781.708.4445

wmlevine@levinedisputeresolution.com

Divorce Mediation Blog

A Prenup Head Shaker from the Appeals Court: Stacy v. Stacy

Wednesday, January 04, 2017

In a Rule 1:28 Memorandum and Order, a panel of the Massachusetts Appeals Court ruled that a pre-marital agreement applied to the death of a spouse, based on contract language that described its scope. Here is that term, fully as reported in the opinion, but broken down by clause:

    … a final and complete settlement of all matters relating to the interest and obligations of each [party] with respect to all future property matters, including but not limited to alimony, support, maintenance, property assignment, and the rights of the parties under G.L., c. 208, §34, as amended, in the event of divorce.

Yet, here is how the Appeals Court must have read it:

    … a final and complete settlement of all matters relating to the interest and obligations of each [party] with respect to all future property matters[.]

    [ ]

    [ ]

The appellate panel tossed out two of the three clauses, which spoke only of divorce, consigned as surplusage, unworthy of consideration, despite the “agreement’s caption referring to G.L., c. 208, §34”, the divorce property division statute.

Now,, let’s cast the provision in the way that is consistent with the maxim that words in a contract are to be accorded meaning within customary everyday usage, with the law of pre-marital agreements that requires that waivers be explicit and the highly probable intent of the parties:

    … a final and complete settlement of all matters relating to the interest and obligations of each [party] with respect to all future property matters, in the event of divorce [,] including but not limited to alimony, support, maintenance, property assignment, and the rights of the parties under G.L., c. 208, §34, as amended[.]

Do you think that the parties’ might have used the word “death” somewhere, if they intended to cover that contingency? Or “estate”? Bequest”? Maybe, “inheritance”? Even “survivor”?

The result is that a widow, with no hint of pending divorce, or even marital strain, must now answer to her sister-in-law (the estate’s personal representative) for “several furnishings and personal belongings” that she removed from her marital home, in part, for alleged violation of a premarital agreement that was to all appearances, extinguished by her husband’s death.

We have no quarrel with the Appeals Court remand on the grounds that a violation of G. L. c. 190B, § 3-709 may have occurred, or that the alleged facts were also sufficient to state claims of a conversion, an unjust enrichment, and a constructive trust. But the Appeals Court is makes unnecessary mischief by inferring intent that doesn’t appear in, or even between the lines of, the contract.



Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:



Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles


recent posts


tags

Massachusetts family law mediation Uniform Arbitration Act facilitated negotiations divorce process disputes special master health insurance Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly divorce arbitrators Family Law Arbitration pre-ARA alimony self-adjusting alimony lawyer-attended mediation divorce agreement family law arbitrators Same Sex Marriage support orders mediation medical benefits mediators family support divorce judgment lawyer divorce and family law mediators mediator divorce mediators General term alimony family law arbitrator Baseball Arbitration lawyers divorce mediation Major League Baseball Arbitration Self-adjusting alimony orders private dispute resolution Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act DOMA how baseball arbitration works litigation family and probate law disputes Defense of Marriage Act Massachusetts divorce lawyers divorce arbitrator MLB labor agreement resolve disputes Chouteau Levine arbitrator dispute resolution IRC §2704 annulment Levine Dispute Resolutions mediations divorce mediator divorced Boston child support Massachusetts divorce mediators Divorce family law Cohabitation health coverage Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC LDRC divorce and family law Divorce Agreements Massachusetts alimony Levine Dispute Resolution Center traditional negotiations Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth divorce lawyers divorce arbitration family mediation Levine Dispute Resolution Massachusetts lawyers high-risk methodology The Seven Sins of Alimony alimony statute fraud separation Obamacare alimony law med-arb SJC divorce mediations alimony orders Baseball alimony reform legislation arbitrators arbitration Massachusetts alimony and child support med/arb rehabilitative alimony COLA Alimony Reform Act conciliation Baseball Players Child Support Guidelines Matrimonial Arbitration alimony divorce litigation