781.708.4445

wmlevine@levinedisputeresolution.com

Divorce Mediation Blog

“Self-Modifying” Divorce Judgments: The Appeals Court Feels Strongly Both Ways. Hassey v. Hassey, Part One

Tuesday, August 05, 2014

In the recent case of Hassey v. Hassey, the Appeals Court reversed Judge Jeffrey A. Abber of the Essex Probate and Family Court, in part, for ordering alimony as a percentage of the husband’s ongoing income, rather than as a flat sum. They justices ruled that the judge had pre-decreed a modification of his own judgment based on facts and circumstances that had not yet changed. Thus, they reasoned, he deprived the husband of the right to resist such a change based on the host of other material and substantial changes that might occur in the interim, in the context of a complaint for modification.

This part of the decision was not surprising. The principle enunciated arises from long-standing precedent, with only 2 previous reported and relatively narrow appellate exceptions. Yet, curiously, the Appeals Court did not vacate that part of the judgment that determined that alimony shall terminate upon the wife’s cohabitation. Before the Alimony Reform Act of 2011 (eff. 3.1.12), this provision would have been absolutely contrary to law. Now, cohabitation is a statutorily recognized basis for change.

But the statute does not dictate the kind or extent of change. The law provides that if cohabitation occurs within the definition provided in the act, then the court shall do something. However, it requires the modifying judge to calibrate the remedy to the circumstances that exist at the time of the cohabitation. A judge may reduce, suspend or terminate alimony. So, when the Hassey judgment decreed that the wife’s cohabitation would automatically terminate alimony, the wife was denied the right, assured by the Alimony Reform Act, to resist termination based on the host of other material and substantial changes that might occur in the interim, in the context of a complaint for modification.

Did the wife fail to perfect this as an issue on appeal, relieving the court of an obligation to address it? We cannot know from the text of the decision. Without doubt, though, the decision is inconsistent, and the cause of consistency and predictability, its victim.

Next: Needs versus 30-35% in Section 53(b): In Its First Foray, Has the Appeals Court Legislated? Hassey v. Hassey, Part Two



Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:



Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles


recent posts


tags

Massachusetts divorce mediators Levine Dispute Resolution arbitrators arbitrator pre-ARA alimony divorce judgment Uniform Arbitration Act family law Massachusetts traditional negotiations Same Sex Marriage high-risk methodology SJC General term alimony mediations Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth Obamacare dispute resolution Matrimonial Arbitration fraud private dispute resolution divorce process Child Support Guidelines family law mediation divorce mediators medical benefits Defense of Marriage Act lawyers separation how baseball arbitration works support orders LDRC mediators divorce lawyers health coverage family law arbitrators health insurance lawyer-attended mediation family mediation Family Law Arbitration annulment Levine Dispute Resolution Center Major League Baseball Arbitration Cohabitation family and probate law disputes rehabilitative alimony med-arb divorce and family law mediators divorce arbitrator Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Levine Dispute Resolutions Divorce Agreements divorce mediation divorce mediations Baseball divorce arbitration divorced divorce arbitrators DOMA divorce litigation family law arbitrator The Seven Sins of Alimony Baseball Players Baseball Arbitration lawyer divorce agreement special master litigation med/arb IRC §2704 facilitated negotiations alimony law child support mediator Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act Boston alimony orders family support alimony statute alimony Divorce Massachusetts lawyers Chouteau Levine divorce mediator MLB labor agreement resolve disputes Alimony Reform Act arbitration disputes Massachusetts alimony and child support divorce and family law Massachusetts divorce lawyers mediation COLA conciliation Massachusetts alimony self-adjusting alimony Self-adjusting alimony orders Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC alimony reform legislation