781.708.4445

wmlevine@levinedisputeresolution.com

Divorce Mediation Blog

Health Insurance In Section 34 And Alimony Reform - Part 2

Sunday, February 16, 2014

In the last blog entry, we introduced this topic and explored the first sentence of the health insurance portion of MGL, chapter 208, section 34, which we set forth in its entirety. It is apparent that a trial judge must make inquiry into spousal health insurance coverage that is available to an alimony payor . On close reading, it is difficult to understand exactly what the meets and bounds of that inquiry are, but plainly it places a priority on providing coverage. This is unsurprising in the current era of health care reform, despite the fact that the section 34 language preceded both the state and federal the individual mandates.

Here, we consider section 34’s relationship to MGL, chapter 208, sections 53 (eff. 3/1/12), which it also preceded. To do so, we take on the third sentence of section 34’s health insurance provision. It says:

    In no event shall the order for alimony be reduced as a result of the obligor’s cost for health insurance coverage for the spouse.

And, it remains good law. Yet, the new alimony law, states that:

    (e) In setting an initial alimony order, or in modifying an existing order, the court may deviate from duration and amount limits for general term alimony and rehabilitative alimony upon written findings that deviation is necessary. Grounds for deviation may include: …
    (3)whether the payor spouse is providing health insurance and the cost of health insurance for the recipient spouse…

So, which law prevails? The one that says that alimony cannot be reduced by reason of costs for health insurance or the one that states that it may?

Previously, we observed how little the health insurance provision of section 34 has been litigated. This statutory conflict may well change that. As divorce mediators, we help our clients address these matters practically, but as divorce arbitrators, we await, and now need, appellate clarification.



Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:



Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles


recent posts


tags

divorce agreement medical benefits facilitated negotiations alimony statute Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act Matrimonial Arbitration COLA Baseball alimony law Alimony Reform Act divorce mediation divorce lawyers divorce arbitration Family Law Arbitration divorce judgment arbitration Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC The Seven Sins of Alimony IRC §2704 family support divorce process Massachusetts lawyers fraud resolve disputes divorce mediations divorce litigation divorce arbitrator disputes Cohabitation alimony reform legislation Baseball Players divorced annulment health insurance med-arb Divorce Major League Baseball Arbitration child support private dispute resolution mediations health coverage family law arbitrator Divorce Agreements Massachusetts alimony and child support special master how baseball arbitration works high-risk methodology lawyer-attended mediation mediation SJC dispute resolution Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly conciliation med/arb Same Sex Marriage Massachusetts alimony support orders traditional negotiations Levine Dispute Resolution separation Levine Dispute Resolution Center arbitrator Defense of Marriage Act Massachusetts divorce mediators Boston Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth family law mediation mediators family law arbitrators litigation LDRC mediator Self-adjusting alimony orders divorce mediator Massachusetts divorce lawyers family and probate law disputes rehabilitative alimony General term alimony divorce and family law Baseball Arbitration Uniform Arbitration Act self-adjusting alimony divorce and family law mediators alimony orders Chouteau Levine family mediation Child Support Guidelines MLB labor agreement Massachusetts divorce mediators pre-ARA alimony Obamacare alimony arbitrators lawyers divorce arbitrators DOMA Levine Dispute Resolutions lawyer family law