Divorce Mediation Blog

“Non-compete” Orders in Massachusetts Divorce: Yes they can!

Wednesday, May 23, 2012

In recent case of Cesar v. Sundelin, the Massachusetts Appeals Court ruled that a Probate & Family Court judge has the power to order one spouse not to compete with the other spouse after a division of property that includes a business. This is new law here, though it had been addressed by a couple of other jurisdictions earlier.

The argument is: if a judge is going to force one person to buy out the interest of the other in a private business, what is the business owner buying if the other spouse can walk across the street (figuratively or literally), set up shop and compete for the same customers? The counter argument is: if the spouse who is being bought out made a living doing the same or similar work, how can that spouse be prevented from making a living, or without being compensated for the loss of an ability to make one?

This ruling is important for at least three reasons. First, it broadens the powers of Probate & Family Court judges to do something that at least one judge thought he could not do (in Cesar the trial judge had refused to enter a non-compete because he thought he lacked that power – and one suspects that others agreed); and it raises questions about how this should factor in to valuation questions, and with regard to alimony based on the “needs” of the spouse who is restrained from competing. Arguably, this issue is limited to cases in which the spouse shared a business activity, but that makes the alimony question more acute.

Should judges have this breadth of power in divorce cases? The Appeals Court thought so, when it is necessary to protect the integrity of the property division order. We will all see how this plays out, over time.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


dispute resolution Massachusetts divorce lawyers divorce arbitrator annulment Boston med/arb medical benefits health coverage lawyers alimony statute med-arb rehabilitative alimony Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC divorce mediation SJC arbitrators alimony how baseball arbitration works arbitrator Cohabitation family law arbitrators family law arbitrator Family Law Arbitration family mediation Massachusetts conciliation MLB labor agreement mediators private dispute resolution Alimony Reform Act alimony reform legislation Massachusetts alimony divorce agreement COLA The Seven Sins of Alimony Obamacare Defense of Marriage Act divorce judgment support orders Levine Dispute Resolution divorced Baseball Players Baseball Arbitration DOMA Child Support Guidelines resolve disputes Uniform Arbitration Act alimony orders arbitration mediator family and probate law disputes Baseball lawyer divorce arbitration divorce lawyers divorce process Major League Baseball Arbitration fraud Self-adjusting alimony orders divorce mediators divorce and family law mediators IRC §2704 Divorce Agreements Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly divorce mediations Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act litigation lawyer-attended mediation facilitated negotiations Levine Dispute Resolution Center high-risk methodology family support special master Massachusetts lawyers divorce mediator separation alimony law LDRC General term alimony Matrimonial Arbitration Massachusetts alimony and child support divorce litigation traditional negotiations divorce arbitrators Chouteau Levine child support Same Sex Marriage Levine Dispute Resolutions mediation pre-ARA alimony family law mediations Divorce divorce and family law family law mediation health insurance self-adjusting alimony disputes Massachusetts divorce mediators Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth