781.708.4445

wmlevine@levinedisputeresolution.com

Divorce Mediation Blog

Important Arbitration Case Pending: May Have Particular Impact on Family Law

Monday, January 18, 2016

We read with interest about the pending case Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) case, Katz Nannis & Solomon, PC v. Levine (no relation), in the October 12, 2015 issue of Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly. Holland & Knight’s Attorney Gordon P. Katz wrote “SJC to Consider Expanded Review of Arbitrators’ Awards”, about the case, a civil action between estranged shareholders of an accounting firm. The question on appeal arises from an arbitration agreement; and specifically whether or not parties can bind each other and the court to rights of review that are broader than those that are set forth in the Massachusetts version of Uniform Arbitration Act.

M.G.L., ch. 251, § 12 limits the right to vacate an arbitral award to the grounds of: corruption or fraud; evident arbitral partiality; exceeded authority; and arbitrator’s refusal to grant a continuance sought with reasonable cause; or failure to admit material evidence. The contract in Katz case added that a court could overturn an award if it were based on “material, gross and flagrant error”, a higher threshold for appeal than provided in civil litigation, but broader, certainly, than §12. The SJC should rule on the matter sometime next year

One of the more frequently cited impediments to the growth of divorce arbitration, despite its manifest opportunities (efficiency, expediency, convenience, privacy, cost and control of selection of decision-maker), is that lawyers are deterred by the general loss of appellate rights. While everyone is well aware that appeals are rare, lengthy, obscenely costly, often inconclusive and always unpredictable, they are slow to relinquish the fail-safe for the true outlier result that they may encounter. We certainly understand the defensive impulse: divorce litigation clients are among the more litigious with their lawyers, post-divorce.

We have long believed that the law should allow people to agree to that level of review that they, as competent contracting parties, feel is appropriate. The American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers Model Family Law Arbitration Act, includes the right of parties to elect appeal of errors of law to the trial court judge, in the first instance, then to the appellate level. The local AAML has advanced a Massachusetts version of that model act here, without success so far. It, too, contains that right to vary review and appeal provisions.

We hope that the SJC recognizes this important contractual right; and that if they do, divorce lawyers will take another look at matrimonial arbitration.

We’re always happy to talk.



Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:



Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles


recent posts


tags

SJC Levine Dispute Resolutions family mediation divorce mediations divorce arbitrators Boston General term alimony Divorce facilitated negotiations Massachusetts lawyers support orders arbitrators fraud mediator Cohabitation separation self-adjusting alimony Massachusetts alimony lawyer-attended mediation Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC The Seven Sins of Alimony special master divorce arbitration family law mediation Massachusetts family support conciliation MLB labor agreement Divorce Agreements annulment DOMA Levine Dispute Resolution med-arb Matrimonial Arbitration rehabilitative alimony family law arbitrator Massachusetts alimony and child support alimony statute high-risk methodology med/arb Chouteau Levine traditional negotiations Massachusetts divorce lawyers dispute resolution divorce process alimony law family and probate law disputes Levine Dispute Resolution Center divorce mediators lawyer family law arbitrators Baseball Arbitration divorce agreement divorce mediation alimony reform legislation LDRC private dispute resolution arbitration family law mediations health coverage resolve disputes alimony orders divorce litigation Child Support Guidelines divorced medical benefits Self-adjusting alimony orders divorce mediator Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly COLA divorce lawyers mediation Obamacare Alimony Reform Act Baseball child support pre-ARA alimony Baseball Players divorce and family law mediators lawyers Family Law Arbitration health insurance Major League Baseball Arbitration arbitrator how baseball arbitration works alimony IRC §2704 mediators Uniform Arbitration Act divorce judgment divorce and family law Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth Defense of Marriage Act divorce arbitrator Same Sex Marriage Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act Massachusetts divorce mediators disputes litigation