Divorce Mediation Blog

As Same Sex Marriage Returns to SCOTUS, Massachusetts Should Celebrate Our Own

Wednesday, May 13, 2015

As we await the U.S. Supreme Court’s latest and perhaps ultimate same sex marriage decision in the four cases led by Obergefell, et. al. v. Hodges, it is worth recalling the breathtakingly fast (for all of us not personally disabled by marriage inequality) evolution in this country’s attitude. Can it be that less that barely 3 years ago, President Obama’s hand was forced by VP Biden’s gaffe (or was it?) to support same sex marriage? And, now, according to some pundits, the Republican party is praying that SCOTUS will strike down all state bans, to extricate the GOP from the pro-discrimination political box that they have crafted to win primaries and lose nationally. Could it be more ironic that Justice Roberts may hold the key to Republican presidential success, by siding with the liberal side of the Court against his own party’s 2012 platform, let alone its culture warriors?

As Massachusetts lawyers, it is equally worth celebrating the Commonwealth’s role in starting the ball rolling. From Mary Bonauto’s groundbreaking advocacy (she also argued the SCOTUS case last month) to Margaret Marshall’s Supreme Judicial Court leadership and eloquence in 2003’s Goodrich v. Department of Public Health, we have much to make us proud. As a state that has not always led with honor (before Plessy v. Ferguson, there was the SJC’s Roberts v. City of Boston, the seed of Plessy’s treacherous outcome) we certainly did so, here. Even the flap that followed the Goodrich decision and preceded it’s 2004 effective date, during which the Court gave the legislature the opportunity to pre-empt its ruling with marriage equality legislation, was brief and relatively contained.

Since then, has the sky not fallen, but one state after another (and D.C.) have followed suit.

When the history of this era’s civil rights development is written, Bonauto and Marshall will be recognized as giants of the ongoing national struggle to expand rights. Whatever SCOTUS decides this term, or later, we owe these women a debt of gratitude.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


family support Uniform Arbitration Act Boston divorce and family law alimony law divorce mediators alimony Obamacare how baseball arbitration works pre-ARA alimony Massachusetts divorce lawyers Self-adjusting alimony orders self-adjusting alimony lawyer-attended mediation rehabilitative alimony The Seven Sins of Alimony SJC arbitrator Baseball Players COLA family law arbitrator special master alimony statute family mediation medical benefits Major League Baseball Arbitration Levine Dispute Resolutions Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly lawyers fraud Divorce divorce litigation separation support orders health coverage traditional negotiations disputes family law mediation Massachusetts lawyers mediations Family Law Arbitration Chouteau Levine Divorce Agreements lawyer divorce and family law mediators high-risk methodology alimony orders divorce arbitrators Massachusetts alimony and child support facilitated negotiations Defense of Marriage Act Same Sex Marriage divorced divorce agreement litigation Massachusetts Matrimonial Arbitration resolve disputes Alimony Reform Act family law arbitrators Cohabitation med-arb family law MLB labor agreement divorce lawyers Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC LDRC IRC §2704 Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act dispute resolution General term alimony child support Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth mediator Baseball Arbitration Levine Dispute Resolution Center arbitrators divorce process mediators divorce mediation DOMA alimony reform legislation divorce arbitrator divorce mediator mediation Massachusetts divorce mediators divorce arbitration private dispute resolution Baseball Levine Dispute Resolution arbitration health insurance med/arb annulment Child Support Guidelines family and probate law disputes divorce mediations conciliation divorce judgment Massachusetts alimony