781.708.4445

info@levinedisputeresolution.com

Divorce Mediation Blog

Why don’t we represent individual clients?

Monday, March 26, 2012

As we have transitioned from private law practice (Bill Levine) and as a sitting judge (Chouteau Levine) to doing full-time work as mediators, arbitrators and other neutral roles only with Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC, many people continue to ask us to take on engagements that are representational in nature. For example, several lawyers and clients from one side of a case have asked us to consult on issues presented by a court-based controversy. For another, we have been asked to represent children in court.

We have declined all of these potential roles.

True, none of these jobs would place us in a position to represent a spouse who is an essential stakeholder to litigation issues. But, by their very nature, these jobs imply something that we are not anymore: practicing lawyers whose job it is to “advocate”. Even a private consultation is a form of advocacy, because we are helping one party or another figure out strengths and weaknesses in his or her case, for the purpose of either honing trial preparations or clarifying/enhancing negotiating positions, to the detriment of another party or parties. Thus, the engagement is neither impartial nor it is neutral. Similarly, representing children is a form of advocacy for a particular point of view, even if the represented party is not “responsible” for causing the conflict.

At LDRC, when we mediate, we see it as our mission to open the minds of the parties to see each other’s points of view, to encourage introspection about one’s own real needs, and to detect where mutual needs and priorities intersect. Then, we try to promote sincere efforts to find creative and efficient ways to make agreements that promote these common areas of interest. When we arbitrate, our job is to make a decision, rather than to promote exploration of interests, but our role is nonetheless one that demands that we remain impartial, or indifferent to who “wins or loses”. We must decide the case strictly based in the facts as we hear them and conclude them to be, and the law to which they relate.

In neither of our roles is there room for advocacy for one side or another; and for us, it is important that our market both see us and understand us to be impartial all of the time. It is equally important or us to maintain this intellectual distinction throughout our workday that helps us to stay “neutral” to the very greatest extent that we possibly can.

Along with skills, experience and judgment, our impartiality it is our calling card.

 



Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:



Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles


recent posts


keywords

divorce engagement Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Anti-Double Counting divorce judgement Business Arbitration Josh Hoch experienced mediators pet custody U.S. Bankruptcy Court how does mediator facilitate negotiations The Defense of Marriage Act Post- Divorce Health Insurance family businesses SJC Pro-Double Counting CSG IRS Form 8332 enhanced communications peacemaker lawyer divorce cases alimony statute local taxes paid Goodridge v. Dept. of Public Health family firm institute program marriage laws Judge James Menno Child support payors advocate financial advisor Alimony Act of 2011 Alternative to Court sitting judge Wosson v. Wosson mediators rehabilitative alimony health insurance coverage transitional alimony Probate and Family Courts divorced spouses joint legal custody alternative disupute resolutions annual training program family support gays and lesbians new alimony laws Family decision making lawyer-assisted mediations lawyer-to-lawyer negotiation Green v. Green negotiations health insurance provision alimony orders mediation and arbitration divorced Thanksgiving marriage taxpayers Appeals Court Massachusetts Department of Revenue Massachusetts alimony and child support divorce mediation and arbitration hybrid Falmouth MA how baseball arbitration works alimony payers mediation center confidential process Massachusetts Bar Association Family Law Conference marital mediation Massachusetts Child Support Guidelines Quadrennial Review divorce mediation family mediation mediate private business polygamous marriage New Massachusetts Alimony Law alimony subsidy United States Supreme Court NEW Child Support Guidelines healthcare laws Family Law Arbitration divorce mediator private consultation mediation with lawyers, mediation without lawyers Spousal support Adams v. Adams IRS Mediation Works Incorporated Suffolk Probate and Family Court William M. Levine divorcing couples Caveney v. Caveney Western Massachusetts private law practice dispute resolution Divorce mediated divorce Massachusetts Divorce mediation process mediation session joint engagement agreement Levine Dispute Resolutions attorney trial court valuation lawyer attended arbitrations Romneycare era reforms MLB labor agreement family post-divorce health coverage Boston Boston Bar Association Family Law Section Divorce in Massachusetts Dispute Resolution Coordinator divorce and family law mediators tax deductions Romneycare resolve disputes Obama-Romney business owners counter arguments medical benefits dispute resolutions medical insurance coverage efficient and voluntary mediation process alimony fixed as child support divorce and family law arb/med civil union Probate and Family Court mediator capital gains income direct negotiation sudden wealth blended tax rate Massachusetts Appeals Court conciliation arbitrators family divorce marital agreement Fiscal Cliff M.B.A. House of Delegates divorce arbitrator Baseball Defense of Marriage Act mediated agreements gathering of mediators Massachusetts alimony law new alimony law Consumer Price Index Bill Levine alternative dispute resolutions What is Family Law Arbitration business owner-spouse divorce issues Ella-Warnken v Elia LDRC cohabitating couples Same Sex Spouses LDRC principals resolving disputes Blog good faith mediation Obama Care ban gay marriage alternative dispute resolution options divorce agreement spouse legal process Massachusetts divorce lawyers health care law family-owned businesses counsel between sessions fair value partner mediation facility Caveney Appeals Court court-appointed mediator Custody mediation for clients public trial process workplace mediation reflection food court insurance coverage family laws Clinton Era family law marriage equality family and divorce mediators and arbitrators investment income/gains Proposed Family Law Arbitration Act business family and divorce mediators workplace mediation Fixed Child Support trial judge hostile divorce private dispute resolution mediation or arbitration commercial litigation house child support and custody Pet Protection divorced people single-issue mediation Certified Divorce Financial Analyst divorce arbitration near-sacred charitable deduction former spouses Cohabitation facilitated negotiations case law Baseball Players tax burden Northeastern University for Family Business Department of Revenue Master Bill and Chouteau Levine counselor Major League Baseball Arbitration Massachusetts divorce mediators food court offerings Massachusetts alimony laws Massachusetts State Law laws of marriage income tax returns family lawyers Massachusetts child support standards divorcing Thanksgivukkah med-arb substantive law and procedure mediation room family mediators child alimony DRC traditional negotiations Greater Boston and Western MA divorce mediators self-insurance employers Massachusetts lawyers attorney mediators, mediators repeal Obamacare Hostess-baker’s union model act high-risk methodology Twinkies cost of living adjustments lawyer assisted-mediation top federal bracket medical insurance for non employee former spouse University of Massachusetts (Amherst) Family Business Center family courts discovery master family law attorneys in Massachusetts neutrol roles Massachusetts divorce mediators and arbitrators Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act Bernier v. Bernier Greater Boston Shared Legal Custody federal Defense of Marriage Act employer provided health care COLA AAML American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers dispute resolution service providers hybrid lawyers bullet arbitration divorce mediators alimony dollar LDRC blog married filing separately Masters Family Law Arbitration Act wins or loses UMass programs lawyer alternative resolution Massachusetts Child Support Guidelines Affordable Health Care Act LDRC’s Chouteau Levine same-sex marriage tax deduction Child Support Guidelines alimony law mediation skills family law arbitrator lawyer-mediators university-based programs refinancing mortgage after divorce separation MA Health Care Reform standard value taxes Chanukah discrimination against gays and lesbians custody litigation home interest post-retirement alimony disputes tax reform Obamacare separation agreements An Act Reforning Alimony divorce process dispute resolution center Boston MA facilitated negotiation Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly same-sex couples litigated custody income litigation divorce laws dispte resolution tax out-of-court resolver tax professina real estate appraiser General term alimony med/arb Children Same Sex Marriage Honorable Chouteau Levine double dipping divorce terms privately held business in divorce Massachusetts Propate and Family Court reimbursement alimony divorce arbitrators post-divorce health insurance couples Levine Dispute Resolution Plymouth Probate and Family Court proposed legistation divorce judges parent coordiation family law arbitrators Chouteau Levine family lawyers in Massachusetts MUAA Baseball Arbitration arbitration cohabitating recipients Romney Care DivorceMediation Dispute resolution methods Alimony Reform and Cohabitation alimony termination Della Corte v. Ramirez lawyer-attended divorce mediation The Boston Globe mediation co-mediators ADPFM new Massachusetts alimony laws lawyer-attended mediation cohabitating partner mediators or arbitrators valuation experts Legal cusody of Children Divorce Mediation Training Program alimony deduction divorce laywers lawyer negotiation Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC Non-compete Orders divorce lawyers Divorce attorneys property Governor Patrick Uniform Arbitration Act alimony DOMA arbitrator alimony gap divorce settlement divorcing parties home ownership alimony laws Matrimonial Arbitration family and probate law disputes mediations Medicaid Financial Experts Probate and Family Court Judge Financial Experts in Divorce Excess Alimony Payments child support Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth litigation attorneys Chouteau Family Law Arbitration in Massachusetts alimony calculation alimony obligation for a cohabitation Recomputation and Alimony health coverage child support treatment family business S Corporation Act Reforming Alimony Honorable John Smoot accountants COBRA Massachusetts re-finance agreement alimony claim mediating with lawyers present settling issues in a divorce case Massachusetts Uniform Arbitration Act alimony recipients Massachusetts alimony Reimbursment Alimony advocacy Massachusetts Bar Association Family Law Section Council interest-based negotiation present legal representation Dogs collaborative process Alimony Reform Act Divorce Agreements Same Sex divorced non-employee spouse divorce mediations family law mediation Congressmen traditional resolutions Hostess Brands 2012 elections alimony reform legislation arbitrations Alimony in Massachusetts neutral professionals Fiscal Cliff America alimony overhaul Massachusetts legislature married filing jointly alimony computation purposes Levine Dispute Resolution Center Same Sex Child Custody neutral Massachusetts Chapter of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers