781.708.4445

wmlevine@levinedisputeresolution.com

Divorce Mediation Blog

MEDIATION CONFIDENTIALITY: IS IT A STEP FORWARD OR BACK?

Wednesday, October 26, 2016

ZVI Construction Company, LLC v. Franklin Levy & another

The Appeals Court recently enforced the important policy of honoring the right of contractual and statutory confidentiality in mediation, as provided by M.G.L., ch. 233, §23C. The statute states that:

    Any communication made in the course of and relating to the subject matter of any mediation and which is made in the presence of such mediator by any participant, mediator or other person shall be a confidential communication and not subject to disclosure in any judicial or administrative proceeding…

Meaning, that what is said in mediation should stay there, freeing parties of the inhibiting worry that their factual or negotiating concessions may come back to haunt them in court, should their mediation fail to achieve complete resolution.

The plaintiffs in October 6th’s ZVI Construction Company, LLC v. Franklin Levy and another, challenged this important principle by demanding that the court write in a “fraud exception” to confidentiality. The Appeals Court declined, upholding trial court decisions to strike statements made in mediation by counsel from pleadings, and later dismissing all claims based on the defendant’s mediation conduct.

In a case of first impression, the Appeals Court relied on the absence of any fraud exception in the statute and the explicit exclusion of a fraud exception in the Uniform Mediation Act of the Uniform Laws Commission, which is the law in 11 states and the District of Columbia, though not Massachusetts. The court also discussed the celebrated case Facebook, Inc. v. Pacific N.W. Software, Inc., a Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision, in which the federal courts declined to relieve the Winklevoss twins of their mediated settlement by reason of Mark Zuckerberg’s alleged overstatement of Facebook’s value.

Unfortunately, we worry that the Appeals Court diluted its message. In discussing the facts of its case, the court observed that:

    [W]e would be hard pressed to find that such an exception exists in the circumstances of this case, where there is a confidentiality agreement, negotiated between sophisticated people with the assistance of legal counsel… (Footnote omitted.)

We are equally hard pressed to imagine that the Appeals Court intended to imply that a fraud exception might exist in other circumstances.



Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:



Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles


recent posts


tags

health insurance Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly divorce arbitrators dispute resolution resolve disputes divorce mediator pre-ARA alimony family law mediation divorce mediators divorce judgment self-adjusting alimony General term alimony Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act facilitated negotiations disputes conciliation alimony reform legislation divorce arbitration Divorce Agreements family law divorce and family law divorce and family law mediators arbitrators Self-adjusting alimony orders Massachusetts divorce mediators high-risk methodology mediator MLB labor agreement Boston mediators Levine Dispute Resolution Center Massachusetts alimony divorce process Alimony Reform Act health coverage DOMA Baseball Arbitration Same Sex Marriage Defense of Marriage Act lawyer family law arbitrator alimony orders Levine Dispute Resolution LDRC Major League Baseball Arbitration child support divorce litigation Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth lawyers Massachusetts alimony and child support Cohabitation arbitrator Levine Dispute Resolutions IRC §2704 lawyer-attended mediation alimony Matrimonial Arbitration Massachusetts mediations Massachusetts lawyers divorce mediation Child Support Guidelines annulment separation divorce arbitrator arbitration Divorce traditional negotiations family law arbitrators divorce lawyers family and probate law disputes alimony law private dispute resolution med-arb divorce mediations med/arb litigation family support Massachusetts divorce lawyers special master Baseball Players Obamacare Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC Family Law Arbitration alimony statute COLA SJC how baseball arbitration works family mediation rehabilitative alimony divorce agreement Chouteau Levine The Seven Sins of Alimony mediation divorced Baseball support orders medical benefits fraud Uniform Arbitration Act