Divorce Mediation Blog

GOP Plan to End Alimony Deductibility: Time to reform the Alimony Reform Act?

Monday, November 20, 2017

Levine Dispute Resolution - Alimony

The House GOP seems to think that repealing §215 of the Internal Revenue Code is a good idea. We have long believed that there are probably too many alimony-paying lawyers in Congress to let this day ever come. It probably won’t, but if it does, it will plunge the Alimony Reform Act (ARA) (eff. 3.1.12) into crisis. Either way, the legislature needs to respond.

M.G.L., ch. 208, §48 defines “alimony” as: “the payment of support from a spouse, who has the ability to pay, to a spouse in need of support for a reasonable length of time, under a court order”. Nothing about tax impact. The drafters, like us, clearly took deductibility under federal and state law for granted.

Moreover, M.G.L., ch. 208, §53(b) defines a “reasonable and lawful” presumptive formulation for general term alimony, stating the general term alimony should generally not exceed the recipient needs, or 30-35% of the difference between the parties’ applicable gross incomes.

This statutory range makes the same once-safe assumption: that IRC §215 allows parties to leverage dollars to the family’s benefit, by shifting income tax from a higher progressive tax rate of the payor, to the payee’s lower rate.

If the alimony deduction dies, it will take the viability of §53(b) along with it. Yet, the zombie statute will persist, entitling litigants to rely on it, despite its infirmity; unless and until the state legislature takes corrective action. This will not happen overnight – these things never do – and in the meantime… Sophisticated divorce agreements have “savings” clauses, which help people adjust alimony sums in the unlikely event of a deductibility repeal, and the GOP plan grandparents existing judgments, at least until modification. But modification cases and new divorces won’t get off so easy.

Maybe, the legislature should take the GOP proposal as a warning shot, at least. The legislature could act pre-emptively. Sections 48 and 53(b) at least need reformulation, regardless of Congress’ ultimate action. We should convert the assumption of the tax-shifting leverage of continued deductibility for alimony into a clear predicate for the ARA, with provisions to address the alternative.

And, if the unthinkable happens, it’s better get started now.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


family law Massachusetts divorce lawyers divorce and family law med/arb Uniform Arbitration Act conciliation family and probate law disputes Massachusetts alimony and child support SJC lawyers divorce process mediators alimony statute Baseball resolve disputes Levine Dispute Resolutions alimony Family Law Arbitration high-risk methodology Divorce Agreements Massachusetts divorce mediators divorced MLB labor agreement family law arbitrator pre-ARA alimony Obamacare divorce lawyers facilitated negotiations divorce mediations General term alimony arbitration Massachusetts lawyers mediator IRC §2704 arbitrator Levine Dispute Resolution Baseball Players alimony reform legislation Divorce disputes annulment support orders dispute resolution mediation divorce mediator Matrimonial Arbitration Chouteau Levine divorce judgment litigation Massachusetts alimony The Seven Sins of Alimony family support Child Support Guidelines Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC lawyer family law mediation separation divorce and family law mediators private dispute resolution how baseball arbitration works Massachusetts fraud lawyer-attended mediation divorce arbitration health insurance mediations divorce mediators LDRC self-adjusting alimony Alimony Reform Act Cohabitation Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth DOMA divorce arbitrator COLA special master Major League Baseball Arbitration Levine Dispute Resolution Center family law arbitrators divorce agreement health coverage child support Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act divorce mediation alimony orders arbitrators medical benefits Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Boston Self-adjusting alimony orders med-arb rehabilitative alimony family mediation Same Sex Marriage Defense of Marriage Act traditional negotiations divorce litigation Baseball Arbitration divorce arbitrators alimony law