Divorce Mediation Blog

#marriedseparateddivorcedcohabitedmarrieddivorced: The SJC makes it up and gets it right: Duff-Kareores v. Kareores – Part 3

Wednesday, July 27, 2016

In our last two entries, we considered the central features of the Supreme Judicial Court’s (SJC) recent case, Duff-Kareores v. Kareores. Today, we comment briefly on a collateral benefit of the SJC’s opinion in another area the Alimony Reform Act (eff. 3.1.12) (ARA): the “common household” provision of in M.G.L., ch. 208, § 49(d). In its decision, the high court lifted the enumerated criteria of §49(d) (how to prove common household) and grafted them onto §48 (how to prove length of marriage to equitably pre-marital economic partnership during cohabitation).

In doing so, the SJC described §49(d) as the factual basis upon which a judge may reduce, suspend or terminate alimony by reason of a relationship that:

“…resembles, but is not equivalent to a legal marriage.”

In this dictum, the SJC says what the legislature did not with the greatest clarity: that the purpose of §49(d) is to give potential recourse to an alimony payor, without the burden of proving abated financial “need”, when an alimony recipient has assumed a marriage-like relationship. In the bare statute, the only word that connotes this meaning is “couple”, appearing in sub-sections ii. and v.; the dictionary meaning of which is not limited to romantic pairings. (See, http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/couple.)

We hope that this collateral comment by the SJC will caution any future litigant against stretching the benefits of §49(d) beyond what we believe be its intended purpose.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


divorce lawyers mediators Divorce Agreements alimony law Baseball Arbitration divorce and family law mediators mediation Levine Dispute Resolution Center lawyers MLB labor agreement divorce arbitration divorce litigation Baseball Players health coverage divorced dispute resolution disputes Defense of Marriage Act Chouteau Levine annulment family mediation divorce mediators The Seven Sins of Alimony arbitrators Massachusetts alimony and child support Baseball Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC family and probate law disputes LDRC Obamacare mediations alimony reform legislation Levine Dispute Resolutions COLA med-arb Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth divorce agreement General term alimony Massachusetts SJC Massachusetts divorce lawyers support orders pre-ARA alimony Massachusetts divorce mediators divorce mediation fraud family law arbitrator divorce and family law resolve disputes litigation private dispute resolution arbitration divorce mediator divorce judgment divorce process lawyer-attended mediation lawyer Family Law Arbitration alimony orders DOMA traditional negotiations self-adjusting alimony divorce arbitrator Uniform Arbitration Act Same Sex Marriage Major League Baseball Arbitration mediator Alimony Reform Act high-risk methodology health insurance Self-adjusting alimony orders Boston family law conciliation alimony statute family law mediation separation Massachusetts alimony how baseball arbitration works IRC §2704 Matrimonial Arbitration family support Divorce Cohabitation Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Massachusetts lawyers divorce arbitrators medical benefits facilitated negotiations special master med/arb family law arbitrators alimony Levine Dispute Resolution Child Support Guidelines divorce mediations arbitrator rehabilitative alimony child support