781.708.4445

info@levinedisputeresolution.com

Divorce Mediation Blog

No Country for Old Men, Part 5: The Appeals Court Tells 79-Year Old Alimony Payor “Si, Mas” Muellner v. Muellner

Thursday, September 06, 2018

Levine Dispute Resolution - Alimony

In an unpublished opinion under Rule 1:28, the Massachusetts Appeals Court recently consigned a septuagenarian couple to resumed legal combat in the Probate and Family Court, 14 years after their divorce. The appellate court vacated two modification judgments of the Probate and Family Court, reducing the now 79-year-old husband’s alimony to his former wife, for the judge’s failure to “demonstrate ‘appropriate consideration’” of:

  • the husband’s ability to pay;
  • the wife’s financial need; and
  • the “intent” of the parties as evidenced by their divorce agreement.

Putting aside completely the M.G.L., ch. 208, §49 (f) presumption that alimony terminates upon the payor’s attainment of full social security retirement age - a distant memory for this payor - since this divorce predated the Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act (eff. 3.1.12) (See, LDRC previous blog entries, “No Country for Old Men”, Parts 1 through 4) this decision is problematic for at least two reasons:

  • it appears that the trial judge is faulted for not considering information that the parties didn’t offer him at trial; and
  • the Appeals Court’s inference of the parties’ intent is pure speculation – the kind for which it might well criticize a trial judge.

Ah, Rule 1:28 decisions. The facts are not “fully addressed”, but one fact that the Appeals Court did disclose is that both modification “trials” were decisions entrusted to the Probate and Family Court judge by agreement of the parties, to be rendered on “stipulation[s] of facts in lieu of testimony”. No one gave direct testimony, and no one was cross-examined, no experts opined.

In other words, no trial at all, with all of its glorious inefficiencies and protections.

Then again, this is what the parties signed up for. Competent adults are, or should be, allowed to make decisions, including ones that disadvantage them. These parties were not juveniles – far from it – and they chose the rules by which they would play. No parens patriae, here. Essentially, they put the judge in the position of an arbitrator, limiting the evidence and circumscribing procedure; and accepting that the decision in generally binding.

The specters of 80-year-olds paying alimony, golden years spent in litigation and my self-indulgent blog title totally aside: shouldn’t the Appeals Court have left well enough alone?



Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:



Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles


recent posts


tags

Massachusetts divorce mediators DOMA divorce arbitrator Obamacare family law Self-adjusting alimony orders Massachusetts alimony and child support Cohabitation divorce mediator fraud med-arb mediations self-adjusting alimony divorced Family Law Arbitration divorce and family law mediators family law arbitrators alimony reform legislation arbitrators alimony health coverage divorce arbitrators MLB labor agreement family law arbitrator med/arb COLA Uniform Arbitration Act child support Child Support Guidelines SJC mediators General term alimony Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly lawyer-attended mediation rehabilitative alimony alimony law litigation alimony statute high-risk methodology Major League Baseball Arbitration LDRC divorce mediation Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC The Seven Sins of Alimony Levine Dispute Resolution Center Chouteau Levine how baseball arbitration works Divorce Baseball Players conciliation Matrimonial Arbitration Same Sex Marriage Levine Dispute Resolutions Baseball Baseball Arbitration lawyer divorce agreement annulment alimony orders divorce and family law health insurance lawyers Divorce Agreements special master family and probate law disputes divorce process IRC §2704 family law mediation facilitated negotiations family support Levine Dispute Resolution divorce arbitration Defense of Marriage Act pre-ARA alimony arbitrator Massachusetts mediation Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth Massachusetts lawyers Massachusetts divorce lawyers divorce mediators divorce judgment disputes private dispute resolution dispute resolution Massachusetts alimony separation divorce litigation traditional negotiations divorce lawyers mediator Alimony Reform Act family mediation arbitration resolve disputes Boston divorce mediations support orders medical benefits Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act