Divorce Mediation Blog

Health Insurance In Section 34 And Alimony Reform - Part 2

Sunday, February 16, 2014

In the last blog entry, we introduced this topic and explored the first sentence of the health insurance portion of MGL, chapter 208, section 34, which we set forth in its entirety. It is apparent that a trial judge must make inquiry into spousal health insurance coverage that is available to an alimony payor . On close reading, it is difficult to understand exactly what the meets and bounds of that inquiry are, but plainly it places a priority on providing coverage. This is unsurprising in the current era of health care reform, despite the fact that the section 34 language preceded both the state and federal the individual mandates.

Here, we consider section 34’s relationship to MGL, chapter 208, sections 53 (eff. 3/1/12), which it also preceded. To do so, we take on the third sentence of section 34’s health insurance provision. It says:

    In no event shall the order for alimony be reduced as a result of the obligor’s cost for health insurance coverage for the spouse.

And, it remains good law. Yet, the new alimony law, states that:

    (e) In setting an initial alimony order, or in modifying an existing order, the court may deviate from duration and amount limits for general term alimony and rehabilitative alimony upon written findings that deviation is necessary. Grounds for deviation may include: …
    (3)whether the payor spouse is providing health insurance and the cost of health insurance for the recipient spouse…

So, which law prevails? The one that says that alimony cannot be reduced by reason of costs for health insurance or the one that states that it may?

Previously, we observed how little the health insurance provision of section 34 has been litigated. This statutory conflict may well change that. As divorce mediators, we help our clients address these matters practically, but as divorce arbitrators, we await, and now need, appellate clarification.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


divorce mediator child support alimony Baseball Divorce Agreements alimony reform legislation divorce lawyers The Seven Sins of Alimony divorce and family law mediators support orders divorce mediation arbitration arbitrators self-adjusting alimony Levine Dispute Resolutions alimony orders annulment litigation IRC §2704 Massachusetts alimony Massachusetts alimony and child support special master resolve disputes General term alimony family law divorce mediators divorce and family law Levine Dispute Resolution Center Divorce Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act divorce process family law mediation health coverage private dispute resolution mediator dispute resolution divorce arbitration LDRC Matrimonial Arbitration divorce agreement Self-adjusting alimony orders divorce mediations Baseball Players mediations med/arb Massachusetts divorce mediators lawyer-attended mediation family and probate law disputes traditional negotiations health insurance facilitated negotiations arbitrator rehabilitative alimony conciliation alimony law Same Sex Marriage mediators Uniform Arbitration Act lawyers Massachusetts divorce lawyers family mediation Baseball Arbitration SJC divorce arbitrator Chouteau Levine Massachusetts med-arb Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC divorce judgment divorce arbitrators Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly MLB labor agreement fraud family support mediation family law arbitrator Cohabitation disputes divorce litigation Massachusetts lawyers Obamacare lawyer Major League Baseball Arbitration Levine Dispute Resolution Family Law Arbitration Defense of Marriage Act separation alimony statute pre-ARA alimony how baseball arbitration works Alimony Reform Act DOMA Child Support Guidelines divorced Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth medical benefits COLA high-risk methodology Boston family law arbitrators