Divorce Mediation Blog

Important Arbitration Case Pending: May Have Particular Impact on Family Law

Monday, January 18, 2016

We read with interest about the pending case Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) case, Katz Nannis & Solomon, PC v. Levine (no relation), in the October 12, 2015 issue of Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly. Holland & Knight’s Attorney Gordon P. Katz wrote “SJC to Consider Expanded Review of Arbitrators’ Awards”, about the case, a civil action between estranged shareholders of an accounting firm. The question on appeal arises from an arbitration agreement; and specifically whether or not parties can bind each other and the court to rights of review that are broader than those that are set forth in the Massachusetts version of Uniform Arbitration Act.

M.G.L., ch. 251, § 12 limits the right to vacate an arbitral award to the grounds of: corruption or fraud; evident arbitral partiality; exceeded authority; and arbitrator’s refusal to grant a continuance sought with reasonable cause; or failure to admit material evidence. The contract in Katz case added that a court could overturn an award if it were based on “material, gross and flagrant error”, a higher threshold for appeal than provided in civil litigation, but broader, certainly, than §12. The SJC should rule on the matter sometime next year

One of the more frequently cited impediments to the growth of divorce arbitration, despite its manifest opportunities (efficiency, expediency, convenience, privacy, cost and control of selection of decision-maker), is that lawyers are deterred by the general loss of appellate rights. While everyone is well aware that appeals are rare, lengthy, obscenely costly, often inconclusive and always unpredictable, they are slow to relinquish the fail-safe for the true outlier result that they may encounter. We certainly understand the defensive impulse: divorce litigation clients are among the more litigious with their lawyers, post-divorce.

We have long believed that the law should allow people to agree to that level of review that they, as competent contracting parties, feel is appropriate. The American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers Model Family Law Arbitration Act, includes the right of parties to elect appeal of errors of law to the trial court judge, in the first instance, then to the appellate level. The local AAML has advanced a Massachusetts version of that model act here, without success so far. It, too, contains that right to vary review and appeal provisions.

We hope that the SJC recognizes this important contractual right; and that if they do, divorce lawyers will take another look at matrimonial arbitration.

We’re always happy to talk.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


General term alimony divorce litigation Divorce Agreements divorce and family law SJC Baseball divorce agreement how baseball arbitration works divorce process MLB labor agreement med-arb Uniform Arbitration Act Levine Dispute Resolutions divorce arbitration divorce arbitrators family law mediation divorced The Seven Sins of Alimony divorce mediations alimony law Same Sex Marriage COLA Massachusetts divorce lawyers Divorce mediation child support IRC §2704 medical benefits divorce mediators Levine Dispute Resolution Center mediations health coverage divorce arbitrator Levine Dispute Resolution arbitrators traditional negotiations arbitrator LDRC mediators self-adjusting alimony mediator Child Support Guidelines Chouteau Levine Baseball Arbitration family law arbitrator Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth alimony litigation dispute resolution disputes private dispute resolution family and probate law disputes lawyer-attended mediation Massachusetts divorce lawyers Self-adjusting alimony orders alimony statute pre-ARA alimony lawyer med/arb divorce and family law mediators alimony orders DOMA Obamacare Boston family law special master resolve disputes Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly rehabilitative alimony arbitration divorce mediator family law arbitrators family support fraud Massachusetts divorce mediators facilitated negotiations Massachusetts lawyers support orders Cohabitation Massachusetts alimony separation alimony reform legislation lawyers Massachusetts alimony and child support annulment divorce judgment divorce mediation Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act health insurance family mediation Baseball Players Major League Baseball Arbitration high-risk methodology Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC Matrimonial Arbitration conciliation Family Law Arbitration Alimony Reform Act Defense of Marriage Act