Divorce Mediation Blog

Alimony Reform and Child Support Changes: Judge Ginsburg’s View

Wednesday, June 04, 2014

In the April 14, 2014 Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly, the most thoughtful Massachusetts Probate and Family Court judge of his generation, Hon. Edward M. Ginsburg (ret), laments that 2012’s alimony overhaul by the legislature and 2013’s quadrennial review and revisions to the child support guidelines by the Trial Court add up to a giant missed opportunity, and a failure that will hurt families for years to come. Specifically, Judge Ginsburg, who devoted a good chunk of his two decades on the bench to advocating for predictability and consistency in all things support points out that no one thought to look at spousal support and child support as a piece. He is right.

We have all been focused intensely on how the new alimony laws work; how the new guidelines work; and how we might manipulate the two into making sensible orders that are tax-efficient. But in debating the trees, we lost sight of the forest: why didn’t the lawmakers look at these two cognate and connected subjects as two parts of the same puzzle that they are? How do we rationalize two sets of support theory into a fair, efficient and sustainable whole, not just for the privileged few who will take the time in mediation, or with sophisticated counsel, to develop a custom-made support regime, but for everyone? Reform is not reform without addressing all relevant considerations; and here, half the house was built as a tudor and the other side a cape. The result is a leaky home.

An example. We recently had to explain the following muddle to mediation clients. Under the new child support guidelines, a mother with 2 children would often receive 18.4% of the Husband’s gross income as child support, and no alimony, he having income of about $200,000.00 per year. The same woman learned that if she had no kids at all, she might expect 30 – 35% of the very same income, as alimony. Granted, we explained, taxable income is worth less than its gross sum. But is it worth less that 18.4% on the gross? Not likely.

Another example. As we have discussed here before, the alimony law says that the court may not take dollars into account that have already been tapped for child support, suggesting that child support is computed first on income up to $250,000.00 per year, with excess income only being addressed for alimony. Meanwhile, the child support guidelines say that the court may calculate alimony first, and then child support. We have argued before that sound discretion and good divorce mediation can turn these conflicts into opportunity in the search for a sensible result. But the legal inconsistency is undeniable.

Would it not have made sense for some body to review the matter of family support as of a whole? Is it too late?

Thanks to Judge Ginsburg for this valuable and disturbing insight.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


Massachusetts alimony family law arbitrators Baseball Arbitration SJC divorce arbitrator high-risk methodology Massachusetts divorce lawyers lawyer divorce agreement support orders General term alimony family support Divorce Agreements mediators alimony family law divorce judgment The Seven Sins of Alimony Massachusetts alimony and child support divorce lawyers dispute resolution arbitrator Levine Dispute Resolution Cohabitation divorce and family law mediators private dispute resolution alimony reform legislation arbitration Baseball rehabilitative alimony alimony orders disputes family mediation Chouteau Levine Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Levine Dispute Resolutions traditional negotiations family and probate law disputes medical benefits Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act divorce mediators Uniform Arbitration Act divorce mediation Same Sex Marriage mediations child support arbitrators facilitated negotiations divorced COLA Divorce alimony statute Major League Baseball Arbitration Family Law Arbitration MLB labor agreement family law arbitrator divorce arbitrators Alimony Reform Act IRC §2704 mediator Obamacare divorce mediations lawyers litigation separation alimony law family law mediation divorce and family law Levine Dispute Resolution Center self-adjusting alimony Child Support Guidelines conciliation lawyer-attended mediation Matrimonial Arbitration Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC Defense of Marriage Act Boston divorce litigation divorce arbitration health coverage divorce mediator mediation special master health insurance Self-adjusting alimony orders Massachusetts divorce process Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth Massachusetts lawyers fraud Baseball Players med/arb annulment pre-ARA alimony LDRC Massachusetts divorce mediators DOMA med-arb resolve disputes how baseball arbitration works