Divorce Mediation Blog

A guy on the water and a wife in the soup… MEANS A FAILED PRENUPTIAL AGREEMENT (AND EVEN WHEN THEY’RE NOT ABOUT ALIMONY THEY’RE STILL ABOUT ALIMONY) Kelcourse v. Kelcourse – Part 1

Wednesday, February 04, 2015

The recent Massachusetts Appeals Court case of Kelcourse v. Kelcourse is significant for upholding a Probate and Family Court’s determination that a prenuptial agreement was unenforceable when it would have left the wife without sufficient property, alimony or other means of self-support. It begins to shape the “second look” factually, 33 years after the Supreme Judicial Court’s Osborne v. Osborne mandated that a prenuptial agreement be fair and reasonable at the time of divorce, and 13 years past DeMatteo v. DeMatteo’s conscionability test.

We suspect that the facts made this an easy decision for the trial judge. It had all the earmarks of behavior that would drive her to want to find against the husband. As always, we can only rely on the facts as selected and presented by the appellate court, but the published reasons that would likely have pushed any judge over the edge, included:

-- a last minute agreement (four days before marriage);

-- a broken promise (to buy a home shortly after the start of marriage, with the wife finding herself in the same rental unit 15 years later);

-- a slick maneuver (the husband removing himself to a $1.7 million “marina residence”;

-- mice! (the husband leaving the wife behind in the offending rental unit that the parties had subsequently purchased at fire sale, that had equity, at the time of divorce, according to the judge of minus $66,000 (the husband protested that it had +$62,000 of equity!), with $300,000 of required repairs, and yes, vermin;

-- a wife who earned $300.00 per week; and

-- a husband who apparently made a whole lot more, given the alimony award, such as it was.

The “feel” and the facts say that the judge and the Appeals Court got it right, at least in not reinstating the terms of the offending agreement. The trial judge could have easily justified giving the wife more, perhaps considerably more, since M.G.L., chapter 208, section 34 equitable division was now in play, with the prenup gone. It appears, though, that the wife did not seek more at the appellate level, but was merely defending what she had received from the trial judge, so the Appeals Court correctly hewed to the issues before it.

In the opinion, alimony was a bit player. Yet, even here, where alimony was not a central appellate issue, there is still an “alimony reform” angle. We will explore that in our next entry.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


divorce litigation alimony arbitrator family law mediation Chouteau Levine Divorce med-arb divorce mediation Same Sex Marriage mediations Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Major League Baseball Arbitration lawyers Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act LDRC family law arbitrators Obamacare Defense of Marriage Act child support Self-adjusting alimony orders support orders alimony orders fraud dispute resolution medical benefits health insurance resolve disputes family law Uniform Arbitration Act Massachusetts alimony family law arbitrator Family Law Arbitration lawyer-attended mediation family support special master divorce mediator General term alimony DOMA alimony law Cohabitation traditional negotiations divorce process Baseball Arbitration Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth mediator arbitration divorced med/arb Levine Dispute Resolutions alimony statute private dispute resolution conciliation annulment Massachusetts lawyers disputes Baseball Players Massachusetts divorce lawyers Levine Dispute Resolution family mediation alimony reform legislation divorce arbitrator Alimony Reform Act facilitated negotiations self-adjusting alimony how baseball arbitration works The Seven Sins of Alimony Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC mediators Massachusetts arbitrators separation divorce mediations family and probate law disputes COLA Baseball divorce lawyers lawyer pre-ARA alimony health coverage Child Support Guidelines divorce agreement divorce and family law Matrimonial Arbitration divorce and family law mediators Massachusetts divorce mediators Boston divorce mediators Massachusetts alimony and child support litigation rehabilitative alimony divorce judgment high-risk methodology SJC divorce arbitration MLB labor agreement divorce arbitrators Divorce Agreements mediation Levine Dispute Resolution Center IRC §2704