Divorce Mediation Blog

Matrimonial Arbitration is the Not Credit Card Kind

Wednesday, May 27, 2015

In the May 25th Opinion page of The Boston Globe, Law Professor Jeff Sovern wrote convincingly that arbitration, the kind that appears in the very small print of credit card agreements should be banned as unfair and anti-consumer. Thinking back to law school the term “contract of adhesion” comes to mind, where the commercially powerful victimizes the weak with terms on which the latter has no practical ability to negotiate.

But the piece also brings us back far more recent events, in which one of us attempted, over a period of nearly 10 years, to advance a proposed Family Law Arbitration Act, on behalf of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, through the pre-legislative stage. In trying to build support among the bar by endorsement of the Massachusetts and Boston Bar Associations, without which legislators will not consider sponsorship, Bill Levine spent parts of 3 separate years successfully obtaining approvals of the associations’ family law sections, only to founder when other sections had interests that viewed family law arbitration as if it emanated from the small print of similarly one-sided transactions. In some frustration, and by an otherwise tactical decision, we backed away from the effort, approval of the broader bar associations being unlikely, to await the Uniform Laws Commission’s (formerly NCCUSL) Model Family Law Arbitration Act that is expected in 2016 or so, when we expect to take another run.

Matrimonial arbitration is not credit card arbitration. Every agreement from which it must arise is one in which that parties have, or have the right, to counsel. In each case, both parties have an absolute right to say “no”. Every agreement to arbitrate future disputes, as part of the divorce agreement is approved by a judge and subject to later objection and review on the basis of contract defenses such as incapacity, duress, coercion or undue influence. Each agreement to arbitrate a present dispute is subject to court approval. Subject matter limitations in the name of parens patraie, such as best interests review and trial de novo of custody matters are policy long established in common law. As a matter of current case law here, all arbitration awards are likely subject to fairness review.

Would some overbearing litigants seek advantage by cutting off opponents’ direct access to court? Most likely, yes. Are there ways to vet and avoid the consummation of such schemes that deny free will? Absolutely. Should this concern throw out legislative promotion of a cost-effective process that merely adds one more optional remedy for parties’ who struggle with a highly public, overloaded and fiscally-hobbled public court system, serving themselves and relieving resource scarcity for the public at the same time? Emphatically, no.

Don’t let banks prey on weak consumers. But, at the same time, see the problem for what it is: overbearing commercial interests reducing their own liability for predatory lending practices; and not an indictment of arbitration per se.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


traditional negotiations child support Massachusetts alimony and child support Massachusetts lawyers health insurance how baseball arbitration works Chouteau Levine annulment divorce mediators divorce mediation arbitrator alimony law Alimony Reform Act resolve disputes IRC §2704 Massachusetts divorce mediators Massachusetts alimony family mediation separation Levine Dispute Resolution Center SJC Child Support Guidelines Levine Dispute Resolution lawyer-attended mediation family law mediation private dispute resolution Uniform Arbitration Act Boston family law arbitrator divorce process divorce mediator LDRC dispute resolution Baseball Players mediation COLA alimony reform legislation Defense of Marriage Act Massachusetts Matrimonial Arbitration health coverage rehabilitative alimony Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth Massachusetts divorce lawyers Same Sex Marriage divorce and family law mediators lawyers arbitration family and probate law disputes self-adjusting alimony divorce lawyers medical benefits Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC Divorce facilitated negotiations litigation Levine Dispute Resolutions fraud med/arb alimony statute Obamacare The Seven Sins of Alimony Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly disputes Major League Baseball Arbitration MLB labor agreement Family Law Arbitration Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act Baseball Arbitration alimony orders lawyer mediations high-risk methodology med-arb family law Baseball DOMA divorced divorce mediations conciliation family support mediators divorce litigation special master General term alimony divorce agreement family law arbitrators mediator divorce and family law divorce arbitrator Self-adjusting alimony orders divorce judgment support orders divorce arbitrators alimony Cohabitation divorce arbitration arbitrators Divorce Agreements pre-ARA alimony