Divorce Mediation Blog

Health Insurance In Section 34 And Alimony Reform - Part 2

Sunday, February 16, 2014

In the last blog entry, we introduced this topic and explored the first sentence of the health insurance portion of MGL, chapter 208, section 34, which we set forth in its entirety. It is apparent that a trial judge must make inquiry into spousal health insurance coverage that is available to an alimony payor . On close reading, it is difficult to understand exactly what the meets and bounds of that inquiry are, but plainly it places a priority on providing coverage. This is unsurprising in the current era of health care reform, despite the fact that the section 34 language preceded both the state and federal the individual mandates.

Here, we consider section 34’s relationship to MGL, chapter 208, sections 53 (eff. 3/1/12), which it also preceded. To do so, we take on the third sentence of section 34’s health insurance provision. It says:

    In no event shall the order for alimony be reduced as a result of the obligor’s cost for health insurance coverage for the spouse.

And, it remains good law. Yet, the new alimony law, states that:

    (e) In setting an initial alimony order, or in modifying an existing order, the court may deviate from duration and amount limits for general term alimony and rehabilitative alimony upon written findings that deviation is necessary. Grounds for deviation may include: …
    (3)whether the payor spouse is providing health insurance and the cost of health insurance for the recipient spouse…

So, which law prevails? The one that says that alimony cannot be reduced by reason of costs for health insurance or the one that states that it may?

Previously, we observed how little the health insurance provision of section 34 has been litigated. This statutory conflict may well change that. As divorce mediators, we help our clients address these matters practically, but as divorce arbitrators, we await, and now need, appellate clarification.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


Self-adjusting alimony orders divorce mediations Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly mediation family law arbitrators Child Support Guidelines Baseball divorced divorce and family law family mediation arbitrators alimony Same Sex Marriage private dispute resolution IRC §2704 lawyers medical benefits mediations med-arb arbitrator Massachusetts lawyers Obamacare Family Law Arbitration Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC Chouteau Levine med/arb disputes alimony reform legislation divorce and family law mediators Levine Dispute Resolution conciliation how baseball arbitration works Baseball Arbitration divorce arbitration divorce arbitrators Baseball Players Cohabitation child support divorce mediator traditional negotiations Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act family support resolve disputes MLB labor agreement high-risk methodology Major League Baseball Arbitration COLA family law Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth divorce mediators Levine Dispute Resolution Center divorce judgment Alimony Reform Act alimony law Matrimonial Arbitration lawyer annulment lawyer-attended mediation special master Massachusetts alimony and child support litigation rehabilitative alimony family and probate law disputes alimony orders Massachusetts alimony divorce agreement Massachusetts divorce mediators LDRC divorce lawyers family law mediation divorce litigation Uniform Arbitration Act divorce arbitrator separation Divorce Agreements Boston alimony statute Massachusetts divorce lawyers health coverage The Seven Sins of Alimony mediators Massachusetts arbitration Levine Dispute Resolutions Defense of Marriage Act General term alimony dispute resolution SJC divorce process Divorce facilitated negotiations health insurance fraud DOMA divorce mediation family law arbitrator pre-ARA alimony mediator support orders self-adjusting alimony