Divorce Mediation Blog

No Country for Old Men, Part 5: The Appeals Court Tells 79-Year Old Alimony Payor “Si, Mas” Muellner v. Muellner

Thursday, September 06, 2018

Levine Dispute Resolution - Alimony

In an unpublished opinion under Rule 1:28, the Massachusetts Appeals Court recently consigned a septuagenarian couple to resumed legal combat in the Probate and Family Court, 14 years after their divorce. The appellate court vacated two modification judgments of the Probate and Family Court, reducing the now 79-year-old husband’s alimony to his former wife, for the judge’s failure to “demonstrate ‘appropriate consideration’” of:

  • the husband’s ability to pay;
  • the wife’s financial need; and
  • the “intent” of the parties as evidenced by their divorce agreement.

Putting aside completely the M.G.L., ch. 208, §49 (f) presumption that alimony terminates upon the payor’s attainment of full social security retirement age - a distant memory for this payor - since this divorce predated the Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act (eff. 3.1.12) (See, LDRC previous blog entries, “No Country for Old Men”, Parts 1 through 4) this decision is problematic for at least two reasons:

  • it appears that the trial judge is faulted for not considering information that the parties didn’t offer him at trial; and
  • the Appeals Court’s inference of the parties’ intent is pure speculation – the kind for which it might well criticize a trial judge.

Ah, Rule 1:28 decisions. The facts are not “fully addressed”, but one fact that the Appeals Court did disclose is that both modification “trials” were decisions entrusted to the Probate and Family Court judge by agreement of the parties, to be rendered on “stipulation[s] of facts in lieu of testimony”. No one gave direct testimony, and no one was cross-examined, no experts opined.

In other words, no trial at all, with all of its glorious inefficiencies and protections.

Then again, this is what the parties signed up for. Competent adults are, or should be, allowed to make decisions, including ones that disadvantage them. These parties were not juveniles – far from it – and they chose the rules by which they would play. No parens patriae, here. Essentially, they put the judge in the position of an arbitrator, limiting the evidence and circumscribing procedure; and accepting that the decision in generally binding.

The specters of 80-year-olds paying alimony, golden years spent in litigation and my self-indulgent blog title totally aside: shouldn’t the Appeals Court have left well enough alone?


Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


IRC §2704 lawyer Massachusetts divorce mediators arbitration support orders Defense of Marriage Act rehabilitative alimony Cohabitation alimony law divorce and family law Divorce Agreements divorce and family law mediators alimony reform legislation arbitrator fraud COLA divorce arbitration SJC conciliation health coverage Same Sex Marriage Baseball Players Massachusetts divorce mediation alimony statute family law arbitrators Boston self-adjusting alimony Child Support Guidelines traditional negotiations family support med/arb Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act divorce mediations Massachusetts alimony divorce process resolve disputes divorce mediators Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC mediations Obamacare family law arbitrator private dispute resolution Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth divorce litigation divorce arbitrators lawyer-attended mediation annulment lawyers Baseball Arbitration Massachusetts lawyers Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Family Law Arbitration mediators divorce agreement Levine Dispute Resolutions how baseball arbitration works health insurance Matrimonial Arbitration arbitrators General term alimony alimony orders family law mediation facilitated negotiations separation litigation dispute resolution med-arb Chouteau Levine Divorce Major League Baseball Arbitration Self-adjusting alimony orders divorce arbitrator Levine Dispute Resolution Center high-risk methodology special master mediator Baseball family and probate law disputes The Seven Sins of Alimony pre-ARA alimony divorce lawyers MLB labor agreement Massachusetts divorce lawyers family law mediation Massachusetts alimony and child support DOMA Levine Dispute Resolution alimony LDRC Uniform Arbitration Act divorced divorce judgment medical benefits Alimony Reform Act disputes child support family mediation divorce mediator