781.708.4445

wmlevine@levinedisputeresolution.com

Divorce Mediation Blog

#marriedseparateddivorcedcohabitedmarrieddivorced: The SJC makes it up and gets it right: Duff-Kareores v. Kareores – Part 3

Wednesday, July 27, 2016

In our last two entries, we considered the central features of the Supreme Judicial Court’s (SJC) recent case, Duff-Kareores v. Kareores. Today, we comment briefly on a collateral benefit of the SJC’s opinion in another area the Alimony Reform Act (eff. 3.1.12) (ARA): the “common household” provision of in M.G.L., ch. 208, § 49(d). In its decision, the high court lifted the enumerated criteria of §49(d) (how to prove common household) and grafted them onto §48 (how to prove length of marriage to equitably pre-marital economic partnership during cohabitation).

In doing so, the SJC described §49(d) as the factual basis upon which a judge may reduce, suspend or terminate alimony by reason of a relationship that:

“…resembles, but is not equivalent to a legal marriage.”

In this dictum, the SJC says what the legislature did not with the greatest clarity: that the purpose of §49(d) is to give potential recourse to an alimony payor, without the burden of proving abated financial “need”, when an alimony recipient has assumed a marriage-like relationship. In the bare statute, the only word that connotes this meaning is “couple”, appearing in sub-sections ii. and v.; the dictionary meaning of which is not limited to romantic pairings. (See, http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/couple.)

We hope that this collateral comment by the SJC will caution any future litigant against stretching the benefits of §49(d) beyond what we believe be its intended purpose.



Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:



Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles


recent posts


tags

Uniform Arbitration Act annulment family law traditional negotiations Levine Dispute Resolution Cohabitation lawyer mediation family mediation fraud Same Sex Marriage divorce mediations Baseball Arbitration Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth Massachusetts alimony LDRC family support child support divorce arbitration family law arbitrator arbitrator private dispute resolution Alimony Reform Act Divorce Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC Family Law Arbitration alimony statute special master support orders Levine Dispute Resolutions Baseball med/arb divorce and family law mediators Chouteau Levine divorce and family law Levine Dispute Resolution Center Baseball Players arbitration rehabilitative alimony alimony law disputes alimony orders divorce agreement Divorce Agreements conciliation The Seven Sins of Alimony COLA pre-ARA alimony lawyer-attended mediation divorce mediator family and probate law disputes Matrimonial Arbitration Massachusetts alimony and child support how baseball arbitration works Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act divorce arbitrator alimony alimony reform legislation mediations mediator Boston IRC §2704 separation self-adjusting alimony divorced divorce lawyers facilitated negotiations SJC mediators divorce mediation Massachusetts divorce judgment health insurance litigation health coverage med-arb Massachusetts lawyers dispute resolution divorce process family law mediation arbitrators divorce mediators Massachusetts divorce mediators Obamacare Child Support Guidelines divorce arbitrators General term alimony Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly resolve disputes DOMA Massachusetts divorce lawyers family law arbitrators Major League Baseball Arbitration lawyers Self-adjusting alimony orders Defense of Marriage Act medical benefits high-risk methodology divorce litigation MLB labor agreement