Divorce Mediation Blog

Rule 2704 Opposition - Talking Points

Wednesday, November 23, 2016

Recently, we blogged about the Internal Revenue Service proposed new section 2704 rules, which if enacted in their current form would create a new minimum value for businesses subject to intra-family transactions, and essentially eliminate discounts for marketability in that context.

Many in the business appraisal and estate planning communities are up in arms, and they mobilizing to defeat this IRS move, before it becomes entrenched.

While keeping an eye on unfolding commentary, we ran across “talking points” suggested by the American Society of Appraisers for use in opposing the new regulations. In summary they are:

  1. By increasing the value of fractional interests in family businesses, the new rules would result in an "stealth" tax increase of 25-50% in estate and gift taxes.
  2. By treating intra-family actors as "known parties", rather than hypothetical buyers and sellers, the rule would disregard the reality that a fractional interest is in fact, fractional, and not controlling, reducing its economic value.
  3. The notion that families will always work in concert has been rejected previously by the United States Supreme Court.
  4. The suggestion that intra-family transfers should be treated differently than those between unrelated parties is unsupported by any public reasoning advanced by the IRS.
  5. The proposed rule may put IRS regulations on a collision course with various state laws which recognize applicability of marketability discounts.
  6. This new approach will cause family-owned businesses to delay capital investment, and inhibit new hiring, as they preserve cash for pain increased taxes.

As divorce mediators and arbitrators, a former Probate judge, and litigators-in-recovery, we are used to this approach from Bernier, in the divorce context, but in estate and gift taxation?

What do you think?

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


divorce lawyers Divorce Agreements Defense of Marriage Act family law Massachusetts divorce and family law Massachusetts alimony health insurance annulment Self-adjusting alimony orders MLB labor agreement Boston Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth high-risk methodology resolve disputes divorced Obamacare Massachusetts divorce mediators Uniform Arbitration Act divorce judgment family and probate law disputes private dispute resolution Massachusetts lawyers Alimony Reform Act SJC rehabilitative alimony pre-ARA alimony special master Chouteau Levine LDRC Divorce facilitated negotiations traditional negotiations alimony law alimony statute arbitrator arbitration Levine Dispute Resolutions lawyers med-arb Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act Same Sex Marriage how baseball arbitration works conciliation lawyer Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Baseball Arbitration IRC §2704 COLA support orders Massachusetts divorce lawyers The Seven Sins of Alimony Family Law Arbitration health coverage Massachusetts alimony and child support divorce arbitrators self-adjusting alimony divorce arbitration divorce and family law mediators alimony family law arbitrators Levine Dispute Resolution family law mediation arbitrators Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC Major League Baseball Arbitration mediator Levine Dispute Resolution Center Child Support Guidelines General term alimony Baseball mediators mediation mediations fraud family law arbitrator divorce arbitrator med/arb alimony reform legislation divorce mediations family mediation medical benefits divorce mediation litigation Matrimonial Arbitration dispute resolution lawyer-attended mediation divorce mediators divorce mediator Cohabitation child support divorce process DOMA divorce agreement separation Baseball Players family support alimony orders divorce litigation disputes