Divorce Mediation Blog

Lawyers Weekly Takes On Rule 1:28: We Agree

Wednesday, November 04, 2015

We have commented here, on a number of occasions, about the Appeals Court's use and misuse of Rule 1:28's so-called "unpublished" opinions.

They are informal, scant on facts and often reasoning, sometimes obscure and too-often just confusing to family law discourse. If the Appeals Court is not going to stand behind its cases as precedent, or if an opinion is truly for the sole benefit of the captioned parties, the public record would be better served by a simple "affirmed" or "reversed" notation. As public records, the "full" opinions would be available to the highly motivated, but the cases would not be citable from the current netherworld of "persuasive but not precedent", to which the Appeals Court has assigned them.

For that reason, we delighted in reading October 26th's Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly, wherein the Editorial Board opined, at p. 38, that newly minted Chief Justice Scott L. Kafker should pay "immediate attention" to the problem of Rule 1:28. Lawyers Weekly described the intent of the rule to address "straightforward cases" and that the Appeals Court overuses the rule to the public's detriment. While our critique goes further, the editorial's targeting of the issue is welcome; and we thank the board for its call to action.

Either way: elevate all opinions to the level of precedent, then analyze and write them accordingly; or reduce them to simple announcements of the action taken on appeal. We respect the burden that the Appeals Court's unchecked, non-discretionary caseload poses. But do something please, Chief Justice Kafker, about this unhelpful practice.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


mediation IRC §2704 Levine Dispute Resolutions Self-adjusting alimony orders divorce mediation divorce lawyers alimony statute Massachusetts alimony and child support separation traditional negotiations Chouteau Levine mediator Massachusetts divorce lawyers divorce agreement mediations DOMA how baseball arbitration works Cohabitation Defense of Marriage Act lawyer divorce litigation health coverage Matrimonial Arbitration mediators Family Law Arbitration family mediation SJC Levine Dispute Resolution Center General term alimony divorce mediator Major League Baseball Arbitration alimony law divorce mediators Levine Dispute Resolution self-adjusting alimony Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth Uniform Arbitration Act family law arbitrator arbitration Divorce Agreements Massachusetts divorce mediators arbitrators Baseball divorce mediations divorce and family law divorce arbitrators med/arb LDRC health insurance Massachusetts lawyers Obamacare med-arb resolve disputes Baseball Arbitration Baseball Players rehabilitative alimony Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC alimony fraud private dispute resolution medical benefits family law annulment divorce arbitration child support The Seven Sins of Alimony divorce process MLB labor agreement alimony orders divorce judgment alimony reform legislation Divorce lawyers arbitrator divorced litigation Massachusetts divorce arbitrator family law arbitrators Same Sex Marriage dispute resolution Child Support Guidelines special master lawyer-attended mediation Boston family law mediation Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act COLA divorce and family law mediators family and probate law disputes high-risk methodology pre-ARA alimony family support disputes facilitated negotiations Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly support orders conciliation Massachusetts alimony Alimony Reform Act