781.708.4445

wmlevine@levinedisputeresolution.com

Divorce Mediation Blog

A Prenup Head Shaker from the Appeals Court: Stacy v. Stacy

Wednesday, January 04, 2017

In a Rule 1:28 Memorandum and Order, a panel of the Massachusetts Appeals Court ruled that a pre-marital agreement applied to the death of a spouse, based on contract language that described its scope. Here is that term, fully as reported in the opinion, but broken down by clause:

    … a final and complete settlement of all matters relating to the interest and obligations of each [party] with respect to all future property matters, including but not limited to alimony, support, maintenance, property assignment, and the rights of the parties under G.L., c. 208, §34, as amended, in the event of divorce.

Yet, here is how the Appeals Court must have read it:

    … a final and complete settlement of all matters relating to the interest and obligations of each [party] with respect to all future property matters[.]

    [ ]

    [ ]

The appellate panel tossed out two of the three clauses, which spoke only of divorce, consigned as surplusage, unworthy of consideration, despite the “agreement’s caption referring to G.L., c. 208, §34”, the divorce property division statute.

Now,, let’s cast the provision in the way that is consistent with the maxim that words in a contract are to be accorded meaning within customary everyday usage, with the law of pre-marital agreements that requires that waivers be explicit and the highly probable intent of the parties:

    … a final and complete settlement of all matters relating to the interest and obligations of each [party] with respect to all future property matters, in the event of divorce [,] including but not limited to alimony, support, maintenance, property assignment, and the rights of the parties under G.L., c. 208, §34, as amended[.]

Do you think that the parties’ might have used the word “death” somewhere, if they intended to cover that contingency? Or “estate”? Bequest”? Maybe, “inheritance”? Even “survivor”?

The result is that a widow, with no hint of pending divorce, or even marital strain, must now answer to her sister-in-law (the estate’s personal representative) for “several furnishings and personal belongings” that she removed from her marital home, in part, for alleged violation of a premarital agreement that was to all appearances, extinguished by her husband’s death.

We have no quarrel with the Appeals Court remand on the grounds that a violation of G. L. c. 190B, § 3-709 may have occurred, or that the alleged facts were also sufficient to state claims of a conversion, an unjust enrichment, and a constructive trust. But the Appeals Court is makes unnecessary mischief by inferring intent that doesn’t appear in, or even between the lines of, the contract.



Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:



Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles


recent posts


tags

Matrimonial Arbitration Uniform Arbitration Act Baseball Arbitration Massachusetts lawyers med-arb Massachusetts divorce lawyers lawyers divorce and family law mediators self-adjusting alimony Massachusetts divorce mediators divorce lawyers divorce process disputes Levine Dispute Resolution Center conciliation arbitrators divorced divorce arbitrators DOMA IRC §2704 divorce arbitrator medical benefits Levine Dispute Resolution family law arbitrators litigation Family Law Arbitration alimony law Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act divorce agreement special master dispute resolution General term alimony The Seven Sins of Alimony family law arbitrator Baseball alimony orders med/arb family and probate law disputes divorce litigation Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly alimony statute arbitration Chouteau Levine Divorce Agreements health coverage pre-ARA alimony private dispute resolution divorce mediation divorce mediator Massachusetts alimony Alimony Reform Act support orders Child Support Guidelines family law Defense of Marriage Act alimony reform legislation mediation Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC Cohabitation high-risk methodology lawyer-attended mediation divorce judgment resolve disputes mediations traditional negotiations lawyer how baseball arbitration works Levine Dispute Resolutions MLB labor agreement Massachusetts alimony and child support rehabilitative alimony Baseball Players Boston health insurance SJC Same Sex Marriage facilitated negotiations alimony Divorce family support COLA divorce mediations divorce mediators divorce and family law Self-adjusting alimony orders LDRC arbitrator separation mediators fraud Obamacare Major League Baseball Arbitration family mediation mediator divorce arbitration annulment family law mediation child support Massachusetts