Divorce Mediation Blog

Proposed IRC §2704: Life Imitating Divorce?

Wednesday, October 12, 2016

We receive newsletters from several CPA firms, and they are often both informative and useful. Recently, they are aflame with comment on proposed IRC §2704, issued by the Internal Revenue Service on August 4th. Section 2704 would limit or eliminate the use of discounts for lack of control and lack of marketability for businesses being valued for estate and gift tax purposes: raising values and taxation on intergenerational transfers; and challenging estate planners in crafting tax avoidance/minimization strategies.

To accomplish this, we understand, the proposed rule includes minimum valuation rules (pro rata share of net worth); mandated disregard of ownership agreement and state law restrictions on stock transfers; and close scrutiny of personal goodwill, size and customer concentration concepts as value reducers. Valuation experts and estate planners promise complexity, uncertainty, litigation and general misery ahead. Among other things, critics opine that treating highly illiquid assets, as most small businesses are, as liquid, indulges a fiction that will undermine families’ ability to preserve businesses across generations.

In divorce world, we have seen this movie before. Since 2007’s Bernier v. Bernier, Massachusetts has led the way in severely limiting -- all but abolishing -- the application of discounts in valuation: rejecting the concept that divorce valuation is based on a hypothetical sale, with attendant discounting; and analogizing divorce, instead, to that of the involuntary purging of a shareholder from a going concern for which sale is not, in fact, contemplated. Fair value, rather than fair market value,now holds sway in most cases since business owners can’t dispose of their firms – quite apart from market realities – because they, and their families, depend on the businesses for their economic support. As with proposed §2704, the result of Bernier is higher valuations that often disregard business realities, to the consternation of business owners.

Policy is shaped by goals. In Bernier, the Supreme Judicial Court felt it unfair to reduce the non-owner’s sharing of value when continued operation is the value to the holder, and ruled accordingly. The government wants more tax receipts and the I.R.S., exists to collect it. No surprise there.

Is Bernier the chicken to the federal government’s egg?

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


family law arbitrators mediations lawyer Massachusetts alimony and child support Self-adjusting alimony orders divorce and family law mediators Family Law Arbitration COLA traditional negotiations divorce arbitration Divorce Agreements private dispute resolution med/arb Massachusetts divorce mediators support orders divorce mediators family law mediation family and probate law disputes Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC arbitrators mediators rehabilitative alimony dispute resolution Baseball health coverage divorce litigation Massachusetts lawyers how baseball arbitration works Baseball Arbitration Major League Baseball Arbitration family mediation resolve disputes Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth mediator divorce judgment MLB labor agreement alimony statute facilitated negotiations high-risk methodology Child Support Guidelines divorce arbitrator family support lawyers LDRC divorce mediations DOMA alimony law Chouteau Levine Uniform Arbitration Act divorce arbitrators annulment divorce lawyers Levine Dispute Resolution Center Alimony Reform Act disputes Massachusetts divorce lawyers lawyer-attended mediation med-arb IRC §2704 mediation Matrimonial Arbitration family law divorce agreement pre-ARA alimony Obamacare Cohabitation fraud child support The Seven Sins of Alimony Boston litigation General term alimony medical benefits divorce and family law self-adjusting alimony health insurance divorce mediation alimony divorce process Same Sex Marriage arbitrator family law arbitrator Levine Dispute Resolutions separation special master Massachusetts Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act Levine Dispute Resolution Massachusetts alimony conciliation Defense of Marriage Act arbitration Baseball Players alimony orders divorce mediator Divorce Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly divorced SJC alimony reform legislation