Divorce Mediation Blog

A guy on the water and a wife in the soup… MEANS A FAILED PRENUPTIAL AGREEMENT (AND EVEN WHEN THEY’RE NOT ABOUT ALIMONY THEY’RE STILL ABOUT ALIMONY) Kelcourse v. Kelcourse – Part 1

Wednesday, February 04, 2015

The recent Massachusetts Appeals Court case of Kelcourse v. Kelcourse is significant for upholding a Probate and Family Court’s determination that a prenuptial agreement was unenforceable when it would have left the wife without sufficient property, alimony or other means of self-support. It begins to shape the “second look” factually, 33 years after the Supreme Judicial Court’s Osborne v. Osborne mandated that a prenuptial agreement be fair and reasonable at the time of divorce, and 13 years past DeMatteo v. DeMatteo’s conscionability test.

We suspect that the facts made this an easy decision for the trial judge. It had all the earmarks of behavior that would drive her to want to find against the husband. As always, we can only rely on the facts as selected and presented by the appellate court, but the published reasons that would likely have pushed any judge over the edge, included:

-- a last minute agreement (four days before marriage);

-- a broken promise (to buy a home shortly after the start of marriage, with the wife finding herself in the same rental unit 15 years later);

-- a slick maneuver (the husband removing himself to a $1.7 million “marina residence”;

-- mice! (the husband leaving the wife behind in the offending rental unit that the parties had subsequently purchased at fire sale, that had equity, at the time of divorce, according to the judge of minus $66,000 (the husband protested that it had +$62,000 of equity!), with $300,000 of required repairs, and yes, vermin;

-- a wife who earned $300.00 per week; and

-- a husband who apparently made a whole lot more, given the alimony award, such as it was.

The “feel” and the facts say that the judge and the Appeals Court got it right, at least in not reinstating the terms of the offending agreement. The trial judge could have easily justified giving the wife more, perhaps considerably more, since M.G.L., chapter 208, section 34 equitable division was now in play, with the prenup gone. It appears, though, that the wife did not seek more at the appellate level, but was merely defending what she had received from the trial judge, so the Appeals Court correctly hewed to the issues before it.

In the opinion, alimony was a bit player. Yet, even here, where alimony was not a central appellate issue, there is still an “alimony reform” angle. We will explore that in our next entry.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


family law arbitrators lawyers Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act divorce mediators DOMA Divorce Agreements alimony reform legislation medical benefits Levine Dispute Resolutions Boston traditional negotiations Cohabitation Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Massachusetts alimony and child support support orders family law arbitrator Defense of Marriage Act divorce mediator mediator divorce litigation mediators med-arb Family Law Arbitration annulment General term alimony private dispute resolution alimony statute pre-ARA alimony family law divorce arbitration alimony Alimony Reform Act Baseball alimony orders divorce judgment arbitrator how baseball arbitration works divorced Baseball Arbitration divorce process Uniform Arbitration Act divorce mediation family mediation divorce arbitrator Massachusetts The Seven Sins of Alimony Self-adjusting alimony orders divorce mediations divorce arbitrators divorce and family law mediators IRC §2704 Massachusetts divorce lawyers child support Child Support Guidelines Baseball Players high-risk methodology litigation separation conciliation family support Massachusetts alimony Massachusetts lawyers Matrimonial Arbitration MLB labor agreement Chouteau Levine med/arb Levine Dispute Resolution resolve disputes mediations divorce and family law disputes health coverage Obamacare rehabilitative alimony Massachusetts divorce mediators Divorce mediation dispute resolution divorce lawyers fraud family law mediation SJC lawyer health insurance Same Sex Marriage alimony law Major League Baseball Arbitration special master LDRC lawyer-attended mediation facilitated negotiations Levine Dispute Resolution Center arbitrators arbitration family and probate law disputes Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC divorce agreement self-adjusting alimony COLA