Divorce Mediation Blog

Appointed Arbitrators and Masters

Thursday, October 18, 2012

Increasingly, litigation parties whose disputes elude settlement are opting out of the public trial process and electing private resolution services instead. Sometimes, the mutual recognition of the need to “go private” itself unlocks the capacity to agree on substantive points; but often the parties remain fixed in their negotiating positions, despite the recognition that they share important process interests. For these people, third-party decision-making remains necessary.

Contracting parties may, for a variety of reasons, conclude that future disputes may well occur, yet they share an interest in avoiding litigation. Therefore, they designate an arbitrator before whom to air future controversies. The arbitrator holds the power make “awards” that are final and binding (subject in the case of child support and child custody matters to review by the court for “best interests”). If the designated arbitrator becomes unable or unwilling to serve, the parties may designate the court as the agent to appoint another arbitrator.

The decision to seek private adjudication may also arise from the litigation process itself. In these cases, the result may be arbitration, but it may also take the form of a court-appointed “master”. A master sits as an agent of the court, holding hearings, considering evidence, finding “facts” and recommending resolutions. The master’s work is subject to review by the appointing court, most often resulting in adoption of the master’s results.

In either case, the parties have asserted control over their own destiny, despite their inability to achieve substantive settlement. They select their decision-maker and conduct hearings at times and with rules to which they themselves agree, with efficiency and privacy maximized.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


divorce and family law alimony law General term alimony divorce mediations divorce arbitration Baseball Players arbitrator Divorce Agreements family mediation MLB labor agreement divorce process The Seven Sins of Alimony mediation Boston med-arb Massachusetts divorce mediators Major League Baseball Arbitration divorced divorce lawyers alimony Uniform Arbitration Act family and probate law disputes high-risk methodology arbitration COLA divorce agreement Matrimonial Arbitration Levine Dispute Resolutions divorce arbitrators Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth fraud Cohabitation divorce mediator divorce judgment mediations health insurance Massachusetts divorce lawyers separation alimony reform legislation annulment Levine Dispute Resolution Center support orders family support child support lawyers divorce and family law mediators how baseball arbitration works rehabilitative alimony mediator Self-adjusting alimony orders divorce litigation family law arbitrator arbitrators health coverage med/arb lawyer Chouteau Levine alimony statute disputes Obamacare Baseball Baseball Arbitration family law Child Support Guidelines Alimony Reform Act divorce mediators Levine Dispute Resolution LDRC DOMA facilitated negotiations Massachusetts lawyers Same Sex Marriage resolve disputes Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC family law arbitrators private dispute resolution Massachusetts IRC §2704 Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act Massachusetts alimony and child support traditional negotiations special master conciliation pre-ARA alimony litigation dispute resolution mediators divorce mediation Family Law Arbitration lawyer-attended mediation family law mediation alimony orders self-adjusting alimony Divorce Massachusetts alimony divorce arbitrator SJC Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Defense of Marriage Act medical benefits