Divorce Mediation Blog

Applying Marketability Discount for the Wrong Reason: Wasniewski v. Walsh

Wednesday, April 12, 2017

Over the last year, BV Wire, an excellent publication of Business Valuation Resources, LLC, has been chronicling the New Jersey trial of Wasniewski v. Walsh, in which three Superior Court judges addressed a shareholder withdrawal case, with serial appeals and remands.

The issue presented is if the trial judge acted properly in applying a 15% discount for lack of marketability (“DLOM”) in setting the buyout of the withdrawing 50% shareholder, not because the interest difficult to sell, but rather to redress the plaintiff’s oppression of the shareholder-defendant.

(New Jersey law apparently permits the application of a DLOM in fair value determination in “extraordinary” circumstances).

Since BV Wire first reported the case, various experts have weighed in with critical thinking, including one who observed that:

    If trial courts determine marketability discounts as bad behavior discounts, there is really no way that business appraisers can provide meaningful information to the court. If the court’s concern is one “of the equities” in a matter rather than in determining the fair value…, then there is little that appraisers can do to help.

    (BVWire Issue #161-2, February 10, 2016, quoting a blog post by Chris Mercer at http://chrismercer.net/bad-behavior-marketability-discount-new-jersey/; italics ours.)

BVWire recently reported a New Jersey lawyer’s support of the Mercer view, noting that:

    …the use of the DLOM as a legal penalty voids a long-thought-out valuation measure of its meaning and separates it from its economic basis. The DLOM application should not become contingent on the character of the parties but be based instead on the actual value factors of marketability.

    (BVWire Issue #174-2, March 8, 2017, summarizing Michelle Patterson; italics ours).

While we prefer the conclusion that this trial court’s use of a DLOM was driven by “bad behavior” rather than “character”, there is no question that it was a sanction, and as such it is troubling.

As former trial lawyers, a retired trial judge and a frequent family law arbitrator and special master addressing business issues, we are always alert to the need to recognize (and avoid) implicit bias in fact-finding. Instead, this case seems to validate explicit bias.

Business valuation is meant to be an objective economic exercise. Bad behavior is a fact. Redressing inequity, when relevant, should find its voice in remedy, rather than fact-finding.

It seems to us that Wasniewski v. Walsh encourages a toxic mix.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


Matrimonial Arbitration Baseball Arbitration alimony statute Divorce Agreements Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act resolve disputes lawyers mediators mediation Massachusetts lawyers Divorce Major League Baseball Arbitration divorce agreement annulment Family Law Arbitration Self-adjusting alimony orders alimony law rehabilitative alimony divorce lawyers mediations Massachusetts Levine Dispute Resolution Center divorce mediation divorced divorce arbitration med/arb Boston Alimony Reform Act divorce litigation dispute resolution self-adjusting alimony family law arbitrator Baseball Players litigation The Seven Sins of Alimony separation Child Support Guidelines divorce judgment family law arbitrators family and probate law disputes arbitrator Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth COLA SJC Defense of Marriage Act facilitated negotiations divorce and family law mediators mediator Massachusetts divorce mediators General term alimony Baseball support orders Massachusetts divorce lawyers fraud child support divorce and family law Cohabitation how baseball arbitration works family law mediation family law Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC arbitrators Obamacare family mediation alimony orders health coverage disputes Levine Dispute Resolutions med-arb divorce mediators lawyer-attended mediation divorce mediations LDRC health insurance Same Sex Marriage Uniform Arbitration Act divorce arbitrator Massachusetts alimony divorce mediator conciliation special master alimony pre-ARA alimony Massachusetts alimony and child support arbitration family support alimony reform legislation traditional negotiations divorce process IRC §2704 lawyer medical benefits high-risk methodology Chouteau Levine divorce arbitrators Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Levine Dispute Resolution private dispute resolution DOMA MLB labor agreement