Divorce Mediation Blog

Masters and the Probate & Family Courts

Wednesday, December 12, 2012

The Probate and Family Court appoint two kinds of “masters”. A master is a lawyer who holds hearings as an extension of the Court itself. One kind is a “discovery master”. The other is a “master, facts final”.

A discovery master aids the Court’s case management by helping the attorneys negotiate, and if necessary by deciding disputes over the exchange of information, known as discovery, in the litigation process. Each side may challenge the discovery master’s decision to the appointing judge, but they rarely do so. This is because the lawyers generally feel that the master process was fair and that a judge will likely address the issue in the same or a similar fashion as the master.

A master, facts final, hears some or all of the contested case, and makes a recommended judgment. The process follows the same rules as in court, unless the parties agree otherwise. One or both parties ask the Court to “confirm” the master’s recommended judgment. If one party disagrees, he or she retains the right to oppose the entry of the master’s decision and a court judgment. The Court retains the right to accept or reject the master’s recommendation in whole or in part.

Where parties cannot settle their matter by direct negotiation, by mediation or otherwise, the use of either kind of master is a way in which they can maximize control over their case, by selecting their own master, and by pursuing what is a mostly private proceeding that most often results in the agreed entry of judgment based thereon.

With our courts in crisis, this avenue is being followed more and more. Most every judge is happy to approve a selected master and to stand by for the master’s result. When faced with long delays and abounding uncertainties in the public trial process, due consideration should be given to the use of a master for all or part of a contested case.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


dispute resolution Baseball Players family and probate law disputes mediator Levine Dispute Resolution Baseball child support MLB labor agreement divorce mediator self-adjusting alimony divorce arbitration Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly divorce judgment Self-adjusting alimony orders Massachusetts divorce lawyers Boston arbitrator Child Support Guidelines lawyers divorce mediators divorce lawyers family mediation Uniform Arbitration Act Major League Baseball Arbitration Divorce Agreements Massachusetts divorced conciliation traditional negotiations Levine Dispute Resolution Center Massachusetts lawyers Cohabitation divorce arbitrator Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act health insurance divorce litigation LDRC Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth rehabilitative alimony alimony reform legislation medical benefits COLA alimony law annulment divorce process divorce and family law health coverage divorce mediations how baseball arbitration works SJC Obamacare divorce and family law mediators family law mediation Massachusetts alimony and child support alimony orders family law separation support orders resolve disputes lawyer-attended mediation mediations med/arb Defense of Marriage Act special master pre-ARA alimony Matrimonial Arbitration Family Law Arbitration arbitration IRC §2704 arbitrators disputes mediators Chouteau Levine DOMA mediation divorce arbitrators Baseball Arbitration divorce agreement Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC family support divorce mediation facilitated negotiations lawyer fraud Same Sex Marriage alimony statute family law arbitrator family law arbitrators Massachusetts divorce mediators med-arb Alimony Reform Act high-risk methodology Massachusetts alimony General term alimony The Seven Sins of Alimony Divorce litigation private dispute resolution Levine Dispute Resolutions alimony