781.708.4445

wmlevine@levinedisputeresolution.com

Divorce Mediation Blog

No Country for Old Men, Part 5: The Appeals Court Tells 79-Year Old Alimony Payor “Si, Mas” Muellner v. Muellner

Thursday, September 06, 2018

Levine Dispute Resolution - Alimony

In an unpublished opinion under Rule 1:28, the Massachusetts Appeals Court recently consigned a septuagenarian couple to resumed legal combat in the Probate and Family Court, 14 years after their divorce. The appellate court vacated two modification judgments of the Probate and Family Court, reducing the now 79-year-old husband’s alimony to his former wife, for the judge’s failure to “demonstrate ‘appropriate consideration’” of:

  • the husband’s ability to pay;
  • the wife’s financial need; and
  • the “intent” of the parties as evidenced by their divorce agreement.

Putting aside completely the M.G.L., ch. 208, §49 (f) presumption that alimony terminates upon the payor’s attainment of full social security retirement age - a distant memory for this payor - since this divorce predated the Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act (eff. 3.1.12) (See, LDRC previous blog entries, “No Country for Old Men”, Parts 1 through 4) this decision is problematic for at least two reasons:

  • it appears that the trial judge is faulted for not considering information that the parties didn’t offer him at trial; and
  • the Appeals Court’s inference of the parties’ intent is pure speculation – the kind for which it might well criticize a trial judge.

Ah, Rule 1:28 decisions. The facts are not “fully addressed”, but one fact that the Appeals Court did disclose is that both modification “trials” were decisions entrusted to the Probate and Family Court judge by agreement of the parties, to be rendered on “stipulation[s] of facts in lieu of testimony”. No one gave direct testimony, and no one was cross-examined, no experts opined.

In other words, no trial at all, with all of its glorious inefficiencies and protections.

Then again, this is what the parties signed up for. Competent adults are, or should be, allowed to make decisions, including ones that disadvantage them. These parties were not juveniles – far from it – and they chose the rules by which they would play. No parens patriae, here. Essentially, they put the judge in the position of an arbitrator, limiting the evidence and circumscribing procedure; and accepting that the decision in generally binding.

The specters of 80-year-olds paying alimony, golden years spent in litigation and my self-indulgent blog title totally aside: shouldn’t the Appeals Court have left well enough alone?



Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:



Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles


recent posts


tags

divorce arbitrators med/arb IRC §2704 alimony law Massachusetts alimony and child support divorce mediators arbitration health coverage divorce litigation family law arbitrator Self-adjusting alimony orders family mediation family law annulment disputes traditional negotiations mediation mediator divorce and family law mediators conciliation Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act The Seven Sins of Alimony Massachusetts divorce mediators medical benefits alimony reform legislation Alimony Reform Act family and probate law disputes General term alimony child support Massachusetts alimony lawyers family law mediation litigation Chouteau Levine divorce and family law arbitrator health insurance med-arb pre-ARA alimony Cohabitation Levine Dispute Resolutions divorce lawyers Defense of Marriage Act dispute resolution resolve disputes divorce arbitration alimony orders DOMA lawyer LDRC divorce arbitrator facilitated negotiations mediators Divorce Baseball Players rehabilitative alimony Divorce Agreements Levine Dispute Resolution Center special master Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Major League Baseball Arbitration high-risk methodology self-adjusting alimony Massachusetts lawyers family support divorce mediation Boston family law arbitrators MLB labor agreement support orders Uniform Arbitration Act Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC Massachusetts alimony COLA Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth lawyer-attended mediation Child Support Guidelines private dispute resolution divorced Family Law Arbitration Obamacare divorce process Baseball Arbitration mediations fraud divorce mediations Matrimonial Arbitration how baseball arbitration works arbitrators Same Sex Marriage Baseball alimony statute Levine Dispute Resolution separation Massachusetts divorce lawyers divorce judgment SJC divorce agreement divorce mediator