Divorce Mediation Blog

The SJC Weighs in on Self-Adjusting Alimony Orders and Recipient “Need”: Young v. Young, Part 5

Wednesday, December 13, 2017

“What’s a judge to do?”

Levine Dispute Resolution - Alimony

In this entry, we consider a particular challenge that the trial judge will have on remand from the Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) in Young v. Young, in grappling with her assessment of the wife’s “need” for alimony. The trial judge tried to quantify the wife’s “need” by the tangible costs thereof, a common means of doing so. But, it appears that the evidence thwarted the judge in doing so, as she bumped up against a too frequent phenomenon: incredible and incredibly rising expense claims on sequential Rule 401 financial statements during litigation.

During an 11-month span of the Young case, the wife’s claims of weekly expense rose a remarkable 44%, from $453,856 per year to $653,906!

We have seen this movie before, as lawyers, judge, special master and divorce arbitrator. While it is certainly challenging for parties to give dispositive expense information when Rule 410 requires a full statement within 45 days, or when a party files motions, just 10 days. Moreover, uncertainty about just what “need” means, can make presenting financial statement expense claims dicey for the preparer.

Yet, litigation strategy plays an undeniable role. And, strategy evolves..

As a result, the judge critically found that the wife lacked “…personal knowledge regarding her own expenses,” and that her financial statements were not “…an accurate reflection of her need.” The wife’s credibility shot, the judge avoided the quantification of need and, instead opted for an ill-fated percentage-of-income order.

So, where the judge simply disbelieved the wife, and where she did not, apparently, find other, more convincing evidence of the wife’s “need” in the trial record (presumably there was no expert “lifestyle” testimony, or none at least that the court found credible), how will she do so now, on remand?

Don’t bet against a Young v. Young II appellate case, when one of these spouses appeals the judgment after remand.

In our next entry, we will consider the role that financial complexity played in undermining the fate of the trial court decision.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


Massachusetts alimony and child support divorce lawyers mediation med/arb Family Law Arbitration Levine Dispute Resolution Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth divorced Divorce separation Divorce Agreements Massachusetts divorce mediators self-adjusting alimony medical benefits arbitrators divorce arbitrator alimony reform legislation private dispute resolution Baseball family support arbitration Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC mediator Obamacare divorce judgment Child Support Guidelines divorce litigation alimony Cohabitation Levine Dispute Resolution Center health insurance alimony law divorce and family law mediators divorce arbitration Baseball Players Baseball Arbitration litigation Major League Baseball Arbitration lawyers Same Sex Marriage alimony statute rehabilitative alimony Alimony Reform Act General term alimony IRC §2704 traditional negotiations family and probate law disputes family law arbitrators family law mediation conciliation special master resolve disputes health coverage child support DOMA fraud med-arb divorce mediations divorce agreement Uniform Arbitration Act divorce and family law pre-ARA alimony divorce mediation Massachusetts lawyers disputes Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act how baseball arbitration works family law Levine Dispute Resolutions Self-adjusting alimony orders Matrimonial Arbitration Massachusetts facilitated negotiations high-risk methodology The Seven Sins of Alimony Defense of Marriage Act divorce arbitrators divorce process mediators Boston Chouteau Levine support orders Massachusetts alimony mediations divorce mediators MLB labor agreement lawyer-attended mediation alimony orders LDRC family law arbitrator arbitrator Twinkies family mediation divorce mediator COLA Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly lawyer SJC dispute resolution annulment