Divorce Mediation Blog

“Non-compete” Orders in Massachusetts Divorce: Yes they can!

Wednesday, May 23, 2012

In recent case of Cesar v. Sundelin, the Massachusetts Appeals Court ruled that a Probate & Family Court judge has the power to order one spouse not to compete with the other spouse after a division of property that includes a business. This is new law here, though it had been addressed by a couple of other jurisdictions earlier.

The argument is: if a judge is going to force one person to buy out the interest of the other in a private business, what is the business owner buying if the other spouse can walk across the street (figuratively or literally), set up shop and compete for the same customers? The counter argument is: if the spouse who is being bought out made a living doing the same or similar work, how can that spouse be prevented from making a living, or without being compensated for the loss of an ability to make one?

This ruling is important for at least three reasons. First, it broadens the powers of Probate & Family Court judges to do something that at least one judge thought he could not do (in Cesar the trial judge had refused to enter a non-compete because he thought he lacked that power – and one suspects that others agreed); and it raises questions about how this should factor in to valuation questions, and with regard to alimony based on the “needs” of the spouse who is restrained from competing. Arguably, this issue is limited to cases in which the spouse shared a business activity, but that makes the alimony question more acute.

Should judges have this breadth of power in divorce cases? The Appeals Court thought so, when it is necessary to protect the integrity of the property division order. We will all see how this plays out, over time.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


Divorce Child Support Guidelines support orders Alimony Reform Act high-risk methodology Divorce Agreements dispute resolution divorce judgment health insurance Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC lawyers separation disputes Defense of Marriage Act Baseball Arbitration child support divorce mediations family law arbitrator Massachusetts alimony and child support med-arb Massachusetts divorce mediators medical benefits annulment Baseball traditional negotiations Levine Dispute Resolution Uniform Arbitration Act arbitrators conciliation Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth Major League Baseball Arbitration divorce process facilitated negotiations The Seven Sins of Alimony divorce mediator mediator Levine Dispute Resolutions Baseball Players health coverage Matrimonial Arbitration divorced how baseball arbitration works Obamacare divorce mediation special master LDRC General term alimony Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Massachusetts family law family law arbitrators litigation private dispute resolution resolve disputes alimony law Massachusetts lawyers MLB labor agreement family and probate law disputes arbitration mediation family mediation divorce mediators alimony orders divorce arbitrator Chouteau Levine lawyer Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act divorce lawyers divorce arbitration family support SJC rehabilitative alimony DOMA alimony divorce and family law family law mediation Massachusetts divorce lawyers arbitrator divorce arbitrators Self-adjusting alimony orders divorce litigation pre-ARA alimony Massachusetts alimony Boston divorce and family law mediators alimony statute fraud Family Law Arbitration IRC §2704 divorce agreement COLA mediations Cohabitation Levine Dispute Resolution Center lawyer-attended mediation self-adjusting alimony mediators Same Sex Marriage alimony reform legislation med/arb