781.708.4445

wmlevine@levinedisputeresolution.com

Divorce Mediation Blog

“Self-Modifying” Divorce Judgments: The Appeals Court Feels Strongly Both Ways. Hassey v. Hassey, Part One

Tuesday, August 05, 2014

In the recent case of Hassey v. Hassey, the Appeals Court reversed Judge Jeffrey A. Abber of the Essex Probate and Family Court, in part, for ordering alimony as a percentage of the husband’s ongoing income, rather than as a flat sum. They justices ruled that the judge had pre-decreed a modification of his own judgment based on facts and circumstances that had not yet changed. Thus, they reasoned, he deprived the husband of the right to resist such a change based on the host of other material and substantial changes that might occur in the interim, in the context of a complaint for modification.

This part of the decision was not surprising. The principle enunciated arises from long-standing precedent, with only 2 previous reported and relatively narrow appellate exceptions. Yet, curiously, the Appeals Court did not vacate that part of the judgment that determined that alimony shall terminate upon the wife’s cohabitation. Before the Alimony Reform Act of 2011 (eff. 3.1.12), this provision would have been absolutely contrary to law. Now, cohabitation is a statutorily recognized basis for change.

But the statute does not dictate the kind or extent of change. The law provides that if cohabitation occurs within the definition provided in the act, then the court shall do something. However, it requires the modifying judge to calibrate the remedy to the circumstances that exist at the time of the cohabitation. A judge may reduce, suspend or terminate alimony. So, when the Hassey judgment decreed that the wife’s cohabitation would automatically terminate alimony, the wife was denied the right, assured by the Alimony Reform Act, to resist termination based on the host of other material and substantial changes that might occur in the interim, in the context of a complaint for modification.

Did the wife fail to perfect this as an issue on appeal, relieving the court of an obligation to address it? We cannot know from the text of the decision. Without doubt, though, the decision is inconsistent, and the cause of consistency and predictability, its victim.

Next: Needs versus 30-35% in Section 53(b): In Its First Foray, Has the Appeals Court Legislated? Hassey v. Hassey, Part Two



Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:



Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles


recent posts


tags

special master arbitrator traditional negotiations facilitated negotiations Baseball Players IRC §2704 Massachusetts alimony and child support Divorce rehabilitative alimony how baseball arbitration works Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC LDRC mediator Child Support Guidelines alimony orders Levine Dispute Resolution Center The Seven Sins of Alimony divorce mediators divorce agreement Chouteau Levine divorce lawyers high-risk methodology med/arb lawyer-attended mediation divorce mediator DOMA Baseball health coverage family law family mediation Matrimonial Arbitration divorce judgment Alimony Reform Act Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly divorce process family law mediation separation mediations child support arbitrators self-adjusting alimony mediators Major League Baseball Arbitration lawyers litigation family law arbitrators family and probate law disputes Uniform Arbitration Act family support divorced divorce and family law mediators Massachusetts lawyers Cohabitation divorce mediations Self-adjusting alimony orders SJC health insurance Boston Massachusetts alimony Massachusetts divorce lawyers COLA annulment divorce mediation pre-ARA alimony med-arb alimony statute Baseball Arbitration alimony law conciliation medical benefits dispute resolution family law arbitrator lawyer divorce litigation resolve disputes alimony Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth Defense of Marriage Act private dispute resolution alimony reform legislation mediation Levine Dispute Resolutions Massachusetts Levine Dispute Resolution divorce arbitrators disputes fraud divorce arbitrator Same Sex Marriage divorce and family law MLB labor agreement Divorce Agreements Massachusetts divorce mediators Obamacare Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act divorce arbitration General term alimony Family Law Arbitration support orders arbitration