781.708.4445

wmlevine@levinedisputeresolution.com

Divorce Mediation Blog

#marriedseparateddivorcedcohabitedmarrieddivorced: The SJC makes it up and gets it right: Duff-Kareores v. Kareores – Part 3

Wednesday, July 27, 2016

In our last two entries, we considered the central features of the Supreme Judicial Court’s (SJC) recent case, Duff-Kareores v. Kareores. Today, we comment briefly on a collateral benefit of the SJC’s opinion in another area the Alimony Reform Act (eff. 3.1.12) (ARA): the “common household” provision of in M.G.L., ch. 208, § 49(d). In its decision, the high court lifted the enumerated criteria of §49(d) (how to prove common household) and grafted them onto §48 (how to prove length of marriage to equitably pre-marital economic partnership during cohabitation).

In doing so, the SJC described §49(d) as the factual basis upon which a judge may reduce, suspend or terminate alimony by reason of a relationship that:

“…resembles, but is not equivalent to a legal marriage.”

In this dictum, the SJC says what the legislature did not with the greatest clarity: that the purpose of §49(d) is to give potential recourse to an alimony payor, without the burden of proving abated financial “need”, when an alimony recipient has assumed a marriage-like relationship. In the bare statute, the only word that connotes this meaning is “couple”, appearing in sub-sections ii. and v.; the dictionary meaning of which is not limited to romantic pairings. (See, http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/couple.)

We hope that this collateral comment by the SJC will caution any future litigant against stretching the benefits of §49(d) beyond what we believe be its intended purpose.



Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:



Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles


recent posts


tags

Self-adjusting alimony orders divorce judgment Major League Baseball Arbitration Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act SJC Child Support Guidelines Uniform Arbitration Act conciliation mediation traditional negotiations Matrimonial Arbitration General term alimony alimony reform legislation health coverage separation family and probate law disputes resolve disputes family law mediation Same Sex Marriage Boston mediator divorce mediator MLB labor agreement family law arbitrators COLA fraud Levine Dispute Resolution Center IRC §2704 mediations child support special master Massachusetts divorce lawyers Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC Massachusetts alimony Family Law Arbitration Baseball LDRC self-adjusting alimony Chouteau Levine arbitrator Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth disputes divorced Divorce divorce and family law lawyer-attended mediation divorce lawyers dispute resolution Baseball Arbitration The Seven Sins of Alimony alimony statute lawyers litigation family law arbitrator divorce and family law mediators family law Alimony Reform Act Massachusetts alimony and child support divorce arbitration Massachusetts family support annulment divorce mediation Defense of Marriage Act facilitated negotiations alimony orders Obamacare how baseball arbitration works rehabilitative alimony mediators divorce process lawyer health insurance med/arb Levine Dispute Resolutions family mediation medical benefits arbitration divorce agreement alimony law DOMA Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly private dispute resolution Baseball Players pre-ARA alimony Divorce Agreements divorce litigation Massachusetts lawyers Cohabitation alimony divorce arbitrator high-risk methodology divorce mediators med-arb Massachusetts divorce mediators divorce arbitrators arbitrators Levine Dispute Resolution support orders divorce mediations