781.708.4445

wmlevine@levinedisputeresolution.com

Divorce Mediation Blog

Health Insurance In Section 34 And Alimony Reform - Part 2

Sunday, February 16, 2014

In the last blog entry, we introduced this topic and explored the first sentence of the health insurance portion of MGL, chapter 208, section 34, which we set forth in its entirety. It is apparent that a trial judge must make inquiry into spousal health insurance coverage that is available to an alimony payor . On close reading, it is difficult to understand exactly what the meets and bounds of that inquiry are, but plainly it places a priority on providing coverage. This is unsurprising in the current era of health care reform, despite the fact that the section 34 language preceded both the state and federal the individual mandates.

Here, we consider section 34’s relationship to MGL, chapter 208, sections 53 (eff. 3/1/12), which it also preceded. To do so, we take on the third sentence of section 34’s health insurance provision. It says:

    In no event shall the order for alimony be reduced as a result of the obligor’s cost for health insurance coverage for the spouse.

And, it remains good law. Yet, the new alimony law, states that:

    (e) In setting an initial alimony order, or in modifying an existing order, the court may deviate from duration and amount limits for general term alimony and rehabilitative alimony upon written findings that deviation is necessary. Grounds for deviation may include: …
    (3)whether the payor spouse is providing health insurance and the cost of health insurance for the recipient spouse…

So, which law prevails? The one that says that alimony cannot be reduced by reason of costs for health insurance or the one that states that it may?

Previously, we observed how little the health insurance provision of section 34 has been litigated. This statutory conflict may well change that. As divorce mediators, we help our clients address these matters practically, but as divorce arbitrators, we await, and now need, appellate clarification.



Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:



Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles


recent posts


tags

divorce mediator Family Law Arbitration separation Self-adjusting alimony orders child support Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth divorce mediations Major League Baseball Arbitration mediator alimony orders med/arb lawyer-attended mediation conciliation divorce mediators Uniform Arbitration Act alimony law facilitated negotiations Boston alimony health coverage Levine Dispute Resolution divorce arbitration mediators The Seven Sins of Alimony Baseball Arbitration disputes Levine Dispute Resolutions arbitration Cohabitation family support Massachusetts alimony Same Sex Marriage General term alimony high-risk methodology divorce mediation lawyer Child Support Guidelines SJC medical benefits self-adjusting alimony divorce and family law mediators Massachusetts divorce lawyers alimony reform legislation Chouteau Levine Massachusetts alimony and child support dispute resolution family law arbitrator fraud IRC §2704 family law mediation divorce agreement arbitrators alimony statute divorce litigation mediations Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act Baseball Players Baseball MLB labor agreement Divorce traditional negotiations Massachusetts divorce mediators Obamacare divorce and family law Matrimonial Arbitration health insurance Massachusetts divorce judgment divorce arbitrator COLA mediation private dispute resolution Alimony Reform Act family law Levine Dispute Resolution Center LDRC annulment divorce lawyers Massachusetts lawyers Divorce Agreements family mediation Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Defense of Marriage Act pre-ARA alimony resolve disputes lawyers rehabilitative alimony special master how baseball arbitration works Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC divorced med-arb divorce arbitrators divorce process support orders litigation arbitrator family law arbitrators DOMA family and probate law disputes