Divorce Mediation Blog

Rule 2704 Opposition - Talking Points

Wednesday, November 23, 2016

Recently, we blogged about the Internal Revenue Service proposed new section 2704 rules, which if enacted in their current form would create a new minimum value for businesses subject to intra-family transactions, and essentially eliminate discounts for marketability in that context.

Many in the business appraisal and estate planning communities are up in arms, and they mobilizing to defeat this IRS move, before it becomes entrenched.

While keeping an eye on unfolding commentary, we ran across “talking points” suggested by the American Society of Appraisers for use in opposing the new regulations. In summary they are:

  1. By increasing the value of fractional interests in family businesses, the new rules would result in an "stealth" tax increase of 25-50% in estate and gift taxes.
  2. By treating intra-family actors as "known parties", rather than hypothetical buyers and sellers, the rule would disregard the reality that a fractional interest is in fact, fractional, and not controlling, reducing its economic value.
  3. The notion that families will always work in concert has been rejected previously by the United States Supreme Court.
  4. The suggestion that intra-family transfers should be treated differently than those between unrelated parties is unsupported by any public reasoning advanced by the IRS.
  5. The proposed rule may put IRS regulations on a collision course with various state laws which recognize applicability of marketability discounts.
  6. This new approach will cause family-owned businesses to delay capital investment, and inhibit new hiring, as they preserve cash for pain increased taxes.

As divorce mediators and arbitrators, a former Probate judge, and litigators-in-recovery, we are used to this approach from Bernier, in the divorce context, but in estate and gift taxation?

What do you think?

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


resolve disputes arbitrators family and probate law disputes Defense of Marriage Act conciliation health coverage Levine Dispute Resolution Center Family Law Arbitration Levine Dispute Resolutions Same Sex Marriage high-risk methodology lawyers divorce lawyers divorce mediator divorce mediations rehabilitative alimony divorce process family law mediation MLB labor agreement Child Support Guidelines family mediation SJC alimony reform legislation Chouteau Levine divorce arbitrators Levine Dispute Resolution Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly mediators family law arbitrator Massachusetts divorce mediators divorced COLA Self-adjusting alimony orders alimony law Alimony Reform Act self-adjusting alimony family law Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act The Seven Sins of Alimony IRC §2704 arbitrator Baseball Arbitration family law arbitrators alimony orders alimony statute health insurance Major League Baseball Arbitration mediation facilitated negotiations mediations Baseball Players private dispute resolution special master Divorce Massachusetts divorce lawyers Baseball separation pre-ARA alimony Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC divorce and family law divorce mediation divorce mediators Massachusetts lawyers LDRC dispute resolution family support Divorce Agreements divorce judgment divorce litigation Cohabitation litigation med-arb traditional negotiations medical benefits General term alimony Massachusetts alimony and child support Massachusetts alimony divorce and family law mediators lawyer-attended mediation divorce agreement support orders divorce arbitrator Massachusetts DOMA lawyer Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth child support Uniform Arbitration Act med/arb Matrimonial Arbitration how baseball arbitration works arbitration fraud annulment Obamacare alimony disputes divorce arbitration mediator Boston