Divorce Mediation Blog

Health Insurance In Section 34 And Alimony Reform - Part 2

Sunday, February 16, 2014

In the last blog entry, we introduced this topic and explored the first sentence of the health insurance portion of MGL, chapter 208, section 34, which we set forth in its entirety. It is apparent that a trial judge must make inquiry into spousal health insurance coverage that is available to an alimony payor . On close reading, it is difficult to understand exactly what the meets and bounds of that inquiry are, but plainly it places a priority on providing coverage. This is unsurprising in the current era of health care reform, despite the fact that the section 34 language preceded both the state and federal the individual mandates.

Here, we consider section 34’s relationship to MGL, chapter 208, sections 53 (eff. 3/1/12), which it also preceded. To do so, we take on the third sentence of section 34’s health insurance provision. It says:

    In no event shall the order for alimony be reduced as a result of the obligor’s cost for health insurance coverage for the spouse.

And, it remains good law. Yet, the new alimony law, states that:

    (e) In setting an initial alimony order, or in modifying an existing order, the court may deviate from duration and amount limits for general term alimony and rehabilitative alimony upon written findings that deviation is necessary. Grounds for deviation may include: …
    (3)whether the payor spouse is providing health insurance and the cost of health insurance for the recipient spouse…

So, which law prevails? The one that says that alimony cannot be reduced by reason of costs for health insurance or the one that states that it may?

Previously, we observed how little the health insurance provision of section 34 has been litigated. This statutory conflict may well change that. As divorce mediators, we help our clients address these matters practically, but as divorce arbitrators, we await, and now need, appellate clarification.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


Self-adjusting alimony orders DOMA lawyer divorce arbitrator Child Support Guidelines conciliation Levine Dispute Resolutions Same Sex Marriage Massachusetts divorce agreement IRC §2704 Divorce Agreements health insurance separation Major League Baseball Arbitration COLA special master alimony Massachusetts lawyers self-adjusting alimony Boston high-risk methodology arbitrators divorce process pre-ARA alimony Divorce Baseball Players rehabilitative alimony Massachusetts alimony and child support divorce lawyers Massachusetts divorce lawyers support orders mediators Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly lawyer-attended mediation Defense of Marriage Act Levine Dispute Resolution Center family support annulment Massachusetts alimony LDRC Cohabitation divorce litigation divorce mediation alimony statute family law arbitrator facilitated negotiations divorce mediators medical benefits med-arb family law arbitrators Levine Dispute Resolution health coverage Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth divorce arbitrators MLB labor agreement Alimony Reform Act how baseball arbitration works disputes resolve disputes Massachusetts divorce mediators divorce and family law mediators divorce arbitration alimony orders alimony reform legislation lawyers Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act mediator family law mediation traditional negotiations arbitrator litigation family and probate law disputes divorce and family law Chouteau Levine family mediation divorce mediations SJC private dispute resolution mediation Obamacare Matrimonial Arbitration Baseball dispute resolution divorce judgment fraud med/arb divorced arbitration child support Family Law Arbitration Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC The Seven Sins of Alimony alimony law Baseball Arbitration divorce mediator mediations family law Uniform Arbitration Act General term alimony