Divorce Mediation Blog

“Self-Modifying” Divorce Judgments: The Appeals Court Feels Strongly Both Ways. Hassey v. Hassey, Part One

Tuesday, August 05, 2014

In the recent case of Hassey v. Hassey, the Appeals Court reversed Judge Jeffrey A. Abber of the Essex Probate and Family Court, in part, for ordering alimony as a percentage of the husband’s ongoing income, rather than as a flat sum. They justices ruled that the judge had pre-decreed a modification of his own judgment based on facts and circumstances that had not yet changed. Thus, they reasoned, he deprived the husband of the right to resist such a change based on the host of other material and substantial changes that might occur in the interim, in the context of a complaint for modification.

This part of the decision was not surprising. The principle enunciated arises from long-standing precedent, with only 2 previous reported and relatively narrow appellate exceptions. Yet, curiously, the Appeals Court did not vacate that part of the judgment that determined that alimony shall terminate upon the wife’s cohabitation. Before the Alimony Reform Act of 2011 (eff. 3.1.12), this provision would have been absolutely contrary to law. Now, cohabitation is a statutorily recognized basis for change.

But the statute does not dictate the kind or extent of change. The law provides that if cohabitation occurs within the definition provided in the act, then the court shall do something. However, it requires the modifying judge to calibrate the remedy to the circumstances that exist at the time of the cohabitation. A judge may reduce, suspend or terminate alimony. So, when the Hassey judgment decreed that the wife’s cohabitation would automatically terminate alimony, the wife was denied the right, assured by the Alimony Reform Act, to resist termination based on the host of other material and substantial changes that might occur in the interim, in the context of a complaint for modification.

Did the wife fail to perfect this as an issue on appeal, relieving the court of an obligation to address it? We cannot know from the text of the decision. Without doubt, though, the decision is inconsistent, and the cause of consistency and predictability, its victim.

Next: Needs versus 30-35% in Section 53(b): In Its First Foray, Has the Appeals Court Legislated? Hassey v. Hassey, Part Two

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


Same Sex Marriage Boston divorce process Major League Baseball Arbitration Child Support Guidelines LDRC family law mediation Massachusetts divorce mediators med-arb arbitrators General term alimony private dispute resolution Massachusetts alimony Matrimonial Arbitration Levine Dispute Resolution Center litigation Cohabitation Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly DOMA med/arb The Seven Sins of Alimony annulment rehabilitative alimony Family Law Arbitration family mediation Baseball Players Alimony Reform Act SJC Chouteau Levine mediator family and probate law disputes how baseball arbitration works Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth self-adjusting alimony divorce and family law alimony Massachusetts divorce lawyers Defense of Marriage Act Massachusetts alimony and child support high-risk methodology divorce agreement resolve disputes Massachusetts lawyers divorce arbitrator Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act medical benefits Massachusetts divorce and family law mediators alimony statute divorced lawyers Uniform Arbitration Act divorce mediation IRC §2704 mediations fraud Divorce traditional negotiations Levine Dispute Resolution support orders pre-ARA alimony Obamacare mediators divorce litigation divorce arbitrators Levine Dispute Resolutions separation dispute resolution MLB labor agreement alimony reform legislation health insurance COLA Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC alimony orders health coverage child support lawyer-attended mediation family support Baseball Arbitration Baseball divorce judgment disputes lawyer special master family law arbitrator arbitration Divorce Agreements family law facilitated negotiations family law arbitrators Self-adjusting alimony orders alimony law divorce mediations arbitrator divorce mediators mediation divorce lawyers conciliation divorce mediator divorce arbitration