Divorce Mediation Blog

Do Mediators and Court Reformers Enable Divorce? Jennifer Graham Might Think So

Wednesday, July 16, 2014

In her June 16, 2014 Boston Globe column "The divorce is worse than the marriage", Jennifer Graham praised a movement to curtail access to divorce in America, lamenting that “conservative” efforts to make divorce more difficult to obtain carry the political/cultural tag of being "fringe". She contends that the near universal right of divorce without cause has become politically correct and, thus, immune from clear-eyed political re-examination. Coupled with the damage that divorce inflicts on family life, social stability and children's well-being, she crudely terms divorce in the 21st century a "...sacred cow with poisonous teats...” To stem the tide, Ms. Graham suggests that perhaps pre-divorcing couples ought be required to endure a day in family court before filing is permitted. Her thesis suggests that watching the humiliation of others will slap couples back to sensibility, domestic tranquility, or at least resignation. Sort of a domestic Reefer Madness.

Tasteless analogy aside, Ms. Graham ‘s piece raises an ironic question: do people who dedicate their professional lives to making divorce less humiliating and costly, more humane and child-sensitive, cause more harm than good, by making the divorce experience less poisonous for families?

They come in many professions and roles. They are judges, probation officers and lawyers; psychologists, psychiatrists and social workers; teachers and researchers; accountants and financial consultants. They experiment, innovate, mediate and collaborate. They work to make courts less intimidating and more efficient; to assist unrepresented litigants; to create early intervention programs to spot and address child trauma; to educate parents and allied professionals; and to create, refine and staff out-of-court dispute resolutions processes that stress self-determination, self-respect and privacy, outward respect and action on mutual interests and solutions. They pursue different theories and practices. They succeed and fail. They are united in common cause: to reduce trauma, to lessen cost and to enhance children's outcomes.

As divorce mediators, do we work at cross-purposes to Ms. Graham’s defenders of marriage? If fear of humiliation is an effective way to deter divorce, do well-meaning efforts to make divorce less traumatic undermine the family? History brings us the state of marriage. As divorce mediators, we cannot stop it; but we can make it less traumatic. If that enables divorce, sobeit.

Incidentally, we agree with Ms. Graham that good can come from a real day in court, but for different reasons. Real life court watching can provide perspective to those considering marriage, and those considering divorce litigation alike. To the former, the seriousness of the decision to marry may be reinforced; and viewing the agony of others may drive would be litigants to out-of-court processes that are less costly and destructive. It can encourage a wavering litigation client to settle, to avoid the spectacle and uncertainty of trial and pursue out-of-court options.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


special master dispute resolution Levine Dispute Resolution Center mediators MLB labor agreement mediation Same Sex Marriage Chouteau Levine med/arb conciliation divorce lawyers annulment divorce mediators Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth divorce and family law Cohabitation divorce arbitrators pre-ARA alimony self-adjusting alimony med-arb Baseball Arbitration family support arbitrators family law arbitrator health insurance Defense of Marriage Act resolve disputes lawyer medical benefits fraud private dispute resolution family and probate law disputes litigation alimony reform legislation Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act alimony statute divorce judgment Uniform Arbitration Act divorce litigation Boston alimony Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly how baseball arbitration works family law mediation Massachusetts divorce mediators alimony orders General term alimony Baseball lawyer-attended mediation Massachusetts alimony IRC §2704 Divorce SJC alimony law divorced arbitrator Child Support Guidelines Matrimonial Arbitration rehabilitative alimony family mediation Massachusetts divorce lawyers facilitated negotiations LDRC divorce mediator COLA divorce mediations Major League Baseball Arbitration health coverage divorce mediation mediations DOMA divorce arbitrator Massachusetts lawyers Divorce Agreements Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC divorce arbitration disputes Levine Dispute Resolution divorce and family law mediators support orders child support Massachusetts alimony and child support The Seven Sins of Alimony lawyers Self-adjusting alimony orders divorce agreement Obamacare arbitration Levine Dispute Resolutions traditional negotiations Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act high-risk methodology separation mediator Family Law Arbitration divorce process family law arbitrators family law Baseball Players