Divorce Mediation Blog

Rule 2704 Opposition - Talking Points

Wednesday, November 23, 2016

Recently, we blogged about the Internal Revenue Service proposed new section 2704 rules, which if enacted in their current form would create a new minimum value for businesses subject to intra-family transactions, and essentially eliminate discounts for marketability in that context.

Many in the business appraisal and estate planning communities are up in arms, and they mobilizing to defeat this IRS move, before it becomes entrenched.

While keeping an eye on unfolding commentary, we ran across “talking points” suggested by the American Society of Appraisers for use in opposing the new regulations. In summary they are:

  1. By increasing the value of fractional interests in family businesses, the new rules would result in an "stealth" tax increase of 25-50% in estate and gift taxes.
  2. By treating intra-family actors as "known parties", rather than hypothetical buyers and sellers, the rule would disregard the reality that a fractional interest is in fact, fractional, and not controlling, reducing its economic value.
  3. The notion that families will always work in concert has been rejected previously by the United States Supreme Court.
  4. The suggestion that intra-family transfers should be treated differently than those between unrelated parties is unsupported by any public reasoning advanced by the IRS.
  5. The proposed rule may put IRS regulations on a collision course with various state laws which recognize applicability of marketability discounts.
  6. This new approach will cause family-owned businesses to delay capital investment, and inhibit new hiring, as they preserve cash for pain increased taxes.

As divorce mediators and arbitrators, a former Probate judge, and litigators-in-recovery, we are used to this approach from Bernier, in the divorce context, but in estate and gift taxation?

What do you think?

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


divorce and family law mediators divorce arbitrators Uniform Arbitration Act Levine Dispute Resolution special master how baseball arbitration works Alimony Reform Act Self-adjusting alimony orders family and probate law disputes child support alimony orders divorce agreement medical benefits Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth Cohabitation divorce and family law Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC Defense of Marriage Act divorce mediators Baseball Players lawyer-attended mediation med/arb Divorce IRC §2704 Massachusetts divorce lawyers arbitrator family support resolve disputes Massachusetts divorce lawyers alimony reform legislation divorce mediator Obamacare COLA family law mediation DOMA divorce arbitrator private dispute resolution self-adjusting alimony divorced lawyers med-arb divorce litigation General term alimony alimony statute LDRC Divorce Agreements Chouteau Levine lawyer Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act conciliation traditional negotiations mediator arbitration Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly mediation disputes fraud separation arbitrators MLB labor agreement Major League Baseball Arbitration divorce mediations family law arbitrator Massachusetts divorce mediators SJC Levine Dispute Resolutions divorce mediation family law arbitrators mediations health coverage Massachusetts alimony and child support litigation high-risk methodology Massachusetts alimony Matrimonial Arbitration The Seven Sins of Alimony divorce arbitration health insurance Family Law Arbitration annulment facilitated negotiations alimony dispute resolution Baseball Arbitration mediators Boston Levine Dispute Resolution Center divorce process rehabilitative alimony Baseball support orders Same Sex Marriage Massachusetts lawyers Child Support Guidelines pre-ARA alimony alimony law family law divorce judgment family mediation