Divorce Mediation Blog

Masters and the Probate & Family Courts

Wednesday, December 12, 2012

The Probate and Family Court appoint two kinds of “masters”. A master is a lawyer who holds hearings as an extension of the Court itself. One kind is a “discovery master”. The other is a “master, facts final”.

A discovery master aids the Court’s case management by helping the attorneys negotiate, and if necessary by deciding disputes over the exchange of information, known as discovery, in the litigation process. Each side may challenge the discovery master’s decision to the appointing judge, but they rarely do so. This is because the lawyers generally feel that the master process was fair and that a judge will likely address the issue in the same or a similar fashion as the master.

A master, facts final, hears some or all of the contested case, and makes a recommended judgment. The process follows the same rules as in court, unless the parties agree otherwise. One or both parties ask the Court to “confirm” the master’s recommended judgment. If one party disagrees, he or she retains the right to oppose the entry of the master’s decision and a court judgment. The Court retains the right to accept or reject the master’s recommendation in whole or in part.

Where parties cannot settle their matter by direct negotiation, by mediation or otherwise, the use of either kind of master is a way in which they can maximize control over their case, by selecting their own master, and by pursuing what is a mostly private proceeding that most often results in the agreed entry of judgment based thereon.

With our courts in crisis, this avenue is being followed more and more. Most every judge is happy to approve a selected master and to stand by for the master’s result. When faced with long delays and abounding uncertainties in the public trial process, due consideration should be given to the use of a master for all or part of a contested case.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


Cohabitation Defense of Marriage Act child support family law mediation Baseball Arbitration rehabilitative alimony divorce judgment separation divorce lawyers Self-adjusting alimony orders special master family support divorce mediator Alimony Reform Act divorce mediations lawyer-attended mediation fraud high-risk methodology med-arb Massachusetts alimony and child support alimony law support orders disputes divorce arbitrators how baseball arbitration works Baseball mediator Divorce family and probate law disputes COLA lawyers alimony orders Chouteau Levine Obamacare Massachusetts divorce mediators Uniform Arbitration Act Massachusetts alimony conciliation Matrimonial Arbitration med/arb mediators Massachusetts lawyers mediations alimony statute Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act family law arbitrators The Seven Sins of Alimony divorce and family law mediators family law arbitrator resolve disputes MLB labor agreement annulment Baseball Players mediation health coverage Child Support Guidelines traditional negotiations Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth pre-ARA alimony facilitated negotiations LDRC IRC §2704 SJC family mediation family law General term alimony self-adjusting alimony divorce process divorce arbitration lawyer arbitrators divorce litigation arbitrator Massachusetts divorce mediators divorced private dispute resolution litigation Boston Divorce Agreements divorce agreement Major League Baseball Arbitration health insurance Levine Dispute Resolution divorce arbitrator DOMA Levine Dispute Resolution Center alimony reform legislation Family Law Arbitration Levine Dispute Resolutions divorce and family law arbitration Same Sex Marriage Massachusetts divorce lawyers Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC medical benefits alimony Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly divorce mediation dispute resolution