Divorce Mediation Blog

#marriedseparateddivorcedcohabitedmarrieddivorced: The SJC makes it up and gets it right: Duff-Kareores v. Kareores – Part 3

Wednesday, July 27, 2016

In our last two entries, we considered the central features of the Supreme Judicial Court’s (SJC) recent case, Duff-Kareores v. Kareores. Today, we comment briefly on a collateral benefit of the SJC’s opinion in another area the Alimony Reform Act (eff. 3.1.12) (ARA): the “common household” provision of in M.G.L., ch. 208, § 49(d). In its decision, the high court lifted the enumerated criteria of §49(d) (how to prove common household) and grafted them onto §48 (how to prove length of marriage to equitably pre-marital economic partnership during cohabitation).

In doing so, the SJC described §49(d) as the factual basis upon which a judge may reduce, suspend or terminate alimony by reason of a relationship that:

“…resembles, but is not equivalent to a legal marriage.”

In this dictum, the SJC says what the legislature did not with the greatest clarity: that the purpose of §49(d) is to give potential recourse to an alimony payor, without the burden of proving abated financial “need”, when an alimony recipient has assumed a marriage-like relationship. In the bare statute, the only word that connotes this meaning is “couple”, appearing in sub-sections ii. and v.; the dictionary meaning of which is not limited to romantic pairings. (See, http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/couple.)

We hope that this collateral comment by the SJC will caution any future litigant against stretching the benefits of §49(d) beyond what we believe be its intended purpose.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


Family Law Arbitration dispute resolution Cohabitation Levine Dispute Resolution Center rehabilitative alimony health coverage alimony reform legislation divorce and family law mediators divorce mediation divorce mediator pre-ARA alimony DOMA Baseball Arbitration divorce litigation separation Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act facilitated negotiations Defense of Marriage Act COLA The Seven Sins of Alimony Baseball Boston Massachusetts alimony and child support family mediation child support self-adjusting alimony Obamacare Major League Baseball Arbitration arbitrators Divorce Agreements divorce arbitrator health insurance divorce lawyers Levine Dispute Resolution mediations Child Support Guidelines medical benefits Same Sex Marriage MLB labor agreement divorce arbitrators private dispute resolution Levine Dispute Resolutions alimony law mediator divorce and family law how baseball arbitration works traditional negotiations Alimony Reform Act med/arb divorce judgment arbitration family law arbitrators lawyer Massachusetts alimony Baseball Players General term alimony fraud high-risk methodology Matrimonial Arbitration support orders family law Massachusetts lawyers IRC §2704 litigation special master Massachusetts divorce mediators Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly mediators family law mediation Self-adjusting alimony orders resolve disputes disputes Massachusetts mediation lawyer-attended mediation divorced divorce agreement alimony LDRC family and probate law disputes alimony statute SJC family law arbitrator divorce process family support arbitrator conciliation med-arb annulment divorce arbitration alimony orders divorce mediations divorce mediators Divorce Chouteau Levine Massachusetts divorce lawyers Uniform Arbitration Act Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC lawyers