Divorce Mediation Blog

The Defense of Marriage Act: Defending the Indefensible

Thursday, July 05, 2012

Since 2004, gays and lesbians have been legally free to marry in Massachusetts. That is now the law in six (6) states and the District of Columbia. Yet, by congressional action, signed into law by President Clinton, legally married couples here are not legally married for any federal purpose, nor is their status respected in most other states.

The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) (declaring a marriage as only between one man and one woman for all federal law purposes and relieving other states of any obligation to recognize a same sex marriage permissibly created in another state) denies same sex spouses more than a thousand benefits, including the right to file joint tax returns, to have tax privileged spousal medical benefits and access to many social security and veterans survivors benefits. In divorce, gays and lesbians may not transfer property without taxation at the time of divorce, cannot claim alimony tax deductions and are prohibited from transferring pension assets without triggering tax consequences, which can be sometimes catastrophic; rights that all hetero-sexual married couples take for granted.

A group of plaintiffs sued in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts in the case of Gill v. O.P.M. and 2 companion cases, seeking to have DOMA declared unconstitutional. After defending DOMA and losing in the trial court, the Obama Administration declined to defend it again in the appeal of Judge Joseph Tauro’s judgment wherein he declared DOMA to be unconstitutional. The Department of Justice declared the statute indefensible. The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, agreed with Judge Tauro and upheld his judgment.

The next stop for this controversy is the United States Supreme Court, where others will stand in as surrogates for the federal government in seeking to reverse the First Circuit’s decision, doing what the current government refuses to do: defend the indefensible.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


family law arbitrators Self-adjusting alimony orders med/arb alimony law Matrimonial Arbitration Levine Dispute Resolution Center divorce mediations Divorce Baseball divorce and family law how baseball arbitration works COLA facilitated negotiations Boston arbitrator The Seven Sins of Alimony special master Alimony Reform Act DOMA Major League Baseball Arbitration private dispute resolution divorce lawyers pre-ARA alimony Divorce Agreements LDRC arbitration conciliation Defense of Marriage Act high-risk methodology divorce arbitrator Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth alternative dispute resolutions Massachusetts alimony and child support Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act divorce litigation family mediation family and probate law disputes resolve disputes divorce arbitration mediators alimony reform legislation lawyers Cohabitation Obamacare Massachusetts lawyers family law arbitrator Child Support Guidelines Uniform Arbitration Act child support Family Law Arbitration General term alimony rehabilitative alimony Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Massachusetts divorce mediators traditional negotiations alimony orders divorce judgment divorce mediators divorce agreement IRC §2704 lawyer-attended mediation mediations divorced MLB labor agreement divorce process health insurance family law mediation Massachusetts Baseball Arbitration divorce and family law mediators divorce mediation lawyer mediator Same Sex Marriage support orders alimony arbitrators medical benefits divorce mediator Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC Levine Dispute Resolution divorce arbitrators Levine Dispute Resolutions dispute resolution med-arb mediation Chouteau Levine litigation family support Twinkies separation Massachusetts alimony SJC family law Baseball Players alimony laws alimony statute health coverage disputes self-adjusting alimony