Divorce Mediation Blog

The Defense of Marriage Act: Defending the Indefensible

Thursday, July 05, 2012

Since 2004, gays and lesbians have been legally free to marry in Massachusetts. That is now the law in six (6) states and the District of Columbia. Yet, by congressional action, signed into law by President Clinton, legally married couples here are not legally married for any federal purpose, nor is their status respected in most other states.

The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) (declaring a marriage as only between one man and one woman for all federal law purposes and relieving other states of any obligation to recognize a same sex marriage permissibly created in another state) denies same sex spouses more than a thousand benefits, including the right to file joint tax returns, to have tax privileged spousal medical benefits and access to many social security and veterans survivors benefits. In divorce, gays and lesbians may not transfer property without taxation at the time of divorce, cannot claim alimony tax deductions and are prohibited from transferring pension assets without triggering tax consequences, which can be sometimes catastrophic; rights that all hetero-sexual married couples take for granted.

A group of plaintiffs sued in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts in the case of Gill v. O.P.M. and 2 companion cases, seeking to have DOMA declared unconstitutional. After defending DOMA and losing in the trial court, the Obama Administration declined to defend it again in the appeal of Judge Joseph Tauro’s judgment wherein he declared DOMA to be unconstitutional. The Department of Justice declared the statute indefensible. The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, agreed with Judge Tauro and upheld his judgment.

The next stop for this controversy is the United States Supreme Court, where others will stand in as surrogates for the federal government in seeking to reverse the First Circuit’s decision, doing what the current government refuses to do: defend the indefensible.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


Self-adjusting alimony orders conciliation lawyer med-arb Chouteau Levine lawyers alimony orders divorce litigation Boston Massachusetts high-risk methodology Child Support Guidelines pre-ARA alimony Massachusetts lawyers divorce arbitrator Baseball Players Family Law Arbitration rehabilitative alimony divorce process self-adjusting alimony divorce lawyers health insurance Massachusetts alimony family law mediation alimony statute alimony reform legislation alimony Alimony Reform Act family and probate law disputes Same Sex Marriage MLB labor agreement Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act family support special master divorced Twinkies Major League Baseball Arbitration family law arbitrator SJC divorce mediations IRC §2704 divorce mediators litigation annulment divorce judgment divorce arbitrators separation support orders fraud divorce agreement lawyer-attended mediation divorce mediator divorce and family law mediators COLA Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Levine Dispute Resolution divorce and family law family mediation mediation DOMA arbitrator The Seven Sins of Alimony alimony law Divorce Agreements mediator arbitrators Defense of Marriage Act dispute resolution family law arbitrators Matrimonial Arbitration Baseball Arbitration Massachusetts divorce lawyers resolve disputes facilitated negotiations med/arb divorce arbitration Uniform Arbitration Act Baseball General term alimony family law Levine Dispute Resolutions medical benefits Divorce mediations Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC Massachusetts alimony and child support Cohabitation Obamacare mediators Massachusetts divorce mediators arbitration Levine Dispute Resolution Center child support disputes health coverage how baseball arbitration works divorce mediation LDRC traditional negotiations private dispute resolution