Divorce Mediation Blog

No Country for Old Men, Part 5: The Appeals Court Tells 79-Year Old Alimony Payor “Si, Mas” Muellner v. Muellner

Thursday, September 06, 2018

Levine Dispute Resolution - Alimony

In an unpublished opinion under Rule 1:28, the Massachusetts Appeals Court recently consigned a septuagenarian couple to resumed legal combat in the Probate and Family Court, 14 years after their divorce. The appellate court vacated two modification judgments of the Probate and Family Court, reducing the now 79-year-old husband’s alimony to his former wife, for the judge’s failure to “demonstrate ‘appropriate consideration’” of:

  • the husband’s ability to pay;
  • the wife’s financial need; and
  • the “intent” of the parties as evidenced by their divorce agreement.

Putting aside completely the M.G.L., ch. 208, §49 (f) presumption that alimony terminates upon the payor’s attainment of full social security retirement age - a distant memory for this payor - since this divorce predated the Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act (eff. 3.1.12) (See, LDRC previous blog entries, “No Country for Old Men”, Parts 1 through 4) this decision is problematic for at least two reasons:

  • it appears that the trial judge is faulted for not considering information that the parties didn’t offer him at trial; and
  • the Appeals Court’s inference of the parties’ intent is pure speculation – the kind for which it might well criticize a trial judge.

Ah, Rule 1:28 decisions. The facts are not “fully addressed”, but one fact that the Appeals Court did disclose is that both modification “trials” were decisions entrusted to the Probate and Family Court judge by agreement of the parties, to be rendered on “stipulation[s] of facts in lieu of testimony”. No one gave direct testimony, and no one was cross-examined, no experts opined.

In other words, no trial at all, with all of its glorious inefficiencies and protections.

Then again, this is what the parties signed up for. Competent adults are, or should be, allowed to make decisions, including ones that disadvantage them. These parties were not juveniles – far from it – and they chose the rules by which they would play. No parens patriae, here. Essentially, they put the judge in the position of an arbitrator, limiting the evidence and circumscribing procedure; and accepting that the decision in generally binding.

The specters of 80-year-olds paying alimony, golden years spent in litigation and my self-indulgent blog title totally aside: shouldn’t the Appeals Court have left well enough alone?


Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


medical benefits Major League Baseball Arbitration mediation lawyer-attended mediation rehabilitative alimony Matrimonial Arbitration divorce arbitration Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth alimony law Family Law Arbitration Levine Dispute Resolution family mediation IRC §2704 family law arbitrators self-adjusting alimony pre-ARA alimony Massachusetts alimony and child support arbitrators LDRC private dispute resolution family support divorce process litigation Alimony Reform Act arbitration MLB labor agreement Massachusetts divorce lawyers health insurance Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act family law mediation Massachusetts lawyers Same Sex Marriage divorce and family law Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly resolve disputes divorce and family law mediators fraud high-risk methodology Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC General term alimony DOMA Baseball Players Baseball Arbitration conciliation Levine Dispute Resolutions Divorce Agreements alimony orders Massachusetts support orders divorced mediators special master SJC family law arbitrator child support Boston lawyer facilitated negotiations Cohabitation divorce mediator separation annulment The Seven Sins of Alimony family and probate law disputes divorce arbitrator alimony Obamacare traditional negotiations family law Levine Dispute Resolution Center lawyers Self-adjusting alimony orders divorce arbitrators dispute resolution divorce mediations Divorce divorce judgment divorce mediation COLA disputes how baseball arbitration works med-arb Uniform Arbitration Act alimony reform legislation divorce agreement Child Support Guidelines alimony statute mediator divorce mediators mediations med/arb Chouteau Levine Massachusetts divorce mediators Defense of Marriage Act arbitrator divorce lawyers divorce litigation health coverage Massachusetts alimony Baseball