Divorce Mediation Blog

No Country for Old Men, Part 5: The Appeals Court Tells 79-Year Old Alimony Payor “Si, Mas” Muellner v. Muellner

Thursday, September 06, 2018

Levine Dispute Resolution - Alimony

In an unpublished opinion under Rule 1:28, the Massachusetts Appeals Court recently consigned a septuagenarian couple to resumed legal combat in the Probate and Family Court, 14 years after their divorce. The appellate court vacated two modification judgments of the Probate and Family Court, reducing the now 79-year-old husband’s alimony to his former wife, for the judge’s failure to “demonstrate ‘appropriate consideration’” of:

  • the husband’s ability to pay;
  • the wife’s financial need; and
  • the “intent” of the parties as evidenced by their divorce agreement.

Putting aside completely the M.G.L., ch. 208, §49 (f) presumption that alimony terminates upon the payor’s attainment of full social security retirement age - a distant memory for this payor - since this divorce predated the Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act (eff. 3.1.12) (See, LDRC previous blog entries, “No Country for Old Men”, Parts 1 through 4) this decision is problematic for at least two reasons:

  • it appears that the trial judge is faulted for not considering information that the parties didn’t offer him at trial; and
  • the Appeals Court’s inference of the parties’ intent is pure speculation – the kind for which it might well criticize a trial judge.

Ah, Rule 1:28 decisions. The facts are not “fully addressed”, but one fact that the Appeals Court did disclose is that both modification “trials” were decisions entrusted to the Probate and Family Court judge by agreement of the parties, to be rendered on “stipulation[s] of facts in lieu of testimony”. No one gave direct testimony, and no one was cross-examined, no experts opined.

In other words, no trial at all, with all of its glorious inefficiencies and protections.

Then again, this is what the parties signed up for. Competent adults are, or should be, allowed to make decisions, including ones that disadvantage them. These parties were not juveniles – far from it – and they chose the rules by which they would play. No parens patriae, here. Essentially, they put the judge in the position of an arbitrator, limiting the evidence and circumscribing procedure; and accepting that the decision in generally binding.

The specters of 80-year-olds paying alimony, golden years spent in litigation and my self-indulgent blog title totally aside: shouldn’t the Appeals Court have left well enough alone?

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


Divorce Agreements medical benefits family law arbitrator high-risk methodology SJC how baseball arbitration works Divorce Defense of Marriage Act health insurance arbitrators divorce litigation private dispute resolution separation LDRC COLA divorce agreement health coverage Alimony Reform Act IRC §2704 family law MLB labor agreement mediations traditional negotiations alimony divorce judgment self-adjusting alimony divorce mediators disputes family law arbitrators Massachusetts support orders fraud Self-adjusting alimony orders pre-ARA alimony annulment litigation Same Sex Marriage Massachusetts divorce mediators Massachusetts alimony and child support arbitration Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC Chouteau Levine alimony law Massachusetts divorce lawyers divorce mediator arbitrator family and probate law disputes lawyers mediators divorce arbitration divorce mediations divorce and family law mediators divorced DOMA Levine Dispute Resolutions Family Law Arbitration resolve disputes conciliation General term alimony Levine Dispute Resolution divorce mediation special master med-arb divorce process Massachusetts lawyers lawyer lawyer-attended mediation Uniform Arbitration Act Baseball Arbitration family mediation alimony statute Levine Dispute Resolution Center divorce arbitrators facilitated negotiations rehabilitative alimony alimony reform legislation med/arb Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act divorce lawyers dispute resolution Baseball Players Boston Major League Baseball Arbitration Baseball The Seven Sins of Alimony Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly family support Massachusetts alimony mediator alimony orders Child Support Guidelines mediation divorce arbitrator divorce and family law Obamacare Matrimonial Arbitration family law mediation Cohabitation child support