Divorce Mediation Blog

The SJC Weighs in on Self-Adjusting Alimony Orders and Recipient “Need”: Young v. Young, Part 5

Wednesday, December 13, 2017

“What’s a judge to do?”

Levine Dispute Resolution - Alimony

In this entry, we consider a particular challenge that the trial judge will have on remand from the Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) in Young v. Young, in grappling with her assessment of the wife’s “need” for alimony. The trial judge tried to quantify the wife’s “need” by the tangible costs thereof, a common means of doing so. But, it appears that the evidence thwarted the judge in doing so, as she bumped up against a too frequent phenomenon: incredible and incredibly rising expense claims on sequential Rule 401 financial statements during litigation.

During an 11-month span of the Young case, the wife’s claims of weekly expense rose a remarkable 44%, from $453,856 per year to $653,906!

We have seen this movie before, as lawyers, judge, special master and divorce arbitrator. While it is certainly challenging for parties to give dispositive expense information when Rule 410 requires a full statement within 45 days, or when a party files motions, just 10 days. Moreover, uncertainty about just what “need” means, can make presenting financial statement expense claims dicey for the preparer.

Yet, litigation strategy plays an undeniable role. And, strategy evolves..

As a result, the judge critically found that the wife lacked “…personal knowledge regarding her own expenses,” and that her financial statements were not “…an accurate reflection of her need.” The wife’s credibility shot, the judge avoided the quantification of need and, instead opted for an ill-fated percentage-of-income order.

So, where the judge simply disbelieved the wife, and where she did not, apparently, find other, more convincing evidence of the wife’s “need” in the trial record (presumably there was no expert “lifestyle” testimony, or none at least that the court found credible), how will she do so now, on remand?

Don’t bet against a Young v. Young II appellate case, when one of these spouses appeals the judgment after remand.

In our next entry, we will consider the role that financial complexity played in undermining the fate of the trial court decision.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


mediators divorce judgment divorce arbitrators family law Defense of Marriage Act Massachusetts alimony and child support Levine Dispute Resolution Center Baseball med/arb mediator IRC §2704 rehabilitative alimony separation alimony arbitrators conciliation Obamacare divorce mediator litigation Uniform Arbitration Act divorce mediations annulment Divorce Agreements family mediation divorce lawyers facilitated negotiations Twinkies divorce arbitration Levine Dispute Resolutions SJC Divorce Alimony Reform Act disputes Family Law Arbitration fraud alimony orders divorced family law arbitrators family law mediation Massachusetts divorce lawyers dispute resolution LDRC arbitrator divorce mediation family and probate law disputes mediation Massachusetts alimony self-adjusting alimony how baseball arbitration works private dispute resolution Child Support Guidelines lawyers Baseball Arbitration lawyer Matrimonial Arbitration divorce litigation The Seven Sins of Alimony Major League Baseball Arbitration divorce arbitrator Baseball Players Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly support orders Cohabitation divorce mediators high-risk methodology traditional negotiations med-arb lawyer-attended mediation Chouteau Levine medical benefits divorce and family law family support family law arbitrator child support health insurance alimony statute Massachusetts divorce process Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act arbitration Boston special master Self-adjusting alimony orders Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC Levine Dispute Resolution resolve disputes alimony reform legislation Same Sex Marriage MLB labor agreement mediations divorce agreement COLA divorce and family law mediators alimony law pre-ARA alimony Massachusetts divorce mediators DOMA General term alimony Massachusetts lawyers health coverage