Divorce Mediation Blog

Masters and the Probate & Family Courts

Wednesday, December 12, 2012

The Probate and Family Court appoint two kinds of “masters”. A master is a lawyer who holds hearings as an extension of the Court itself. One kind is a “discovery master”. The other is a “master, facts final”.

A discovery master aids the Court’s case management by helping the attorneys negotiate, and if necessary by deciding disputes over the exchange of information, known as discovery, in the litigation process. Each side may challenge the discovery master’s decision to the appointing judge, but they rarely do so. This is because the lawyers generally feel that the master process was fair and that a judge will likely address the issue in the same or a similar fashion as the master.

A master, facts final, hears some or all of the contested case, and makes a recommended judgment. The process follows the same rules as in court, unless the parties agree otherwise. One or both parties ask the Court to “confirm” the master’s recommended judgment. If one party disagrees, he or she retains the right to oppose the entry of the master’s decision and a court judgment. The Court retains the right to accept or reject the master’s recommendation in whole or in part.

Where parties cannot settle their matter by direct negotiation, by mediation or otherwise, the use of either kind of master is a way in which they can maximize control over their case, by selecting their own master, and by pursuing what is a mostly private proceeding that most often results in the agreed entry of judgment based thereon.

With our courts in crisis, this avenue is being followed more and more. Most every judge is happy to approve a selected master and to stand by for the master’s result. When faced with long delays and abounding uncertainties in the public trial process, due consideration should be given to the use of a master for all or part of a contested case.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


divorce arbitrator lawyer rehabilitative alimony traditional negotiations alimony statute med-arb Matrimonial Arbitration alimony orders mediators lawyers family law Boston Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act The Seven Sins of Alimony Family Law Arbitration Baseball mediator arbitrator divorce arbitrators divorce mediators divorce process med/arb Child Support Guidelines Massachusetts alimony and child support divorce mediation Massachusetts divorce mediators alimony reform legislation mediations divorce arbitration self-adjusting alimony divorce and family law mediators separation annulment family mediation divorce mediations Massachusetts divorce judgment IRC §2704 how baseball arbitration works Divorce support orders Massachusetts lawyers Baseball Arbitration Levine Dispute Resolution Center Baseball Players arbitrators mediation resolve disputes Uniform Arbitration Act General term alimony Major League Baseball Arbitration divorce agreement pre-ARA alimony family law mediation health coverage medical benefits private dispute resolution divorced alimony law disputes SJC Alimony Reform Act health insurance Defense of Marriage Act facilitated negotiations arbitration divorce lawyers divorce and family law alimony Levine Dispute Resolution family law arbitrator lawyer-attended mediation divorce litigation Chouteau Levine Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC Self-adjusting alimony orders conciliation family law arbitrators child support Massachusetts alimony fraud Levine Dispute Resolutions Same Sex Marriage Divorce Agreements COLA Cohabitation Obamacare Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly family support litigation DOMA special master divorce mediator LDRC high-risk methodology dispute resolution family and probate law disputes MLB labor agreement Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth Massachusetts divorce lawyers