781.708.4445

wmlevine@levinedisputeresolution.com

Divorce Mediation Blog

… Bad Boys, Whatcha Gonna Do? The punishment exceeded the crime for divorce property division in D.R. v. D.A

Wednesday, June 13, 2018

Levine Dispute Resolution - Divorce Property Division

We will not bore you with our complaints about Appellate Rule 1:28 again, but …

In the case of D.R. v. D.A, the Massachusetts Appeals Court found that the Probate Court judge “gave undue weight to the husband’s ‘bad’ conduct such that the grossly unequal asset allocation ‘falls outside the range of reasonable alternatives’”, vacating the 4 to 9 per cent asset allocation to the offending spouse (the parties gave different computations), a difference that the appellate panel deemed “immaterial”.

The bill of particulars against the husband: voluntary unemployment, controlling and abusive behavior, no contribution to household tasks and unexplained negative impact on the habitability of the martial residence. The trial judge concluded that the husband contributed “little to the marital enterprise…economically or otherwise [and negatively impacted] the wife’s wellbeing.”

Elaborating on prior case law in which the Massachusetts courts had established that “conduct” that “harmed the marriage or the marital estate” could lead to diminished recovery under equitable property distribution principles, the Appeals Court resorted to a graphic treatise treatment:

    Negative conduct, to be more than a featherweight factor, must either be economically detrimental to the welfare of the partnership, such as by undermining the family’s economic stability such as through disposal or waste of martial assets, such as through unlawful or fraudulent acts, or be so egregious as to impair the ability of one spouse to function in the future

A pretty specific set of limiting criteria: the kind that a court that intends to assert clarifying precedent would use. The again, D.R. may not be cited as precedent.



Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:



Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles


recent posts


tags

Levine Dispute Resolutions Massachusetts divorce mediators Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth Cohabitation alimony divorce agreement support orders mediators lawyer conciliation divorce and family law special master LDRC Massachusetts Divorce divorce mediators Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly divorced Boston private dispute resolution Defense of Marriage Act COLA divorce and family law mediators arbitration Child Support Guidelines Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC family law arbitrators alimony law divorce lawyers family law mediation facilitated negotiations Baseball Arbitration arbitrators IRC §2704 lawyer-attended mediation Self-adjusting alimony orders Massachusetts alimony lawyers dispute resolution family law arbitrator med/arb Levine Dispute Resolution health coverage medical benefits rehabilitative alimony divorce process resolve disputes divorce mediation alimony orders Family Law Arbitration family law family mediation Divorce Agreements disputes divorce litigation how baseball arbitration works Baseball mediator arbitrator separation self-adjusting alimony divorce arbitration annulment mediation mediations Alimony Reform Act SJC divorce mediations Massachusetts divorce lawyers Baseball Players traditional negotiations pre-ARA alimony divorce mediator Levine Dispute Resolution Center Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act MLB labor agreement family and probate law disputes Major League Baseball Arbitration Massachusetts alimony and child support health insurance litigation The Seven Sins of Alimony alimony statute med-arb Uniform Arbitration Act high-risk methodology divorce arbitrator fraud DOMA Same Sex Marriage divorce arbitrators General term alimony Chouteau Levine Massachusetts lawyers family support divorce judgment child support alimony reform legislation Obamacare Matrimonial Arbitration