Divorce Mediation Blog

They Got A Lot Right: Hassey v. Hassey, Part Three

Wednesday, September 03, 2014

In our last two blogs, we took the Appeals Court to task for inconsistency and over-reaching as we saw it, but we should not let it go without acknowledging what the Court got right:

  1. The trial judge terminated alimony for “retirement as defined in the [alimony] act.” The Appeals court hewed to the statutory language that absent a defined deviation, alimony stops at a specific retirement age, and not necessarily at actual retirement, before or after. Under the law, a person can work beyond retirement age and pay no alimony, unless a judge explicitly rules otherwise in conformity with criteria set forth in the statute.
  2. Where the trial court ordered the husband to disclose his income periodically to the wife in furtherance of his sliding alimony order, the Appeals Court ruled this an abuse of discretion, because it gave the wife free information about the husband’s changing circumstances while denying the same to the husband, about the wife. (This will likely not impact the parties since the Appeals Court vacated the percentage arrangement, which, in all likelihood, will cause Judge Abber to drop the disclosure provision, too).
  3. Findings of needs, as stressed in this decision, absolutely, are a critical component of alimony law, common and statutory; and the “new” alimony law underscores the practice, rather that reducing it.
  4. On property, the trial court excluded the wife’s family of origin-derived vacation home from property division calculation, while not excluding any part of the husband’s partially family of origin-derived dental practice. The appellate panel reversed on this point, being unconvinced by the trial judge’s conclusion that the vacation home was “never relied on as a financial resource” by the family; pointing out that the family’s habitual use of the property during the marriage was, in fact, a form of financial reliance that was worthy of consideration in weighing the equities of exclusion or inclusion in the section 34 distribution numbers.

The Appeals Court also noted, twice, that Judge Abber was dealing with an extraordinarily complex statutory scheme with little or no appellate guidance, a departure from the too frequent practice of appellate courts speaking uncharitably about the efforts of their trial court colleagues. They certainly got that right.

Go Back to “Self-Modifying” Divorce Judgments: The Appeals Court Feels Strongly Both Ways. Hassey v. Hassey, Part One

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


Divorce Agreements Obamacare mediations alimony reform legislation SJC mediation divorce mediators resolve disputes Self-adjusting alimony orders Massachusetts alimony health insurance divorce arbitration LDRC Massachusetts divorce lawyers Massachusetts divorce mediations divorce agreement Levine Dispute Resolution Center divorce mediation Major League Baseball Arbitration alimony Baseball Players med/arb child support mediator lawyer Child Support Guidelines health coverage litigation family and probate law disputes divorce process Boston conciliation family law arbitrator family law divorce and family law mediators alimony law Levine Dispute Resolution General term alimony Uniform Arbitration Act DOMA how baseball arbitration works special master divorce judgment Chouteau Levine Same Sex Marriage separation The Seven Sins of Alimony disputes arbitrators alimony statute Twinkies divorce arbitrators Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC family law mediation lawyers med-arb support orders divorce mediator medical benefits Baseball Arbitration family mediation Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly self-adjusting alimony private dispute resolution divorce arbitrator COLA Baseball facilitated negotiations mediators Divorce high-risk methodology lawyer-attended mediation traditional negotiations divorce and family law fraud Family Law Arbitration divorced MLB labor agreement rehabilitative alimony Alimony Reform Act pre-ARA alimony Cohabitation Defense of Marriage Act Massachusetts divorce mediators Massachusetts lawyers divorce litigation Massachusetts alimony and child support Levine Dispute Resolutions Matrimonial Arbitration family support divorce lawyers annulment alimony orders Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act arbitration IRC §2704 dispute resolution family law arbitrators arbitrator