Divorce Mediation Blog

Litigation Attorneys and Mediation

Monday, November 12, 2012

As our practice develops, more of it seems devoted to lawyer-attended mediations, arbitrations and hybrids. When clients come to us with their counsel it is most often after the parties have experienced some litigation, and its attendant costs, delays and confrontations. They are either in the phase where the case has been pre-tried by the court and sits in the long queue for trial; or before the pre-trial conference itself. Occasionally, the case is in an earlier stage.

Why would litigation attorneys encourage or participate in mediation at any of these stages of litigation? It might seem to run counter to their own economic interest, and it involves relaxing some measure of control, something lawyers are loath to do. One reason is that some clients insist upon it, having heard from others that it may be an effective way of shortening what feels like an interminable process. Another is the wear and tear that increasing costs and the lack of any assured containment within the public court process imposes on lawyers and clients alike.

But, we find that the most common reason is that every week, more lawyers are realizing that it works! The lawyers themselves realize that they do retain a good measure of influence in this process. They see and experience that the mediation is fairly run; that everyone has their “say”; and, that in the end, no one is forced to do anything. Counsel also realizes that it is better to be paid fully for a process that bring early closure, than to run up an often uncollectible bill from a client after a long trial. Clients in the end are happier, and thus, more inclined to refer new clients to the mediation-friendly lawyer.

Mediators who do not welcome litigation counsel are cutting off a valuable source of business. Lawyers who refuse to mediate are short-selling their clients. The meeting of the two is good for all, especially the clients.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


Alimony Reform Act child support Cohabitation alimony COLA Massachusetts alimony divorce arbitrator high-risk methodology divorce mediator dispute resolution Levine Dispute Resolutions family and probate law disputes Major League Baseball Arbitration family law arbitrators rehabilitative alimony special master fraud Defense of Marriage Act mediators divorce judgment family law mediation MLB labor agreement divorce litigation SJC divorced facilitated negotiations Family Law Arbitration Baseball Players Same Sex Marriage divorce mediation annulment arbitration General term alimony Massachusetts divorce lawyers Divorce Agreements Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth Massachusetts Levine Dispute Resolution family law arbitrator Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act divorce mediators DOMA traditional negotiations Massachusetts divorce mediators med/arb mediator divorce arbitrators divorce mediations medical benefits Child Support Guidelines lawyer-attended mediation Uniform Arbitration Act lawyers Baseball Divorce Baseball Arbitration separation med-arb alimony law The Seven Sins of Alimony private dispute resolution health insurance alimony orders Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Levine Dispute Resolution Center how baseball arbitration works LDRC Self-adjusting alimony orders lawyer divorce and family law mediators alimony reform legislation mediation IRC §2704 mediations resolve disputes Matrimonial Arbitration litigation divorce agreement Massachusetts lawyers self-adjusting alimony Chouteau Levine conciliation Massachusetts alimony and child support divorce arbitration divorce process divorce and family law disputes Boston arbitrators alimony statute family law divorce lawyers arbitrator family mediation family support pre-ARA alimony support orders health coverage Obamacare Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC