Divorce Mediation Blog

Rule 2704 Opposition - Talking Points

Wednesday, November 23, 2016

Recently, we blogged about the Internal Revenue Service proposed new section 2704 rules, which if enacted in their current form would create a new minimum value for businesses subject to intra-family transactions, and essentially eliminate discounts for marketability in that context.

Many in the business appraisal and estate planning communities are up in arms, and they mobilizing to defeat this IRS move, before it becomes entrenched.

While keeping an eye on unfolding commentary, we ran across “talking points” suggested by the American Society of Appraisers for use in opposing the new regulations. In summary they are:

  1. By increasing the value of fractional interests in family businesses, the new rules would result in an "stealth" tax increase of 25-50% in estate and gift taxes.
  2. By treating intra-family actors as "known parties", rather than hypothetical buyers and sellers, the rule would disregard the reality that a fractional interest is in fact, fractional, and not controlling, reducing its economic value.
  3. The notion that families will always work in concert has been rejected previously by the United States Supreme Court.
  4. The suggestion that intra-family transfers should be treated differently than those between unrelated parties is unsupported by any public reasoning advanced by the IRS.
  5. The proposed rule may put IRS regulations on a collision course with various state laws which recognize applicability of marketability discounts.
  6. This new approach will cause family-owned businesses to delay capital investment, and inhibit new hiring, as they preserve cash for pain increased taxes.

As divorce mediators and arbitrators, a former Probate judge, and litigators-in-recovery, we are used to this approach from Bernier, in the divorce context, but in estate and gift taxation?

What do you think?

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC facilitated negotiations alimony orders family mediation disputes Levine Dispute Resolutions pre-ARA alimony Divorce Agreements Uniform Arbitration Act Massachusetts lawyers Same Sex Marriage self-adjusting alimony SJC divorce arbitrator med/arb private dispute resolution Obamacare family law arbitrators divorce lawyers resolve disputes rehabilitative alimony health coverage lawyer-attended mediation Baseball Arbitration divorce mediator separation family and probate law disputes COLA med-arb family support Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act Massachusetts divorce lawyers Massachusetts divorce mediators Levine Dispute Resolution Center LDRC arbitration divorce and family law mediators mediators Alimony Reform Act family law mediation Chouteau Levine DOMA Family Law Arbitration Cohabitation divorce mediators support orders family law mediation divorce mediations divorce process divorce mediation how baseball arbitration works Massachusetts alimony and child support IRC §2704 dispute resolution Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth Matrimonial Arbitration lawyer Levine Dispute Resolution General term alimony health insurance Massachusetts alimony arbitrator Baseball Players conciliation child support traditional negotiations annulment Child Support Guidelines arbitrators divorce arbitration medical benefits special master alimony reform legislation Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Divorce lawyers mediations MLB labor agreement Baseball high-risk methodology alimony statute The Seven Sins of Alimony Massachusetts divorce agreement litigation alimony law family law arbitrator mediator divorce judgment alimony divorce and family law divorced fraud divorce litigation divorce arbitrators Boston Defense of Marriage Act Self-adjusting alimony orders Major League Baseball Arbitration