781.708.4445

wmlevine@levinedisputeresolution.com

Divorce Mediation Blog

#marriedseparateddivorcedcohabitedmarrieddivorced: The SJC makes it up and gets it right: Duff-Kareores v. Kareores – Part 3

Wednesday, July 27, 2016

In our last two entries, we considered the central features of the Supreme Judicial Court’s (SJC) recent case, Duff-Kareores v. Kareores. Today, we comment briefly on a collateral benefit of the SJC’s opinion in another area the Alimony Reform Act (eff. 3.1.12) (ARA): the “common household” provision of in M.G.L., ch. 208, § 49(d). In its decision, the high court lifted the enumerated criteria of §49(d) (how to prove common household) and grafted them onto §48 (how to prove length of marriage to equitably pre-marital economic partnership during cohabitation).

In doing so, the SJC described §49(d) as the factual basis upon which a judge may reduce, suspend or terminate alimony by reason of a relationship that:

“…resembles, but is not equivalent to a legal marriage.”

In this dictum, the SJC says what the legislature did not with the greatest clarity: that the purpose of §49(d) is to give potential recourse to an alimony payor, without the burden of proving abated financial “need”, when an alimony recipient has assumed a marriage-like relationship. In the bare statute, the only word that connotes this meaning is “couple”, appearing in sub-sections ii. and v.; the dictionary meaning of which is not limited to romantic pairings. (See, http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/couple.)

We hope that this collateral comment by the SJC will caution any future litigant against stretching the benefits of §49(d) beyond what we believe be its intended purpose.



Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:



Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles


recent posts


tags

divorce arbitrators health insurance divorce mediation Divorce Agreements mediators family support arbitrator facilitated negotiations mediator Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Massachusetts divorce mediators resolve disputes Baseball Arbitration Massachusetts alimony and child support family law rehabilitative alimony litigation support orders Divorce Baseball Players child support alimony Obamacare divorce mediations Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act divorce and family law Defense of Marriage Act arbitrators divorce lawyers separation lawyers Levine Dispute Resolution Matrimonial Arbitration General term alimony annulment DOMA Massachusetts medical benefits divorce process mediations Massachusetts divorce lawyers arbitration lawyer The Seven Sins of Alimony Major League Baseball Arbitration lawyer-attended mediation divorce arbitration Family Law Arbitration MLB labor agreement med/arb family mediation Uniform Arbitration Act Alimony Reform Act alimony reform legislation Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC COLA private dispute resolution family law mediation Massachusetts alimony self-adjusting alimony SJC divorce mediators alimony law conciliation divorce agreement LDRC alimony statute divorce and family law mediators Levine Dispute Resolutions high-risk methodology Levine Dispute Resolution Center traditional negotiations special master divorce judgment divorce mediator Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth fraud Child Support Guidelines Cohabitation med-arb divorced Self-adjusting alimony orders alimony orders disputes Same Sex Marriage mediation health coverage Baseball how baseball arbitration works family law arbitrators dispute resolution pre-ARA alimony divorce litigation Massachusetts lawyers Boston divorce arbitrator family and probate law disputes family law arbitrator Chouteau Levine IRC §2704