Divorce Mediation Blog

Why don’t we represent individual clients?

Monday, March 26, 2012

As we have transitioned from private law practice (Bill Levine) and as a sitting judge (Chouteau Levine) to doing full-time work as mediators, arbitrators and other neutral roles only with Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC, many people continue to ask us to take on engagements that are representational in nature. For example, several lawyers and clients from one side of a case have asked us to consult on issues presented by a court-based controversy. For another, we have been asked to represent children in court.

We have declined all of these potential roles.

True, none of these jobs would place us in a position to represent a spouse who is an essential stakeholder to litigation issues. But, by their very nature, these jobs imply something that we are not anymore: practicing lawyers whose job it is to “advocate”. Even a private consultation is a form of advocacy, because we are helping one party or another figure out strengths and weaknesses in his or her case, for the purpose of either honing trial preparations or clarifying/enhancing negotiating positions, to the detriment of another party or parties. Thus, the engagement is neither impartial nor it is neutral. Similarly, representing children is a form of advocacy for a particular point of view, even if the represented party is not “responsible” for causing the conflict.

At LDRC, when we mediate, we see it as our mission to open the minds of the parties to see each other’s points of view, to encourage introspection about one’s own real needs, and to detect where mutual needs and priorities intersect. Then, we try to promote sincere efforts to find creative and efficient ways to make agreements that promote these common areas of interest. When we arbitrate, our job is to make a decision, rather than to promote exploration of interests, but our role is nonetheless one that demands that we remain impartial, or indifferent to who “wins or loses”. We must decide the case strictly based in the facts as we hear them and conclude them to be, and the law to which they relate.

In neither of our roles is there room for advocacy for one side or another; and for us, it is important that our market both see us and understand us to be impartial all of the time. It is equally important or us to maintain this intellectual distinction throughout our workday that helps us to stay “neutral” to the very greatest extent that we possibly can.

Along with skills, experience and judgment, our impartiality it is our calling card.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


Same Sex Marriage General term alimony health coverage how baseball arbitration works separation divorce and family law Massachusetts alimony and child support dispute resolution Defense of Marriage Act conciliation lawyer-attended mediation family law arbitrator Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act rehabilitative alimony Obamacare Levine Dispute Resolutions alimony orders high-risk methodology IRC §2704 mediators Chouteau Levine support orders family and probate law disputes arbitrator Baseball Self-adjusting alimony orders alimony divorce mediators Massachusetts alimony Twinkies family mediation family law mediation Divorce The Seven Sins of Alimony Boston mediator child support divorce arbitrators divorce arbitration family law DOMA medical benefits alimony statute Massachusetts divorce mediators SJC pre-ARA alimony Uniform Arbitration Act special master facilitated negotiations med/arb alimony laws divorce litigation mediations MLB labor agreement litigation arbitrators Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly divorce agreement mediation Alimony Reform Act health insurance Cohabitation Divorce Agreements Child Support Guidelines divorce mediations LDRC Matrimonial Arbitration Baseball Players Major League Baseball Arbitration Levine Dispute Resolution Center traditional negotiations divorce arbitrator Massachusetts alimony reform legislation disputes Levine Dispute Resolution family law arbitrators divorce and family law mediators family support self-adjusting alimony alternative dispute resolutions divorce mediation private dispute resolution divorce mediator Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth divorce process lawyers Baseball Arbitration Massachusetts lawyers COLA divorced resolve disputes med-arb alimony law divorce judgment arbitration divorce lawyers Family Law Arbitration lawyer