Divorce Mediation Blog

The SJC Weighs in on Self-Adjusting Alimony Orders and Recipient “Need”: Young v. Young, Part 6

Wednesday, December 27, 2017

“Not everyone can afford a special master”

Levine Dispute Resolution - Alimony

Now, we will consider the role that financial complexity played in undermining the fate of the trial court decision in the Supreme Judicial Court’s (SJC) Young v. Young. The SJC reports that:

    …the [trial] judge found that, because of "the complex nature of [the husband's] compensation over and above his base salary and bonus," and because of "the constantly shifting nature of [the husband's] compensation," "it is reasonable and fair in the circumstances" to award alimony to the wife in the amount of thirty-three percent of the husband's gross income, rather than a fixed amount. (Italics ours)

The husband’s employment income arose from seven different compensation programs, including stock options, bonuses, investor entity units and discount stock purchase program opportunities. The various compensation modes featured differing consistencies, liquidity and transferability attributes, “…both considerable and variable”.

The SJC worried that the trial court’s self-adjusting alimony award (one-third of the husband’s gross pre-tax compensation) would lead to uncertainty of implementation, causing “continued strife” between the parties, citing the potential for inexact drafting and employer-employee collusion (to depress applicable income). The trial judge implicitly recognized the chance of future contention by appointing a special master, to keep the peace. Think: alimony coordinator.

The SJC deadpanned that: “Not everyone can afford a special master.”

If Mr. Young were simply a salaried employee, without the corporate power to manipulate his compensation, might the result have been different?

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


lawyer-attended mediation family law rehabilitative alimony child support Child Support Guidelines medical benefits divorce mediation annulment family law mediation MLB labor agreement Defense of Marriage Act Massachusetts lawyers divorce litigation Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly arbitration Obamacare Alimony Reform Act how baseball arbitration works lawyers self-adjusting alimony divorce arbitrator alimony statute General term alimony family law arbitrators Levine Dispute Resolution lawyer alimony law health coverage divorced Cohabitation Uniform Arbitration Act health insurance divorce mediator alimony traditional negotiations Family Law Arbitration divorce agreement Massachusetts divorce mediators private dispute resolution high-risk methodology divorce arbitrators divorce mediators conciliation Same Sex Marriage arbitrator Chouteau Levine The Seven Sins of Alimony separation med-arb Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act special master divorce mediations DOMA disputes Massachusetts alimony and child support Massachusetts Levine Dispute Resolutions facilitated negotiations IRC §2704 resolve disputes Massachusetts alimony Matrimonial Arbitration SJC Twinkies LDRC Self-adjusting alimony orders divorce judgment arbitrators family mediation fraud COLA Baseball Players family and probate law disputes alimony orders divorce and family law mediators mediation med/arb Major League Baseball Arbitration family support litigation family law arbitrator Divorce Agreements mediator mediators Divorce dispute resolution pre-ARA alimony divorce arbitration alimony reform legislation Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC mediations Levine Dispute Resolution Center divorce and family law Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth Boston divorce lawyers support orders Baseball divorce process Baseball Arbitration