781.708.4445

wmlevine@levinedisputeresolution.com

Divorce Mediation Blog

A Prenup Head Shaker from the Appeals Court: Stacy v. Stacy

Wednesday, January 04, 2017

In a Rule 1:28 Memorandum and Order, a panel of the Massachusetts Appeals Court ruled that a pre-marital agreement applied to the death of a spouse, based on contract language that described its scope. Here is that term, fully as reported in the opinion, but broken down by clause:

    … a final and complete settlement of all matters relating to the interest and obligations of each [party] with respect to all future property matters, including but not limited to alimony, support, maintenance, property assignment, and the rights of the parties under G.L., c. 208, §34, as amended, in the event of divorce.

Yet, here is how the Appeals Court must have read it:

    … a final and complete settlement of all matters relating to the interest and obligations of each [party] with respect to all future property matters[.]

    [ ]

    [ ]

The appellate panel tossed out two of the three clauses, which spoke only of divorce, consigned as surplusage, unworthy of consideration, despite the “agreement’s caption referring to G.L., c. 208, §34”, the divorce property division statute.

Now,, let’s cast the provision in the way that is consistent with the maxim that words in a contract are to be accorded meaning within customary everyday usage, with the law of pre-marital agreements that requires that waivers be explicit and the highly probable intent of the parties:

    … a final and complete settlement of all matters relating to the interest and obligations of each [party] with respect to all future property matters, in the event of divorce [,] including but not limited to alimony, support, maintenance, property assignment, and the rights of the parties under G.L., c. 208, §34, as amended[.]

Do you think that the parties’ might have used the word “death” somewhere, if they intended to cover that contingency? Or “estate”? Bequest”? Maybe, “inheritance”? Even “survivor”?

The result is that a widow, with no hint of pending divorce, or even marital strain, must now answer to her sister-in-law (the estate’s personal representative) for “several furnishings and personal belongings” that she removed from her marital home, in part, for alleged violation of a premarital agreement that was to all appearances, extinguished by her husband’s death.

We have no quarrel with the Appeals Court remand on the grounds that a violation of G. L. c. 190B, § 3-709 may have occurred, or that the alleged facts were also sufficient to state claims of a conversion, an unjust enrichment, and a constructive trust. But the Appeals Court is makes unnecessary mischief by inferring intent that doesn’t appear in, or even between the lines of, the contract.



Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:



Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles


recent posts


tags

divorce litigation Massachusetts alimony The Seven Sins of Alimony divorce arbitrators arbitrators Massachusetts alimony and child support litigation Boston Massachusetts divorce mediators divorce mediator Levine Dispute Resolutions self-adjusting alimony Massachusetts lawyers Alimony Reform Act lawyers med-arb Divorce special master Divorce Agreements child support alimony orders divorced medical benefits Family Law Arbitration Defense of Marriage Act divorce agreement med/arb Levine Dispute Resolution Center annulment Baseball Arbitration Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC Massachusetts high-risk methodology divorce mediators Levine Dispute Resolution divorce arbitration SJC arbitrator Baseball Players family law facilitated negotiations Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly divorce arbitrator family support rehabilitative alimony Major League Baseball Arbitration mediations LDRC separation Obamacare DOMA disputes Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth pre-ARA alimony divorce lawyers MLB labor agreement Chouteau Levine mediator fraud Child Support Guidelines dispute resolution alimony statute Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act family mediation family law arbitrator divorce mediation family and probate law disputes Uniform Arbitration Act conciliation health coverage health insurance mediators Massachusetts divorce lawyers alimony law arbitration Baseball divorce process traditional negotiations mediation family law arbitrators private dispute resolution divorce judgment divorce and family law divorce and family law mediators COLA resolve disputes alimony support orders Same Sex Marriage divorce mediations how baseball arbitration works family law mediation lawyer-attended mediation lawyer Cohabitation Self-adjusting alimony orders IRC §2704 alimony reform legislation General term alimony Matrimonial Arbitration