Divorce Mediation Blog

O Pfannenstiehl! Part 3: No Wonder We’re All Confused (Be Careful What You Wish For)

Wednesday, October 28, 2015

In our last Pfannenstiehl entry, we looked at the internal inconsistency of the Massachusetts Appeals Court decision, in which it found that the husband’s trust interest was a divisible marital asset, and that he can access its fruits, freely. But, when the trustees called the trial court’s bluff by refusing to give the husband money to pay the wife under the divorce judgment mandate, the appellate court blinked, concluding that trial judge was wrong under the law in enforcing her judgment with the coercive powers of contempt.

Putting aside the impact on the public in future estate planning, family law negotiations, divorce mediations and litigations, what about Mrs. Pfannenstiehl?

We have to assume that the trial judge adopted the wife’s theory the case, or some proximate version of it. The extremity of the result left the husband with little option but to appeal, which he did. But, in a strange irony, while he lost again on the substantive questions, he may have won a larger battle, when the Appeals Court vacated the contempt judgment. There was no remand. There is no re-trial. There is no ready way for the trial judge to make her judgment more enforceable.

So, what does the wife have to show for her efforts, time and cost?

She is a judgment creditor, which gives her 20 years to collect, under Massachusetts law. She is denied the normal enforcement remedies for divorced persons: either a Probate and Family Court contempt, with its coercive powers and streamlined procedures; or, for people with surviving agreements, breach of contract actions in the District or Superior Courts (she has no contract).

Might she sue on the judgment in a supplementary process action in the Superior Court? If so, she would have to bide her time and determine when the husband might have the provable resources against which to proceed. But how will she know? There is no known divorce order to the husband to disclose future circumstances, as there might have been with an “if and when” assignment order. And, she would have to fund the action.

Could the wife obtain some form of equity relief through an action under M.G.L., 215 ch. §6, asking the Probate and Family Court to create a supplemental judgment that obliges the husband to disclose and/or pay over any sums that he ultimately receives from the trust? If so, his failure to disclose may give rise to contempt exposure.

We doubt that she could bring a complaint for modification, because nothing has changed! The trustees stopped distributing on the eve of divorce, and post-divorce, they are just doing more of the same.

Might she negotiate, or even mediate a solution with the husband? Maybe. To avoid the threat of the wife laying in wait to enforce the judgment, and to avoid paralyzing the trustees, the husband might drive down the price to an acceptable level, and then pay off the judgment agreeably (with the trustees’ acquiescence, of course).

Or maybe the SJC will take the case, with who knows what result.

We will take a guess on that, in later blog entry.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


mediation Boston divorce mediation health insurance Levine Dispute Resolution Center Chouteau Levine rehabilitative alimony lawyer Major League Baseball Arbitration Levine Dispute Resolutions health coverage how baseball arbitration works family and probate law disputes Massachusetts alimony med-arb annulment Self-adjusting alimony orders dispute resolution Divorce Agreements pre-ARA alimony DOMA Massachusetts divorce lawyers private dispute resolution COLA divorce agreement Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC mediator family law arbitrators lawyer-attended mediation alimony law Levine Dispute Resolution divorce and family law mediators alimony Massachusetts divorce mediators divorce arbitrators arbitration special master divorce litigation Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth family mediation divorced IRC §2704 The Seven Sins of Alimony divorce process Obamacare family law Baseball MLB labor agreement divorce arbitrator high-risk methodology alimony reform legislation traditional negotiations support orders divorce mediators child support family law arbitrator Defense of Marriage Act resolve disputes medical benefits mediators Massachusetts alimony and child support fraud arbitrator divorce and family law divorce arbitration Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act disputes arbitrators Matrimonial Arbitration Child Support Guidelines Alimony Reform Act conciliation self-adjusting alimony family support litigation alimony statute Divorce family law mediation mediations Massachusetts divorce lawyers Baseball Players divorce mediations divorce mediator Baseball Arbitration Cohabitation SJC General term alimony Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly separation divorce judgment Same Sex Marriage Massachusetts lawyers Family Law Arbitration med/arb lawyers facilitated negotiations alimony orders Uniform Arbitration Act LDRC