Divorce Mediation Blog

The SJC Weighs in on Self-Adjusting Alimony Orders and Recipient “Need”: Young v. Young, Part 8

Wednesday, January 24, 2018

Levine Dispute Resolution - Alimony

“Did stated intent of the
order trump the its effect?”

In Young v. Young, the Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) vacated the trial court judgment that awarded variable alimony based on a fixed percentage of the husband’s gross pre-tax compensation, based in part on its conclusion that it crossed the Alimony Reform Act (ARA) (eff. 3.1.12):

…[B]ecause [the order] was intended to award the wife an amount of alimony that exceeds her need to maintain the lifestyle she enjoyed during the marriage. (Italics ours)

By focusing on the intent of the order, we can only infer that the court was addressing the judge’s rationale for the order, instead of the order itself. That election matters, because it raises two questions:

  1. If the trial judge explained herself differently, might the SJC have upheld the judgment?
  2. If the SJC looked at the order in its full ramification, would it have impacted the outcome?

The actual support award in Young was bi-lateral, rising and dropping with the husband’s income, a fact eclipsed by the court’s sharp focus on intent. Thus, while the trial judge may have focused her analysis of the parties’ rising station, her order actually provided downside protection for the husband, too.

Had the judge expressed an intent to protect the husband in the event of income decline and stressed it concomitantly with the potential for “upside”, might the “intent” infirmity that the SJC seized upon been neutralized? Or, if the judge had found that a family with roller coaster income might experience corresponding lifestyle flux?

After all, as the SJC observed:

    There may also be special circumstances where an alimony award based on a percentage of the supporting spouse's income might not be an abuse of discretion, such as where the supporting spouse's income is highly variable from year to year, sometimes severely limiting his or her ability to pay, and where a percentage formula, averaged over time, is likely not to exceed the needs of the recipient spouse.

The SJC dealt with the former, but not the latter.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


alimony laws divorce mediations mediators mediator arbitration arbitrator divorce and family law Massachusetts alimony and child support divorce litigation Massachusetts divorce mediators child support Baseball Players dispute resolution family and probate law disputes conciliation mediations resolve disputes SJC Family Law Arbitration Levine Dispute Resolutions family law mediation special master Massachusetts lawyers disputes divorce arbitration support orders Child Support Guidelines LDRC Obamacare Massachusetts Divorce Agreements Major League Baseball Arbitration IRC §2704 high-risk methodology Baseball arbitrators family law arbitrator Levine Dispute Resolution Center family mediation lawyer-attended mediation health insurance how baseball arbitration works Same Sex Marriage medical benefits Chouteau Levine Divorce alimony reform legislation Boston Twinkies divorced divorce mediation Cohabitation divorce lawyers Defense of Marriage Act Uniform Arbitration Act lawyer Massachusetts alimony alimony divorce agreement pre-ARA alimony facilitated negotiations Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC private dispute resolution divorce process alimony orders separation Self-adjusting alimony orders divorce mediators self-adjusting alimony divorce judgment divorce arbitrator The Seven Sins of Alimony DOMA health coverage med/arb family support alimony law divorce and family law mediators MLB labor agreement Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth traditional negotiations Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act med-arb rehabilitative alimony Baseball Arbitration alternative dispute resolutions Alimony Reform Act family law arbitrators COLA mediation lawyers General term alimony family law litigation Levine Dispute Resolution divorce mediator divorce arbitrators Matrimonial Arbitration alimony statute