781.708.4445

wmlevine@levinedisputeresolution.com

Divorce Mediation Blog

A guy on the water and a wife in the soup… MEANS A FAILED PRENUPTIAL AGREEMENT (AND EVEN WHEN THEY’RE NOT ABOUT ALIMONY THEY’RE STILL ABOUT ALIMONY) Kelcourse v. Kelcourse – Part 1

Wednesday, February 04, 2015

The recent Massachusetts Appeals Court case of Kelcourse v. Kelcourse is significant for upholding a Probate and Family Court’s determination that a prenuptial agreement was unenforceable when it would have left the wife without sufficient property, alimony or other means of self-support. It begins to shape the “second look” factually, 33 years after the Supreme Judicial Court’s Osborne v. Osborne mandated that a prenuptial agreement be fair and reasonable at the time of divorce, and 13 years past DeMatteo v. DeMatteo’s conscionability test.

We suspect that the facts made this an easy decision for the trial judge. It had all the earmarks of behavior that would drive her to want to find against the husband. As always, we can only rely on the facts as selected and presented by the appellate court, but the published reasons that would likely have pushed any judge over the edge, included:

-- a last minute agreement (four days before marriage);

-- a broken promise (to buy a home shortly after the start of marriage, with the wife finding herself in the same rental unit 15 years later);

-- a slick maneuver (the husband removing himself to a $1.7 million “marina residence”;

-- mice! (the husband leaving the wife behind in the offending rental unit that the parties had subsequently purchased at fire sale, that had equity, at the time of divorce, according to the judge of minus $66,000 (the husband protested that it had +$62,000 of equity!), with $300,000 of required repairs, and yes, vermin;

-- a wife who earned $300.00 per week; and

-- a husband who apparently made a whole lot more, given the alimony award, such as it was.

The “feel” and the facts say that the judge and the Appeals Court got it right, at least in not reinstating the terms of the offending agreement. The trial judge could have easily justified giving the wife more, perhaps considerably more, since M.G.L., chapter 208, section 34 equitable division was now in play, with the prenup gone. It appears, though, that the wife did not seek more at the appellate level, but was merely defending what she had received from the trial judge, so the Appeals Court correctly hewed to the issues before it.

In the opinion, alimony was a bit player. Yet, even here, where alimony was not a central appellate issue, there is still an “alimony reform” angle. We will explore that in our next entry.



Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:



Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles


recent posts


tags

Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth Self-adjusting alimony orders General term alimony how baseball arbitration works private dispute resolution divorce process pre-ARA alimony Divorce Agreements conciliation resolve disputes disputes lawyer divorce lawyers MLB labor agreement Levine Dispute Resolutions IRC §2704 divorce arbitrators Major League Baseball Arbitration fraud Massachusetts divorce lawyers Massachusetts alimony statute DOMA Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act Massachusetts lawyers Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC arbitrator lawyers family support support orders family and probate law disputes Family Law Arbitration Alimony Reform Act med-arb Baseball Arbitration divorce mediations divorce and family law mediators facilitated negotiations family law mediation separation Same Sex Marriage self-adjusting alimony alimony reform legislation Divorce SJC Baseball rehabilitative alimony alimony orders Defense of Marriage Act Baseball Players mediation divorced divorce mediators traditional negotiations high-risk methodology Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly arbitration divorce mediator alimony law Cohabitation divorce judgment family law divorce agreement family law arbitrators annulment The Seven Sins of Alimony Massachusetts alimony divorce arbitration Matrimonial Arbitration Massachusetts alimony and child support lawyer-attended mediation Boston LDRC COLA med/arb divorce litigation special master Chouteau Levine Massachusetts divorce mediators mediators mediator family law arbitrator health coverage arbitrators divorce and family law Levine Dispute Resolution Obamacare dispute resolution family mediation litigation divorce mediation Uniform Arbitration Act health insurance Levine Dispute Resolution Center mediations medical benefits alimony child support divorce arbitrator Child Support Guidelines