Divorce Mediation Blog

The SJC Weighs in on Self-Adjusting Alimony Orders and Recipient “Need”: Young v. Young, Part 6

Wednesday, December 27, 2017

“Not everyone can afford a special master”

Levine Dispute Resolution - Alimony

Now, we will consider the role that financial complexity played in undermining the fate of the trial court decision in the Supreme Judicial Court’s (SJC) Young v. Young. The SJC reports that:

    …the [trial] judge found that, because of "the complex nature of [the husband's] compensation over and above his base salary and bonus," and because of "the constantly shifting nature of [the husband's] compensation," "it is reasonable and fair in the circumstances" to award alimony to the wife in the amount of thirty-three percent of the husband's gross income, rather than a fixed amount. (Italics ours)

The husband’s employment income arose from seven different compensation programs, including stock options, bonuses, investor entity units and discount stock purchase program opportunities. The various compensation modes featured differing consistencies, liquidity and transferability attributes, “…both considerable and variable”.

The SJC worried that the trial court’s self-adjusting alimony award (one-third of the husband’s gross pre-tax compensation) would lead to uncertainty of implementation, causing “continued strife” between the parties, citing the potential for inexact drafting and employer-employee collusion (to depress applicable income). The trial judge implicitly recognized the chance of future contention by appointing a special master, to keep the peace. Think: alimony coordinator.

The SJC deadpanned that: “Not everyone can afford a special master.”

If Mr. Young were simply a salaried employee, without the corporate power to manipulate his compensation, might the result have been different?

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


divorce process divorce and family law litigation Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act divorce mediators conciliation Massachusetts divorce mediators divorce arbitrator Boston SJC separation Family Law Arbitration mediator Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Baseball divorce litigation high-risk methodology Levine Dispute Resolution special master Baseball Arbitration child support Chouteau Levine fraud Levine Dispute Resolutions mediators pre-ARA alimony Twinkies Divorce Agreements divorce lawyers Self-adjusting alimony orders family law rehabilitative alimony lawyers alimony LDRC lawyer-attended mediation health insurance family and probate law disputes Massachusetts Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC arbitrator divorce arbitrators alimony reform legislation Cohabitation resolve disputes lawyer divorce arbitration dispute resolution Major League Baseball Arbitration The Seven Sins of Alimony support orders arbitration Divorce MLB labor agreement family support arbitrators Massachusetts alimony alimony law mediation disputes Same Sex Marriage divorce judgment family mediation family law mediation med-arb Baseball Players Massachusetts lawyers family law arbitrator alimony orders how baseball arbitration works COLA divorce mediation alimony statute med/arb Levine Dispute Resolution Center divorced divorce and family law mediators facilitated negotiations health coverage Matrimonial Arbitration mediations Massachusetts divorce lawyers private dispute resolution Alimony Reform Act traditional negotiations Uniform Arbitration Act General term alimony divorce mediator Massachusetts alimony and child support Defense of Marriage Act self-adjusting alimony family law arbitrators divorce mediations medical benefits divorce agreement Obamacare IRC §2704 Child Support Guidelines DOMA annulment