Divorce Mediation Blog

Lawyers Weekly Takes On Rule 1:28: We Agree

Wednesday, November 04, 2015

We have commented here, on a number of occasions, about the Appeals Court's use and misuse of Rule 1:28's so-called "unpublished" opinions.

They are informal, scant on facts and often reasoning, sometimes obscure and too-often just confusing to family law discourse. If the Appeals Court is not going to stand behind its cases as precedent, or if an opinion is truly for the sole benefit of the captioned parties, the public record would be better served by a simple "affirmed" or "reversed" notation. As public records, the "full" opinions would be available to the highly motivated, but the cases would not be citable from the current netherworld of "persuasive but not precedent", to which the Appeals Court has assigned them.

For that reason, we delighted in reading October 26th's Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly, wherein the Editorial Board opined, at p. 38, that newly minted Chief Justice Scott L. Kafker should pay "immediate attention" to the problem of Rule 1:28. Lawyers Weekly described the intent of the rule to address "straightforward cases" and that the Appeals Court overuses the rule to the public's detriment. While our critique goes further, the editorial's targeting of the issue is welcome; and we thank the board for its call to action.

Either way: elevate all opinions to the level of precedent, then analyze and write them accordingly; or reduce them to simple announcements of the action taken on appeal. We respect the burden that the Appeals Court's unchecked, non-discretionary caseload poses. But do something please, Chief Justice Kafker, about this unhelpful practice.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


alimony law family mediation Levine Dispute Resolution Center annulment mediation divorce agreement medical benefits Same Sex Marriage family law arbitrators General term alimony Massachusetts alimony and child support alimony statute arbitration SJC Family Law Arbitration divorce lawyers med-arb arbitrators divorce mediator arbitrator self-adjusting alimony facilitated negotiations family support The Seven Sins of Alimony private dispute resolution health insurance Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC divorce judgment Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act Cohabitation how baseball arbitration works disputes Boston special master litigation Baseball Players health coverage mediator Baseball Arbitration Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth traditional negotiations Massachusetts divorce lawyers lawyer alimony divorce arbitrator MLB labor agreement Divorce Agreements Levine Dispute Resolutions Divorce family law mediation lawyer-attended mediation high-risk methodology mediators support orders Self-adjusting alimony orders divorce mediations divorce arbitration Massachusetts divorce mediators family law arbitrator Baseball Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Chouteau Levine child support Levine Dispute Resolution Major League Baseball Arbitration alimony orders divorce arbitrators rehabilitative alimony divorce and family law mediators separation COLA divorce mediation DOMA IRC §2704 Massachusetts lawyers divorce and family law divorce process Massachusetts alimony reform legislation family law Uniform Arbitration Act Obamacare mediations lawyers resolve disputes Matrimonial Arbitration family and probate law disputes med/arb Alimony Reform Act dispute resolution pre-ARA alimony LDRC divorce mediators divorced Child Support Guidelines conciliation fraud divorce litigation Massachusetts alimony Defense of Marriage Act