Divorce Mediation Blog

Alimony Reform: One Year Later – Part 1

Wednesday, January 09, 2013

A year plus after the state legislature enacted and Governor Patrick signed the Massachusetts alimony overhaul, bar association groups have devoted many of their seminar offerings to retrospectives by Probate and Family Court judges about their experiences with the complex new law since its effective date of March 1, 2012. From what we are seeing and hearing from these programs, and from talking to lawyers constantly in our practice about their experiences, some trends seem to emerge.

  1. Judges, by and large, do not want to strictly enforce the presumption that alimony terminates at the full social security retirement age (usually 66-67 for the current divorcing population) of the payor if the parties have been married for a very long time and the recipient spouse has been out of the workforce for a long time, too. This is especially true if the judge is addressing the issue in a case when the divorce entered before the alimony reform legislation occurred and the parties are appearing in court on termination issues by complaint for modification; and particularly if the payor is continuing to work beyond “retirement age”.
  2. Judges seem to believe that the statute’s mandate not to apply income of the payor to alimony calculation after having already counted it in determining child support, does not require that they determine child support first, and alimony second. In some circumstances judges apply the child support guidelines to the first $250,000 of combined parental income and then implement the alimony statute on excess income only; while in others, judges feel free to determine alimony obligations first, and then look at child support contributions in light of resulting adjusted incomes.
  3. In cases where alimony would have been open-ended (and not bounded by the durational limits of the new alimony law) and where property would have been presumed to be split equally, judges are open to persuasion that the time limited alimony recipient, who does not have clear and obvious prospects of substantial self-support) may be entitled to something more than half of the assets.

A few more observations will follow in our next entry.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


DOMA MLB labor agreement med/arb high-risk methodology Massachusetts divorce lawyers family and probate law disputes Divorce Agreements Massachusetts alimony SJC mediations Massachusetts Cohabitation conciliation alimony statute divorce arbitrator alimony orders support orders Levine Dispute Resolution family law arbitrator divorce litigation separation mediation Baseball Arbitration Uniform Arbitration Act General term alimony divorce lawyers dispute resolution private dispute resolution Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC alimony reform legislation traditional negotiations family mediation health insurance Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act family law family support divorce and family law mediators self-adjusting alimony arbitrator litigation arbitrators Major League Baseball Arbitration divorce mediations divorce mediator Boston Levine Dispute Resolutions Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth divorce agreement resolve disputes Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly annulment Massachusetts lawyers disputes how baseball arbitration works divorce arbitration divorce mediators COLA mediators lawyer-attended mediation Massachusetts divorce mediators alimony law LDRC Chouteau Levine family law mediation Family Law Arbitration IRC §2704 pre-ARA alimony med-arb Self-adjusting alimony orders rehabilitative alimony Baseball divorce process alimony facilitated negotiations lawyers fraud family law arbitrators The Seven Sins of Alimony Levine Dispute Resolution Center Same Sex Marriage Alimony Reform Act Baseball Players special master divorce arbitrators divorce mediation Massachusetts alimony and child support Divorce Matrimonial Arbitration mediator Defense of Marriage Act lawyer arbitration medical benefits divorce and family law health coverage Child Support Guidelines Obamacare divorced divorce judgment child support