Divorce Mediation Blog

Same Sex Marriage after Obama-Romney

Wednesday, December 19, 2012

The 2012 elections are behind us, thank goodness.

We will remember them for the ebb and flow of the presidential confrontation between President Obama and Mitt Romney, and its attendant drama, both media-manufactured and real. But, in the long run, we wonder if the exercise in direct democracy that played out in the decisions of four states on the matter of marriage equality will outweigh the important consequences of the this election cycle at the “top of the ticket”.

After the Massachusetts landmark 2003 Supreme Judicial Court decision to permit same sex marriage, the acts of five other supreme courts or legislatures followed suit over time. Sometimes these actions were controversial. Interests opposed to the SJC’s action attempted to block the decision by legislative action here, before its May 2004 effective date. In Iowa, the voters purged its Supreme Court justices blamed for the legalization decision. When legislatures acted in New York, Vermont and Washington, D.C., the opposition reaction was more muted. After all, the action was legislative and not the result of “judicial activism”.

November 2012 was different. It was direct democracy in action. In these states, the populations led the leaders. In Maine, Washington State and Maryland, the voters seized the initiative and extended marriage affirmatively to gay and lesbian couples by referendum. Remarkable actions all, but standing alone, they might still be marginalized as coastal elitism. But Minnesota stands alone. For the first time, a state in the middle of the country, by statewide vote, declined to ban gay marriage, after years of other states doing exactly that.

“Suddenly”, twenty per cent of the states embrace marriage equity. Was all of this simply a product of blue states in a presidential turnout year being encouraged by Vice-President Biden’s “accidental” outing of the administration’s support of marriage equality – followed by the President’s public affirmance? Or was a cresting wave hitting the social fabric of the country? The answer may be “both of the above”, but if history is a guide, November 2012 will be remembered as the date that hastened the end of official discrimination against gays and lesbians.

With a plateful of economic and foreign policy crises, and maybe even some long overdue attention to our ongoing national gun/mental health negligence, it cannot be in the forefront, but can the end of federal discrimination, festering in Defense of Marriage Act, survive much longer? With the Supreme Court accepting one Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) challenge, and the marriage equity case from California, for review this term, we cannot know if the trend will be encouraged or slowed. But, in the end, the painful and gradual, but continuing trend of civic emancipation continues: and November 2012 will take a place of significance in that history.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


divorce mediator facilitated negotiations Chouteau Levine DOMA IRC §2704 Boston mediations family and probate law disputes separation The Seven Sins of Alimony med-arb lawyer-attended mediation fraud Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act Child Support Guidelines divorce judgment arbitration divorce litigation Same Sex Marriage litigation Massachusetts mediators Family Law Arbitration divorce process Obamacare dispute resolution divorce arbitration divorce arbitrator Uniform Arbitration Act medical benefits resolve disputes alimony reform legislation child support Cohabitation pre-ARA alimony alimony orders traditional negotiations support orders Levine Dispute Resolutions alimony Massachusetts divorce mediators family support divorce mediations Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth mediation Divorce General term alimony SJC alimony law disputes divorce mediation Major League Baseball Arbitration rehabilitative alimony Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC Defense of Marriage Act LDRC health coverage Levine Dispute Resolution Center special master arbitrator divorce mediators med/arb family law arbitrators arbitrators Massachusetts divorce lawyers lawyers mediator family law arbitrator divorce and family law mediators family law how baseball arbitration works divorce and family law Massachusetts lawyers Baseball Arbitration divorce arbitrators family mediation Divorce Agreements alimony statute private dispute resolution Alimony Reform Act Massachusetts alimony and child support self-adjusting alimony high-risk methodology Massachusetts alimony Self-adjusting alimony orders Matrimonial Arbitration divorce agreement MLB labor agreement Baseball Players Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Levine Dispute Resolution conciliation family law mediation health insurance divorced COLA Baseball annulment lawyer divorce lawyers