Divorce Mediation Blog

The SJC Weighs in on Self-Adjusting Alimony Orders and Recipient “Need”: Young v. Young, Part 6

Wednesday, December 27, 2017

“Not everyone can afford a special master”

Levine Dispute Resolution - Alimony

Now, we will consider the role that financial complexity played in undermining the fate of the trial court decision in the Supreme Judicial Court’s (SJC) Young v. Young. The SJC reports that:

    …the [trial] judge found that, because of "the complex nature of [the husband's] compensation over and above his base salary and bonus," and because of "the constantly shifting nature of [the husband's] compensation," "it is reasonable and fair in the circumstances" to award alimony to the wife in the amount of thirty-three percent of the husband's gross income, rather than a fixed amount. (Italics ours)

The husband’s employment income arose from seven different compensation programs, including stock options, bonuses, investor entity units and discount stock purchase program opportunities. The various compensation modes featured differing consistencies, liquidity and transferability attributes, “…both considerable and variable”.

The SJC worried that the trial court’s self-adjusting alimony award (one-third of the husband’s gross pre-tax compensation) would lead to uncertainty of implementation, causing “continued strife” between the parties, citing the potential for inexact drafting and employer-employee collusion (to depress applicable income). The trial judge implicitly recognized the chance of future contention by appointing a special master, to keep the peace. Think: alimony coordinator.

The SJC deadpanned that: “Not everyone can afford a special master.”

If Mr. Young were simply a salaried employee, without the corporate power to manipulate his compensation, might the result have been different?

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


alternative dispute resolutions divorce agreement divorce arbitrators facilitated negotiations Defense of Marriage Act MLB labor agreement pre-ARA alimony family and probate law disputes Self-adjusting alimony orders COLA divorce judgment child support Family Law Arbitration alimony orders Levine Dispute Resolution Center Massachusetts alimony and child support health insurance self-adjusting alimony Levine Dispute Resolutions family law arbitrator divorce mediation divorce lawyers Baseball Players med/arb divorce mediations litigation lawyers medical benefits Chouteau Levine Twinkies divorce litigation divorce and family law mediators mediators resolve disputes separation disputes dispute resolution arbitrator support orders alimony divorce mediators Massachusetts divorce mediators Major League Baseball Arbitration Child Support Guidelines alimony laws Boston divorce and family law Baseball Arbitration health coverage family law mediation traditional negotiations mediation divorce arbitrator Obamacare DOMA alimony law Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Uniform Arbitration Act high-risk methodology Divorce Agreements mediator private dispute resolution family mediation Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC special master rehabilitative alimony SJC Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act Alimony Reform Act arbitrators how baseball arbitration works divorced arbitration Levine Dispute Resolution alimony reform legislation Same Sex Marriage conciliation divorce arbitration Matrimonial Arbitration LDRC family law alimony statute Divorce lawyer-attended mediation The Seven Sins of Alimony divorce process mediations family law arbitrators Massachusetts lawyers Massachusetts alimony Baseball General term alimony Cohabitation Massachusetts Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth lawyer med-arb family support divorce mediator IRC §2704