Divorce Mediation Blog

If It Looks Like a Duck: Might Just as Well Get Married

Wednesday, May 07, 2014

It looks like the days of the cohabitation dividend may be numbered.

As anyone who cares, knows, M.G.L., chapter 208, section 49(d)(2) (eff. 3/1/12), directs that a probate and family court judge shall reduce, suspend or terminate alimony when the recipient is shown to have cohabited (as defined) for more than three months. And, the courts have been busy hearing requests to do exactly that regularly ever since.

A hot controversy over section 49(d)(2) is whether the enactment of the new law was itself a change of circumstances that would allow the court to act, in a case where the cohabitation pre-dated the new law, or if the alimony payor would only have access to relief if he or she could show a substantial change of financial circumstances since the court’s last judgment in the case, be it a divorce or a modification. Lawyers have debated this issue, including in this blog. (See, Maureen McBrien’s “Impact of Cohabitation Under Alimony Reform Act”, May 2, 2012; and David Lee’s “Counterpoint re: Alimony Reform and Cohabitation”, July 10, 2012.)

One judge recently decided the issue for the parties in Schwartz v. Schwartz, Middlesex Probate and Family Court Docket No. 03D 2715. Judge Edward F. Donnelly concluded that the new alimony statute was itself sufficient to justify alimony termination, and he did just that. Critically, the request under Section 49(d)(2) concerned an established cohabitation that Judge Donnelly saw as tantamount to marriage; and the relationship existed in that form before a previous modification judgment between the parties. Financial circumstances had not substantially changed since the last judgment; the common household circumstances had not changed either; and the only material change was enactment of the statute.

In his rationale, the judge observed that:

    It does not make sense that the husband is penalized because of a modification judgment which entered almost two years prior to the enactment of the alimony reform act. To require the husband to show a change of circumstances independent of the statute would render the language of G.L.208, [s.] 49(d), which requires that the court terminate, modify or suspend alimony upon cohabitation of the recipient spouse, meaningless in many cases. (Italics added.)

Certainly, a clear statement from a thoughtful judge; but one with which Ms. Schwartz deeply disagrees, one assumes. We expect that an appeal will follow on this delicate point of policy and statutory interpretation. Just one of many appellate cases to come from the alimony reform statute: the gift that keeps on giving.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


divorced Defense of Marriage Act SJC Levine Dispute Resolutions family law mediation Self-adjusting alimony orders Child Support Guidelines health coverage LDRC divorce process COLA divorce arbitration high-risk methodology Alimony Reform Act divorce judgment resolve disputes family law arbitrators Major League Baseball Arbitration IRC §2704 mediations DOMA divorce agreement Same Sex Marriage divorce litigation Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly med/arb alimony arbitration Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth lawyer Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC facilitated negotiations medical benefits Massachusetts alimony and child support traditional negotiations Levine Dispute Resolution Center Family Law Arbitration conciliation fraud mediators divorce mediation divorce arbitrators Divorce Agreements litigation family mediation divorce lawyers med-arb divorce arbitrator MLB labor agreement Divorce arbitrator health insurance dispute resolution separation Chouteau Levine how baseball arbitration works Massachusetts divorce mediators mediator Baseball Players divorce and family law alimony orders Massachusetts special master Massachusetts divorce lawyers The Seven Sins of Alimony lawyer-attended mediation support orders divorce and family law mediators pre-ARA alimony Baseball Arbitration divorce mediator General term alimony Massachusetts alimony self-adjusting alimony Matrimonial Arbitration arbitrators family and probate law disputes family support family law divorce mediations child support disputes alimony statute alimony reform legislation Boston alimony law mediation Uniform Arbitration Act private dispute resolution Levine Dispute Resolution divorce mediators rehabilitative alimony family law arbitrator Cohabitation Baseball annulment Massachusetts lawyers Obamacare lawyers