781.708.4445

wmlevine@levinedisputeresolution.com

Divorce Mediation Blog

A Prenup Head Shaker from the Appeals Court: Stacy v. Stacy

Wednesday, January 04, 2017

In a Rule 1:28 Memorandum and Order, a panel of the Massachusetts Appeals Court ruled that a pre-marital agreement applied to the death of a spouse, based on contract language that described its scope. Here is that term, fully as reported in the opinion, but broken down by clause:

    … a final and complete settlement of all matters relating to the interest and obligations of each [party] with respect to all future property matters, including but not limited to alimony, support, maintenance, property assignment, and the rights of the parties under G.L., c. 208, §34, as amended, in the event of divorce.

Yet, here is how the Appeals Court must have read it:

    … a final and complete settlement of all matters relating to the interest and obligations of each [party] with respect to all future property matters[.]

    [ ]

    [ ]

The appellate panel tossed out two of the three clauses, which spoke only of divorce, consigned as surplusage, unworthy of consideration, despite the “agreement’s caption referring to G.L., c. 208, §34”, the divorce property division statute.

Now,, let’s cast the provision in the way that is consistent with the maxim that words in a contract are to be accorded meaning within customary everyday usage, with the law of pre-marital agreements that requires that waivers be explicit and the highly probable intent of the parties:

    … a final and complete settlement of all matters relating to the interest and obligations of each [party] with respect to all future property matters, in the event of divorce [,] including but not limited to alimony, support, maintenance, property assignment, and the rights of the parties under G.L., c. 208, §34, as amended[.]

Do you think that the parties’ might have used the word “death” somewhere, if they intended to cover that contingency? Or “estate”? Bequest”? Maybe, “inheritance”? Even “survivor”?

The result is that a widow, with no hint of pending divorce, or even marital strain, must now answer to her sister-in-law (the estate’s personal representative) for “several furnishings and personal belongings” that she removed from her marital home, in part, for alleged violation of a premarital agreement that was to all appearances, extinguished by her husband’s death.

We have no quarrel with the Appeals Court remand on the grounds that a violation of G. L. c. 190B, § 3-709 may have occurred, or that the alleged facts were also sufficient to state claims of a conversion, an unjust enrichment, and a constructive trust. But the Appeals Court is makes unnecessary mischief by inferring intent that doesn’t appear in, or even between the lines of, the contract.



Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:



Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles


recent posts


tags

traditional negotiations arbitrators Chouteau Levine COLA alimony law family law divorce arbitration Same Sex Marriage divorce mediators self-adjusting alimony divorce arbitrators divorce litigation divorce agreement alimony reform legislation pre-ARA alimony child support medical benefits family law arbitrator arbitration mediators LDRC family mediation divorce arbitrator divorce and family law mediators Massachusetts alimony and child support fraud Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly divorce mediation annulment Boston Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth Baseball Players health coverage Massachusetts alimony mediation DOMA lawyer Levine Dispute Resolutions divorce mediator facilitated negotiations mediator General term alimony Uniform Arbitration Act resolve disputes high-risk methodology Baseball Levine Dispute Resolution Center IRC §2704 Massachusetts The Seven Sins of Alimony support orders family and probate law disputes med/arb Major League Baseball Arbitration separation Alimony Reform Act family support Massachusetts lawyers special master how baseball arbitration works divorce process Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC divorce and family law divorce lawyers Massachusetts divorce lawyers Baseball Arbitration dispute resolution divorce judgment litigation divorce mediations Levine Dispute Resolution alimony statute lawyers Cohabitation disputes MLB labor agreement conciliation Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act Self-adjusting alimony orders alimony orders family law mediation alimony Family Law Arbitration Divorce family law arbitrators SJC Massachusetts divorce mediators divorced Divorce Agreements med-arb rehabilitative alimony arbitrator mediations Obamacare Defense of Marriage Act Child Support Guidelines private dispute resolution lawyer-attended mediation health insurance Matrimonial Arbitration