Divorce Mediation Blog

The SJC Weighs in on Self-Adjusting Alimony Orders and Recipient “Need”: Young v. Young, Part 5

Wednesday, December 13, 2017

“What’s a judge to do?”

Levine Dispute Resolution - Alimony

In this entry, we consider a particular challenge that the trial judge will have on remand from the Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) in Young v. Young, in grappling with her assessment of the wife’s “need” for alimony. The trial judge tried to quantify the wife’s “need” by the tangible costs thereof, a common means of doing so. But, it appears that the evidence thwarted the judge in doing so, as she bumped up against a too frequent phenomenon: incredible and incredibly rising expense claims on sequential Rule 401 financial statements during litigation.

During an 11-month span of the Young case, the wife’s claims of weekly expense rose a remarkable 44%, from $453,856 per year to $653,906!

We have seen this movie before, as lawyers, judge, special master and divorce arbitrator. While it is certainly challenging for parties to give dispositive expense information when Rule 410 requires a full statement within 45 days, or when a party files motions, just 10 days. Moreover, uncertainty about just what “need” means, can make presenting financial statement expense claims dicey for the preparer.

Yet, litigation strategy plays an undeniable role. And, strategy evolves..

As a result, the judge critically found that the wife lacked “…personal knowledge regarding her own expenses,” and that her financial statements were not “…an accurate reflection of her need.” The wife’s credibility shot, the judge avoided the quantification of need and, instead opted for an ill-fated percentage-of-income order.

So, where the judge simply disbelieved the wife, and where she did not, apparently, find other, more convincing evidence of the wife’s “need” in the trial record (presumably there was no expert “lifestyle” testimony, or none at least that the court found credible), how will she do so now, on remand?

Don’t bet against a Young v. Young II appellate case, when one of these spouses appeals the judgment after remand.

In our next entry, we will consider the role that financial complexity played in undermining the fate of the trial court decision.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


arbitrator Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth lawyers dispute resolution divorce mediation family mediation Twinkies facilitated negotiations divorce agreement family law mediation divorce mediators family law LDRC Major League Baseball Arbitration Child Support Guidelines divorced Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Defense of Marriage Act separation alimony law Self-adjusting alimony orders divorce lawyers Family Law Arbitration divorce and family law mediators IRC §2704 med/arb pre-ARA alimony conciliation med-arb divorce litigation lawyer-attended mediation family law arbitrator Divorce child support private dispute resolution alimony orders arbitrators rehabilitative alimony The Seven Sins of Alimony Massachusetts divorce mediators health insurance divorce process arbitration Massachusetts divorce arbitrators mediation General term alimony mediations divorce mediations Same Sex Marriage mediators alternative dispute resolutions family and probate law disputes SJC MLB labor agreement divorce judgment Cohabitation self-adjusting alimony DOMA Divorce Agreements Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act mediator divorce and family law Levine Dispute Resolutions Massachusetts alimony alimony laws Baseball Players Obamacare family law arbitrators medical benefits Uniform Arbitration Act alimony divorce mediator Boston how baseball arbitration works resolve disputes Levine Dispute Resolution Center Massachusetts lawyers special master Massachusetts alimony and child support Baseball alimony reform legislation Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC Baseball Arbitration litigation Alimony Reform Act family support lawyer support orders alimony statute health coverage traditional negotiations COLA high-risk methodology Matrimonial Arbitration divorce arbitration divorce arbitrator Levine Dispute Resolution disputes Chouteau Levine