Divorce Mediation Blog

Alimony Reform and Child Support Changes: Judge Ginsburg’s View

Wednesday, June 04, 2014

In the April 14, 2014 Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly, the most thoughtful Massachusetts Probate and Family Court judge of his generation, Hon. Edward M. Ginsburg (ret), laments that 2012’s alimony overhaul by the legislature and 2013’s quadrennial review and revisions to the child support guidelines by the Trial Court add up to a giant missed opportunity, and a failure that will hurt families for years to come. Specifically, Judge Ginsburg, who devoted a good chunk of his two decades on the bench to advocating for predictability and consistency in all things support points out that no one thought to look at spousal support and child support as a piece. He is right.

We have all been focused intensely on how the new alimony laws work; how the new guidelines work; and how we might manipulate the two into making sensible orders that are tax-efficient. But in debating the trees, we lost sight of the forest: why didn’t the lawmakers look at these two cognate and connected subjects as two parts of the same puzzle that they are? How do we rationalize two sets of support theory into a fair, efficient and sustainable whole, not just for the privileged few who will take the time in mediation, or with sophisticated counsel, to develop a custom-made support regime, but for everyone? Reform is not reform without addressing all relevant considerations; and here, half the house was built as a tudor and the other side a cape. The result is a leaky home.

An example. We recently had to explain the following muddle to mediation clients. Under the new child support guidelines, a mother with 2 children would often receive 18.4% of the Husband’s gross income as child support, and no alimony, he having income of about $200,000.00 per year. The same woman learned that if she had no kids at all, she might expect 30 – 35% of the very same income, as alimony. Granted, we explained, taxable income is worth less than its gross sum. But is it worth less that 18.4% on the gross? Not likely.

Another example. As we have discussed here before, the alimony law says that the court may not take dollars into account that have already been tapped for child support, suggesting that child support is computed first on income up to $250,000.00 per year, with excess income only being addressed for alimony. Meanwhile, the child support guidelines say that the court may calculate alimony first, and then child support. We have argued before that sound discretion and good divorce mediation can turn these conflicts into opportunity in the search for a sensible result. But the legal inconsistency is undeniable.

Would it not have made sense for some body to review the matter of family support as of a whole? Is it too late?

Thanks to Judge Ginsburg for this valuable and disturbing insight.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


family law arbitrators Divorce LDRC resolve disputes IRC §2704 traditional negotiations Uniform Arbitration Act divorce mediations Massachusetts alimony divorce process Same Sex Marriage facilitated negotiations MLB labor agreement Obamacare high-risk methodology Baseball Players lawyer-attended mediation Cohabitation family and probate law disputes rehabilitative alimony family mediation self-adjusting alimony family support private dispute resolution Self-adjusting alimony orders Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC The Seven Sins of Alimony Child Support Guidelines Massachusetts divorce lawyers Massachusetts lawyers child support mediation support orders SJC alimony divorce mediation special master alimony orders Chouteau Levine divorced Alimony Reform Act Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth Levine Dispute Resolution Center Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly litigation lawyer Levine Dispute Resolution DOMA family law mediation dispute resolution fraud divorce arbitrator Family Law Arbitration conciliation divorce and family law divorce arbitration arbitrators divorce lawyers divorce mediators pre-ARA alimony separation divorce litigation mediator medical benefits family law arbitrator Major League Baseball Arbitration Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act divorce arbitrators health insurance divorce agreement Boston how baseball arbitration works med-arb divorce judgment Matrimonial Arbitration family law disputes Massachusetts divorce mediators General term alimony arbitration Defense of Marriage Act mediators annulment divorce mediator Massachusetts alimony and child support COLA Baseball Arbitration Levine Dispute Resolutions alimony reform legislation Baseball Divorce Agreements divorce and family law mediators health coverage arbitrator lawyers Massachusetts alimony law alimony statute mediations med/arb