Divorce Mediation Blog

Post-Divorce Health Insurance in For Same Sex Spouses: One More Reason to End DOMA

Wednesday, June 12, 2013

In a previous entry, we discussed the “self-insured” loophole to the Massachusetts insurance laws that otherwise require extension of medical benefits beyond federal "COBRA" benefits to ex-spouses. If a family is unlucky enough to have employer coverage where risk of loss remains the employer’s, rather than an insurer’s, these benefits do not apply; and the parties must default to the less generous COBRA.

As difficult as this is for families who depend on self-insured employers, the result is even more draconian for same sex ex-spouses. This is because the existing federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), does not recognize legally married couples of the same gender (now including ten states and D.C.) as spouses, at all. Since spousal COBRA rights require a federally recognized marriage, divorced same sex spouses with self-insured employers here remain uncovered by any spousal continuation benefits.

Beyond simple unfairness, this undermines the policy of the 2012 Affordable Care Act, as it becomes fully operative in 2014: just one more reason to hope that the United States Supreme Court strikes down DOMA.


Divorce Agreements: Where Have All the COLA’s Gone? Part 3 Four Reasons Why COLA’s May Hurt

Wednesday, April 03, 2013

In previous entries, we recalled the days when cost of living adjustments (COLA) provisions were a common feature of Massachusetts alimony and child support settlements, and their virtual disappearance. Then, we focused on 7 reasons why COLA’s may be beneficial to divorcing parties.

Here, we look at 4 risks of COLA’s :

  1. COLA’s are very technical. The structure of COLA’s vary quite a bit, from “simple” to quite complex. Complexity results from the negotiator and drafter’s efforts to cut risks, to accommodate competing interests and to effectuate compromise. A “blown” COLA can result in betraying the parties’ intentions, increasing tensions and litigation costs in efforts to rectify poor or problematic drafting.
  2. The unknown is unknowable. In a relatively benign inflation environment, the sting of a periodic automatic increase may seem manageable, especially with a payor’s career ascending. But, as discussed in our last 2 blog entries, the cost of living is subject to unexpected changes. An inflation spike may be accompanied by wage hikes, or it may reverse the arc of a rising career. The payor’s perceived need for insulation from upward support modification can become a resented memory; and the recipient’s sense of protection from rising costs may ring hollow, when trumped by the other party’s poor work fortunes.
  3. The unknowable may stay that way. Mostly, the economic lives of divorced parties become opaque to each other. Certainly, houses, cars and vacations with kids give clues to changes in the other’s economic life. But, appearances can be deceiving. The flip side of the support modification disincentives noted in our last entry, is that one party may never know that he/she might be eligible for a great increase or decrease in support, for reasons that would become known only through the information exchanges that are mandatory in modification cases. The well-functioning COLA may mask other changes of circumstances that one party might dearly like to know, suggesting that a substantial shift of equities between the parties has rendered the previous deal unfair.
  4. Security can feel insecure. Being free(er) of inflation pressures (recipient), or insulated from unwanted upward modifications (payor), can make both parties feel freer to move forward with their lives, and less burdened by worry about future litigation. Yet, the parties can also come to feel victimized by their own success. A recipient who feels protected by the COLA may later encounter a judge who is less likely than otherwise to increase support. At the same time, a payor, especially one who has a COLA that is sensitive to the comparison of his/her income changes relative to inflation, may find a judge who is less apt to reduce support based in changes in his/her own purchasing power, when this issue has already been addressed by the parties’ agreement. Both parties may have compromised their access to the safety net of court-ordered modification, which for all its costs, inefficiencies and risks, may feel like a loss.


Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


divorce mediations disputes General term alimony Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act litigation separation divorce litigation Massachusetts alimony lawyer facilitated negotiations alimony law DOMA conciliation Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth medical benefits mediator high-risk methodology divorce arbitration divorce process Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly child support resolve disputes Massachusetts alimony and child support mediations Same Sex Marriage divorce agreement Massachusetts divorce mediators family mediation Levine Dispute Resolution Boston Baseball Players divorce and family law mediators support orders divorce judgment med-arb Cohabitation alimony laws LDRC Self-adjusting alimony orders rehabilitative alimony Levine Dispute Resolution Center Divorce Agreements Major League Baseball Arbitration traditional negotiations COLA Massachusetts lawyers alimony orders Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC family support Matrimonial Arbitration divorce mediation divorce mediator Alimony Reform Act Family Law Arbitration alimony arbitration health insurance Chouteau Levine mediators Obamacare arbitrators divorced divorce arbitrators IRC §2704 Defense of Marriage Act pre-ARA alimony special master alternative dispute resolutions Child Support Guidelines how baseball arbitration works SJC health coverage family law arbitrators Twinkies Levine Dispute Resolutions family and probate law disputes Baseball Arbitration divorce arbitrator alimony statute divorce and family law The Seven Sins of Alimony lawyer-attended mediation self-adjusting alimony Divorce family law arbitrator dispute resolution private dispute resolution Baseball med/arb alimony reform legislation family law mediation divorce mediators family law arbitrator lawyers MLB labor agreement mediation Uniform Arbitration Act divorce lawyers Massachusetts