Divorce Mediation Blog

Lawyers Weekly Takes On Rule 1:28: We Agree

Wednesday, November 04, 2015

We have commented here, on a number of occasions, about the Appeals Court's use and misuse of Rule 1:28's so-called "unpublished" opinions.

They are informal, scant on facts and often reasoning, sometimes obscure and too-often just confusing to family law discourse. If the Appeals Court is not going to stand behind its cases as precedent, or if an opinion is truly for the sole benefit of the captioned parties, the public record would be better served by a simple "affirmed" or "reversed" notation. As public records, the "full" opinions would be available to the highly motivated, but the cases would not be citable from the current netherworld of "persuasive but not precedent", to which the Appeals Court has assigned them.

For that reason, we delighted in reading October 26th's Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly, wherein the Editorial Board opined, at p. 38, that newly minted Chief Justice Scott L. Kafker should pay "immediate attention" to the problem of Rule 1:28. Lawyers Weekly described the intent of the rule to address "straightforward cases" and that the Appeals Court overuses the rule to the public's detriment. While our critique goes further, the editorial's targeting of the issue is welcome; and we thank the board for its call to action.

Either way: elevate all opinions to the level of precedent, then analyze and write them accordingly; or reduce them to simple announcements of the action taken on appeal. We respect the burden that the Appeals Court's unchecked, non-discretionary caseload poses. But do something please, Chief Justice Kafker, about this unhelpful practice.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


support orders IRC §2704 mediator Massachusetts alimony fraud SJC Massachusetts divorce lawyers conciliation arbitrator divorce and family law Baseball Players health coverage The Seven Sins of Alimony Defense of Marriage Act divorced Baseball family law family support med-arb Massachusetts divorce arbitrator divorce arbitration med/arb divorce mediators self-adjusting alimony Boston how baseball arbitration works Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Self-adjusting alimony orders divorce mediator Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC high-risk methodology arbitrators Levine Dispute Resolutions Matrimonial Arbitration alimony reform legislation Major League Baseball Arbitration alimony law Same Sex Marriage divorce mediation Divorce Agreements medical benefits General term alimony special master Alimony Reform Act divorce agreement divorce litigation Baseball Arbitration Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act resolve disputes mediation arbitration alimony orders Massachusetts alimony and child support child support family law mediation lawyer family and probate law disputes family mediation MLB labor agreement alimony Divorce divorce mediations disputes Uniform Arbitration Act separation Child Support Guidelines mediators rehabilitative alimony Chouteau Levine facilitated negotiations Massachusetts divorce mediators alimony statute divorce and family law mediators Massachusetts lawyers private dispute resolution annulment Levine Dispute Resolution Family Law Arbitration dispute resolution pre-ARA alimony health insurance COLA Levine Dispute Resolution Center litigation mediations divorce lawyers lawyer-attended mediation Obamacare LDRC family law arbitrators lawyers Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth divorce judgment family law arbitrator traditional negotiations Cohabitation divorce process DOMA divorce arbitrators