Divorce Mediation Blog

Appointed Arbitrators and Masters

Thursday, October 18, 2012

Increasingly, litigation parties whose disputes elude settlement are opting out of the public trial process and electing private resolution services instead. Sometimes, the mutual recognition of the need to “go private” itself unlocks the capacity to agree on substantive points; but often the parties remain fixed in their negotiating positions, despite the recognition that they share important process interests. For these people, third-party decision-making remains necessary.

Contracting parties may, for a variety of reasons, conclude that future disputes may well occur, yet they share an interest in avoiding litigation. Therefore, they designate an arbitrator before whom to air future controversies. The arbitrator holds the power make “awards” that are final and binding (subject in the case of child support and child custody matters to review by the court for “best interests”). If the designated arbitrator becomes unable or unwilling to serve, the parties may designate the court as the agent to appoint another arbitrator.

The decision to seek private adjudication may also arise from the litigation process itself. In these cases, the result may be arbitration, but it may also take the form of a court-appointed “master”. A master sits as an agent of the court, holding hearings, considering evidence, finding “facts” and recommending resolutions. The master’s work is subject to review by the appointing court, most often resulting in adoption of the master’s results.

In either case, the parties have asserted control over their own destiny, despite their inability to achieve substantive settlement. They select their decision-maker and conduct hearings at times and with rules to which they themselves agree, with efficiency and privacy maximized.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


Family Law Arbitration Cohabitation alimony orders COLA mediators Defense of Marriage Act Divorce dispute resolution Levine Dispute Resolutions fraud Massachusetts divorce mediators Baseball The Seven Sins of Alimony Baseball Players divorce mediation mediations family law arbitrators self-adjusting alimony Boston Baseball Arbitration Levine Dispute Resolution annulment Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act IRC §2704 Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC lawyers divorce lawyers Major League Baseball Arbitration divorce litigation health coverage divorce agreement conciliation arbitrators family law arbitrator disputes Alimony Reform Act SJC divorce mediators divorce arbitrator family and probate law disputes divorce arbitrators alimony statute med/arb Child Support Guidelines traditional negotiations family law private dispute resolution health insurance how baseball arbitration works rehabilitative alimony Chouteau Levine facilitated negotiations special master Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly separation Massachusetts alimony Massachusetts divorce lawyers divorce and family law Massachusetts alimony and child support resolve disputes LDRC divorce mediations family law mediation arbitrator lawyer MLB labor agreement Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth General term alimony Massachusetts lawyers arbitration support orders family support high-risk methodology family mediation alimony law divorce mediator Divorce Agreements Levine Dispute Resolution Center Uniform Arbitration Act mediator child support divorced divorce arbitration Matrimonial Arbitration divorce process divorce judgment alimony Same Sex Marriage DOMA alimony reform legislation litigation lawyer-attended mediation medical benefits Obamacare divorce and family law mediators mediation Massachusetts Self-adjusting alimony orders pre-ARA alimony med-arb