781.708.4445

wmlevine@levinedisputeresolution.com

Divorce Mediation Blog

Financial Bigamy: Failing the Irony Test and An Important SJC Alimony Decision in Connor v. Benedict

Wednesday, March 20, 2019

Levine Dispute Resolution Center - Alimony

“Financial bigamy”.

It sounds like a name that we might see on the back of a 40-footer in the local marina, as in “my family is expensive, but man, you should see my boat!” Or, a bad reality TV show (sorry for redundancy).

The term actually finds its origin in the recent Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) case Connor v. Benedict, an important and well-reasoned case on the question, in part, of just how high the evidentiary bar is in pre-dating the start of marriage (for durational limit calculation purposes) to a time before the actual marriage ceremony because:

    “…there is evidence that the parties’ economic marital partnership began during their cohabitation period prior to the marriage.” M.G.L., ch. 208, §48.

Previously, the SJC’s Duff-Koreores v. Kaoreores (2016) lifted a set of fact criteria for the determination of pre-marital “economic partnership” from the Alimony Reform Act’s enumerated factors for finding “common household” of an alimony recipient post-divorce. While this may or may not been what the legislature intended, it certainly works well enough.

The challenge in Connor was that the husband argued that he and the wife could not, as a matter of law, have been engaged in a marital partnership because while –

    the parties lived together -

    they shared health insurance -

    they bought, carried and improved a home together and -

    they publicly held out a filial relationship between the husband and his future step-son -

    they were engaged in “financial bigamy” because the wife was simultaneously collecting alimony from her ex-husband!

After gaining benefit from the wife’s previous alimony, the husband doubled down now by using that same alimony as a shield against his own obligation to her. He plainly missed the irony of his double recovery effort. A really good trial judge didn’t, and clearly the SJC did not miss it either.

These are busy days for the Appellate Irony Chutzpah Scale (AICS). First, last November’s Boblis v. Costa, where a father tried to cut off child support for “military enlistment” emancipation, after his son reduced his father’s tuition bills by accepting a ROTC scholarship (November 7, 2019 blog entry); then, Dilanian v. Dilanian in December, in which the husband asked the judge to take his word about material facts while giving the court documents that established the opposite! (December 8, 2018 blog entry) Luckily, In all three cases, the courts’ irony sensors have been up to the task.



Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:



Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles


recent posts


tags

SJC Massachusetts alimony and child support medical benefits private dispute resolution family law arbitrator Baseball arbitrator alimony litigation divorced rehabilitative alimony MLB labor agreement mediation The Seven Sins of Alimony Levine Dispute Resolutions Baseball Arbitration divorce agreement divorce arbitration mediator alimony law conciliation Uniform Arbitration Act divorce litigation divorce and family law mediators family support Child Support Guidelines Family Law Arbitration high-risk methodology support orders alimony statute divorce and family law health insurance Self-adjusting alimony orders family law arbitrators Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly special master Alimony Reform Act alimony orders Cohabitation arbitrators COLA resolve disputes annulment med-arb IRC §2704 divorce arbitrators Massachusetts Divorce divorce arbitrator mediations self-adjusting alimony Levine Dispute Resolution child support divorce lawyers family law Major League Baseball Arbitration General term alimony Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC Massachusetts divorce mediators Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act divorce mediations Massachusetts divorce lawyers family law mediation Boston Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth Matrimonial Arbitration Chouteau Levine Levine Dispute Resolution Center facilitated negotiations divorce mediation Divorce Agreements health coverage Defense of Marriage Act divorce mediators Same Sex Marriage family mediation disputes arbitration divorce judgment traditional negotiations divorce mediator lawyer DOMA Massachusetts alimony lawyer-attended mediation lawyers Obamacare Baseball Players dispute resolution pre-ARA alimony fraud LDRC how baseball arbitration works family and probate law disputes med/arb divorce process Massachusetts lawyers separation mediators alimony reform legislation