Divorce Mediation Blog

No Country for Old Men, Part 5: The Appeals Court Tells 79-Year Old Alimony Payor “Si, Mas” Muellner v. Muellner

Thursday, September 06, 2018

Levine Dispute Resolution - Alimony

In an unpublished opinion under Rule 1:28, the Massachusetts Appeals Court recently consigned a septuagenarian couple to resumed legal combat in the Probate and Family Court, 14 years after their divorce. The appellate court vacated two modification judgments of the Probate and Family Court, reducing the now 79-year-old husband’s alimony to his former wife, for the judge’s failure to “demonstrate ‘appropriate consideration’” of:

  • the husband’s ability to pay;
  • the wife’s financial need; and
  • the “intent” of the parties as evidenced by their divorce agreement.

Putting aside completely the M.G.L., ch. 208, §49 (f) presumption that alimony terminates upon the payor’s attainment of full social security retirement age - a distant memory for this payor - since this divorce predated the Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act (eff. 3.1.12) (See, LDRC previous blog entries, “No Country for Old Men”, Parts 1 through 4) this decision is problematic for at least two reasons:

  • it appears that the trial judge is faulted for not considering information that the parties didn’t offer him at trial; and
  • the Appeals Court’s inference of the parties’ intent is pure speculation – the kind for which it might well criticize a trial judge.

Ah, Rule 1:28 decisions. The facts are not “fully addressed”, but one fact that the Appeals Court did disclose is that both modification “trials” were decisions entrusted to the Probate and Family Court judge by agreement of the parties, to be rendered on “stipulation[s] of facts in lieu of testimony”. No one gave direct testimony, and no one was cross-examined, no experts opined.

In other words, no trial at all, with all of its glorious inefficiencies and protections.

Then again, this is what the parties signed up for. Competent adults are, or should be, allowed to make decisions, including ones that disadvantage them. These parties were not juveniles – far from it – and they chose the rules by which they would play. No parens patriae, here. Essentially, they put the judge in the position of an arbitrator, limiting the evidence and circumscribing procedure; and accepting that the decision in generally binding.

The specters of 80-year-olds paying alimony, golden years spent in litigation and my self-indulgent blog title totally aside: shouldn’t the Appeals Court have left well enough alone?


Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


Baseball Arbitration DOMA health coverage pre-ARA alimony family support litigation divorce mediations Massachusetts divorce lawyers Divorce Agreements conciliation private dispute resolution Alimony Reform Act IRC §2704 traditional negotiations The Seven Sins of Alimony divorce litigation how baseball arbitration works Baseball SJC Levine Dispute Resolution divorce and family law alimony health insurance Chouteau Levine mediation self-adjusting alimony Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth Major League Baseball Arbitration resolve disputes Uniform Arbitration Act disputes Massachusetts divorce mediators Matrimonial Arbitration Massachusetts alimony separation divorce and family law mediators divorce judgment Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act divorced mediators arbitrator lawyer-attended mediation Family Law Arbitration facilitated negotiations family law arbitrators alimony reform legislation annulment alimony statute family and probate law disputes Self-adjusting alimony orders Cohabitation family law Levine Dispute Resolution Center dispute resolution family mediation family law mediation med/arb rehabilitative alimony Divorce Baseball Players Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC LDRC Boston divorce agreement Massachusetts alimony and child support fraud General term alimony child support divorce process Same Sex Marriage support orders divorce mediators divorce arbitrator Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly divorce arbitration divorce arbitrators divorce lawyers alimony law Massachusetts lawyers alimony orders Defense of Marriage Act mediations divorce mediator Child Support Guidelines lawyers COLA arbitration Obamacare med-arb Levine Dispute Resolutions mediator high-risk methodology medical benefits divorce mediation special master arbitrators Massachusetts family law arbitrator lawyer MLB labor agreement