Divorce Mediation Blog

#marriedseparateddivorcedcohabitedmarrieddivorced: The SJC makes it up and gets it right: Duff-Kareores v. Kareores – Part 3

Wednesday, July 27, 2016

In our last two entries, we considered the central features of the Supreme Judicial Court’s (SJC) recent case, Duff-Kareores v. Kareores. Today, we comment briefly on a collateral benefit of the SJC’s opinion in another area the Alimony Reform Act (eff. 3.1.12) (ARA): the “common household” provision of in M.G.L., ch. 208, § 49(d). In its decision, the high court lifted the enumerated criteria of §49(d) (how to prove common household) and grafted them onto §48 (how to prove length of marriage to equitably pre-marital economic partnership during cohabitation).

In doing so, the SJC described §49(d) as the factual basis upon which a judge may reduce, suspend or terminate alimony by reason of a relationship that:

“…resembles, but is not equivalent to a legal marriage.”

In this dictum, the SJC says what the legislature did not with the greatest clarity: that the purpose of §49(d) is to give potential recourse to an alimony payor, without the burden of proving abated financial “need”, when an alimony recipient has assumed a marriage-like relationship. In the bare statute, the only word that connotes this meaning is “couple”, appearing in sub-sections ii. and v.; the dictionary meaning of which is not limited to romantic pairings. (See, http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/couple.)

We hope that this collateral comment by the SJC will caution any future litigant against stretching the benefits of §49(d) beyond what we believe be its intended purpose.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


family and probate law disputes family mediation MLB labor agreement lawyer medical benefits Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Baseball Divorce Agreements annulment Major League Baseball Arbitration divorce arbitrators divorce mediation arbitration pre-ARA alimony COLA disputes Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC divorce mediator lawyers Child Support Guidelines divorce litigation Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act Massachusetts divorce lawyers arbitrators divorce and family law mediators Family Law Arbitration SJC Same Sex Marriage Cohabitation traditional negotiations mediations The Seven Sins of Alimony Defense of Marriage Act child support divorced Baseball Arbitration alimony orders family law arbitrator divorce agreement how baseball arbitration works Matrimonial Arbitration fraud Levine Dispute Resolution litigation mediators Massachusetts alimony and child support LDRC Massachusetts family support Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth mediator alimony health insurance Obamacare divorce and family law Boston special master high-risk methodology Baseball Players family law arbitrator divorce process conciliation med/arb mediation med-arb divorce arbitration General term alimony Alimony Reform Act divorce judgment Uniform Arbitration Act lawyer-attended mediation Massachusetts divorce mediators family law mediation Self-adjusting alimony orders health coverage IRC §2704 divorce mediations support orders Chouteau Levine separation DOMA divorce lawyers divorce arbitrator Levine Dispute Resolutions facilitated negotiations dispute resolution self-adjusting alimony family law arbitrators Levine Dispute Resolution Center rehabilitative alimony Divorce divorce mediators Massachusetts lawyers Massachusetts alimony resolve disputes private dispute resolution alimony statute alimony reform legislation alimony law