Divorce Mediation Blog

Divorcing Parties Playing Against Type - Don’t Do It

Wednesday, April 04, 2012

Recently, we spent a Sunday evening at a new Easthampton, MA business: a “free movie” venue called “Popcorn Noir”. This creative venture offers gourmet popcorn, snacks, dinner, hot cider; and intimate seating for 20 or so lucky viewers. Members pay a modest annual fee to have access to this storefront treasure with vintage films.

We watched the Billy Wilder-directed Fred McMurray and Barbara Stanwyck classic “Double Indemnity”, from 1944. A film student introduced the show with the comment that one thing that made this noir piece so effective was that every actor played “against type”. For those of us who grew up with McMurray on “My Three Sons” (most of us) knew exactly what she meant. She also described the coming feature as a tale of three people enmeshed in a spiral of events of mutual destruction, leaving them all dead.

This all got me thinking (after the show) about divorce mediation! Divorce lawyers like to tell prospective clients that criminal lawyers see bad people on their best behavior while family law clients are “good people at their worst”. This cliché is largely geared towards providing cover to the upset spouse for out-of-control feelings and decisions, but there is also truth to this stereotype. Many people react to the crucible of stress, worry and fear of impending divorce in ways that lead them to make quick decisions that yield far-reaching and long-term effects on families, sometimes quite negative. As friends and family urge the spouses to “protect” themselves (and their children) from each other, they are often inclined to accept the most aggressive lawyers and advice, and the most assertive processes that they can find..

Sometimes this advice is absolutely on the mark, and there is no good choice but to lawyer up and get to court. But, too often, this just sets a tone of heightened confrontation, crushing costs and lost years of litigation, when calm reflection and facilitated discussion might serve the family more effectively, leaving people in a place where their ability to cooperate is less damaged and sometimes even enhanced. There is a reason that the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court requires lawyers to discuss alternative dispute resolution options with clients before filing suit,. But we suspect that this rule is honored far more in the breach that in its careful and enthusiastic observance, as many lawyers perceive litigation as the “only way” to go.

Good people in crisis should not play against type. Beginning divorce with an arms race when unnecessary consigns the family to a spiral of controversy and financial calamity, when reflection and facilitated negotiation are likely to be less expensive, less antagonistic and more constructive than the alternative. Divorce does not have to be all noir. It can be seen as a transition: to be managed and experienced as an honest, direct and personalized process in which people “play” themselves, and not the mythical “worst behavior” caricature.

Mediation is not for everyone. But, almost everyone should at least consider it – seriously.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


Massachusetts divorce mediators Divorce how baseball arbitration works Chouteau Levine Massachusetts alimony Massachusetts lawyers family and probate law disputes Alimony Reform Act family mediation alimony orders health insurance litigation divorce lawyers annulment divorced special master divorce agreement alimony statute divorce litigation traditional negotiations divorce mediation Uniform Arbitration Act medical benefits fraud alimony law support orders private dispute resolution arbitrators Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly DOMA Baseball Players dispute resolution Baseball Arbitration mediation Boston lawyer-attended mediation lawyers family law arbitrators divorce mediations alimony reform legislation family law mediation child support separation Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act divorce mediators mediator The Seven Sins of Alimony pre-ARA alimony MLB labor agreement divorce arbitration facilitated negotiations divorce mediator arbitration Cohabitation alimony conciliation divorce process Child Support Guidelines General term alimony rehabilitative alimony mediations med/arb Obamacare Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth divorce arbitrator lawyer Massachusetts alimony and child support mediators Massachusetts divorce lawyers Matrimonial Arbitration family law SJC family support disputes Major League Baseball Arbitration Levine Dispute Resolution Center Divorce Agreements self-adjusting alimony divorce and family law Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC high-risk methodology Same Sex Marriage Baseball family law arbitrator health coverage COLA med-arb Self-adjusting alimony orders arbitrator LDRC Levine Dispute Resolutions divorce and family law mediators Family Law Arbitration Levine Dispute Resolution resolve disputes Massachusetts Defense of Marriage Act IRC §2704 divorce judgment divorce arbitrators