781.708.4445

wmlevine@levinedisputeresolution.com

Divorce Mediation Blog

A Well-Reasoned Opinion from the Appeals Court on a Tricky Subject: Calhoun v. Rawlings

Wednesday, July 11, 2018

Levine Dispute Resolution - Divorce Mediation

The Massachusetts Appeals Court recently reviewed the decision of a Superior Court judge on the question of whether or not a spendthrift trust settled for the benefit of a disabled person, created and funded with a divorce settlement - assets transferred to the trust by his (ex-) wife – was a “self-settled” trust as a matter of law, and hence, reachable by a potential tort-creditor of his estate. The husband’s court-appointed guardian signed the separation agreement and trust instrument on his behalf.

The trust named the wife as the settlor; and it appointed the husband’s guardian, his sister and a bank as trustees, with broad discretion. The wife funded the trust with assets exceeding $4 million in value; and the husband transferred some $120,000 from his own name into the trust.

The husband appears to have later caused an automobile collision, in which he died, while seriously injuring the occupants of another other car, resulting in a lawsuit for damages, seeking, in part, a declaration that the husband’s trust assets are available to the plaintiffs for potential damages. The Superior Court judge ruled that the plaintiffs could only reach that part of the trust corpus that the husband’s own cash funded, which the judge deemed to be the trust “self-settled”. The plaintiffs appealed.

Justice Amy Blake wrote the opinion of the Appeals Court, with clear analysis and expression. “Self-settled” trusts, or those where the creator and the beneficiary are the same, she observed, cannot serve as a firewall against creditors as a matter of public policy, at least to the extent that distributions are permitted to the beneficiary in a “support or discretionary trust”. The case turned, then, on whether or not the portion contributed by the decedent’s wife as a divorce settlement should also be deemed “self-settled”.

Justice Blake wrote of the need look past the labels of a trust to determine its true character. Remember that the wife was the named settlor of the trust, and she literally paid in 98% of the trust holdings. But, the court reasoned that her transfer was not a gift, but rather a disgorgement of marital assets to which the husband was equitably entitled under M.G.L., ch. 208, §34.

The court then invoked the law of contract, reasoning that in return for the wife’s recognition of the husband’s equitable property rights, he (by his guardian) consented to the trust’s creation, thus, providing consideration. In so doing, the husband, substantively, even if not in form, settled the trust. She then drew on analogy, comparing this to a pair of cases involving Medicaid and bankruptcy wherein a conservator created a trust, the other was funded by inheritance, each deemed to be “self-settled” despite literal trust nomenclature.

In the end, the spouses’ intent to shield the assets from creditors fell to the public policy that bars a creditor from a self-interested embargo of assets.

As we read this decision, we fully expected the opposite outcome, but by the end, we said “of course”. All in all, a really good appellate read.



Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:



Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles


recent posts


tags

support orders divorce mediation lawyer-attended mediation family law mediation annulment Baseball Players Alimony Reform Act lawyers Massachusetts alimony mediators Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC health coverage divorce arbitration Baseball Uniform Arbitration Act Chouteau Levine DOMA alimony reform legislation litigation Massachusetts alimony and child support Divorce conciliation Massachusetts divorce lawyers Major League Baseball Arbitration Divorce Agreements SJC divorce and family law Massachusetts facilitated negotiations divorce mediator family law arbitrator arbitration mediator COLA med-arb rehabilitative alimony divorce arbitrator alimony statute resolve disputes Levine Dispute Resolutions pre-ARA alimony Massachusetts lawyers family mediation Baseball Arbitration Family Law Arbitration alimony law divorce mediators medical benefits divorced family and probate law disputes Boston self-adjusting alimony divorce mediations Self-adjusting alimony orders special master med/arb Defense of Marriage Act traditional negotiations General term alimony separation divorce arbitrators Massachusetts divorce mediators Cohabitation Same Sex Marriage divorce agreement Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act Child Support Guidelines arbitrators fraud how baseball arbitration works divorce and family law mediators lawyer family support Matrimonial Arbitration LDRC Levine Dispute Resolution family law health insurance mediation The Seven Sins of Alimony divorce process IRC §2704 alimony orders Obamacare Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth child support Levine Dispute Resolution Center dispute resolution arbitrator private dispute resolution divorce lawyers alimony high-risk methodology mediations divorce litigation MLB labor agreement disputes family law arbitrators divorce judgment