Divorce Mediation Blog

Rule 2704 Opposition - Talking Points

Wednesday, November 23, 2016

Recently, we blogged about the Internal Revenue Service proposed new section 2704 rules, which if enacted in their current form would create a new minimum value for businesses subject to intra-family transactions, and essentially eliminate discounts for marketability in that context.

Many in the business appraisal and estate planning communities are up in arms, and they mobilizing to defeat this IRS move, before it becomes entrenched.

While keeping an eye on unfolding commentary, we ran across “talking points” suggested by the American Society of Appraisers for use in opposing the new regulations. In summary they are:

  1. By increasing the value of fractional interests in family businesses, the new rules would result in an "stealth" tax increase of 25-50% in estate and gift taxes.
  2. By treating intra-family actors as "known parties", rather than hypothetical buyers and sellers, the rule would disregard the reality that a fractional interest is in fact, fractional, and not controlling, reducing its economic value.
  3. The notion that families will always work in concert has been rejected previously by the United States Supreme Court.
  4. The suggestion that intra-family transfers should be treated differently than those between unrelated parties is unsupported by any public reasoning advanced by the IRS.
  5. The proposed rule may put IRS regulations on a collision course with various state laws which recognize applicability of marketability discounts.
  6. This new approach will cause family-owned businesses to delay capital investment, and inhibit new hiring, as they preserve cash for pain increased taxes.

As divorce mediators and arbitrators, a former Probate judge, and litigators-in-recovery, we are used to this approach from Bernier, in the divorce context, but in estate and gift taxation?

What do you think?

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


mediation mediators Baseball Baseball Arbitration divorce litigation divorced Uniform Arbitration Act fraud self-adjusting alimony Boston Levine Dispute Resolutions traditional negotiations how baseball arbitration works litigation support orders Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC divorce and family law mediators high-risk methodology Levine Dispute Resolution Chouteau Levine divorce arbitration mediator divorce mediator General term alimony divorce process family mediation family law arbitrator Same Sex Marriage dispute resolution alimony statute alimony Family Law Arbitration Massachusetts alimony Divorce LDRC COLA facilitated negotiations medical benefits Divorce Agreements arbitration family law arbitrators Massachusetts private dispute resolution Obamacare Child Support Guidelines health insurance Massachusetts divorce mediators Alimony Reform Act divorce mediations divorce judgment Levine Dispute Resolution Center SJC alimony law Massachusetts lawyers lawyer annulment rehabilitative alimony med-arb divorce and family law MLB labor agreement separation conciliation alimony orders divorce arbitrators Baseball Players arbitrator Massachusetts divorce lawyers disputes Self-adjusting alimony orders alimony reform legislation health coverage Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth family law mediation divorce lawyers family support pre-ARA alimony Cohabitation lawyers divorce agreement Defense of Marriage Act Matrimonial Arbitration divorce mediators divorce mediation family law resolve disputes lawyer-attended mediation special master DOMA Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly med/arb arbitrators IRC §2704 mediations divorce arbitrator The Seven Sins of Alimony Massachusetts alimony and child support Major League Baseball Arbitration child support family and probate law disputes