Divorce Mediation Blog

A Well-Reasoned Opinion from the Appeals Court on a Tricky Subject: Calhoun v. Rawlings

Wednesday, July 11, 2018

Levine Dispute Resolution - Divorce Mediation

The Massachusetts Appeals Court recently reviewed the decision of a Superior Court judge on the question of whether or not a spendthrift trust settled for the benefit of a disabled person, created and funded with a divorce settlement - assets transferred to the trust by his (ex-) wife – was a “self-settled” trust as a matter of law, and hence, reachable by a potential tort-creditor of his estate. The husband’s court-appointed guardian signed the separation agreement and trust instrument on his behalf.

The trust named the wife as the settlor; and it appointed the husband’s guardian, his sister and a bank as trustees, with broad discretion. The wife funded the trust with assets exceeding $4 million in value; and the husband transferred some $120,000 from his own name into the trust.

The husband appears to have later caused an automobile collision, in which he died, while seriously injuring the occupants of another other car, resulting in a lawsuit for damages, seeking, in part, a declaration that the husband’s trust assets are available to the plaintiffs for potential damages. The Superior Court judge ruled that the plaintiffs could only reach that part of the trust corpus that the husband’s own cash funded, which the judge deemed to be the trust “self-settled”. The plaintiffs appealed.

Justice Amy Blake wrote the opinion of the Appeals Court, with clear analysis and expression. “Self-settled” trusts, or those where the creator and the beneficiary are the same, she observed, cannot serve as a firewall against creditors as a matter of public policy, at least to the extent that distributions are permitted to the beneficiary in a “support or discretionary trust”. The case turned, then, on whether or not the portion contributed by the decedent’s wife as a divorce settlement should also be deemed “self-settled”.

Justice Blake wrote of the need look past the labels of a trust to determine its true character. Remember that the wife was the named settlor of the trust, and she literally paid in 98% of the trust holdings. But, the court reasoned that her transfer was not a gift, but rather a disgorgement of marital assets to which the husband was equitably entitled under M.G.L., ch. 208, §34.

The court then invoked the law of contract, reasoning that in return for the wife’s recognition of the husband’s equitable property rights, he (by his guardian) consented to the trust’s creation, thus, providing consideration. In so doing, the husband, substantively, even if not in form, settled the trust. She then drew on analogy, comparing this to a pair of cases involving Medicaid and bankruptcy wherein a conservator created a trust, the other was funded by inheritance, each deemed to be “self-settled” despite literal trust nomenclature.

In the end, the spouses’ intent to shield the assets from creditors fell to the public policy that bars a creditor from a self-interested embargo of assets.

As we read this decision, we fully expected the opposite outcome, but by the end, we said “of course”. All in all, a really good appellate read.


Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


MLB labor agreement Massachusetts divorce lawyers divorce arbitrator LDRC alimony orders Baseball fraud Chouteau Levine disputes health coverage high-risk methodology Alimony Reform Act Baseball Arbitration resolve disputes family law arbitrators Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act SJC divorce arbitration alimony reform legislation divorce agreement separation alimony law litigation arbitrator alimony statute Levine Dispute Resolution Center Matrimonial Arbitration facilitated negotiations divorce mediator Massachusetts rehabilitative alimony divorce and family law mediators family law arbitrator IRC §2704 divorce arbitrators divorce and family law Divorce Agreements lawyer lawyers The Seven Sins of Alimony special master family law mediation Divorce family law health insurance Major League Baseball Arbitration Massachusetts lawyers Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC arbitrators mediator Same Sex Marriage mediations Self-adjusting alimony orders Cohabitation family support Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth Family Law Arbitration Baseball Players traditional negotiations Massachusetts alimony and child support divorce mediations self-adjusting alimony alimony med-arb divorce mediation Massachusetts alimony medical benefits divorce mediators divorced COLA mediation Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly support orders med/arb arbitration Defense of Marriage Act lawyer-attended mediation how baseball arbitration works annulment divorce litigation Levine Dispute Resolution General term alimony Boston pre-ARA alimony Massachusetts divorce mediators Child Support Guidelines DOMA Obamacare Uniform Arbitration Act conciliation divorce process dispute resolution private dispute resolution divorce lawyers child support family mediation family and probate law disputes mediators divorce judgment Levine Dispute Resolutions