Divorce Mediation Blog

Masters and the Probate & Family Courts

Wednesday, December 12, 2012

The Probate and Family Court appoint two kinds of “masters”. A master is a lawyer who holds hearings as an extension of the Court itself. One kind is a “discovery master”. The other is a “master, facts final”.

A discovery master aids the Court’s case management by helping the attorneys negotiate, and if necessary by deciding disputes over the exchange of information, known as discovery, in the litigation process. Each side may challenge the discovery master’s decision to the appointing judge, but they rarely do so. This is because the lawyers generally feel that the master process was fair and that a judge will likely address the issue in the same or a similar fashion as the master.

A master, facts final, hears some or all of the contested case, and makes a recommended judgment. The process follows the same rules as in court, unless the parties agree otherwise. One or both parties ask the Court to “confirm” the master’s recommended judgment. If one party disagrees, he or she retains the right to oppose the entry of the master’s decision and a court judgment. The Court retains the right to accept or reject the master’s recommendation in whole or in part.

Where parties cannot settle their matter by direct negotiation, by mediation or otherwise, the use of either kind of master is a way in which they can maximize control over their case, by selecting their own master, and by pursuing what is a mostly private proceeding that most often results in the agreed entry of judgment based thereon.

With our courts in crisis, this avenue is being followed more and more. Most every judge is happy to approve a selected master and to stand by for the master’s result. When faced with long delays and abounding uncertainties in the public trial process, due consideration should be given to the use of a master for all or part of a contested case.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


resolve disputes pre-ARA alimony MLB labor agreement mediation med-arb Massachusetts lawyers Major League Baseball Arbitration Baseball Arbitration Baseball Players divorce lawyers Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Divorce Agreements family support alimony statute alimony reform legislation Massachusetts divorce mediators Divorce private dispute resolution dispute resolution General term alimony arbitration divorce mediators alimony law Massachusetts alimony divorce litigation Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act divorce judgment divorce process IRC §2704 family and probate law disputes divorce arbitration health insurance Massachusetts alimony and child support Levine Dispute Resolution Center divorce arbitrator mediators health coverage family law arbitrators SJC family law arbitrator LDRC arbitrator Levine Dispute Resolution facilitated negotiations Cohabitation Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth Uniform Arbitration Act Matrimonial Arbitration rehabilitative alimony divorce mediations traditional negotiations high-risk methodology arbitrators Massachusetts special master Baseball Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC Defense of Marriage Act med/arb alimony Self-adjusting alimony orders divorce arbitrators disputes family law DOMA mediations Massachusetts divorce lawyers Levine Dispute Resolutions divorce mediator conciliation family mediation family law mediation separation divorced Alimony Reform Act Obamacare divorce and family law lawyers annulment Same Sex Marriage lawyer-attended mediation mediator Chouteau Levine child support alimony orders litigation support orders divorce mediation medical benefits how baseball arbitration works Boston self-adjusting alimony COLA The Seven Sins of Alimony Child Support Guidelines lawyer fraud divorce and family law mediators Family Law Arbitration divorce agreement