewhere, continue to contend that their obligations are covered by the (lack of) law to trump or augment COBRA in their home state. There is also uncertainty about what happens to the non-employee former spouse’s coverage if the employee changes jobs or moves out of state. To make matters more difficult, many company human resource departments appear, genuinely or not, to be hearing about our laws for the first time when counsel or client inquires.

For all of these reasons, it is a priority in any divorce action for the parties to gain and share the greatest level information possible about the employee spouse’s coverage, at the earliest time available in the divorce process. This information is all spelled out somewhere in paper or digital format; and if it is left to be treated as a last minute detail of divorce negotiation, or as one that is informed by casual representations only, disastrous and unanticipated consequences can occur. Sometimes, significant time must be invested in communicating with the employer about its state law obligations before they will be acknowledged and honored. In some cases, litigation, or the suggestion of same, may even be necessary.

As always, knowing is essential; and time is an ally.



Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:



Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles


recent posts


tags

divorce and family law mediators Family Law Arbitration Divorce Agreements Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth mediator disputes support orders Defense of Marriage Act family support Self-adjusting alimony orders Massachusetts divorce lawyers med/arb Massachusetts alimony and child support Levine Dispute Resolution self-adjusting alimony SJC dispute resolution alimony reform legislation Baseball Players high-risk methodology Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act Baseball Arbitration health coverage Alimony Reform Act fraud Cohabitation lawyer divorce and family law medical benefits conciliation divorce litigation Massachusetts lawyers lawyers divorce arbitrators divorced The Seven Sins of Alimony Chouteau Levine arbitrator divorce process Boston Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC Obamacare divorce lawyers General term alimony alimony orders resolve disputes DOMA facilitated negotiations mediators family mediation alimony health insurance family law mediation rehabilitative alimony divorce mediators family law arbitrators family law Massachusetts divorce mediators separation divorce arbitration mediation COLA Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly divorce arbitrator divorce judgment arbitration private dispute resolution how baseball arbitration works lawyer-attended mediation IRC §2704 arbitrators Child Support Guidelines Matrimonial Arbitration med-arb traditional negotiations divorce mediation special master alimony law litigation LDRC divorce mediations Massachusetts Levine Dispute Resolutions divorce agreement Divorce mediations MLB labor agreement divorce mediator Major League Baseball Arbitration Massachusetts alimony Levine Dispute Resolution Center family law arbitrator pre-ARA alimony child support Baseball Same Sex Marriage annulment alimony statute Uniform Arbitration Act family and probate law disputes