Divorce Mediation Blog

Musing on Massachusetts Alimony: Do "Needs" Still Matter for the “One Percent”?

Wednesday, May 08, 2013

The year-plus-old Massachusetts alimony "reform" statute provides that the court may not include the capital gains, interest and dividend income which derive from property received in divorce equitable asset division in the consideration of alimony rights and obligations. This is of little consequence -- and makes sense -- in most cases, where neither party can reasonably expect to collect income on assets that is enough to affect self-support; especially in a half per cent bank interest environment; and where few people have a critical mass of investable assets to chase stock market returns that would impact the ability to meet current needs.

But, what about cases in which high net worth parties divide large productive estates? In some families, investment returns can meet all reasonable needs, or even both parties’ actual expenses. Before March 1, 2012, this fact alone might have trumped an alimony claim because "need" was a longstanding pillar of alimony law. Even then, need was an elastic term as interpreted by appellate courts, encompassing the specific standard of living of the parties during the marriage. Judges had very broad discretion, to award alimony where the overall equities justified it, or to decline because need was not evident.

While the definition of alimony in the new law expressly includes need, the exclusion of investment income may have the effect of changing that for the “one per cent”.

Consider an extreme set of facts: the parties divide $100 million arising from entrepreneurial success, and the 45 year-old business spouse, out of a job after sale, chooses to take a job with a non-profit employer that pays a salary. A literal reading of the alimony statute would demand that the employee "generally" pay not more than the other spouse’s need, or 30-35% of the difference between the parties' respective gross incomes, but excluding that income produced by their divided assets. In other words, alimony seems mandatory even where no need exists.

If this reading is correct, we suppose that a judge could award $1 of annual alimony and fulfill the statute's mandate, but is that the legislature's intent? As divorce mediators, we look at the economics of every case carefully, but informed clients will know about the law; and we wonder the long-term implications of this statutory provision.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


high-risk methodology lawyers Baseball support orders Defense of Marriage Act The Seven Sins of Alimony Levine Dispute Resolution Center mediations alimony Cohabitation annulment divorced Massachusetts arbitrators child support Family Law Arbitration mediator Massachusetts alimony and child support Matrimonial Arbitration self-adjusting alimony medical benefits mediators divorce arbitrators lawyer-attended mediation Massachusetts lawyers family law mediation facilitated negotiations fraud alimony reform legislation lawyer Divorce Agreements Child Support Guidelines traditional negotiations Massachusetts alimony divorce mediators SJC Massachusetts divorce lawyers Chouteau Levine divorce lawyers Self-adjusting alimony orders Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC family law arbitrator private dispute resolution health coverage divorce and family law arbitration Baseball Players rehabilitative alimony divorce mediator DOMA COLA how baseball arbitration works family law Divorce alimony orders Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth Same Sex Marriage arbitrator family support divorce arbitration IRC §2704 disputes divorce process health insurance divorce agreement separation litigation Massachusetts divorce mediators family mediation Levine Dispute Resolution divorce and family law mediators family and probate law disputes dispute resolution mediation LDRC special master Major League Baseball Arbitration Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act resolve disputes divorce litigation Levine Dispute Resolutions alimony statute alimony law General term alimony Alimony Reform Act med-arb Obamacare pre-ARA alimony divorce mediations conciliation family law arbitrators Boston divorce mediation Baseball Arbitration divorce arbitrator med/arb divorce judgment Uniform Arbitration Act MLB labor agreement