Divorce Mediation Blog

Lawyers Weekly Takes On Rule 1:28: We Agree

Wednesday, November 04, 2015

We have commented here, on a number of occasions, about the Appeals Court's use and misuse of Rule 1:28's so-called "unpublished" opinions.

They are informal, scant on facts and often reasoning, sometimes obscure and too-often just confusing to family law discourse. If the Appeals Court is not going to stand behind its cases as precedent, or if an opinion is truly for the sole benefit of the captioned parties, the public record would be better served by a simple "affirmed" or "reversed" notation. As public records, the "full" opinions would be available to the highly motivated, but the cases would not be citable from the current netherworld of "persuasive but not precedent", to which the Appeals Court has assigned them.

For that reason, we delighted in reading October 26th's Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly, wherein the Editorial Board opined, at p. 38, that newly minted Chief Justice Scott L. Kafker should pay "immediate attention" to the problem of Rule 1:28. Lawyers Weekly described the intent of the rule to address "straightforward cases" and that the Appeals Court overuses the rule to the public's detriment. While our critique goes further, the editorial's targeting of the issue is welcome; and we thank the board for its call to action.

Either way: elevate all opinions to the level of precedent, then analyze and write them accordingly; or reduce them to simple announcements of the action taken on appeal. We respect the burden that the Appeals Court's unchecked, non-discretionary caseload poses. But do something please, Chief Justice Kafker, about this unhelpful practice.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


disputes divorce arbitrators Defense of Marriage Act Same Sex Marriage self-adjusting alimony alimony law family support litigation divorced divorce mediator divorce judgment divorce mediations DOMA Boston Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth Matrimonial Arbitration Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly conciliation rehabilitative alimony fraud SJC separation support orders Uniform Arbitration Act traditional negotiations Levine Dispute Resolution family law health insurance med/arb IRC §2704 Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC family law arbitrators alimony med-arb divorce and family law mediators family law mediation Massachusetts how baseball arbitration works Levine Dispute Resolutions lawyer health coverage General term alimony lawyer-attended mediation arbitration divorce and family law medical benefits family law arbitrator Obamacare divorce process Levine Dispute Resolution Center child support The Seven Sins of Alimony Massachusetts alimony private dispute resolution Baseball Arbitration divorce lawyers Massachusetts divorce mediators Massachusetts divorce lawyers Massachusetts lawyers dispute resolution Self-adjusting alimony orders alimony reform legislation arbitrator Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act alimony statute Massachusetts alimony and child support Major League Baseball Arbitration LDRC COLA alimony orders divorce mediation Child Support Guidelines Chouteau Levine lawyers mediations annulment Family Law Arbitration Baseball MLB labor agreement facilitated negotiations mediation Baseball Players arbitrators high-risk methodology Cohabitation resolve disputes special master divorce arbitrator Alimony Reform Act pre-ARA alimony divorce arbitration Divorce Agreements divorce mediators divorce litigation mediator Divorce mediators family mediation family and probate law disputes divorce agreement