Divorce Mediation Blog

Appointed Arbitrators and Masters

Thursday, October 18, 2012

Increasingly, litigation parties whose disputes elude settlement are opting out of the public trial process and electing private resolution services instead. Sometimes, the mutual recognition of the need to “go private” itself unlocks the capacity to agree on substantive points; but often the parties remain fixed in their negotiating positions, despite the recognition that they share important process interests. For these people, third-party decision-making remains necessary.

Contracting parties may, for a variety of reasons, conclude that future disputes may well occur, yet they share an interest in avoiding litigation. Therefore, they designate an arbitrator before whom to air future controversies. The arbitrator holds the power make “awards” that are final and binding (subject in the case of child support and child custody matters to review by the court for “best interests”). If the designated arbitrator becomes unable or unwilling to serve, the parties may designate the court as the agent to appoint another arbitrator.

The decision to seek private adjudication may also arise from the litigation process itself. In these cases, the result may be arbitration, but it may also take the form of a court-appointed “master”. A master sits as an agent of the court, holding hearings, considering evidence, finding “facts” and recommending resolutions. The master’s work is subject to review by the appointing court, most often resulting in adoption of the master’s results.

In either case, the parties have asserted control over their own destiny, despite their inability to achieve substantive settlement. They select their decision-maker and conduct hearings at times and with rules to which they themselves agree, with efficiency and privacy maximized.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


facilitated negotiations resolve disputes lawyer divorce agreement Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC Chouteau Levine divorce mediators divorced Massachusetts family support divorce lawyers annulment divorce mediator fraud divorce mediations The Seven Sins of Alimony mediator MLB labor agreement arbitrators Matrimonial Arbitration special master Child Support Guidelines high-risk methodology lawyer-attended mediation Major League Baseball Arbitration conciliation divorce arbitrator alimony orders Self-adjusting alimony orders Same Sex Marriage Uniform Arbitration Act arbitrator mediations alimony law Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Family Law Arbitration Massachusetts alimony how baseball arbitration works divorce process mediators Massachusetts divorce lawyers med-arb Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act Massachusetts divorce mediators COLA health coverage Boston Massachusetts lawyers divorce mediation alimony statute DOMA med/arb Cohabitation pre-ARA alimony divorce and family law alimony dispute resolution private dispute resolution family law mediation Defense of Marriage Act rehabilitative alimony Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth Baseball Arbitration family law arbitrator divorce judgment family mediation Levine Dispute Resolutions Levine Dispute Resolution Alimony Reform Act litigation disputes divorce arbitration health insurance arbitration medical benefits traditional negotiations divorce and family law mediators Massachusetts alimony and child support family law Baseball self-adjusting alimony support orders divorce litigation IRC §2704 LDRC Divorce Agreements divorce arbitrators Obamacare separation General term alimony mediation family and probate law disputes SJC child support family law arbitrators Levine Dispute Resolution Center Divorce lawyers Baseball Players alimony reform legislation