Divorce Mediation Blog

Divorcing Parties Playing Against Type - Don’t Do It

Wednesday, April 04, 2012

Recently, we spent a Sunday evening at a new Easthampton, MA business: a “free movie” venue called “Popcorn Noir”. This creative venture offers gourmet popcorn, snacks, dinner, hot cider; and intimate seating for 20 or so lucky viewers. Members pay a modest annual fee to have access to this storefront treasure with vintage films.

We watched the Billy Wilder-directed Fred McMurray and Barbara Stanwyck classic “Double Indemnity”, from 1944. A film student introduced the show with the comment that one thing that made this noir piece so effective was that every actor played “against type”. For those of us who grew up with McMurray on “My Three Sons” (most of us) knew exactly what she meant. She also described the coming feature as a tale of three people enmeshed in a spiral of events of mutual destruction, leaving them all dead.

This all got me thinking (after the show) about divorce mediation! Divorce lawyers like to tell prospective clients that criminal lawyers see bad people on their best behavior while family law clients are “good people at their worst”. This cliché is largely geared towards providing cover to the upset spouse for out-of-control feelings and decisions, but there is also truth to this stereotype. Many people react to the crucible of stress, worry and fear of impending divorce in ways that lead them to make quick decisions that yield far-reaching and long-term effects on families, sometimes quite negative. As friends and family urge the spouses to “protect” themselves (and their children) from each other, they are often inclined to accept the most aggressive lawyers and advice, and the most assertive processes that they can find..

Sometimes this advice is absolutely on the mark, and there is no good choice but to lawyer up and get to court. But, too often, this just sets a tone of heightened confrontation, crushing costs and lost years of litigation, when calm reflection and facilitated discussion might serve the family more effectively, leaving people in a place where their ability to cooperate is less damaged and sometimes even enhanced. There is a reason that the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court requires lawyers to discuss alternative dispute resolution options with clients before filing suit,. But we suspect that this rule is honored far more in the breach that in its careful and enthusiastic observance, as many lawyers perceive litigation as the “only way” to go.

Good people in crisis should not play against type. Beginning divorce with an arms race when unnecessary consigns the family to a spiral of controversy and financial calamity, when reflection and facilitated negotiation are likely to be less expensive, less antagonistic and more constructive than the alternative. Divorce does not have to be all noir. It can be seen as a transition: to be managed and experienced as an honest, direct and personalized process in which people “play” themselves, and not the mythical “worst behavior” caricature.

Mediation is not for everyone. But, almost everyone should at least consider it – seriously.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


Divorce mediation health insurance disputes mediations divorce litigation alimony reform legislation Matrimonial Arbitration divorce and family law Levine Dispute Resolution Center medical benefits Divorce Agreements Baseball Arbitration Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Same Sex Marriage support orders traditional negotiations med-arb MLB labor agreement high-risk methodology divorce arbitrators family mediation divorce agreement fraud facilitated negotiations pre-ARA alimony Baseball Players COLA Massachusetts alimony and child support special master Child Support Guidelines separation divorce mediators DOMA self-adjusting alimony family law arbitrators Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act Levine Dispute Resolution how baseball arbitration works resolve disputes Self-adjusting alimony orders health coverage Massachusetts divorce lawyers family law mediation family support Baseball lawyer-attended mediation divorce lawyers private dispute resolution alimony law family law Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC divorce arbitrator arbitrators IRC §2704 alimony statute Levine Dispute Resolutions divorce mediator mediators divorce judgment Massachusetts divorce mediators arbitrator lawyers The Seven Sins of Alimony divorce mediations LDRC mediator SJC Massachusetts Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth rehabilitative alimony Boston Family Law Arbitration divorce arbitration family law arbitrator General term alimony child support divorce process Alimony Reform Act Massachusetts lawyers dispute resolution conciliation Defense of Marriage Act lawyer divorce mediation Chouteau Levine Uniform Arbitration Act divorce and family law mediators Cohabitation family and probate law disputes litigation Obamacare Major League Baseball Arbitration med/arb alimony alimony orders divorced annulment arbitration Massachusetts alimony