781.708.4445

wmlevine@levinedisputeresolution.com

Divorce Mediation Blog

A Prenup Head Shaker from the Appeals Court: Stacy v. Stacy

Wednesday, January 04, 2017

In a Rule 1:28 Memorandum and Order, a panel of the Massachusetts Appeals Court ruled that a pre-marital agreement applied to the death of a spouse, based on contract language that described its scope. Here is that term, fully as reported in the opinion, but broken down by clause:

    … a final and complete settlement of all matters relating to the interest and obligations of each [party] with respect to all future property matters, including but not limited to alimony, support, maintenance, property assignment, and the rights of the parties under G.L., c. 208, §34, as amended, in the event of divorce.

Yet, here is how the Appeals Court must have read it:

    … a final and complete settlement of all matters relating to the interest and obligations of each [party] with respect to all future property matters[.]

    [ ]

    [ ]

The appellate panel tossed out two of the three clauses, which spoke only of divorce, consigned as surplusage, unworthy of consideration, despite the “agreement’s caption referring to G.L., c. 208, §34”, the divorce property division statute.

Now,, let’s cast the provision in the way that is consistent with the maxim that words in a contract are to be accorded meaning within customary everyday usage, with the law of pre-marital agreements that requires that waivers be explicit and the highly probable intent of the parties:

    … a final and complete settlement of all matters relating to the interest and obligations of each [party] with respect to all future property matters, in the event of divorce [,] including but not limited to alimony, support, maintenance, property assignment, and the rights of the parties under G.L., c. 208, §34, as amended[.]

Do you think that the parties’ might have used the word “death” somewhere, if they intended to cover that contingency? Or “estate”? Bequest”? Maybe, “inheritance”? Even “survivor”?

The result is that a widow, with no hint of pending divorce, or even marital strain, must now answer to her sister-in-law (the estate’s personal representative) for “several furnishings and personal belongings” that she removed from her marital home, in part, for alleged violation of a premarital agreement that was to all appearances, extinguished by her husband’s death.

We have no quarrel with the Appeals Court remand on the grounds that a violation of G. L. c. 190B, § 3-709 may have occurred, or that the alleged facts were also sufficient to state claims of a conversion, an unjust enrichment, and a constructive trust. But the Appeals Court is makes unnecessary mischief by inferring intent that doesn’t appear in, or even between the lines of, the contract.



Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:



Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles


recent posts


tags

Family Law Arbitration mediation Levine Dispute Resolution arbitration family law arbitrators divorced special master divorce arbitrator Baseball Arbitration med/arb Massachusetts alimony Levine Dispute Resolutions divorce mediations mediators divorce and family law facilitated negotiations private dispute resolution Obamacare how baseball arbitration works child support litigation arbitrators alimony separation Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly divorce litigation Massachusetts divorce lawyers divorce process annulment Child Support Guidelines divorce lawyers family law health insurance divorce mediators rehabilitative alimony divorce and family law mediators support orders MLB labor agreement LDRC Boston alimony law resolve disputes divorce arbitration COLA Defense of Marriage Act medical benefits Self-adjusting alimony orders mediator Cohabitation dispute resolution Massachusetts divorce mediators self-adjusting alimony high-risk methodology Same Sex Marriage DOMA conciliation Uniform Arbitration Act family law arbitrator med-arb Divorce Alimony Reform Act lawyers divorce agreement family mediation divorce mediation Divorce Agreements divorce arbitrators lawyer alimony orders Massachusetts lawyers Levine Dispute Resolution Center health coverage family and probate law disputes Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC Matrimonial Arbitration Major League Baseball Arbitration Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth divorce judgment divorce mediator alimony statute family law mediation Baseball Players pre-ARA alimony Chouteau Levine disputes General term alimony mediations fraud arbitrator Massachusetts Baseball The Seven Sins of Alimony Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act lawyer-attended mediation SJC Massachusetts alimony and child support traditional negotiations alimony reform legislation IRC §2704 family support