Divorce Mediation Blog

The SJC Weighs in on Self-Adjusting Alimony Orders and Recipient “Need”: Young v. Young, Part 8

Wednesday, January 24, 2018

Levine Dispute Resolution - Alimony

“Did stated intent of the
order trump the its effect?”

In Young v. Young, the Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) vacated the trial court judgment that awarded variable alimony based on a fixed percentage of the husband’s gross pre-tax compensation, based in part on its conclusion that it crossed the Alimony Reform Act (ARA) (eff. 3.1.12):

…[B]ecause [the order] was intended to award the wife an amount of alimony that exceeds her need to maintain the lifestyle she enjoyed during the marriage. (Italics ours)

By focusing on the intent of the order, we can only infer that the court was addressing the judge’s rationale for the order, instead of the order itself. That election matters, because it raises two questions:

  1. If the trial judge explained herself differently, might the SJC have upheld the judgment?
  2. If the SJC looked at the order in its full ramification, would it have impacted the outcome?

The actual support award in Young was bi-lateral, rising and dropping with the husband’s income, a fact eclipsed by the court’s sharp focus on intent. Thus, while the trial judge may have focused her analysis of the parties’ rising station, her order actually provided downside protection for the husband, too.

Had the judge expressed an intent to protect the husband in the event of income decline and stressed it concomitantly with the potential for “upside”, might the “intent” infirmity that the SJC seized upon been neutralized? Or, if the judge had found that a family with roller coaster income might experience corresponding lifestyle flux?

After all, as the SJC observed:

    There may also be special circumstances where an alimony award based on a percentage of the supporting spouse's income might not be an abuse of discretion, such as where the supporting spouse's income is highly variable from year to year, sometimes severely limiting his or her ability to pay, and where a percentage formula, averaged over time, is likely not to exceed the needs of the recipient spouse.

The SJC dealt with the former, but not the latter.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


med/arb mediator Levine Dispute Resolutions pre-ARA alimony family and probate law disputes LDRC alimony statute Massachusetts lawyers COLA self-adjusting alimony dispute resolution Cohabitation Massachusetts alimony and child support MLB labor agreement lawyer Levine Dispute Resolution Massachusetts The Seven Sins of Alimony Massachusetts divorce lawyers Baseball rehabilitative alimony Chouteau Levine Major League Baseball Arbitration alimony reform legislation health insurance Self-adjusting alimony orders family support Massachusetts divorce mediators divorce arbitrators Divorce mediators child support Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC Same Sex Marriage Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly conciliation family law divorce litigation Family Law Arbitration divorce process lawyer-attended mediation Levine Dispute Resolution Center special master family law arbitrators divorce judgment health coverage General term alimony lawyers Alimony Reform Act divorce and family law mediators arbitrators private dispute resolution Baseball Players traditional negotiations Boston Defense of Marriage Act divorce mediator Child Support Guidelines Uniform Arbitration Act separation Divorce Agreements divorced arbitrator Matrimonial Arbitration disputes divorce mediation divorce and family law arbitration alimony orders medical benefits SJC fraud divorce agreement divorce mediations litigation family mediation divorce arbitrator high-risk methodology alimony law Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act resolve disputes Massachusetts alimony DOMA Obamacare how baseball arbitration works IRC §2704 annulment mediation med-arb alimony family law mediation divorce lawyers facilitated negotiations divorce mediators Baseball Arbitration mediations support orders family law arbitrator divorce arbitration Twinkies