781.708.4445

wmlevine@levinedisputeresolution.com

Divorce Mediation Blog

Obama Care, Romney Care and Divorce in Massachusetts

Wednesday, April 18, 2012

During this time of national debate about the Affordable Health Care Act, now two years old and being challenged in the United States Supreme Court, we are receiving media messages about Massachusetts health care reform that occurred during the Romney administration here, and it relationship to the federal law. The former governor opposes in the federal law, whose close cousin is the Massachusetts precedent. Should divorcing spouses be especially concerned?

Whether you see Obama Care as government intrusion into Americans’ self-determination, a weak substitute for a single payer system or somewhere in between, the impact on divorcing spouses, as opposed to the population at large, is not especially concerning. That is because, unlike residents of most states, we in Massachusetts do not look to federal law predominantly for post-divorce health coverage protection. The states that do rely on federal law can only assure a divorced non-employee spouse of up to 36 months of continuing health coverage on the other spouse’s work plan. So-called COBRA coverage costs 102% of the cost to the group to cover an individual, and when the three years expired, the ex-spouse is expelled from any continuing family plan that continues to cover the employee-spouse and children.

Massachusetts state law, by contrast, requires health insurance carriers to provide continuing coverage for a non-employee ex-spouse on the continuing family plan at no additional cost, until the employee ex-spouse marries another person. Even then, as long as the non-employee spouse remains unmarried and has no other employer-provided health insurance available, the insurance company is still required to extend coverage to the non-employee spouse for an indefinite period of time, at the same cost of an individual employee in the particular plan. Massachusetts’ law favors coverage for divorced people, and it controls over federal law for Massachusetts residents. (There are holes in our statute such as the “self-insured exception”, but the number of persons affected by that is relatively small.) There is nothing in the challenge to Obama Care that should adversely affect the Massachusetts protection of divorced spouses.

One aspect of Obama Care that has caught substantial attention and that often concerns divorcing parents, though not a divorce provision of the law per se, is the extension of coverage for dependent children to age 26 on their parent’s employment health plan. But, this existed in our state law before Congress adopted it, and there is no reason to assume that any action by the Supreme Court to strike this down nationally would impact on our state law. The same is true about our state law, which prohibits health insurance carriers from refusing to cover a person with pre-existing health conditions. If the federal “individual mandate” falls, that could challenge the viability of mandatory insurance here for political, but not likely for constitutional reasons.

Divorcing couples have enough problems, as is. The machinations of national politics and the U.S. Supreme Court will probably not make things more difficult for divorcing couples in Massachusetts on the question of health care, than for any other non-divorcing citizen. One less thing to worry about, and that is a good thing.



Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:



Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles


recent posts


tags

Self-adjusting alimony orders divorce arbitration annulment lawyer alimony law conciliation Levine Dispute Resolution Center IRC §2704 divorce process divorce agreement Levine Dispute Resolutions LDRC divorce judgment arbitration divorce mediators child support DOMA family mediation divorce mediator Baseball Players Alimony Reform Act divorce arbitrator Levine Dispute Resolution Child Support Guidelines separation Baseball Family Law Arbitration Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC Chouteau Levine divorced pre-ARA alimony resolve disputes divorce arbitrators alimony orders arbitrator mediations litigation health insurance Uniform Arbitration Act mediators divorce litigation alimony statute mediator divorce and family law med-arb family law arbitrator mediation Major League Baseball Arbitration SJC divorce lawyers rehabilitative alimony divorce and family law mediators med/arb health coverage Boston Divorce Divorce Agreements Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Massachusetts divorce lawyers family law arbitrators lawyer-attended mediation family and probate law disputes medical benefits private dispute resolution self-adjusting alimony Matrimonial Arbitration The Seven Sins of Alimony divorce mediation Massachusetts Massachusetts divorce mediators alimony reform legislation Obamacare Cohabitation disputes Massachusetts alimony divorce mediations dispute resolution General term alimony Massachusetts alimony and child support support orders Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth traditional negotiations Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act Baseball Arbitration alimony family support arbitrators how baseball arbitration works lawyers family law fraud family law mediation Massachusetts lawyers facilitated negotiations Defense of Marriage Act special master MLB labor agreement high-risk methodology COLA Same Sex Marriage