781.708.4445

wmlevine@levinedisputeresolution.com

Divorce Mediation Blog

#marriedseparateddivorcedcohabitedmarrieddivorced: The SJC makes it up and gets it right: Duff-Kareores v. Kareores – Part 3

Wednesday, July 27, 2016

In our last two entries, we considered the central features of the Supreme Judicial Court’s (SJC) recent case, Duff-Kareores v. Kareores. Today, we comment briefly on a collateral benefit of the SJC’s opinion in another area the Alimony Reform Act (eff. 3.1.12) (ARA): the “common household” provision of in M.G.L., ch. 208, § 49(d). In its decision, the high court lifted the enumerated criteria of §49(d) (how to prove common household) and grafted them onto §48 (how to prove length of marriage to equitably pre-marital economic partnership during cohabitation).

In doing so, the SJC described §49(d) as the factual basis upon which a judge may reduce, suspend or terminate alimony by reason of a relationship that:

“…resembles, but is not equivalent to a legal marriage.”

In this dictum, the SJC says what the legislature did not with the greatest clarity: that the purpose of §49(d) is to give potential recourse to an alimony payor, without the burden of proving abated financial “need”, when an alimony recipient has assumed a marriage-like relationship. In the bare statute, the only word that connotes this meaning is “couple”, appearing in sub-sections ii. and v.; the dictionary meaning of which is not limited to romantic pairings. (See, http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/couple.)

We hope that this collateral comment by the SJC will caution any future litigant against stretching the benefits of §49(d) beyond what we believe be its intended purpose.



Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:



Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles


recent posts


tags

Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act lawyer Major League Baseball Arbitration special master divorce litigation medical benefits Massachusetts divorce lawyers DOMA lawyers divorce process Child Support Guidelines alimony reform legislation divorce and family law mediators mediations self-adjusting alimony mediator Self-adjusting alimony orders divorced mediators mediation Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Baseball Players Massachusetts Massachusetts divorce mediators Divorce Massachusetts alimony high-risk methodology Boston divorce mediator divorce mediation family law mediation divorce arbitrator alimony orders Cohabitation Alimony Reform Act support orders MLB labor agreement lawyer-attended mediation fraud General term alimony med/arb Levine Dispute Resolutions divorce judgment alimony statute resolve disputes arbitration conciliation Chouteau Levine divorce arbitrators family law Levine Dispute Resolution Center health coverage divorce and family law IRC §2704 divorce agreement facilitated negotiations family mediation divorce mediations disputes Baseball Uniform Arbitration Act child support Family Law Arbitration med-arb Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC Massachusetts lawyers Defense of Marriage Act family law arbitrators Matrimonial Arbitration COLA litigation traditional negotiations family law arbitrator SJC health insurance annulment pre-ARA alimony family support arbitrator Levine Dispute Resolution Divorce Agreements alimony law family and probate law disputes Obamacare Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth divorce mediators dispute resolution Massachusetts alimony and child support Baseball Arbitration The Seven Sins of Alimony LDRC private dispute resolution arbitrators how baseball arbitration works divorce arbitration rehabilitative alimony separation Same Sex Marriage alimony divorce lawyers