Divorce Mediation Blog

Alimony Reform and Child Support Changes: Judge Ginsburg’s View

Wednesday, June 04, 2014

In the April 14, 2014 Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly, the most thoughtful Massachusetts Probate and Family Court judge of his generation, Hon. Edward M. Ginsburg (ret), laments that 2012’s alimony overhaul by the legislature and 2013’s quadrennial review and revisions to the child support guidelines by the Trial Court add up to a giant missed opportunity, and a failure that will hurt families for years to come. Specifically, Judge Ginsburg, who devoted a good chunk of his two decades on the bench to advocating for predictability and consistency in all things support points out that no one thought to look at spousal support and child support as a piece. He is right.

We have all been focused intensely on how the new alimony laws work; how the new guidelines work; and how we might manipulate the two into making sensible orders that are tax-efficient. But in debating the trees, we lost sight of the forest: why didn’t the lawmakers look at these two cognate and connected subjects as two parts of the same puzzle that they are? How do we rationalize two sets of support theory into a fair, efficient and sustainable whole, not just for the privileged few who will take the time in mediation, or with sophisticated counsel, to develop a custom-made support regime, but for everyone? Reform is not reform without addressing all relevant considerations; and here, half the house was built as a tudor and the other side a cape. The result is a leaky home.

An example. We recently had to explain the following muddle to mediation clients. Under the new child support guidelines, a mother with 2 children would often receive 18.4% of the Husband’s gross income as child support, and no alimony, he having income of about $200,000.00 per year. The same woman learned that if she had no kids at all, she might expect 30 – 35% of the very same income, as alimony. Granted, we explained, taxable income is worth less than its gross sum. But is it worth less that 18.4% on the gross? Not likely.

Another example. As we have discussed here before, the alimony law says that the court may not take dollars into account that have already been tapped for child support, suggesting that child support is computed first on income up to $250,000.00 per year, with excess income only being addressed for alimony. Meanwhile, the child support guidelines say that the court may calculate alimony first, and then child support. We have argued before that sound discretion and good divorce mediation can turn these conflicts into opportunity in the search for a sensible result. But the legal inconsistency is undeniable.

Would it not have made sense for some body to review the matter of family support as of a whole? Is it too late?

Thanks to Judge Ginsburg for this valuable and disturbing insight.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


Baseball Players family law mediation mediation arbitrators Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC med-arb disputes lawyers resolve disputes support orders dispute resolution alimony Baseball IRC §2704 Baseball Arbitration Uniform Arbitration Act COLA divorce judgment child support family law arbitrator MLB labor agreement special master Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth Cohabitation divorce mediator Massachusetts lawyers divorce mediators arbitration DOMA arbitrator mediations medical benefits The Seven Sins of Alimony divorce agreement alimony orders SJC fraud health insurance lawyer-attended mediation Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act self-adjusting alimony mediator high-risk methodology mediators Divorce Agreements rehabilitative alimony Levine Dispute Resolution Same Sex Marriage family law arbitrators Obamacare divorce and family law Levine Dispute Resolutions Major League Baseball Arbitration med/arb alimony statute Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Family Law Arbitration health coverage facilitated negotiations Massachusetts divorce lawyers pre-ARA alimony Massachusetts alimony and child support Massachusetts divorce mediators annulment conciliation divorced divorce process Boston Child Support Guidelines Massachusetts alimony divorce arbitration General term alimony Self-adjusting alimony orders separation family law divorce mediation Chouteau Levine divorce litigation divorce mediations LDRC Massachusetts divorce arbitrator Levine Dispute Resolution Center alimony law litigation Matrimonial Arbitration family and probate law disputes how baseball arbitration works Alimony Reform Act divorce lawyers Defense of Marriage Act alimony reform legislation private dispute resolution divorce and family law mediators family support Divorce traditional negotiations family mediation divorce arbitrators lawyer