781.708.4445

info@levinedisputeresolution.com

Divorce Mediation Blog

Why don’t we represent individual clients?

Monday, March 26, 2012

As we have transitioned from private law practice (Bill Levine) and as a sitting judge (Chouteau Levine) to doing full-time work as mediators, arbitrators and other neutral roles only with Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC, many people continue to ask us to take on engagements that are representational in nature. For example, several lawyers and clients from one side of a case have asked us to consult on issues presented by a court-based controversy. For another, we have been asked to represent children in court.

We have declined all of these potential roles.

True, none of these jobs would place us in a position to represent a spouse who is an essential stakeholder to litigation issues. But, by their very nature, these jobs imply something that we are not anymore: practicing lawyers whose job it is to “advocate”. Even a private consultation is a form of advocacy, because we are helping one party or another figure out strengths and weaknesses in his or her case, for the purpose of either honing trial preparations or clarifying/enhancing negotiating positions, to the detriment of another party or parties. Thus, the engagement is neither impartial nor it is neutral. Similarly, representing children is a form of advocacy for a particular point of view, even if the represented party is not “responsible” for causing the conflict.

At LDRC, when we mediate, we see it as our mission to open the minds of the parties to see each other’s points of view, to encourage introspection about one’s own real needs, and to detect where mutual needs and priorities intersect. Then, we try to promote sincere efforts to find creative and efficient ways to make agreements that promote these common areas of interest. When we arbitrate, our job is to make a decision, rather than to promote exploration of interests, but our role is nonetheless one that demands that we remain impartial, or indifferent to who “wins or loses”. We must decide the case strictly based in the facts as we hear them and conclude them to be, and the law to which they relate.

In neither of our roles is there room for advocacy for one side or another; and for us, it is important that our market both see us and understand us to be impartial all of the time. It is equally important or us to maintain this intellectual distinction throughout our workday that helps us to stay “neutral” to the very greatest extent that we possibly can.

Along with skills, experience and judgment, our impartiality it is our calling card.



Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:



Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles


recent posts


tags

dispute resolution fraud resolve disputes alimony statute family support mediator DOMA Uniform Arbitration Act high-risk methodology divorce and family law mediators medical benefits Twinkies health insurance IRC §2704 SJC divorce lawyers Family Law Arbitration arbitrators Boston alimony reform legislation divorce mediators litigation Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly pre-ARA alimony Major League Baseball Arbitration Massachusetts lawyers MLB labor agreement Levine Dispute Resolutions divorce arbitrators divorce judgment how baseball arbitration works Levine Dispute Resolution Center rehabilitative alimony family law arbitrator divorce mediation health coverage child support family law arbitrators Divorce Obamacare conciliation family law Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC Baseball Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth traditional negotiations arbitration Chouteau Levine divorce agreement family and probate law disputes divorce mediator self-adjusting alimony divorce arbitration divorce litigation Matrimonial Arbitration divorce and family law Massachusetts divorce mediators alimony law Divorce Agreements mediators mediations special master divorced separation lawyer-attended mediation Cohabitation COLA Self-adjusting alimony orders Massachusetts annulment LDRC Child Support Guidelines Defense of Marriage Act Massachusetts alimony and child support mediation Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act divorce process General term alimony Baseball Players support orders facilitated negotiations family mediation Baseball Arbitration med-arb Massachusetts alimony alimony family law mediation divorce mediations private dispute resolution Same Sex Marriage med/arb lawyers arbitrator alimony orders lawyer Levine Dispute Resolution The Seven Sins of Alimony Alimony Reform Act disputes divorce arbitrator