Divorce Mediation Blog

“Non-compete” Orders in Massachusetts Divorce: Yes they can!

Wednesday, May 23, 2012

In recent case of Cesar v. Sundelin, the Massachusetts Appeals Court ruled that a Probate & Family Court judge has the power to order one spouse not to compete with the other spouse after a division of property that includes a business. This is new law here, though it had been addressed by a couple of other jurisdictions earlier.

The argument is: if a judge is going to force one person to buy out the interest of the other in a private business, what is the business owner buying if the other spouse can walk across the street (figuratively or literally), set up shop and compete for the same customers? The counter argument is: if the spouse who is being bought out made a living doing the same or similar work, how can that spouse be prevented from making a living, or without being compensated for the loss of an ability to make one?

This ruling is important for at least three reasons. First, it broadens the powers of Probate & Family Court judges to do something that at least one judge thought he could not do (in Cesar the trial judge had refused to enter a non-compete because he thought he lacked that power – and one suspects that others agreed); and it raises questions about how this should factor in to valuation questions, and with regard to alimony based on the “needs” of the spouse who is restrained from competing. Arguably, this issue is limited to cases in which the spouse shared a business activity, but that makes the alimony question more acute.

Should judges have this breadth of power in divorce cases? The Appeals Court thought so, when it is necessary to protect the integrity of the property division order. We will all see how this plays out, over time.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


divorce arbitration Major League Baseball Arbitration Massachusetts lawyers annulment Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act divorce agreement Massachusetts divorce mediators disputes divorce mediation litigation alimony law arbitration Chouteau Levine Massachusetts divorce lawyers IRC §2704 divorced family law arbitrator lawyers alimony reform legislation Same Sex Marriage child support MLB labor agreement special master support orders Levine Dispute Resolution Center rehabilitative alimony Alimony Reform Act Obamacare Cohabitation health coverage health insurance conciliation high-risk methodology separation mediator Baseball Players resolve disputes Defense of Marriage Act facilitated negotiations lawyer pre-ARA alimony Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC Baseball Arbitration Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth divorce mediations divorce mediators General term alimony LDRC divorce process alimony statute family law mediation Family Law Arbitration family law divorce and family law mediators Boston self-adjusting alimony Massachusetts alimony and child support divorce arbitrators fraud traditional negotiations divorce judgment arbitrator DOMA divorce and family law Divorce family support how baseball arbitration works med/arb The Seven Sins of Alimony Massachusetts family and probate law disputes mediations divorce lawyers dispute resolution family law arbitrators Levine Dispute Resolutions medical benefits divorce arbitrator private dispute resolution Baseball mediation alimony orders med-arb Uniform Arbitration Act COLA Divorce Agreements Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly mediators Self-adjusting alimony orders SJC Levine Dispute Resolution divorce mediator alimony Matrimonial Arbitration arbitrators lawyer-attended mediation Child Support Guidelines family mediation divorce litigation Massachusetts alimony