Divorce Mediation Blog

Applying Marketability Discount for the Wrong Reason: Wasniewski v. Walsh

Wednesday, April 12, 2017

Over the last year, BV Wire, an excellent publication of Business Valuation Resources, LLC, has been chronicling the New Jersey trial of Wasniewski v. Walsh, in which three Superior Court judges addressed a shareholder withdrawal case, with serial appeals and remands.

The issue presented is if the trial judge acted properly in applying a 15% discount for lack of marketability (“DLOM”) in setting the buyout of the withdrawing 50% shareholder, not because the interest difficult to sell, but rather to redress the plaintiff’s oppression of the shareholder-defendant.

(New Jersey law apparently permits the application of a DLOM in fair value determination in “extraordinary” circumstances).

Since BV Wire first reported the case, various experts have weighed in with critical thinking, including one who observed that:

    If trial courts determine marketability discounts as bad behavior discounts, there is really no way that business appraisers can provide meaningful information to the court. If the court’s concern is one “of the equities” in a matter rather than in determining the fair value…, then there is little that appraisers can do to help.

    (BVWire Issue #161-2, February 10, 2016, quoting a blog post by Chris Mercer at http://chrismercer.net/bad-behavior-marketability-discount-new-jersey/; italics ours.)

BVWire recently reported a New Jersey lawyer’s support of the Mercer view, noting that:

    …the use of the DLOM as a legal penalty voids a long-thought-out valuation measure of its meaning and separates it from its economic basis. The DLOM application should not become contingent on the character of the parties but be based instead on the actual value factors of marketability.

    (BVWire Issue #174-2, March 8, 2017, summarizing Michelle Patterson; italics ours).

While we prefer the conclusion that this trial court’s use of a DLOM was driven by “bad behavior” rather than “character”, there is no question that it was a sanction, and as such it is troubling.

As former trial lawyers, a retired trial judge and a frequent family law arbitrator and special master addressing business issues, we are always alert to the need to recognize (and avoid) implicit bias in fact-finding. Instead, this case seems to validate explicit bias.

Business valuation is meant to be an objective economic exercise. Bad behavior is a fact. Redressing inequity, when relevant, should find its voice in remedy, rather than fact-finding.

It seems to us that Wasniewski v. Walsh encourages a toxic mix.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


Baseball Arbitration The Seven Sins of Alimony Divorce Agreements Chouteau Levine alimony orders Massachusetts alimony Massachusetts alimony and child support lawyers rehabilitative alimony Massachusetts Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth divorce arbitrators health insurance alimony reform legislation General term alimony conciliation family mediation arbitrator Massachusetts divorce lawyers Child Support Guidelines resolve disputes Baseball divorce lawyers Family Law Arbitration Baseball Players Self-adjusting alimony orders family law mediation Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC family and probate law disputes divorce mediators Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly private dispute resolution Alimony Reform Act alimony divorce mediator medical benefits litigation high-risk methodology Levine Dispute Resolution mediators Matrimonial Arbitration divorce agreement support orders divorce arbitrator med/arb Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act alimony statute Divorce arbitration Massachusetts divorce mediators divorce mediation Massachusetts lawyers Major League Baseball Arbitration family support divorce and family law annulment med-arb mediator mediations Uniform Arbitration Act Defense of Marriage Act health coverage family law arbitrators alimony law divorce mediations facilitated negotiations MLB labor agreement traditional negotiations divorce arbitration divorce litigation DOMA LDRC family law arbitrator Obamacare disputes child support lawyer-attended mediation fraud Levine Dispute Resolutions dispute resolution Levine Dispute Resolution Center mediation special master pre-ARA alimony Same Sex Marriage lawyer IRC §2704 divorce judgment divorce process arbitrators family law separation Boston divorced SJC Cohabitation self-adjusting alimony divorce and family law mediators how baseball arbitration works COLA