781.708.4445

wmlevine@levinedisputeresolution.com

Divorce Mediation Blog

Health Insurance In Section 34 And Alimony Reform - Part 2

Sunday, February 16, 2014

In the last blog entry, we introduced this topic and explored the first sentence of the health insurance portion of MGL, chapter 208, section 34, which we set forth in its entirety. It is apparent that a trial judge must make inquiry into spousal health insurance coverage that is available to an alimony payor . On close reading, it is difficult to understand exactly what the meets and bounds of that inquiry are, but plainly it places a priority on providing coverage. This is unsurprising in the current era of health care reform, despite the fact that the section 34 language preceded both the state and federal the individual mandates.

Here, we consider section 34’s relationship to MGL, chapter 208, sections 53 (eff. 3/1/12), which it also preceded. To do so, we take on the third sentence of section 34’s health insurance provision. It says:

    In no event shall the order for alimony be reduced as a result of the obligor’s cost for health insurance coverage for the spouse.

And, it remains good law. Yet, the new alimony law, states that:

    (e) In setting an initial alimony order, or in modifying an existing order, the court may deviate from duration and amount limits for general term alimony and rehabilitative alimony upon written findings that deviation is necessary. Grounds for deviation may include: …
    (3)whether the payor spouse is providing health insurance and the cost of health insurance for the recipient spouse…

So, which law prevails? The one that says that alimony cannot be reduced by reason of costs for health insurance or the one that states that it may?

Previously, we observed how little the health insurance provision of section 34 has been litigated. This statutory conflict may well change that. As divorce mediators, we help our clients address these matters practically, but as divorce arbitrators, we await, and now need, appellate clarification.



Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:



Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles


recent posts


tags

private dispute resolution Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC Divorce family and probate law disputes divorce mediation pre-ARA alimony family law arbitrator disputes Obamacare divorce mediations family law mediation Same Sex Marriage Alimony Reform Act special master Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth self-adjusting alimony med-arb The Seven Sins of Alimony alimony law Baseball Players divorce arbitrators divorce process mediators MLB labor agreement divorce mediator lawyer-attended mediation SJC Matrimonial Arbitration Self-adjusting alimony orders divorce and family law mediators resolve disputes divorce arbitrator mediation Boston Massachusetts divorce lawyers arbitrator alimony reform legislation Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act divorce arbitration arbitrators dispute resolution Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly support orders separation medical benefits Child Support Guidelines alimony statute fraud divorce and family law Massachusetts alimony and child support conciliation Baseball divorce judgment litigation Divorce Agreements divorced divorce mediators Major League Baseball Arbitration Chouteau Levine rehabilitative alimony divorce agreement mediations COLA alimony orders how baseball arbitration works child support family mediation Levine Dispute Resolutions Cohabitation lawyers arbitration IRC §2704 med/arb divorce litigation Massachusetts lawyers health coverage alimony General term alimony Family Law Arbitration annulment Massachusetts Defense of Marriage Act Massachusetts divorce mediators lawyer family support divorce lawyers Massachusetts alimony Baseball Arbitration mediator family law DOMA traditional negotiations Uniform Arbitration Act high-risk methodology Levine Dispute Resolution Center health insurance Levine Dispute Resolution family law arbitrators facilitated negotiations LDRC