781.708.4445

wmlevine@levinedisputeresolution.com

Divorce Mediation Blog

Appointed Arbitrators and Masters

Thursday, October 18, 2012

Increasingly, litigation parties whose disputes elude settlement are opting out of the public trial process and electing private resolution services instead. Sometimes, the mutual recognition of the need to “go private” itself unlocks the capacity to agree on substantive points; but often the parties remain fixed in their negotiating positions, despite the recognition that they share important process interests. For these people, third-party decision-making remains necessary.

Contracting parties may, for a variety of reasons, conclude that future disputes may well occur, yet they share an interest in avoiding litigation. Therefore, they designate an arbitrator before whom to air future controversies. The arbitrator holds the power make “awards” that are final and binding (subject in the case of child support and child custody matters to review by the court for “best interests”). If the designated arbitrator becomes unable or unwilling to serve, the parties may designate the court as the agent to appoint another arbitrator.

The decision to seek private adjudication may also arise from the litigation process itself. In these cases, the result may be arbitration, but it may also take the form of a court-appointed “master”. A master sits as an agent of the court, holding hearings, considering evidence, finding “facts” and recommending resolutions. The master’s work is subject to review by the appointing court, most often resulting in adoption of the master’s results.

In either case, the parties have asserted control over their own destiny, despite their inability to achieve substantive settlement. They select their decision-maker and conduct hearings at times and with rules to which they themselves agree, with efficiency and privacy maximized.



Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:



Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles


recent posts


tags

conciliation separation health coverage Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly health insurance lawyer-attended mediation COLA special master family law divorce and family law Levine Dispute Resolutions Matrimonial Arbitration Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth Self-adjusting alimony orders litigation disputes divorce mediator divorce judgment Chouteau Levine General term alimony Massachusetts lawyers Baseball divorce mediations divorce and family law mediators fraud support orders divorce lawyers alimony reform legislation family law arbitrator Obamacare Baseball Arbitration MLB labor agreement arbitrators arbitration mediations family law arbitrators The Seven Sins of Alimony family law mediation Uniform Arbitration Act divorced Baseball Players lawyer how baseball arbitration works Massachusetts alimony and child support medical benefits Alimony Reform Act LDRC private dispute resolution traditional negotiations rehabilitative alimony SJC pre-ARA alimony Same Sex Marriage family and probate law disputes divorce arbitrators Massachusetts divorce mediators Defense of Marriage Act alimony statute Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC Levine Dispute Resolution divorce mediation annulment Divorce Agreements divorce arbitrator family mediation alimony alimony law mediators divorce agreement Levine Dispute Resolution Center high-risk methodology Cohabitation alimony orders facilitated negotiations Massachusetts divorce lawyers Family Law Arbitration mediation Major League Baseball Arbitration Boston Divorce Child Support Guidelines dispute resolution divorce process Massachusetts Massachusetts alimony family support med-arb divorce mediators DOMA child support divorce arbitration med/arb mediator IRC §2704 lawyers self-adjusting alimony Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act divorce litigation resolve disputes arbitrator