781.708.4445

wmlevine@levinedisputeresolution.com

Divorce Mediation Blog

Alimony Reform: One Year Later – Part 1

Wednesday, January 09, 2013

A year plus after the state legislature enacted and Governor Patrick signed the Massachusetts alimony overhaul, bar association groups have devoted many of their seminar offerings to retrospectives by Probate and Family Court judges about their experiences with the complex new law since its effective date of March 1, 2012. From what we are seeing and hearing from these programs, and from talking to lawyers constantly in our practice about their experiences, some trends seem to emerge.

  1. Judges, by and large, do not want to strictly enforce the presumption that alimony terminates at the full social security retirement age (usually 66-67 for the current divorcing population) of the payor if the parties have been married for a very long time and the recipient spouse has been out of the workforce for a long time, too. This is especially true if the judge is addressing the issue in a case when the divorce entered before the alimony reform legislation occurred and the parties are appearing in court on termination issues by complaint for modification; and particularly if the payor is continuing to work beyond “retirement age”.
  2. Judges seem to believe that the statute’s mandate not to apply income of the payor to alimony calculation after having already counted it in determining child support, does not require that they determine child support first, and alimony second. In some circumstances judges apply the child support guidelines to the first $250,000 of combined parental income and then implement the alimony statute on excess income only; while in others, judges feel free to determine alimony obligations first, and then look at child support contributions in light of resulting adjusted incomes.
  3. In cases where alimony would have been open-ended (and not bounded by the durational limits of the new alimony law) and where property would have been presumed to be split equally, judges are open to persuasion that the time limited alimony recipient, who does not have clear and obvious prospects of substantial self-support) may be entitled to something more than half of the assets.

A few more observations will follow in our next entry.



Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:



Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles


recent posts


tags

Same Sex Marriage divorced Family Law Arbitration family mediation family law arbitrator special master family law arbitrators facilitated negotiations Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth family law mediation divorce mediators LDRC conciliation family law Baseball divorce arbitrators high-risk methodology lawyer-attended mediation separation arbitration Massachusetts divorce mediators disputes Levine Dispute Resolutions annulment Baseball Arbitration arbitrators Baseball Players Massachusetts alimony and child support med-arb Cohabitation divorce arbitration Levine Dispute Resolution litigation alimony reform legislation Self-adjusting alimony orders child support private dispute resolution mediations med/arb Defense of Marriage Act Boston divorce mediation divorce mediations alimony statute divorce judgment dispute resolution mediators pre-ARA alimony The Seven Sins of Alimony family and probate law disputes resolve disputes lawyer COLA alimony alimony law support orders DOMA self-adjusting alimony family support Child Support Guidelines Chouteau Levine IRC §2704 how baseball arbitration works divorce agreement arbitrator divorce litigation Massachusetts Matrimonial Arbitration divorce lawyers health insurance Uniform Arbitration Act Major League Baseball Arbitration rehabilitative alimony divorce and family law mediators fraud Divorce Agreements mediator medical benefits Levine Dispute Resolution Center Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act divorce arbitrator Divorce Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly MLB labor agreement Massachusetts lawyers SJC Obamacare General term alimony Massachusetts alimony divorce and family law Alimony Reform Act health coverage lawyers alimony orders divorce process divorce mediator traditional negotiations mediation Massachusetts divorce lawyers Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC